Archive

2024

Browsing

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Inter Miami star Lionel Messi started Wednesday’s match on a tear, assisting and scoring a goal in the first 23 minutes against Nashville SC in the second leg of their Concacaf Champions Cup round-of-16 bout.

But five minutes into the second half, Messi came off the pitch as a surprise substitute. Messi experienced some discomfort in his right hamstring, and left the match as a precaution.

Inter Miami didn’t need him anymore, anyway, defeating Nashville 3-1 – and 5-3 on aggregate – to advance to the quarterfinals of the Concacaf Champions Cup tournament.

Inter Miami awaits the winner of CF Monterrey and FC Cincinnati in the next round. Those teams will play in Mexico on Thursday night, with Monterrey up 1-0.

What did Inter Miami coach Tata Martino say about Lionel Messi injury?

“We didn’t want to run a risk,” Inter Miami coach Tata Martino said of Messi, who has scored five goals in six matches overall this season. “We tried to see if he could go a little longer, but we preferred for him to get out of the game.”

Martino said Messi undergo imaging to see the extent of his injury, and would not be available for Inter Miami’s match Saturday against D.C. United at Audi Field in Washington D.C.

“I don’t want to risk it, but I would imagine for Saturday’s match he will not be available,” Martino said. “Looking ahead, we’ll evaluate. He’ll get some imaging done. And we’ll see how it develops.”

How did Messi perform against Nashville SC in Champions Cup?

Messi assisted on Luis Suárez’s goal in the eighth minute of the match, and scored in the 23rd minute after an assist from Diego Gomez to give Inter Miami a 2-0 lead early in the first half.

Messi joined his teammates for the start of the second half, but walked off the pitch after five minutes with Robert Taylor coming into the match.

Nashville coach Gary Smith’s reaction to Messi’s early exit? “Thank goodness,” he said.

Ultimately, Messi’s early exit did not matter.

Taylor scored a header goal from Suárez about 13 minutes after entering the game to give Inter Miami a 3-0 lead, and secure a major cushion over Nashville.

It was Messi and Suárez who rescued Inter Miami when Nashville took a 2-0 lead in the first leg of their Champions Cup matchup. And it was the dynamic duo who has fueled Inter Miami’s quarterfinal berth.

“They started very, very brightly and we were not able to control the first 15 minutes,” Smith said. “It won them the game.”

Nashville’s Sam Surridge scored in the 92nd minute to spoil Inter Miami goalie Drake Callender’s clean sheet.

It was the second time Inter Miami beat Nashville in four matches – the most frequent opponent Messi has faced in MLS. Although the previous three matches were draws, the first ended in 10-9 penalty kicks with Inter Miami winning the Leagues Cup tournament on Aug. 19, 2023.

Robert Taylor goal: inter Miami 3, Nashville 0

Robert Taylor rose in the air, and delivered a beauty of a header to give Inter Miami a 3-0 lead over Nashville on Wednesday night.

Taylor received the ball from Luis Suárez, who also scored earlier in the match.

Inter Miami has a 5-2 lead in aggregate, and easing any concern why Lionel Messi was pulled early in the second half.

Lionel Messi subs out in 50th minute: Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0

Lionel Messi is coming off the pitch, leaving the game after being substituted in the 50th minute – just five minutes after the second half began.

It’s unclear why Messi has left early, perhaps a precaution with a match Saturday against D.C. United and two matches with Argentina later this month.

But the window as opened for Nashville to jump back into this game.

Messi scores goal: Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0

Lionel Messi thought he got fouled, but didn’t give up on the play.

Diego Gomez penetrated and dished to Messi, who did the rest with his legendary left boot in the 23rd minute.

Luis Suárez goal: Inter Miami 1, Nashville 0

Inter Miami is on the board, and Lionel Messi’s impact has already been felt.

Messi found close friend Luis Suárez open for a breakaway goal in the 8th minute of the match.

The score came right after Messi’s first shot on goal was too high. But Inter Miami has an early lead over Nashville, and a 3-2 lead in the aggregate.

Messi gets foul, free kick: Inter Miami 0, Nashville 0

Messi broke away with a head of steam in the fourth minute, and was fouled as he approached the penalty area.

But Messi’s free kick collided into a wall of defenders.

It was a moment where Messi’s acceleration was on prime display, but an early opportunity Inter Miami could not convert.

How to watch Inter Miami vs. Nashville SC live stream

The Inter Miami vs. Nashville match kicks off at 8:15 p.m. ET on FS2 in English and TUDN in Spanish. 

TICKETS: See Messi and Inter Miami in person vs. Nashville SC

SHOP: Get the latest Messi and Inter Miami gear from the MLS Store

Starting 11s for Inter Miami, Nashville SC

Lionel Messi, as well as his former FC Barcelona teammates Luis Suárez, Sergio Busquets and Jordi Alba, are in the starting lineup for Inter Miami. Alba started Sunday’s game, while Busquets and Suárez came on as second-half substitutes.

For Nashville SC, Taylor Washington starts in place of two-time MLS Defender of the Year Walker Zimmerman, who suffered a knee injury in last week’s Concacaf Champions Cup game vs. Inter Miami.

Messi arrives for Inter Miami vs. Nashville SC

All smiles from Messi and he walked into Chase Stadium for tonight’s match.

Inter Miami vs. Nashville score predictions

Safid Deen, Lionel Messi reporter, USA TODAY:

Inter Miami 3, Nashville 2: Messi and Luis Suárez need to lead the way again for Inter Miami, but they won’t trail from the jump like the first leg. Still, Nashville will be persistent and test Miami like they have in three previous matchups. 

Jacob Shames, Nashville SC beat writer, The Tennessean:

Messi is a ‘conundrum’ for Nashville coach Gary Smith

Nashville will face Messi for the fourth time — the most of any opponent since he joined Inter Miami and MLS.

“You try to set up a group to try and limit what he’s able to do. He’s proved throughout his career, at the very best levels,” Smith said. “No matter how good you are defensively or how organized you are, the caliber of the individual will always find a way.”

Inter Miami vs. Nashville Champions Cup highlights

What happened in the first matchup? Messi scored a goal in the 52nd minute, while Luis Suárez’s header in the fifth minute of extra time helped Inter Miami storm back to finish a 2-2 draw against Nashville in the first leg last Thursday. Nashville’s Jacob Shaffelburg scored twice in the opening minutes of each half to give his side a 2-0 lead.

What does Inter Miami need to advance in Champions Cup? 

Inter Miami needs an outright win, or a 0-0 draw or 1-1 draw to advance. 

What does Nashville need to advance in Champions Cup? 

Nashville needs an outright win, or a draw with the score of at least 3 goals to advance.

What if Inter Miami and Nashville need a tiebreaker in Champions Cup? 

If the aggregate score, or the results of both matches added together remains tied, away goals will work as the first tiebreaker. 

If Inter Miami and Nashville play to another 2-2 draw Wednesday, they will play extra time. If the score remains tied, it will be decided by penalty kicks. 

What’s next for the Inter Miami-Nashville winner?

The Inter Miami-Nashville winner will face either LIGA MX side C.F. Monterrey or MLS side FC Cincinnati, the 2023 Supporters’ Shield winners. 

The quarterfinals for the Concacaf Champions Cup will be held April 2-11.

What is Messi and Inter Miami’s upcoming schedule? 

Messi will likely play his final match of the month with Inter Miami on Saturday, before joining Argentina for two Copa America warmups later this month. 

Inter Miami visits D.C. United on Saturday. Then, Messi will join Argentina for a match against El Salvador in Philadelphia on March 22, and Costa Rica in Los Angeles on March 26. 

Messi could miss two Inter Miami games: Inter Miami vs. New York Red Bulls on March 23 and Inter Miami vs. New York City FC on March 30 for rest purposes. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Lionel Messi had Inter Miami on a roll in the Concacaf Champions Cup, thanks to his latest goal.

Messi received an assist from Diego Gomez, and his legendary left boot did the rest.

Messi gave Inter Miami a 2-0 lead over Nashville SC on Wednesday night en route to a 3-1 victory — and 5-3 on aggregate — to advance to the Champions Cup quarterfinals.

Messi stretched his arms out like he normally does to celebrate, hugging teammates Luis Suarez and Gomez after the score.

Meanwhile, the Inter Miami bench celebrated with more enthusiasm – on the brink of a trip to the Champions Cup quarterfinals.

It’s the fifth goal Messi has scored this season in all competitions, and his second against Nashville in as many games.

Messi was subbed off in the 50th minute and replaced by Robert Taylor, who scored a goal of his own in the 63rd minute.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Nobody knows Luis Suárez like Lionel Messi.

The Inter Miami stars connected for an early goal eight minutes into Wednesday’s Concacaf Champions Cup match against Nashville SC in highlight fashion yet again.

Messi received a pass and found Suárez in stride, and the Uruguayan striker made sure it found the back of the net.

It’s like Messi knew exactly where Suárez was going to be, and placed the ball directly in his path.

It’s the fourth goal Suárez has scored in his Inter Miami stint, joining Messi, Sergio Busquets and Jordi Alba as former FC Barcelona stars in Major League Soccer.

Messi later added a goal of his own as Inter Miami built a 2-0 first-half lead. It would go on to win, 3-1 (5-3 on aggregate) to advance to the Concacaf Champions Cup quarterfinals.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Nearly three decades ago, Michigan State University offered Tom Izzo a five-year, $540,000 contract to be its next men’s basketball coach. He didn’t bother countering or negotiating. In fact, he didn’t even have an agent.

In the years since, Izzo has led the Spartans to eight Final Four appearances and a national championship in 2000 – emerging as one of the sport’s iconic coaches and, in many ways, the face of the university. His contracts have gotten more lucrative and complex as a result, but he said his approach at Michigan State hasn’t changed.

‘I’ve never negotiated a contract,’ Izzo told USA TODAY Sports. ‘Ever.’

Nor does he have an agent.

‘I heard I’m one of the only dumb ones,’ he added, with a laugh.

IT’S BRACKET MADNESS: Enter USA TODAY’s NCAA tournament bracket contest for a chance at $1 million prize.

It’s no surprise that Izzo, who spent 12 seasons as a Michigan State assistant before being promoted to head coach in 1995, is once again among the highest-paid men’s basketball coaches in the country in 2024. According to USA TODAY Sports’ annual review of coaching compensation, the 69-year-old is making roughly $6.2 million this season, which puts him third behind only Bill Self of Kansas and John Calipari of Kentucky.

What’s unusual, however, is the way that Izzo and Michigan State have gotten to this point – piecing together big-money contracts for almost 30 years with little public acrimony, even as Izzo’s stature has grown, administrators have come and gone, and the landscape of college sports has shifted.

“It was not common, not normal,” Izzo said. “I think, in this day and age, could I have made more money? Sure. Could I have made more money by leaving? Sure. But I’m also a relationship-based guy over a transaction-based guy. And I had good relationships.”

Tom Izzo is face of Michigan State, community

Following the recent retirements of Mike Krzyzewski at Duke and Jim Boeheim at Syracuse, few current men’s basketball coaches have more cachet at their schools than Izzo – a man so entwined with Michigan State that the university’s new football facility bears his name.

His friends note that he has been a constant – and, in many ways, an ambassador – for a university that has dealt with its fair share of tragedy and controversy in recent years, including the Larry Nassar scandal and Mel Tucker’s firing for sexual harassment.

In the aftermath of an on-campus shooting last year, Izzo was among those asked to speak at a vigil.

“He’s a face of Michigan, in a way,” former Michigan State athletics director Mark Hollis said. “(University of) Michigan fans respect Tom Izzo. He’s got that kind of role here, in the state.”

And yet, Hollis and other former administrators at the school insist that Izzo has shown little interest in using that stature – or sporadic interest from NBA teams – to squeeze money out of his employer. He said he has never felt the need to involve an agent. And Michigan State has made sure he never had a reason to do so, taking steps to proactively raise his salary or give him new perks.

Under the terms of his contract, Izzo has the choice to transition into the role of “special university advisor to the athletic director” for up to six years. That role would pay him $6.2 million in his first year and $750,000 each year for five years thereafter.  

“I don’t want to sound like I’m some great guy that just said, ‘I don’t care about the money,’ ” Izzo said. “Everybody cares about the money. I just had faith that my people would treat me fairly.”

Tom Izzo’s career payday upward of $93M as head coach

For Izzo, who was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in 2016, the approach has no doubt paid off.

According to USA TODAY Sports research, he has pocketed a colossal amount of money in his 29 years as the head coach of Michigan State – at least $93 million in salaries and bonuses, not adjusted for inflation.

While he has never been the highest-paid coach in the country, he has never ranked worse than seventh since USA TODAY Sports started tracking men’s basketball compensation in 2006-07.

I don’t want to sound like I’m some great guy that just said, ‘I don’t care about the money.’ Everybody cares about the money. I just had faith that my people would treat me fairly.

Tom Izzo, Michigan State men’s basketball coach

But Peter McPherson, who hired Izzo and handled several of his coaching contracts as Michigan State’s president from 1993 to 2004, believes the university has gotten plenty out of the relationship, too.

‘Izzo has earned his money many times over, when you look at what he’s brought to the school, the image,’ said McPherson, who went on to spend 16 years as the president of the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities after leaving East Lansing.

‘He’s been a unifier in these fairly troubled times in recent years, a spokesman of ethical behavior and common sense. His unifying voice has been extremely good for Michigan State.’

McPherson hired Izzo in 1995 on a starting salary of $108,000 per year. He quickly increased Izzo’s compensation package to $440,000 and $600,000 when the program started winning.

The 83-year-old said he made a conscious effort to stay ahead of the market, and he always dealt with Izzo directly on contractual issues.

“I don’t know who Tom talked to, but he wasn’t uninformed,” McPherson said. “He had a pretty good idea of what other people were making and some of the considerations.”

Tom Izzo: ‘I liked where I was at. I liked the way I was treated’

By the time the Spartans won the 2000 national championship, Izzo was making north of $725,000 – with nearly $200,000 more in potential bonuses, and a base salary that had even surpassed McPherson’s. Athletics department revenues were up. University fundraising had skyrocketed. Then, the Atlanta Hawks came calling.

In the first significant courtship of Izzo, the NBA franchise offered him a reported $3 million per year. He rejected Atlanta’s offer and told reporters he would not be seeking a raise, endearing him to local fans.

“Just about every job I was offered was more money than I was making,” Izzo recalled to USA TODAY Sports. “I don’t know. I liked where I was at. I liked the way I was treated. I felt like they appreciated me, and I appreciated them. How backwards is that? That’s illegal nowadays, isn’t it?”

While Izzo stresses that he never negotiated a deal with Michigan State, that’s at least in part because the university did its best to beat him to the punch.

After the Atlanta job fizzled, for example, McPherson upped Izzo’s base pay to $1.3 million and invested $300,000 more per year on his behalf in a university investment account – with the coach eligible to withdraw the money, and any earnings, if he remained in the job five years later. Private donors pledged to give him an additional longevity bonus of $3.4 million, which he earned in 2006.

‘You eat what you kill,’ MSU trustee Joel Ferguson told The Lansing State Journal at the time. ‘And he has killed enough to eat.”

Relationship with Michigan State works because of transparency

Atlanta was hardly the only suitor that came calling for Izzo over the years. The Cleveland Cavaliers wanted to hire him as their head coach in 2010, and Kentucky and Oregon were among the top-tier college programs who were rumored to have pursued him.

“The only sneaky thing I ever did with him is Kentucky was pursuing him once, and I knew the day that they were going to make the phone call,” Hollis recalled. “So I took him to the Masters. And you couldn’t take your phone on the course.”

Hollis was Michigan State’s athletics director from 2008 to 2018, but his relationship with Izzo stretched back decades before that; They were roommates in East Lansing in the mid-1980s, and Izzo was the best man at Hollis’ wedding.

Hollis believes Izzo is unique not because he repeatedly passed on opportunities to leave Michigan State but because of the unusual transparency with which he handled those opportunities. On multiple occasions, for example, Izzo invited Hollis to sit in on phone conversations with NBA owners about potential job offers and salary details.

Even considering their personal relationship, that’s almost unheard of in the cloak-and-dagger coaching searches of today.

“There are coaches that will use rumors like ‘this pro team or this college team wants me, what are you going to do?’” Hollis said. “Tom did not ever play that game with me when I was an AD.”

Hollis said thorny situations such as NBA offers were made easier because Izzo didn’t have an agent – many of whom, in Hollis’ view, “would leverage even the sniff of an opportunity against a school to get a raise.”

Izzo stressed that he doesn’t have anything against agents or coaches who hire them, and he noted that he has sought advice on his contracts and career from various people over the years – including former agent and Michigan State alum Molly Fletcher. Fletcher counseled Izzo in a variety of areas, including speaking and branding opportunities, but did not formally involve herself in his contract negotiations at Michigan State.

‘It’s never been about money to Tom,’ said Fletcher, who is now a motivational speaker and author.

‘The truth is, when other opportunities came his way, he wanted to do everything he could for (the public) to not know.’

It is exceedingly rare for head coaches to go without an agent – especially well-established ones like Izzo, who command the highest salaries and have the most complicated deals. Some coaches find agents to be useful intermediaries that can help advance their careers. The most powerful among them can manipulate the broader market by positioning their clients as candidates for vacant jobs, then parlaying that outside interest into an improved contract or additional perks.

Izzo said he wasn’t interested in any of that. He’s spent almost the entirety of his working life in East Lansing. It’s where he married his wife, Lupe, and raised two children; His son Steven, whom the Izzos adopted as a baby, is a walk-on guard on this year’s basketball team.

‘Everybody says what I didn’t get if I would’ve maybe used it to negotiate,’ Izzo said. ‘But do you ever think of what I did get?’

Tom Izzo ‘cares about the people’

Only one active head coach in Division I men’s basketball has spent more time leading his current school than Izzo has at Michigan State: Greg Kampe, who has been the head coach at Oakland University since 1984.

In fact, with the exception of a forgettable seven-week stint at Tulsa in 1986, Izzo has spent nearly two-thirds of his life coaching basketball in East Lansing – first as an assistant coach under his mentor, Jud Heathcote, then the last 29 as head coach.

‘He cares about the people at Michigan State,’ Fletcher said. ‘The things that Tom does that don’t directly contribute to basketball, and don’t contribute directly to his players, but contribute to the university as a whole, is astounding.’

In that time, Izzo has worked with six university presidents, six athletics directors and eight football coaches, including interims. A seventh president, Kevin Guskiewicz, took over last week.

He’s also helped the university navigate tragedy and controversy.

From 2017 to 2019, multiple top officials at Michigan State – including two consecutive presidents – were forced out in the wake of the scandal involving Larry Nassar, the former USA Gymnastics team doctor and MSU employee who was convicted of sexual assault. Hollis resigned days after Nassar’s conviction. The school reached a $500 million settlement with Nassar’s victims in 2018.

Then, last fall, Michigan State dealt with another scandal, firing football coach Mel Tucker amid allegations of sexual harassment levied by a prominent anti-sexual violence advocate. Tucker and the school are being sued for $75 million in damages.

“Michigan State’s really had some really hard times the last decade,” said Kampe, a longtime friend of Izzo’s. “And who’s the one person that you can always look at and say this is who really Michigan State is? It’s Tom Izzo.”

‘The grass isn’t always greener’

Hollis said Izzo was always comfortable with a contract if he understood how it fit into the athletics department’s broader plans – specifically with regards to football, where he said the coach recognized “if football’s doing well, everybody’s doing well.”

Current Michigan State athletics director Alan Haller echoed that sentiment in a statement provided to USA TODAY Sports by a school spokesperson.

“At multiple points throughout his career, Coach Izzo has either taken less than the market would dictate or not pursued a new contract to allow the athletics department to make commitments in other areas, allowing us to elevate the entire department,” Haller said.

Haller said Izzo’s most recent contract, which he signed in 2022, was in part an attempt to compensate him for past efforts he’s made to help the athletics department.

The deal increased his base salary and supplemental pay to $5.52 million − a $2 million increase from his previous contract signed in 2018 − and has no expiration date, with one year automatically added when each season ends. While it does not include a mandatory percentage raise or longevity bonus as his previous deal did, it does contain a variety of perks, including 25 hours of personal airtime on a private jet each year and the cushy post-coaching job.

Izzo claimed he doesn’t know some of the details of his own contract, but he said he considers it fair. He refers to something Heathcote used to say, that “a good deal is a good deal for you and a good deal for me.”

His contractual relationship with Michigan State, he said, has been a good deal.

“I got to do it, maybe, the right way,” Izzo said. “Did it cost me money? I don’t know. I know I had job offers for a lot more money, but I also know that the grass isn’t always greener. I’ve got a pretty good thing here.”

Contact Tom Schad at tschad@usatoday.com or on social media @Tom_Schad and Steve Berkowitz at sberkowi@usatoday.com or @ByBerkowitz

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Hunter Biden’s former business partner, Tony Bobulinski, has criticized the president’s son for ‘running away’ from the American people after he declined to appear for a congressional hearing next week.

Hunter Biden declined an invite from Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., to attend the House Oversight Committee hearing on March 20, when committee members of both parties will get a chance to ask about alleged influence peddling and the Biden family’s business dealings, his lawyer said in a letter Wednesday.

‘One week from today – on Wednesday, March 20 – I will testify publicly before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability,’ Bobulinski responded in a statement to Fox News Digital. ‘I was disappointed to see the news today that Hunter is running away from his chance to tell the American people the truth. He’s been adamant in wanting to go before the American people, and Oversight is now giving him that opportunity.’

Bobulinski added: ‘Now is the time to step up, Hunter, as you have said you want to do. Don’t cower in the face of accountability and in this fight for truth and democracy!’

Bobulinski previously testified that President Biden ‘enabled’ Hunter to sell access to America’s ‘most dangerous adversaries,’ including China and Russia. 

In his statement, Biden’s former business partner called for ‘truth and transparency’ to prevail.

‘Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, along with countless members of Congress, keep claiming that they are ‘fighting for our Democracy.’ Why don’t we as a nation agree to fight for the truth!’ Bobulinski said. ‘Nearly three-quarters of the American people believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, and I can’t blame them. Truth and transparency would help expose the rot at the center of our political system and begin to fix what ails us.’

‘I am excited and happy to have the opportunity to once again share the facts with the American people. I am deeply committed to getting the full truth before the nation,’ he said, calling for the witnesses in the hearing, including himself, to be subject to a polygraph with ‘real time results to be viewed by the American people.’

‘What better way to ensure that the truth is being told by every witness, including Joe, Hunter and Jim Biden in any future potential hearings?’ he asked.

Bobulinski also openly offered to appear before the committee for an additional hearing whenever it is convenient for Hunter Biden.

‘If by chance March 20th really doesn’t work due to your multiple criminal indictments, please name the date and time and I will be happy to join you at a second hearing for the American people,’ he wrote. 

In addition to Hunter Biden and Bobulinski, the House Oversight Committee invited Devon Archer and Jason Galanis to testify at the 10 a.m. hearing on March 20.

On Wednesday, Biden attorney Abbe Lowell criticized the hearing as a ‘carnival side show.’ 

‘To begin, even if that hearing was a legitimate exercise of congressional authority, neither Mr. Biden nor I can attend because of a court hearing the very next day in California,’ Lowell said in a letter sent to Comer. ‘The scheduling conflict is the least of the issues, however.’

‘Your blatant planned-for-media event is not a proper proceeding but an obvious attempt to throw a Hail Mary pass after the game has ended,’ Lowell wrote. 

‘Mr. Biden declines your invitation to this carnival side show,’ the attorney concluded.

Comer responded Wednesday, saying his committee has ‘called Hunter Biden’s bluff.’ 

‘Hunter Biden for months stated he wanted a public hearing, but now that one has been offered alongside his business associates that he worked with for years, he is refusing to come,’ Comer said.

Fox News’ Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Minutes after they clinched the Democratic and Republican presidential nominations, President Biden and former President Donald Trump took aim at each other as their 2024 general election rematch fired up.

‘Donald Trump is running a campaign of resentment, revenge, and retribution that threatens the very idea of America,’ Biden argued in a statement as he targeted his Republican challenger.

And Trump, blasting his Democratic predecessor in the White House, charged in a social media post that Biden was ‘the Worst, Most Incompetent, Corrupt, and Destructive President in the History of the United States.’

The 2024 rematch – which polls indicate most Americans are anything but enthused about – is now underway.

And the general election campaign started earlier than at any point in 20 years – when then-Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts locked up the 2004 Democratic nomination in early March and faced Republican President George W. Bush.

The November showdown between Biden and Trump is the first rematch in the race for the White House since 1956, when Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower defeated former Democratic Gov. Adlai Stevenson of Illinois as they faced off a second time.

Trump is aiming to become only the second president to serve two non-consecutive terms. That hasn’t been accomplished in over 130 years, since Grover Cleveland, who won the White House in 1884 but lost re-election four years later, won back the presidency in 1892.

With over seven and a half months to go until Election Day on November 5, Trump enjoys the early edge in public opinion polling – both in most national surveys and in many of the polls in five of the six key battleground states where Biden narrowly topped Trump to win the White House in 2020.

But in another key metric – fundraising – Biden currently enjoys the upper hand.

The Biden-Trump rematch offers up stark contrasts when it comes to their style and demeanor, and on where they stand on key issues, such as the economy, health care and entitlements, immigration, abortion, foreign policy, the war in Ukraine, and America’s overseas role going forward.

The 81-year-old Biden, who four years ago made history as the oldest American ever elected president, will continue to face questions about his mental and physical durability, even after last week’s vigorous State of the Union address.

The president also needs to show that he can energize younger voters, progressives, and Black and Latino Americans, who are all key parts of the Democratic base. Biden is also facing primary ballot box protests – materializing in ‘uncommitted’ votes – over his support for Israel in its war in Gaza against Hamas.

The former president is also dealing with plenty of problems. 

Trump, who last year made history as the first president or former president to face criminal charges, now faces four major trials and a total of 91 indictments – including federal cases on his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and on handling classified documents. There’s also a $355 million civil fraud judgment that Trump is appealing. He will have to juggle his appearances in court with his time on the campaign trail. 

The 77-year-old Trump will also need to court the sizable block of Republican voters who backed Nikki Haley in the GOP nomination race. The former U.N. ambassador and former South Carolina governor was Trump’s last remaining rival before ending her White House campaign last week. Haley’s support is shining a spotlight on Trump’s weakness with suburban and highly educated voters.

Complicating matters further – the presidential rematch between Biden and Trump won’t be a two-candidate race.

Democratic-turned-Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is working to place his name on state ballots across the country. Kennedy, a longtime environmental activist and high-profile vaccine skeptic who’s a scion of the famous Kennedy political dynasty, is grabbing double-digits in many general election polls.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein and progressive independent candidate Cornell West are polling in the single digits. And the centrist group No Labels is moving ahead with plans to launch a third party ‘unity’ presidential ticket.

While third party and independent candidates didn’t play much of a role in the 2020 presidential election, they did in the 2016 showdown between Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. And they may again in 2024.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

If you are on the fence between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, consider the current Vice President and the past cases of Breckinridge Long and of RimaAnn Nelson.

The only major ‘known unknown’ in this campaign that is certain to impact some votes is Trump’s choice of a running mate. My long-time opinion is that the candidates for the second spot just don’t matter much.

But, but, but… this year the age and what appears obvious to me and most of America —the increasing infirmity of President Biden—will amp up the focus on Vice President Harris and thus on the contrast between her and Trump’s choice of a running mate. Trump the developer knows ‘contrast’ and its visual power. That future ‘contrast’ has enormous political prowess too. Trump benefits most by selecting a running mate who most sharply contrasts with Harris on intellect and stature.

Harris’s horrific weaknesses as a candidate and often risible public pronouncements as the vice president argue strongly for a selection by Trump of a VP candidate who contrasts sharply with Harris in the general category of ‘seriousness of purpose’ as well as basic intellectual ability.

I’ve long argued for a veteran as Trump’s running mate like Senators Tom Cotton, Joni Ernst or J.D. Vance or former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. There are other names such as Congresswoman Elise Stefanik and former National Security Advisor Ambassador Robert C. O’Brien (the LDS vote in Arizona and Nevada matter), but the basic idea and imperative are obvious: the former president’s first big announcement should crush via comparison the often giggling and usually incoherent Vice President.

Such a choice is also going to telegraph an expanded Trump coalition in the fall that will be built in part with people who understand that the Communist Chinese Party led by General Secretary Xi Jinping and their allied evil regimes in Russia and Iran as well as the second tier ‘threat countries’ in Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela, and Iran’s many proxies such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis pose genuine and lasting danger to the U.S. and our allies.

If it is a close election, it will help Trump considerably to have a veteran running with him, one representative of the next generation of leadership. (Cotton is 46, Ernst 53, Vance 39, and Pompeo 60.) Most important of all, each of these veterans and a handful of others know the world, it’s truly malevolent actors, and are experienced with dealing with the real evils of our enemies abroad. By contrast, Vice President Harris simply evidences no ability to distinguish  between friend and foe, and is especially weak on confronting Iran’s puppets and standing by Israel.

Along with the choice of running mate, Team Trump has an opportunity to message about all of Trump’s future team. While never losing sight that the election is about Trump v. Biden for the large majority of voters, the reality of 2024 is that for independents alarmed by the growing menace of the world’s evil regimes and our domestic disasters of a collapsed southern border, the flood of fentanyl, inflation’s cumulative burden on families and soaring crime in many areas, the 3000 or so political appointees who accompany a president into office should weight on voters’ minds. Which brings me back to Long and Nelson.

Breckinridge Long was a State Department appointee under both Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. Long was also a ‘country club anti-Semite’ who worked overtime to stop Jews fleeing Hitler from entering our country in the late ‘30s and early ‘40s. Long was a character in Herman Wouk’s Winds of War and War and Remembrance (and played by Eddie Albert in the television mini-series based on the books) but his role in keeping the doors shut to the desperate is well-chronicled even by the journalists of his hometown of St Louis.

I thought of Long this week when an underling at the Department of Veteran Affairs issued an edict mandating the removal from all VA facilities of the iconic photo ‘The Kiss’ between a sailor and nurse in Times Square. RimaAnn Nelson, the VA’s assistant secretary of health for operations, sent the Feb. 29 memo calling for the prompt removal of the photo, asserting that it was ‘inconsistent with the VA’s no-tolerance policy toward sexual harassment and assault.’ VA Secretary Denis McDonough quickly reversed the bone-headed decision by Nelson, but what the incident underlines is that the federal government is vast and now deeply ideological across large swaths of it.

Long and Nelson weren’t following their president’s orders. Their presidents may not have ever known about the decisions they were making on the presidents’ behalf. They were exercising their power as they thought fit, exercising their power as they thought fit.

This happens a lot at levels below the president and his cabinet secretaries. Every Administration has thousands of people making tens of thousands of decisions impacting you and your families. The key to a Trump and GOP victory this fall is forcing voters to confront the fact that the Democrats have lurched very far left on any number of issues, though undermining Israel post-10/7 is the one of most concern to voters who know Israel is the equal of any ally the U.S. has.

To combat this permanent government and to ride the fences around the Longs of this era like Nelson and many others, the 3,000 who come along with the president matter almost as much as Biden or Trump. The more voters know that Trump would arrive flanked by serious people across all the agencies that have simply broken down in the last three years, the more likely a voter will chose Trump, despite his or her reservations, especially because they are so concerned by the competence of Team Biden which daily reveals itself to be driven by an extraordinarily radical ideology that comes from the left wing of the Democrat Party.

Friends or Israel especially need to have a ‘come to Jesus’ meeting, as President Biden so appallingly put it, with themselves and their family and friends. It really is a binary choice between Biden and Trump, and that is best illustrated by the teams that will accompany either man being so very different on the issue of supporting the Jewish State. Israelis don’t want innocent Palestinians to die and they and their friends in the United States are sick to death of hearing Biden/Harris suggest otherwise.

With the likely return of Ambassador David Friedman to Israel if Trump wins and the arrival of serious people back at the top of our national security pyramid at Defense, State, the CIA and in the office of the National Security Advisor, Americans (and Israelis) would rest easier about not just the guy in the White House but also about the the jobs that are presently filled by the Long-Nelsons of today.

Trump should win, handily, but he has to help a crucial portion of the electorate understand the fundamental choice confronting them. That starts with the choice of a running mate who towers over Vice President Harris in intellect and experience.

Hugh Hewitt is one of the country’s leading journalists of the center-right. A son of Ohio and a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, Hewitt has been a Professor of Law at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law since 1996 where he teaches Constitutional Law. Hewitt launched his eponymous radio show from Los Angeles in 1990, and it is today syndicated to hundreds of stations and outlets across the country every Monday through Friday morning. Hewitt has frequently appeared on every major national news television network, hosted television shows for PBS and MSNBC, written for every major American paper, has authored a dozen books and moderated a score of Republican candidate debates, most recently the November 2023 Republican presidential debate in Miami and four Republican presidential debates in the 2015-16 cycle. Hewitt focuses his radio show and this column on the Constitution, national security, American politics and the Cleveland Browns and Guardians. Hewitt has interviewed tens of thousands of guests from Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump over his forty years in broadcast, and this column previews the lead story that will drive his radio show today.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Donald Trump holds a slim advantage over President Biden after the two candidates secured their parties’ nominations, a new poll shows. 

The two politicians unofficially secured their respective parties’ nominations on Tuesday after both passed the required threshold of delegates.

The USA Today poll – conducted in partnership with Suffolk University – found that 40% of respondents favored Trump, compared to 38% for Biden.

A key finding of the survey was the number of registered voters who are open to changing their minds. 

Approximately 25% of those surveyed said they would consider switching their vote between now and the election – 14% of likely Biden voters and 15% of likely Trump voters.

Among those polled, 15% of respondents reported disliking both candidates, according to USA Today. Approximately 25% of these individuals leaned toward Trump, 18% toward Biden and 44% of them reported intending to vote for third-party candidates. 

With both Trump and Biden crossing the necessary threshold of delegates to all but guarantee their nominations on Tuesday, the public is expecting a 2020 rematch.

Both candidates have proven exceptionally unpopular with voters, and their presidencies have experienced similar tepidity in approval polls.

It is still unclear if Biden will accept Trump’s challenges for a public debate – the administration has thus far dodged questions on the topic.

The USA Today/Suffolk University poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters. Respondents were contacted via cellphone and landline.

It was conducted from March 8 to 11 and reports a margin of error of +/- 3.1%.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A top House panel is planning an oversight hearing to examine the threat China poses to the U.S. agriculture industry as part of broader efforts to curb foreign influence in the key strategic sector.

The hearing — titled ‘The Danger China Poses to American Agriculture’ — will be hosted by the House Agriculture Committee on March 20 and will cover a range of issues related to China’s involvement in the domestic agriculture sector. Notably, the hearing will include testimony from South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, who has enacted aggressive limitations on foreign ownership of agricultural lands in her state.

‘It’s no secret that China poses significant threats to our way of life, agriculture is no exception,’ Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson, R-Pa., said in a written statement to Fox News Digital.

‘We’ve seen China steal our intellectual property, hack our cyber infrastructure, and buy up American farmland,’ Thompson continued. ‘We will look to every available legislative vehicle, including the farm bill, to stop China in its tracks and strengthen our food and national security.’

According to the committee, the hearing will focus on various ways Chinese entities seek to influence the agricultural industry. In addition to China’s growing ownership of productive lands in the U.S., it will examine the intellectual property theft of patented seeds and how cyberattacks harm the industry.

Noem will testify during the hearing’s first panel alongside other officials, including Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. A second expert panel will include testimony from Kip Tom, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Agencies for Food and Agriculture.

Last week, Noem signed legislation prohibiting six foreign governments — China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela — and associated entities from owning agricultural land in South Dakota. Her office explained at the time that the bill was one of her ‘top priorities.’

‘China is aggressively purchasing land and purchasing property close to our strategic national areas that will house our greatest weapons, and we are going to ensure that, in South Dakota, that never happens,’ Noem remarked at a bill signing event on March 4.

The House Agriculture Committee’s hearing comes shortly after the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a sprawling report earlier this year showing that the Department of Agriculture (USDA) has failed to consistently share timely data on foreign investments in U.S. agricultural land as required under the 1978 Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act.

The USDA’s most recent data suggests that, as of 2021, foreign investment in U.S. agricultural land grew to approximately 40 million acres. Additionally, Chinese agricultural investment in the U.S. increased tenfold between 2009 and 2016 alone. However, data on Chinese ownership since 2016 has yet to be released.

Additionally, in recent months, certain Chinese projects have received local and federal scrutiny. For example, officials in Grand Forks, North Dakota, rejected a Chinese company’s proposed corn mill over concerns about its proximity to a U.S. Air Force base in February 2023, and locals have pushed back against Chinese green energy firm Gotion High-Tech’s purchase of 270 acres of land in Michigan months later.

The Government Accountability Office conducted its review after Thompson and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., led a letter alongside nearly 130 fellow House Republicans requesting such a probe in October 2022.

‘Growing foreign ownership of U.S. farmland, particularly by China, poses a direct threat to our food security and national security,’ Thompson and Comer said in a joint statement in January.

The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The White House is preparing for the possibility that Congress will permanently pause funding for the United Nations relief agency for Palestinians, known as UNRWA. 

Israel accused 12 employees of UNRWA, or the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, in January of participating in the deadly Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel, prompting the United States and more than a dozen other countries to temporarily suspend its funding for the agency. 

The U.S. government said it wants to see the results of the United Nations’ investigation into UNRWA employees allegedly taking part in the assault by Hamas terrorists that killed more than a thousand people and saw about 250 others taken hostage into Gaza before any decisions can be made on resuming contributions. 

‘The supplemental request that passed the Senate contained a prohibition on funding for UNRWA,’ State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at Tuesday’s daily briefing. ‘We obviously have a pause in place for funding for UNRWA right now. We have to plan for the fact that Congress may make that pause permanent. I don’t know if that’s going to happen, and we haven’t made any determinations with respect to what the administration will do because we’re waiting on the U.N. investigation. But just as part of prudent planning, we have to plan for all possible alternatives, so we have been exploring dealing with other humanitarian agencies that could deliver humanitarian assistance.’ 

‘We have to plan to be prudent to make sure there is no suspension of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people because we know that they desperately need it, and we are committed to delivering it,’ Miller added. 

If the U.S. lifts its pause, just $300,000 in funding would remain allocated for UNRWA, and any additional funding for the relief agency would need to be approved by Congress. As UNRWA’s largest donor, the U.S. usually contributes between $300-$400 million annually, Reuters reported. UNRWA employs more than 13,000 people in Gaza. 

‘Right now UNRWA plays a critical role in delivering humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians that no other agency is positioned to assume,’ Miller said Tuesday. ‘I don’t think it’s news that Israel has had issues with UNRWA. Those pre-date Oct. 7. They go back many, many years… But it doesn’t change our position with UNRWA and the important work they continue to do to deliver humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians who desperately need it.’ 

During the pause, the Biden administration has been exploring alternative organizations, such as UNICEF and the World Food Program (WFP), to continue giving aid. 

Last month, the Senate passed a controversial $95 billion national security supplemental package to assist Ukraine, Israel and the Indo-Pacific. It contains a provision that would block funding from going to UNRWA. House Republican leadership have so far resisted pressure to bring the package to a floor vote. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS