Archive

2024

Browsing

During her assault on the record books, Caitlin Clark has drawn no shortage of comparisons.

Her prolific scoring and flair are reminiscent of ‘Pistol Pete’ Maravich — so much so, one of her nicknames is Ponytail Pete. Her ridiculous ability to hit from anywhere, at any time, is Steph Curry-esque. And her late-game daggers, and the trash-talking that follows, is vintage Diana Taurasi. Hilariously so.

But these comparisons, all of which are valid, also fall short. Because Clark is more than just her game. When you factor in the outsized impact she’s having off the court, there’s really been only one other player like her:

Michael Jordan.

Jordan wasn’t just the best player in the history of the game — don’t at me, LeBron fans — he transcended sport. His and all others. He was a cultural sensation, and he elevated the NBA because of it.

Sure, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird’s rivalry had rescued the NBA from the dark days of the ‘80s, when drug use among players was prevalent and games weren’t even shown live on TV. Even some playoff games were still getting the tape-delay treatment in 1986.

But it was Jordan who made the league, and those playing in it, a global phenomenon.

Even if you didn’t like the NBA, or care about any sports, you knew who Michael Jordan was. His jersey was ubiquitous in the ’90s, his shoes and commercials even more so, and kids across the country flocked to courts in hopes they, too, could ‘be like Mike.’ Jordan was so enmeshed in the cultural fabric of our society that he became a de facto member of every American household.

It wasn’t just in the United States, either. Jordan had already won two NBA titles when he and the Dream Team played at the Barcelona Olympics, and even the possibility of catching a glimpse of ‘MJ’ in a hotel lobby or getting on a bus was enough to draw throngs of fans. Even those who didn’t see him in person were inspired to buy the products he pitched or take up the game — future Hall of Famers included.

Clark’s impact might not be as widespread — yet — but it’s no less transformative.

Interest in women’s sports has skyrocketed over the last few years. Viewership during last year’s NCAA basketball tournament obliterated the previous high, with the final between Clark’s Iowa team and LSU alone watched by almost 10 million people.

Franchise values in the NWSL and WNBA are rising, as are TV ratings for both leagues. The NCAA just inked a deal with ESPN that values the women’s basketball tournament at $65 million a year while the NWSL reached a four-year, $240 million deal for its media rights. Nike values Sabrina Ionescu enough to give her her own shoe while Puma gave two-time WNBA MVP Breanna Stewart a signature sneaker, too.

But much like Jordan did, Clark is taking this increased interest and adding rocket fuel to it.

Every game she plays, home and away, is in front of a sold-out crowd. Tickets for Thursday night’s game, when she broke the record a little more than 2 minutes into the first quarter, were the second-highest in history, with courtside seats going for more than $3,100 each. Little boys and girls clamor for her jersey, and fans line up hours before games begin in hopes of putting themselves in position to catch her eye as she enters and exits the court for warmups or, even better, get an autograph.

‘It’s really humbling,’ Clark’s dad, Brent, said in an interview during Fox’s national broadcast of Iowa’s game against Nebraska on Sunday. ‘This is what it should be like for every sports event. Women’s basketball is awesome.’

And thanks to his daughter, more people know that.

As Clark got closer and closer to the all-time NCAA women’s scoring record, it wasn’t only women’s basketball fans paying attention. Or people in Iowa. Her games are now shown at sports bars around the country, and it’s both men and women watching or pausing to check out the scores.

NBA stars routinely took to social media to praise her. Even Patrick Mahomes weighed in, calling her ‘one of the best college basketball players to ever play.’  

Iowa’s game last Thursday against Penn State drew 612,000 viewers on the Big Ten network, its record for a women’s sporting event. Fox put Iowa’s game Sunday against Nebraska on national TV and was rewarded with 1.8 million viewers, a record for that network.

And just as Jordan was once a familiar sight in every American’s living room, it’s becoming impossible to watch any sporting event, heck any show, without seeing Clark in a State Farm commercial. She also has a deal with Nike and, if the manufacturer is smart, it’ll give her her own shoe and give it the Jordan treatment.

The interest in Clark isn’t likely to tail off now that she’s topped Kelsey Plum. Maravich’s all-time scoring record is still out there. So, too, is her professional career, whether that begins in the coming WNBA season or the next.

But the beauty of the spotlight on Clark is, like Jordan’s, it shines on others, too. Those who tuned in to Sunday’s game against Nebraska expecting to see Clark break the record instead saw a tight, compelling game featuring plenty of athleticism, hustle and, yes, some trash-talking. Casual basketball fans might not have known Jaz Shelley’s name before Sunday, but they sure do now.

And on it goes. Like Jordan, Clark will be the gateway to the game for many, but they will soon find their interest growing beyond her. Just as the NBA looked different before Jordan and after, so, too, will women’s sports because of Clark.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Iowa guard Caitlin Clark entered Thursday’s game against Michigan needing eight points to break the women’s all-time NCAA scoring record.

Clark made sure the record went down in a hurry, needing less than three minutes to hit the record-breaking shot.

Iowa took the opening tip, and Clark made her way to the basket and hit a bank shot to open the game. On Iowa’s next possession, she set up on the left wing and launched a three, hitting nothing but nylon.

A few minutes later, Clark took a pass in transition, heaved a 35-foot shot from the Mediacom Court logo, and buried it for the record, sending the sellout crowd at Carver-Hawkeye Arena into a frenzy.

Clark finished with an Iowa record 49 points (the 12th career game of her scoring 40 or more points), hitting nine three-pointers and dishing out 13 assists in the 106-89 victory over the Wolverines.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

At age 38, new Colorado defensive coordinator Robert Livingston has never been a defensive coordinator at any level before now and hasn’t coached at the college level since 2011, when he worked an entry-level job at Vanderbilt. But last week, he signed a two-year contract that is set to make him Colorado’s highest-paid assistant coach ever next year at $995,000 in 2025, according to records obtained by USA TODAY Sports.

Livingston, the former defensive backs coach of the Cincinnati Bengals, will make $800,000 this year under head football coach Deion Sanders in a deal that highly incentivizes him to stay in Boulder in the event he is tempted to leave for other offers.

“I can promise you we’re going to do great things,” Livingston said in a video posted by the university Thursday.

How do his terms compare at Colorado and elsewhere?

Livingston’s two-year deal is similar to that of the coach he’s replacing – veteran assistant Charles Kelly, who left for a similar job at Auburn but had a three-year deal at Colorado averaging $900,000 per year through Jan. 31, 2026. Livingston’s guaranteed pay for next year still would make him CU’s highest-paid assistant ever for a single year.

This allocation stems from an agreement the university made with Sanders to set aside a guaranteed $5 million annually as a total salary pool for all assistant football coaches.

“This amount may be allocated by Sanders in consultation with and subject to the written approval of the Athletics Director,” Sanders’ contract states.

The expiration date on Livingston’s contract (Jan. 31, 2026) also is the same for new full-time offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur and new wide receivers coach Jason Phillips. It converges with a clause in Sanders’ contract that sets up the next two seasons as a time to assess contract extensions beyond that.

Sanders’ contract runs through Dec. 31, 2027, but says he will hold discussions after the 2025 season to discuss a potential extension and changes in terms, including for his pay and potential buyout.

The new full-time coordinators at Colorado still earn far less than what the top-paid public-school coaches earned nationally last year in guaranteed pay, according to USA TODAY Sports’ assistant coaches’ pay database. Clemson offensive coordinator Garrett Riley and Washington offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb both earned about $2 million in guaranteed pay. Among the top-paid assistants in the future Big 12 Conference, Utah’s Andy Ludwig was set to earn $1.85 million in 2023.

What will Deion Sanders’ other new coaches earn?

Colorado officially announced coaching staff changes last week. USA TODAY Sports obtained the contracts, which detail the terms of their employment:

∎ Shurmur, a former NFL head coach, was set to make $50,000 as an off-the-field analyst last year at Colorado but will make $800,000 in his first full season as offensive coordinator. Next year, he will make $850,000. That’s slightly less than the coach he is replacing, Sean Lewis, who left to become head coach at San Diego State. Before he left, Lewis had a three-year deal averaging $900,000 year, including what would have been $900,000 this year and $950,000 next year.

∎ Livingston is considered a rising prospect in the coaching profession, leading Colorado to set up his contract to keep him from leaving for another job anytime soon. His pay jumps from $800,000 to $995,000 next year. The contract also says if he takes an NCAA or NFL position during the first 120 days of his new job, he would owe the university liquidated damages of 80% of his salary. After that, he would owe 25% of his pay if he left for another job.

However, those damages would be waived if he takes an undeniable step up in his career – as an NFL head coach or college head coach. Similarly, if he takes an NFL defensive coordinator job in the second year of his contract, those damages also are waived.

∎ New offensive line coach Phil Loadholt, who previously was an analyst at Oklahoma, has signed a one-year deal that pays him $325,000, the same as what his predecessor, Bill O’Boyle, would have earned this year before he left for San Diego State and then Northwestern.

∎ New wide receivers coach Jason Phillips recently joined Colorado from the Canadian Football League and will earn $315,000 this year and $340,000 next year. He effectively fills an opening that was created when former Colorado tight ends coach Tim Brewster took a job with Charlotte. Brewster was making $400,000 at Colorado before he left and owed the university $100,000 for breaking his contract early. Similarly, Kelly owed the university $212,500 for breaking his contract early, as confirmed by the university to USA TODAY Sports.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As you wake up Saturday morning, Selection Sunday will be exactly one month away. Of course with this being a leap year, that means we’ll have to wait an extra 29th day. That does not, however, diminish the urgency around the men’s college basketball landscape as the season heads into the home stretch.

There’s no shortage of important contests around the country, but as is our custom here we’ll highlight what we think will be the best ones around which to schedule your day of hoops viewing. The Starting Five for Saturday’s slate features a trio of top-25 clashes as well as a couple other games that could provide resume help for NCAA at-large hopefuls.

No. 4 Marquette at No. 1 Connecticut, 3 p.m., Fox

We begin with this top-five tilt in the Big East featuring two of the nation’s hottest teams. The Golden Eagles have rattled off eight victories in succession and very much look the part of a team capable of a deep run in March. Of course that is just as true of the defending champion Huskies, riding a 13-game winning streak with most of their triumphs coming in dominant fashion. While one could certainly make the case that no team is playing better than UConn right now, it is also arguable that no individual is playing better than Marquette’s Tyler Kolek. The Eagles compensate for a net rebounding deficit by generating nearly nine steals a game, so ball security will be the main priority for UConn’s talented backcourt.

No. 20 Kentucky at No. 12 Auburn, 6 p.m., ESPN

It’s been a strange couple of weeks for the Tigers, sandwiching blowout home victories against fellow SEC contenders Alabama and South Carolina around an equally puzzling no-show at Florida. They’re happy to be in friendly territory again to take on the Wildcats, who turned in a solid performance against Mississippi to snap their unprecedented three-game home skid but still face questions about their ultimate staying power. While Kentucky did better on the defensive end Tuesday night against Ole Miss, Auburn will present the kind of multi-faceted attack that has caused problems for the Wildcats. If Auburn’s inside out game initiated by Johni Broome is working, it could be a long night for the visitors. The good news for Kentucky is the Tigers can give up points in bunches as well, so we could be in for a high-scoring affair.

No. 7 Kansas at No. 21 Oklahoma, 4 p.m., ESPN

Life in the Big 12 is the classic conundrum, with every game being a grind but also an opportunity. The Jayhawks would appear to have the added burden of proving they can win outside the friendly confines of Allen Field House, but they’re not likely to garner much sympathy from the faithful in Norman, where the Sooners look to nudge back above .500 in league play and win their final regular-season game against their longtime rival. The most pressing question for Kansas is whether wingman Kevin McCullar, who has missed time with a knee bruise, will be able to go. He poured in 21 last month against Oklahoma in Lawrence, so it goes without saying the Jayhawks would welcome his return. The Sooners have several guys capable of heating up, but Jalon Moore, limited to five points in that last meeting, will need to be more involved.

No. 16 Creighton at Butler, 12:30 p.m., Fox

The first half of the Big East matinee double feature lacks the high-rankings punch of the headliner. But it’s every bit as important as the Bulldogs look to collect another top-tier win and complete a home-and-home sweep of the Bluejays, who will be equally motivated to turn the tables on the road. The Bulldogs aren’t afraid to hoist treys, attempting nearly 23 a game. But Creighton practically lives at the arc, with almost half its field-goal tries coming from three-point range. Jalen Thomas and Andre Screen split time in the middle for Butler and combine for over 11 boards a game, but Bluejays’ veteran big man Ryan Kalkbrenner will still be a tough matchup.

Utah State at No. 25 Colorado State, 5:30 p.m., CBSSN

While debating whether the Mountain West is a true power conference is largely an academic endeavor, there is no disputing that the league will garner multiple dance invitations next month. Just how many remains to be seen, but the good news is most games among the upper echelon are chances to boost credentials. Despite the poll rankings, it is actually the Aggies who lead the conference with the host Rams in need of a bounce-back win at home after coming up short at San Diego State. The ultra-efficient Colorado State offense that shoots 50% as a team is facilitated by point guard Isaiah Stevens, who hands out 7.4 assists a game. The Aggies connect at just under 50% themselves, with three-point marksman Ian Martinez helping Great Osobor find room to operate inside.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It appears we finally know who the best team in ACC women’s basketball is. 

Now the question is, can Virginia Tech widen its lead at the top of the standings? 

The No. 13 Hokies will have an opportunity to do just that this weekend when they visit No. 18 Louisville. Just remember that anything can happen in the ACC, so be wary of betting on any team. 

But that’s hardly the only game to keep an eye on this weekend. We’ve got multiple ranked matchups in the Pac-12, a few bubble teams looking to improve their resumes with solid conference wins and a handful of rockstar freshmen to keep tabs on. (Relatedly, good luck to anyone who has to make All-America teams this year; how do you leave off any of these stellar rookies?) And before you ask, no Caitlin Clark and Iowa don’t play this weekend. After dropping a career-high 49 points and breaking the NCAA women’s scoring record, Clark is taking the weekend off. The Hawkeyes will be back in action late next week at Indiana.

Because it’s a holiday weekend — Monday is Presidents Day, banks will be closed and we hope you don’t have to work — we’re including a game that day. Notably we did not include No. 19 Creighton’s visit to No. 14 UConn, set for noon ET Monday on FOX, because when these two ranked teams met earlier this season in Omaha, UConn won by 44. Yes, you read that correctly. 

Hopefully none of the below games are blowouts. We’re always rooting for exciting finishes, lots of lead changes and overtime (so long as we’re not on deadline). 

No. 9 UCLA at No. 15 Oregon State

Friday, 10 p.m. ET on Pac-12 Networks

The Beavers are one of the hottest teams in the country, having won five in a row, including four over ranked teams. Now UCLA, a popular preseason pick to both win the Pac-12 and go to the Final Four, comes to Corvallis. The Beavers kept it close in a 65-54 loss on Jan. 7 at UCLA, but have dramatically improved since then and are working to solidify a top 16 seed in the NCAA tournament. A win over the No. 9 Bruins would go a long way to making that happen. This will be billed as a battle of the sophomore bigs with OSU’s Raegan Beers (18.2 points, 11.1 rebounds) taking on UCLA’s Lauren Betts (15.0 points, 8.6 rebounds), but guards will likely be the game-changers in this matchup. 

Iowa State at No. 5 Texas

Saturday, 4 p.m. ET on ESPN2

The Cyclones are the classic tale of two teams. At home, they’re almost impossible to beat. On the road, it’s a different story. Iowa State is on the bubble right now, but a win over Texas and Madison Booker (15.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, 4.6 assists), one of the top freshman in the country who has stepped up big time after Rory Harmon’s season-ending knee injury, would help the Cyclones solidify their spot in the postseason. Iowa State’s Audi Crooks  (17.8 points, 7.6 rebounds) is on the list of the nation’s best freshmen.  

No. 13 Virginia Tech at No. 18 Louisville

Sunday at 2 p.m. ET on ESPN

Louisville coach Jeff Walz is likely still worked up about the officiating in last week’s loss to Syracuse — will he and the Cardinals take it out on Georgia Amoore & Co.? They’ll certainly try, that much is for sure. Post play will be crucial in this game, though the players have considerably different styles: Two-time ACC player of the year Liz Kitley (22.8 points, 11.7 rebounds) likes to catch and pivot away — no post in America shoots a fade like her — while Louisville’s Olivia Cochran (11.2 points, 6.2 rebounds) never shies away from contact. Meanwhile, who wins the perimeter battle between Virginia Tech’s Amoore (17.6 points, 7.4 assists) and Louisville guard Kiki Jefferson (13.4 points)?

Tennessee at Vanderbilt

Sunday, 2 p.m. ET on SEC Network

This is an intriguing matchup. Vanderbilt started the season hot, winning 16 of 17, and looked to be a lock to return to the NCAA tournament for the first time since 2014. But the Commodores have stumbled in SEC play, and right now are flirting with missing the postseason. A win against Tennessee would boost both their resume and their confidence. And yet the Lady Vols are hardly what they used to be, currently projected as a 9, 10 or 11 seed in the tournament. Tennessee will need a big game from Rickea Jackson (18.6 points, 8.1 rebounds), while Vanderbilt will need to make sure she’s mostly contained.

No. 17 Notre Dame at Duke

Monday, 7 p.m. ET on ESPN2

Can Duke, known for its defense, slow down superstar freshman Hannah Hidalgo (25.1 points, 6.2 rebounds, 5.6 assists, 5.1 steals) of Notre Dame? Can anyone? The Blue Devils picked up an impressive home win over North Carolina last week, a victory that knocked the Tar Heels out of the top 25. But now Notre Dame comes to town, and Hidalgo is hardly the only headache Duke will have to deal with: Sonia Citron (16.4 points) and Maddy Westbeld (13.9 points, 9.3 rebounds) are also playing well for an Irish team that hasn’t been at full strength all season. On the other end, Duke features one of the most balanced offenses in the country, with four players who average 9.0 points or more. 

Follow Lindsay Schnell on social media: @Lindsay_Schnell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Biden said on Friday, following news of the death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, that there is ‘no doubt’ it was a ‘consequence of something that Putin and his thugs did.’ 

Russian officials said Navalny reported feeling unwell following a walk at the penal colony where he was jailed in Siberia before losing consciousness and dying.  

‘Make no mistake, Putin is responsible for Navalny’s death. Putin is responsible,’ Biden told reporters at the White House. ‘What has happened to Navalny is yet more proof of Putin’s brutality. No one should be fooled, not in Russia, not at home, not anywhere in the world.’ 

‘The answer is, we don’t know exactly what happened, but there is no doubt that the death of Navalny was a consequence of something that Putin and his thugs did,’ Biden added.

‘People across Russia and around the world are mourning Navalny today, because he was so many things that Putin was not,’ Biden continued. ‘He was brave, he was principled, he was dedicated to building a Russia where the rule of law existed and where it applied to everybody. Navalny believed in that Russia, that Russia, he knew it was a cause worth fighting for and obviously even dying for.’ 

In 2021, President Biden, after meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva, Switzerland, was asked about what would happen if Navalny were to die in Russian custody. 

‘I made it clear to him that I believe the consequences of that would be devastating for Russia,’ Biden said at the time. 

When asked about that remark Friday, Biden said,That was three years ago andn the meantime, they faced a hell of a lot of consequences,’ referring to Russian troop losses in the war in Ukraine and international sanctions waged against their government. 

‘I just want to say ‘God bless Alexei Navalny,’’ Biden concluded. ‘His courage will not be forgotten.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Biden called for House Republicans to drop their impeachment inquiry against him, saying on Friday that it has been ‘an outrageous effort from the beginning.’ 

The president’s comments came after the indictment of FBI informant who alleged that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden had been paid millions of dollars in exchange for their help firing the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma Holdings.

‘He is lying, and it should be dropped,’ Biden said after a reporter asked about the indicted FBI informant.

House Republicans told Fox News Digital that their impeachment inquiry has much more evidence that does not rely on the indicted FBI source.

Special Counsel David Weiss charged Alexander Smirnov, 43, with making a false statement and creating a false and fictitious record during FBI interviews. 

According to the indictment, Smirnov gave ‘false derogatory information’ to the FBI despite ‘repeated admonishments that he must provide truthful information and that he must not fabricate evidence.’ 

The indictment says that Smirnov had told an FBI agent in March 2017 that he had had a phone call with Burisma’s owner concerning the firm potentially acquiring a U.S. company and making an initial public offering (IPO) on a U.S.-based stock exchange. 

In reporting this conversation to the FBI agent, Smirnov said that Hunter Biden was a board member of Burisma, though that was publicly known. 

In June 2020, Smirnov is accused of having told the FBI, for the first time, about two meetings he had had four to five years earlier, in which executives associated with Burisma had supposedly admitted that they had hired Hunter Biden to ‘protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.’ 

During this meeting, the indictment alleges that Smirnov said the executives had paid $5 million to each of the Bidens while Joe Biden was still in office. The indictment alleges that Smirnov falsely claimed that the Bidens had been paid so that Hunter Biden, with his dad’s help, could take care of a criminal investigation being conducted by the then-Ukrainian Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, into Burisma. 

The allegations were recorded on an FBI FD-1023 form, which is used by FBI agents to record unverified reporting from confidential human sources. The form is used to document information as told to an FBI agent, but recording that information does not validate or weigh it against other information known by the FBI. 

The FD-1023 form containing the allegations last year became a key document in the House investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer and GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley were approached by a whistleblower last summer who alleged that the FBI was in possession of a document — an FD-1023 form, dated June 30, 2020 — that explicitly detailed information provided by a confidential human source alleging that Biden, while serving as vice president, had been involved in a multi-million-dollar scheme with a foreign national in exchange for influence over policy decisions.

On Friday, Biden was asked about the indictment of Smirnov—and whether it should bring the impeachment inquiry to an end.

‘He is lying, and it should be dropped,’ Biden said, referring to Smirnov’s allegations and the impeachment inquiry. ‘It’s just been a — it’s been an outrageous effort from the beginning.’

Hunter Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell, earlier Friday, said the same: ‘For months we have warned that Republicans have built their conspiracies about Hunter and his family on lies told by people with political agendas, not facts. We were right, and the air is out of their balloon,’ Lowell said in a statement. ‘This is just another instance of Chairmen Comer and Jordan peddling falsehoods based on dishonest, uncredible allegations and witnesses.’

But Comer, who is leading the impeachment inquiry, said that the FBI’s FD-1023 form containing Smirnov’s is not being used in an impeachment inquiry against the president. 

The impeachment inquiry, he said, ‘is based on a large record of evidence, including bank records and witness testimony, revealing that Joe Biden knew of and participated in his family’s business dealings.’ 

‘We have over $30 million reasons to continue this investigation and not one of those reasons relies on the corrupt FBI or an informant. Bank records don’t lie,’ Comer told Fox News Digital on Friday. ‘Bank records and witness testimony reveal Joe Biden knew about and participated in his family’s business schemes, and he has repeatedly lied to the American people about these facts.’

Comer added: ‘The American people demand the truth and accountability for any wrongdoing. We will continue to follow the facts to propose legislation to reform federal ethics laws and to determine whether articles of impeachment are warranted.’

Coming up in the impeachment inquiry is testimony from the president’s brother, Jim Biden, on February 21, and a deposition of Hunter Biden on February 28. Both testimonies will take place behind closed doors. 

Smirnov is accused of repeating some of his false claims during an interview with FBI agents in September 2023, while changing other bits of information, and promoting a new false narrative after claiming to have met with Russian officials. 

If convicted, Smirnov faces a maximum of 25 years in prison.   

Fox News Digital’s Bradford Betz contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., reintroduced the Kids Online Safety Act with more than half of the Senate’s backing, including Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, suggesting that the bill will be filibuster-proof when it comes to the floor. 

On Thursday, Blackburn and Blumenthal announced that the revised bill had 62 senators on board, split evenly between both parties. If passed, it would be one of the largest Big Tech crackdowns in recent years, restricting content for minors that promotes substance abuse, the promotion of suicide, sexual exploitation and alcohol abuse. It would also mandate social media companies to implement certain controls to limit screen time, ban restrictive features and limit access to potentially harmful user profiles. 

‘This overwhelming bipartisan support for the Kids Online Safety Act—62 total co-sponsors, Democrats and Republicans—reflects the powerful voices of young people and parents who want Congress to act,’ lawmakers said in a joint statement. 

The fresh legislation comes just a few weeks after the CEOs of Discord, Snap, TikTok, X and Meta testified before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to discuss online child safety. It also addresses conerns raised by groups who opposed the legislation when it was first rolled out last year due to what they believed would be harmful to LGBTQ+ children. 

GLAAD, a nonprofit LGBTQ+ advocacy group, and the Human Rights Campaign both rescinded their previous opposition to the bill.

‘The recent watershed hearing with Big Tech CEOs showcased the urgent need for reform. With new changes to strengthen the bill and growing support, we should seize this moment to take action. We must listen to the kids, parents, experts, and advocates, and finally hold Big Tech accountable by passing the Kids Online Safety Act into law,’ lawmakers said. 

President Joe Biden urged lawmakers last year, when it was first introduced, to pass the bill. 

Schumer, who also faced pressure this month from hundreds of family members who blamed social media for the death of their children, said in a statement that he looks ‘forward’ to collaborate on a ‘bipartisan basis’ to advance the bill. 

The Kids Online Safety Act will require social media companies to design their products with the safety of kids and teens in mind, provide parents tools to protect their kids and give families more options for managing and disconnecting from these platforms.

I look forward to working on a bipartisan basis with Senators Blumenthal and Blackburn to advance this bill in the Senate,’

Earlier this month, the youngest victim whose relatives signed a letter to Schumer urging his support for the bill, was eight-year-old Lalani Erika Walton, of Texas. Her parents are suing TikTok and parent company, ByteDance, alleging the girl died of self-strangulation while participating in the viral ‘Blackout Challenge,’ which encouraged users to choke themselves with belts, purse strings or other similar items until passing out. 

Fox News’ Daniel Wallace contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., announced Friday that he will not be running for president, shooting down months of speculation that he would join the race on a third-party ticket. 

‘I will not be seeking a third-party run, I will not be involved in a presidential run,’ Manchin said. 

Manchin made the announcement during a speech at West Virginia University as part of his ‘listening tour’ that kicked off last month with his daughter’s campaign group ‘Americans Together’ — a movement that touts itself as the ‘moderate majority’ that rejects the ‘extremism in politics.’ 

‘I’m working with my daughter, working with people that we have around Americans Together and putting all my efforts toward that,’ he said Friday.

Manchin previously said he would not make a decision on whether he would run until after Super Tuesday on March 5. 

‘People are looking for options,’ Manchin said at the time. ‘And we’re going to be looking at that, too.’ 

On Thursday, Manchin said in a hypothetical run he would tap Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, or former Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman to be his vice presidential running mate, but later added he’s not ‘running for anything.’

‘Hypothetically, if I was picking my running mate, really who I would ask right now is Mitt Romney,’ Manchin told voters at the City Club of Cleveland breakfast forum Thursday.

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor who ran for the White House in 2008 and 2012, jokingly called Manchin’s remarks ‘presumptuous.’ 

‘I would be the president. He would be my running mate,’ Romney said in a statement to Deseret News when asked about Manchin’s comment.

Romney also announced last year that he would not seek re-election to the Senate when his term expires in 2025. 

‘No, I’m not going to run for president,’ he added. ‘Certainly I’m not running for vice president. But (Manchin is) kind to say that. We’re good friends.’

No Labels, the third-party effort that is on the ballot in several states and was rumored to be considering placing Manchin on a presidential ticket, said it is considering other potential candidates for a ‘unity ticket.’

‘No Labels has spent 14 years working to create a movement for America’s commonsense majority and we welcome Senator Manchin’s efforts to strengthen it,’ No Labels co-chairs former Sen. Joe Lieberman, Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr., and former North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory said in a joint statement.

‘No Labels is currently speaking with several exceptional leaders about serving on the presidential Unity ticket. We are continuing to make great progress on our ballot access efforts and will announce in the coming weeks whether we will offer our line to a Unity ticket.’

Fox News’ Aubrie Spady and Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, said that he does not have any plans to run for president or vice president in 2024.

Romney’s comment came after Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said he would pick either Romney or former Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman as a running mate if he jumped into the 2024 presidential race.

‘Hypothetically, if I was picking my running mate, really who I would ask right now is Mitt Romney,’ Manchin, who has left the door open to a third-party presidential run, told voters Thursday at the City Club of Cleveland breakfast forum. Manchin, however, added that he was not ‘not running for anything.’

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor who ran for the White House in 2008 and 2012, squashed the rumors and noted he would ‘certainly’ not be a vice president.

‘Well, that’s really presumptuous. I would be the president. He would be my running mate,’ Romney joked in a statement to Deseret News when asked about Manchin’s comment.

‘No, I’m not going to run for president,’ he added. ‘Certainly I’m not running for vice president. But (Manchin is) kind to say that. We’re good friends.’

After flirting with a third-party White House run for months, Manchin on Friday said he wouldn’t bid for the presidency.

‘I will not be seeking a third-party run, i will not be involved in a presidential run,’ Manchin announced during a speech in West Virginia.

Romney was the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, sparking rumors he might be considering a third run at the White House after deciding not to seek re-election in the Senate in 2024.

Romney also added that he will ‘not’ be voting for former President Trump if he is the 2024 GOP nominee.

Fox News’ Jamie Joseph contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS