Archive

2024

Browsing

As bad as the U.S. women’s historic loss to Mexico was, it’s a good thing for the long run.

Not for the USWNT. This was a complete debacle, whether you’re measuring it by the numbers or the play on the field.

Only the second loss ever to Mexico, and first on U.S. soil. The first loss at home to any Concacaf team in 80 matches, a streak that, at 23-plus years, was older than some of the USWNT players.

The same sloppiness and struggles to finish that led to the USWNT losing in the Round of 16 at last year’s World Cup, its earliest exit ever at a major international tournament. The same inability to play wide or establish dominance in the midfield. The same disjointedness that now marks what was once the world’s most ruthless team.

So no, there is nothing good about this loss for the USWNT. At least not in the short term, and definitely not with the Paris Olympics five months away and no obvious answers at the ready.

But the days of the USWNT running roughshod over the rest of the world are long gone. To stay at the top of the game, to be in position to win the World Cup and the Olympics, the U.S. women need to be tested on a consistent basis.

And for far too long, Concacaf didn’t cut it.

The region’s next two biggest teams, Mexico and Canada, were a significant step below the Americans in both quality and confidence, and there was an even sharper drop off from there. Oh, the U.S. women could talk about rivalry games, getting every opponent’s best effort and being able to learn something from each outing. But the reality is, those games were largely gimmes.

If the USWNT wanted a true measure of itself, it needed to do it in friendlies against Brazil, Japan or the European powerhouses. Or in tournaments like the Algarve Cup. Which is fine — except those opportunities are in shorter and shorter supply.

Europe has enough quality teams, and tournaments featuring them, that it no longer needs to travel to the United States for games. The upcoming SheBelieves Cup in April will be the fourth consecutive one without a strong European team. Since England and Spain played in that 2020 edition, Germany is the only European powerhouse that has played games in the United States, and those were at the end of 2022.

The Americans aren’t getting games in Europe, either. Only five since winning the World Cup in France in 2019, and none last year.

The United States still gets heavy doses of Australia, Brazil and Japan, but only one of those teams — Japan, at No. 8 — is currently ranked in the top 10. Europe, meanwhile, has the world’s No. 1 team in Spain, as well as the teams ranked third through seventh.

As the quality of the game continues to improve and as the world’s best teams get more and more technical, national team training camps and games against familiar or lesser opponents aren’t enough to keep the USWNT sharp.

Which brings us back to Concacaf.

Canada has made great strides over the last decade. It was the bronze medalist at the 2012 and 2016 Olympics before winning gold in Tokyo — after beating the USWNT in the semifinals for their first victory over the Americans in 20 years, no less. Though Canada’s federation has been a dumpster fire and all-time international scoring leader Christine Sinclair retired, locking Bev Priestman up means Canada should at least be competitive for the foreseeable future.

Mexico was in such shambles just 18 months ago that it failed to score a single goal or win a game at the Concacaf championship in 2022. A tournament it hosted, mind you. After its performance, Mexico dropped 10 spots in the world rankings, to No. 36, a program low.

But the hiring of Pedro Lopez three months later, in September 2022, as well as the growth of Mexico’s domestic league, has invigorated La Tri. They are unbeaten in their last 22 games, and have some impressive young players, including Lizbeth Ovalle, the 24-year-old who scored the opening goal in Monday night’s 2-0 win, and Karen Luna, who made her Mexico debut in this tournament.

The win over the USWNT was no fluke, either. Mexico was clearly the better team and it dictated the tempo of the game. It made the Americans uncomfortable with its physicality and aggressiveness, poaching bad passes and shutting down lanes. It stayed focus when it got the lead, continuing to push for an insurance goal that finally came in the dying seconds of the game.

“There are no easy games anymore,” interim USWNT coach Twila Kilgore said. “And if we don’t take care of business and we don’t execute, this is to be expected.”

It might have been fun to watch the Americans roll over their regional opponents in the past, but it did them few favors. If the USWNT wants to be the world’s best team again, it has to continually challenge itself.

And that has to begin in its own backyard.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

GOODYEAR, Ariz. — When they’re not shattering teammates’ car windows in living batting practice, when they’re not practicing plays at home plate with stuffed hippos, they’re borrowing the celebrated phrases by one of their famed alumni.

“We comin.’

The Cincinnati Reds, who don’t have a single everyday player born since the last time they won the World Series in 1990, with 29 years gone elapsed since their last postseason series victory, are going all Deion Sanders this season.

This is the year everything changes in Cincinnati.

“This is the year we’re going to be a playoff team’ Jonathan India tells USA TODAY Sports. “We all know it. We just missed the playoffs by two games last year. We’re not going to miss it again.

HOT STOVE UPDATES: MLB free agency: Ranking and tracking the top players available.

“We’ve got more energy. We’ve more confidence. And a lot of us have a chip on our shoulder.

“We’re going to win the division this year.’

Hey, why not? This is the youngest, most dynamic team in baseball. You can’t keep your eyes off Elly De La Cruz’s athleticism, Hunter Greene’s fastball, or the talent of Matt McLain and Spencer Steer.

They’re must-watch even in practice, with De La Cruz shattering Greene’s car window one day, playfully arguing who will pay. Meanwhile, third-base coach J.R. House is using a stuffed hippo for catchers to practice receiving throws and applying tags.

“We’re electric,’ India says. “We’re fast. We’re always on base. We steal bases. We create havoc. We’re got energy. We’re here to change the way of the game this year.

“We’ve got the best fans in baseball, and we’re going to get the division championship for the city.’

This is a city steeped in glorious baseball tradition, going back to 1882, and it fell in love with the Reds all over again. They drew more than two million fans for the first time since 2015. They had 10 sellouts, their most in a decade. And ticket sales for this season are way up.

“It’s a baseball town, you’ve had generations of Reds’ fans,’ says Reds legend Eric Davis, who was on their 1990 World Series team. “They want to see some good exciting baseball, and that’s what we gave them last year. It’s a sea of red.

“Guys that have come up are sliding, running and diving all over the place, and high-fiving. That stuff is contagious. It’s electric.’

Everyone in baseball took notice, with the Reds improving by 20 games last season with an 82-80 record, missing the playoffs by just two games.

“We could have been Arizona,’ India says after the Diamondbacks squeezed into the playoffs and reached the World Series. “I thought about that all winter.’

Cincinnati: A baseball city

Veteran infielder Josh Harrison, who was born and raised in Cincinnati, went to the University of Cincinnati, and still lives here, thought about it all winter too.

This is where he always wanted to play, signing a minor-league contract at the age of 36, hoping he can wear a Reds uniform for the first time in his life.

“I know what baseball means to Cincinnati,’ says Harrison, one of two former All-Stars on the entire roster. “What it meant for the city to win the World Series. What the sport means to Cincinnati. And what it means when this team wins.

“The buzz around the city is insane, and it’s a testament to the way these guys go about their business. They get after it. You watch them on the bases. They got guys getting dirty. Got guys taking the extra bag. It’s the way we all grew up playing, and it’s refreshing to see that guys still have that hunger.’

It’s also a confident team, believing in their hearts they can win the NL Central for the first time since 2012, scoffing at the idea that the Chicago Cubs should be the favorites after re-signing Cody Bellinger.

“I think we still beat them,” India told the Cincinnati Enquirer after the news. “He’s an unbelievable player. He’s an MVP. It definitely helps them.

“But it is what it is. It’s the same team from last year.”

The Reds, who spent $108 million in free agency, are counting on the lessons learned from last season to take them into October.

“It’s still a young team, I think it’ll be that way for a while,’ Reds manager David Bell says, “but these young guys have a year under their belt now. They’ve also developed expectations.

“Guys are loose and having a good time, but there’s a little bit of difference as far as the purpose or even seriousness in a good way.’’

Says Reds GM Nick Krall: “It’s different this year. You still have the youthful energy, but it’s youthful energy with purpose. This reminds me a lot like 2012 with the younger players coming up and gelling together.’

Don’t think for a second that last year’s dramatic rise from dreadfulness to contention was a fluke.

The Reds’ prized trio of young pitchers Hunter Greene, Graham Ashcraft and Nick Lodolo missed a combined 15 months with injuries last season.

India missed two months of the second half with a strained hamstring and plantar fasciitis. Infielder Matt McLain, who finished fifth in the NL Rookie of the Year balloting, was out the last month with an oblique strain.

Still, there they were, hanging in the wild-card race until the last weekend of the season.

“It definitely left a bad taste in our mouths,’ Bell says, “but although there was clear disappointment at the end thinking we were going to get in. But the silver lining is the hunger that’s there this year after being that close.’

‘Organization is flourishing’

They want to win now, and dominate in the future.

“This team is going to be really good for a long time,’’ India says. “This organization is flourishing.’

And these Reds are embracing the pressure and expectations.

“You hear the outside noise,’ says McLain, will be the Reds’ primary second baseman, “but it’s exciting to have expectations. We learned a lot last year. For me personally, the games got a little bigger towards the ends, and I was trying to do too much. It’s easy to get caught up in that.’

The difference now is they know what to expect, have 10 legitimate starting candidates, and the surreal potential of Greene, Ashcraft and Lodolo.

“We know what we got in here, now it’s just a matter of doing it,’ Lodolo says. “We exceeded everyone’s expectations last year, but not our own. We know we belong. Now, we’ve just got to go out there and do it.’

The Reds have the talent, the energy, the hunger, and perhaps now the poise to make it a summer they’ll never forget.

They were a highlight reel last summer.

This time, they want to make it a documentary.

“We all saw the noise they were making the noise last year,’ says veteran reliever Emilio Pagan, one of the first free agents to sign with a two-year, $16 million contract. “Most of the highlights on MLB Network were coming out of this group of players. The highlights were running non-stop. It’s like, ‘These guys are good.’

“Now, to be on a team that winning the division is more than just a goal but a real opportunity, is everything you could want. We got everything we need. All of the right pieces are there for us.

“Now, it’s up to us.’

What more could you ask?

Follow Nightengale on X: @Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

While watching my nephew’s youth hockey game last weekend, I spotted a sign hanging on the glass beside the bleachers. It read:

LET THE REFS REF

LET THE COACHES COACH

LET THE PLAYERS PLAY

YOU ARE A CHEERLEADER

I have seen a number of similar reminders of perspective over the years while watching my own sons play their games. The messages bring to light what has become a national narrative of spectators, namely parents behaving badly at their kids sporting events.

The finer print on this particular note, though, was more of a warning: ‘Please remember that you are on private property and can be asked to leave at any time for any reason.’

Former NFL quarterback Cam Newton and some other youth coaches in Atlanta weren’t just asked to leave a youth football event last weekend when they got into a startling and frightening melee. They were removed after security guards had to forcibly pry them from one another.

The fight, which began atop a staircase and swung around to a fence amid wild shoves and punches, further underscores what’s wrong with our kids’ sports. We know parents can be overbearing and even physically and verbally abusive toward coaches and officials.

But this narrative isn’t just about parents. It’s about all the adults who are ruining youth sports for our children.

Adults such as Newton, who runs a youth sports organization, brawl with each other in front of parents and kids. Adults coach kids but feel they’re facing off against each other, or they sit in the stands across from one another, and feel their egos are on the line. Adults monetize these same kids with their so-called ‘select’ or ‘elite’ pay-to-play teams.

Adults enter these teams in events like the ‘invitation-only’ We Ball Sports tournament that Newton’s C1N football team was involved in last weekend.

‘I just think it’s society in general,’ said Todd Nelson, assistant director of the New York State Public High School Athletic Association. ‘You know, individuals over the last four or five years have felt like they can speak their mind and do what they want to do and shouldn’t be any consequences for that. I think that’s unfortunate because I think they have taken that liberty that we have as a society and as Americans and they have taken it to the extreme.’

Sports officials fear for their safety at youth sports events

I spoke to Nelson last year for a story about how unruly spectator behavior, most notably parents, has created national shortage in sports officials. He wasn’t even talking about physical violence that we have seen at some youth sports events.

Sunday’s brawl involved the 34-year-old Newton and at least two other coaches. Those coaches were from TSP (TopShelf Performance), a national 18U 7-on-7 football program, a source told The Athletic. At the end of one video of the fight, as noted by The Sporting News, Newton yells to someone, ‘I got something for you’ off camera, implying more violence.

Violence inflicted by adults at youth sporting events, sadly, isn’t new. Among many others, there are stories of disgruntled parents throwing punches at sports officials in Florida, Indiana, Mississippi and California.

Even guns have come into play. In the summer of 2022, the brother of former NFL cornerback Aqib Talib pled guilty to the murder of an opposing coach during a horrifying incident in Texas. Last October in St. Louis, a youth football coach of 9- and 10-year-olds was shot four times by a parent apparently upset with the coach’s use of his son on the team. Thankfully, that coach survived.

When I read about such incidents, my mind goes to the spring of 2022, when my then-14-year-old son was about to play a baseball doubleheader in Northern Virginia. The games were canceled because there was a shooting on the sidelines of a youth flag football game at a nearby school amid a dispute between, yes, adults.

Our worst qualities, and those of society, are coming out as we watch kids play games.

‘They are stealing the moment away from children,’ said Brian Barlow, a soccer official interviewed for an HBO Sports documentary of violence against referees. (Note: Video contains profanity.)

Two lacrosse referees in New Jersey I interviewed last year said they feared for their safety while walking to cars after games amid unruly spectators.

‘I’ve been lucky so far with no physical assault – but I am cautious in engaging after the contest; would much prefer not to,’ says Gary Herjo, who has worked two decades as a high school and youth lacrosse official.

In a survey of 36,000 sports officials conducted by the National Association of Sports Officials last year, 50% of the of the men and women from all levels of sports who responded said they have felt unsafe while doing their jobs.

Nearly 50% of the officials polled in the NASO survey said sportsmanship was worst at the ‘youth competitive’ (travel) level.

Adults invest finances, as well as emotions, in kids games

Some of these coaches charge thousands of dollars a year for your kid to play on their team. They run these businesses full time and depend on them for their livelihood. They poach players from one another and get irate at each other for doing so. It’s big business that utilizes, and sometimes exploits, our kids.

During an interview with USA TODAY Sports, Adam Yahn, a former GM for an elite junior hockey team in Ontario, Canada, referenced the recent work of TSN’s Rick Westhead in investigating a team in the Greater Toronto Hockey League.

Westhead sparked a probe into team finances by the GTHL. It followed a parent’s accusation that player dues and fundraising money for the U12 club weren’t properly accounted for.

‘We have to ask ourselves a question: Are we doing this for the kids? Are we doing this to fulfill a dream or are there people in this to make money as opposed to just developing kids in what used to be a volunteer coaching position,’ Yahn says. ‘Parents (are) pushing their kids, but are there others that are financially benefitting from this? Have we gone away from the ‘for love of the game,’ so to speak, to, ‘what’s in it for me?”

Coaches, and parents, can become heated because not only are we watching our kids, but we have invested so much financially. But, in doing so, what are we really mortgaging if the adults running the show can’t behave themselves?

Last December, a video went viral of referees in Colorado fighting at a youth basketball game. Official pools are dwindling nationwide, so lesser-qualified, and in this case lesser-behaved, referees are getting hired.

‘We have informed these independently contracted officials that they are suspended indefinitely from working for Gold Crown Foundation,’ the foundation, which hosted the game, told TMZ. ‘Most importantly we apologize to everyone that had to witness their unacceptable behavior – especially the kids.’

All adults who are supposed to be leaders of kids sports need to take that message to heart. If there are any adults left.

Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for a high schooler and middle schooler. His column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday responded to President Biden’s mention of a possible cease-fire in Gaza, saying a majority of Americans support Israel continuing its campaign until victory. 

In a video address, Netanyahu said he has led a political campaign since the beginning of the war, ‘whose purpose is to curb pressures intended to end the war before its time, and on the other hand gain support for Israel.’ 

Netanyahu pointed to ‘significant success’ in this area, pointing to a Harvard-Harris poll showing that more than 80% of the American public supports Israel.

‘That means four out of five citizens in the United States support Israel, and not Hamas,’ Netanyahu said in Hebrew. ‘This gives us additional strength to continue the campaign until absolute victory.’ 

Netanyahu published the video a day after President Biden expressed his hopes for a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas that would pause hostilities and allow for the remaining hostages to be released by early next week.

Asked when he hoped such a deal could be finalized, Biden said: ‘Well, I hope by … the end of the weekend. My national security adviser tells me that they’re close. They’re close. They’re not done yet. My hope is by next Monday we’ll have a cease-fire.’

Netanyahu had said Sunday that an Israeli military offensive in the southernmost city of Rafah could be ‘delayed somewhat’ if a deal for a weekslong cease-fire between Israel and Hamas is reached. He claims that total victory in Gaza is ‘weeks away’ once the offensive begins.

Talks towards a deal have resumed at the specialist level in Qatar, which is one of the mediators.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Historical and seasonal performance data indicate that the Utilities and Consumer Staples sectors can be effective growth instruments, particularly in March. Technical analysis of the current price action for Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) supports the thesis that these sectors are poised for growth, offering traders potentially favorable entry points for capitalizing on this seasonal trend.

If the best defense is a strong offense, then sometimes the most effective offense is a defensive tactic used offensively (as Napoleon did when he used the divisional square tactic in the Battle of the Pyramids). It’s a matter of proper placement and timing.

The same can be said when it comes to shifting growth vs. defensive tactics in your trades. Specifically, this article focuses on exploiting the Utilities and Consumer Staples sectors as growth instruments. It’s a matter of timing.

Exploiting Seasonal Growth Opportunities Using Defensive Sectors?

This article takes its queue and slight diversion from Tom Bowley’s insightful article, where he discusses the risk-on and risk-off environment, comparing XLU and XLP with the “ultra-aggressive” Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK), a Tech sector proxy. Bowley makes a compelling and balanced case to consider risk and caution as the current bull market continues to reach new heights.

This piece takes a bit of a diversion. Here’s the argument: From a seasonality perspective, March is XLU’s best month for growth and XLP’s second-best month for growth. In short, these two defensive plays happen to bring out their most aggressive characteristics (on a seasonal basis) in the month of March.

XLU’s 10-Year Seasonal Performance Against the S&P 500

CHART 1. 10-YEAR SEASONALITY CHART OF XLU VS S&P 500. Against the broader market, March is XLU’s strongest month.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

On average and over 10 years, the Utilities sector (XLU) has outperformed the S&P 500 with an 89% higher-close rate and a 2.9% average return in March. Looking at all 12 months, you will not find a better-performing month than March.

XLP’s 10-Year Seasonal Performance Against the S&P 500

CHART 2. 10-YEAR SEASONALITY CHART OF XLP VS S&P 500. March is XLP’s second-strongest performance against the S&P following December.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

On average, over 10 years, XLP has outperformed the S&P 500 with a 56% higher-close rate and a 1.3% average return in March. The average higher-close and return rates are strongest in December, but March is XLP’s second-best performing month.

Using “Safe” Plays as a “Bold” Move

Similar to the analogy mentioned above—using a defensive tactic to achieve an aggressive outcome—might it be prudent to shift trading focus to a “caution play” to get ahead of the broader market? Historically and seasonality-wise, this has played out well on average in the last 10 years, but whether the odds are in your favor this year really depends on the whims of market sentiment and whether you can find a sensible entry point in the current price environment.

After all, March is only a few days away.

XLU’s Price Action Now

CHART 3. DAILY CHART OF XLU. The swing chart makes directionality and entry/exit points clear.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The last two lower lows in January and February coincided with a rise in buying pressure, as indicated by the Money Flow Index (MFI), which you can also think of as a volume-weighted RSI. The bullish divergence between declining prices and increasing buying pressure foreshadowed this month’s price rise.

If you take a look at the ZigZag lines, you can see the swing points that define the trend. So, if XLU reverses course and rises to fulfill its seasonality-based projection, it would have to break above the two swing highs (see green dotted lines) at $62.25 and $62.62 to break the current downtrend. It would also have to stay above the most recent swing low (see red dotted line) at $59.15.

If you want to go long XLU, a break above $62.25 on high momentum might be a favorable entry point.

XLP’s Price Action Now

CHART 4. DAILY CHART OF XLP. Just sailing with no clouds in sight? Otherwise, a seemingly boring chart.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Consumer Staples (XLP) appears to be chugging along rather serenely. Looking at the Relative Strength Index (RSI), XLP is neither overbought nor oversold. It’s just there in the middle. To get a clearer and volume-weighted reading, look at the  Money Flow Index (MFI), which shows pretty much the same thing but with a slight upward tilt, indicating a slight rise in buying pressure.

The chart plots a trendline to show the main trend plus a Kumo (Ichimoku Cloud) for secondary context. Based on all of these readings, XLP gives every indication that it’s heading higher. So, if you’re looking to go long XLP to take advantage of its seasonality-based expectations, getting in a position near the trendline, say, $73.50 might be a favorable spot. You don’t want to see price fall below the trendline, and a close below $72.36, its most recent swing low, would likely invalidate the bullish thesis.

The Bottom Line

The strategic exploitation of Utilities (XLU) and Consumer Staples (XLP) sectors for seasonality-based opportunities is an interesting case in which you’d use defensive tools to seek growth. The timing, as with all trades, is crucial, and the coming month of March, historically the strongest for these sectors, offers a unique window for this strategy. Of course, seasonality is never a sure thing, so if you’re planning on pursuing this opportunity, be ready to exit upon the first indications that this season might not follow historical patterns.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The IRS’s new, free filing software for relatively simple tax returns is now available in 12 states.

The Direct File service, which is being piloted for the first time for 2023 tax-year returns, is now being offered to qualified filers in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.

To qualify for Direct File, you have to have a Social Security number or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number for yourself and any spouse or dependents you claim. You also need a current driver’s license, state identification card, U.S. passport or passport card.

There are some limitations to the tax-filing service. Only people who are W-2 employees and those who receive Social Security or unemployment income can use Direct File. Other types of income, like capital gains, rental income or money from payment apps and online marketplaces, can’t be reported with Direct File.

IRS Direct File can be accessed on a mobile device and it’s also available in Spanish.

Taxpayers who use the service can only take the standard deduction — the set dollar amount that reduces your taxable income — and does not allow for itemized deductions. The IRS estimates that about 9 in 10 filers take the standard deduction.

The standard deduction for the 2023 tax year is:

And for people who are 65 and older or blind, the standard deduction is:

The software that powers Direct File also lets taxpayers in five of the pilot states — Arizona, California, Massachusetts, New York and Washington — transfer their federal tax information to their respective state’s online tax tool for state income tax filing.

Direct File is one of many provisions enacted through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which allocated $80 billion in additional funding to the IRS.

Filing companies like Intuit and H&R Block have spent millions over the years to prevent the rollout of such a product, and have criticized the program as a ‘solution in search of a problem.’

However, Eddie Hartwig, partner at consultancy Service Design Collective and former deputy administrator at the United States Digital Service, said millions of taxpayers, especially lower-income people, can inadvertently leave money on the table when using the programs from H&R Block and Intuit (TurboTax), in part by missing things like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit, which could reduce your tax liability and potentially increase your refund.

Direct File, Hartwig said, could help resolve this.

‘We know that there are 5 million EITC applicants not applying, who could get money but are not filing their taxes and not getting money,’ Hartwig said in an interview. ‘And there are 7 million Child Tax Credit folks in the same position … So there are millions of people for whom this would make a big difference in incomes.’

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

If you’re a TSA PreCheck member traveling on United Airlines via Chicago’s O’Hare or Los Angeles international airports, life just got a bit easier.

United recently updated its website to show that ‘Touchless ID’ technology, which lets users go through security just by scanning their face and without having to show a physical ID or a boarding pass, is now available at those two major hubs for TSA Pre users.

Additionally, United passengers at O’Hare can use their face at a new bag-drop shortcut.

To enroll in United’s Touchless ID, a passenger needs to scan their passport and add their Known Traveler Number (KTN) in the United app. The passenger then needs to check in for their flight on the mobile app in order to opt-in and give United permission to use your facial scan as an ID.

Once at the airport, a passenger would only need to scan their face at new Touchless ID kiosks.

For now, Touchless ID at United is only available for customers on single-passenger reservations who are at least 18 years old. And the bag-drop feature at O’Hare is still in a testing phase, meaning agents will still check IDs.

United says it plans to continue rolling out Touchless ID to more bag drop counters, security checkpoints, and boarding gates in the future.

The carrier’s move to touchless follows Delta Air Lines, which has already deployed similar technology at its hubs in Atlanta, Detroit and New York’s John F. Kennedy and LaGuardia international airports.

According to The Points Guy travel website managing editor Clint Henderson, there are already dedicated check-in lanes for touchless at these airports for Delta flyers.

“The agents working at the TSA PreCheck and Clear lines told me to use a new special lane for biometrics that allowed me to skip ahead of both the regular PreCheck and the separate Clear lanes,” Henderson said in a TPG post. “After one minute, the TSA agent waved me over. I simply showed my face in front of a camera, and the agent told me to go ahead to the screening machines. There was no wait.”

In November, the Department of Homeland Security, the TSA’s parent agency, announced it is hoping to roll out an entirely ‘self-service’ screening option that bypasses TSA agents entirely. This involves the use ‘pods’ that combine facial screening and baggage scanning; currently, this program is being tested at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas.

On its website, TSA says it does not store images captured by facial recognition technology ‘except for a limited period of time for testing and evaluation purposes.’ The agency says it retains personal identifying information only for as long as is necessary to fulfill the specified purposes of its biometric technology pilots.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Macy’s plans to close approximately 150 stores nationwide as part of a massive reorganization that will see it pivot to a greater focus on luxury sales.

The retailer on Tuesday announced an initiative it’s calling a ‘bold new chapter’ that will involve shuttering ‘underproductive’ locations, including approximately 50 by the end of the company’s current fiscal year.

In an email, a Macy’s spokesperson declined to comment about which specific stores are closing. In a statement obtained by NBC on Tuesday, San Francisco Mayor London Breed said she had learned that Macy’s 400,000 square-foot flagship location in the city’s Union Square will eventually be part of the closures, though not in the initial round of 50.

The closures will leave approximately 350 Macy’s locations, as well as Bloomingdale’s and Bluemercury beauty and skincare stores.

The company sees those latter brands as its future: It said it plans to take advantage of its leadership position in the luxury market, where it said Bloomingdale’s and Bluemercury have been ‘outperformers’ within the Macy’s portfolio.

The company plans to build out 15 new Bloomingdale’s stores and at least 30 new Bluemercury stores, along with roughly 30 Bluemercury remodels, over the next three years.

“We are making the necessary moves to reinvigorate relationships with our customers through improved shopping experiences, relevant assortments and compelling value,” CEO Tony Spring said in a news release.

Macy’s has been under pressure from investor activists seeking an outright sale of the company due to its decadelong underperformance, with Macy’s real estate considered its most valuable asset.

However, Macy’s recently rejected a takeover offer, saying it undervalued the firm.

Wall Street’s immediate reaction to Tuesday’s announcement was negative, with shares trading more than 2% lower in premarket action.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

House Republicans have subpoenaed Special Counsel Robert Hur for the transcript and any recordings of President Biden’s interview from the investigation into the president’s mishandling of classified documents.

Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry — House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan and House Ways & Means Committee Chair Jason Smith — requested the materials related to Biden’s October 2023 interview be turned over to Congress earlier this month and set a deadline of Feb. 19. That deadline was not met, but the Justice Department said it was ‘working to gather and process’ responsive documents. 

The subpoena, reviewed by Fox News Digital, compels the Justice Department to produce all documents and communications, including audio and video recordings, related to Hur’s interview of Biden. 

The subpoena also covers all documents and communications, including audio and video recordings, related to Hur’s interview of the ghost writer of Biden’s memoir, Mark Zwonitzer; documents identified as ‘A9’ and ‘A10’ in the Appendix A of Hur’s report, which relate to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s Dec. 11, 2015 call with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk; and all communications between or among representatives of the Department of Justice, including the Office of Special Counsel, the Executive Office of the President, and President Biden’s personal counsel referring or relating to Hur’s report.  

Fox News Digital obtained a letter the Republicans sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday, notifying the department of the subpoena, and taking issue with the fact that the DOJ, earlier this month, ‘offered no timeframe by which it expected to make any productions or, indeed, any commitment that it would produce all of the material requested.’ 

‘The Oversight and Judiciary Committees, in coordination with the Ways and Means Committee, are investigating whether sufficient grounds exist to draft articles of impeachment against President Biden for consideration by the full House,’ they wrote. ‘The Committees are concerned that President Biden may have retained sensitive documents related to specific countries involving his family’s foreign business dealings.’ 

The Republicans are also seeking information on ‘whether the White House or President Biden’s personal attorneys placed any limitations or scoping restrictions during the interviews with Special Counsel Hur or Mr. Mark Zwonitzer precluding or addressing any potential statements directly linking President Biden to troublesome foreign payments.’

‘Additionally, the Judiciary Committee requires these materials for its ongoing oversight of the Department’s commitment to impartial justice and its handling of the investigation and prosecution of President Biden’s presumptive opponent, President Donald J. Trump, in the November 2024 presidential election,’ the letter states. ‘The documents requested are directly relevant to both the impeachment inquiry and the Judiciary Committee’s legislative oversight of the Department.’ 

Ahead of the Feb. 19 deadline to produce the records, the Justice Department wrote to the committees that several of the requested materials ‘require review for classification and protection of national defense information.’

The DOJ also said it was standard practice to review and share the materials with the executive branch since they may contain confidential information. 

‘Such confidentiality interests may include, for example, protecting against the unwarranted invasion of privacy of third parties whose names may appear in law enforcement records. We have already begun this process,’ the DOJ said in its Feb. 16 letter to the House committees. ‘The Department is committed to responding to the Committees’ requests expeditiously, consistent with the law, longstanding Department policies and principles, and available resources,’ the DOJ added.

Hur, who released his report to the public earlier this month after months of investigating, did not recommend criminal charges against Biden for mishandling and retaining classified documents and stated that he wouldn’t bring charges against Biden even if he were not in the Oval Office.

Those records included classified documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and other countries, among other records related to national security and foreign policy, which Hur said implicated ‘sensitive intelligence sources and methods.’

Hur did not recommend any charges against the president but did describe him as a ‘sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory’ — a description that has raised significant concerns for Biden’s 2024 re-election campaign.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutors said that former President Trump’s handling of classified documents is not ‘remotely’ similar to how President Biden also handled sensitive national security information as laid out in dueling Special Counsel Rob Hur’s report released this month. 

The 12-page filing Monday countering Trump’s motion to dismiss the indictment ‘based on selective and vindictive prosecution’ serves as Smith’s first response to the blistering Hur report. 

‘The defendants have not identified anyone who has engaged in a remotely similar suite of willful and deceitful criminal conduct and not been prosecuted. Nor could they. Indeed, the comparators on which they rely are readily distinguishable,’ Assistant Special Counsel David Harbach wrote.

Harbach said the ‘primary comparator’ of Trump and co-defendants, body man and valet Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos de Oliveira, is President Biden, whose conduct is described in the recently issued Hur report on the investigation of classified documents recovered from Biden’s primary residence in Delaware and the Penn Biden Center.

‘But as the Hur Report itself recognizes, ‘several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear,’’ Harbach wrote. ‘Most notably, Trump, unlike Biden, is alleged to have engaged in extensive and repeated efforts to obstruct justice and thwart the return of documents bearing classification markings. And the evidence concerning the two men’s intent – whether they knowingly possessed and willfully retained such documents – is also starkly different, as reflected in the Hur Report’s conclusion that ‘the evidence falls short of establishing Mr. Biden’s willful retention of the classified Afghanistan documents beyond a reasonable doubt.’’

Hur’s report, which concluded that no criminal charges were warranted, surmised that at trial, Biden ‘would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.’ 

The special counsel, therefore, asserted that it would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him, ‘by then a former president well into his eighties-of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.’ It also cited how Biden mixed up the date of the death of his son, Beau. 

The White House and Biden allies have deemed the details from the Hur report on Biden’s age and mental fitness as ‘gratuitous’ political attacks.

Although, as Harbach laid out Monday, many government officials have possessed classified documents after the end of their terms in office – often inadvertently, sometimes negligently, and very occasionally willfully – as well as a ‘very small number of cases in which former government officials who have been found in possession of classified documents have briefly resisted the government’s lawful efforts to recover them,’ the special counsel’s team considers Trump’s actions unique.

‘There has never been a case in American history in which a former official has engaged in conduct remotely similar to Trump’s,’ Harbach wrote. 

‘He intentionally took possession of a vast trove of some of the nation’s most sensitive documents – documents so sensitive that they were presented to the President – and stored them in unsecured locations at his heavily trafficked social club,’ he wrote. ‘When the National Archives and Records Administration (‘NARA’) initially sought their return (before learning that they contained classified national defense information), Trump delayed, obfuscated, and dissembled. Faced with the possibility of legal action, he ostensibly agreed to comply with NARA’s requests but in fact engaged in additional deception, returning only a fraction of the documents in his possession while claiming that his production was complete.’

Harbach goes on to highlight how, when presented with a grand jury subpoena demanding the return of the remaining documents bearing classification markings, ‘Trump attempted to enlist his own attorney in the corrupt endeavor, suggesting that he falsely tell the FBI and grand jury that Trump did not have any documents, and suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents rather than produce them to the government.’ The prosecutor said Trump enlisted Nauta ‘in a scheme to deceive the attorney by moving boxes to conceal his (Trump’s) continued possession of classified documents’ and continued a pattern of ‘obstructive conduct’ by allegedly seeking to have some security camera footage deleted.

Trump has said the security camera footage in fact was never deleted, dismissing the assertion as ‘prosecutorial fiction.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS