Archive

2023

Browsing

And then there were eight.

After a tightly contested wild-card weekend, the NFL postseason has reached the divisional round, where berths in championship weekend are at stake.

While the top four seeds in the AFC remain intact, two of the NFC’s wild-card teams prevailed during the first weekend with the New York Giants defeating the Minnesota Vikings, champions of the NFC North, and the Dallas Cowboys beating the NFC South-champion Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

The top seeds in both conferences take the field for the first time in these playoffs with the Kansas City Chiefs hosting the upstart Jacksonville Jaguars and the Philadelphia Eagles taking on the aforementioned Giants.

Follow every game: Latest NFL Scores and Schedules

Here’s a look at how the playoff bracket shapes up heading into the weekend.

Super Bowl 57 will be played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona on Sunday, Feb. 12 at 6:30 p.m. ET.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A California lawmaker introduced a bill Thursday that would require schools that play major college sports to pay some athletes as much as $25,000 annually, along with covering the cost of six-year guaranteed athletic scholarships and post-college medical expenses.

The College Athlete Protection Act is sponsored by Assemblymember Chris Holden, who is a former San Diego State basketball player, and is the type of state-level legislation that the NCAA is looking to federal lawmakers to preempt.

California was the first state to pass a law that gave college athletes the right to be compensated for name, image and likeness back in 2019. That triggered similar action by state legislatures around the country. 

The NCAA lifted its ban on athletes cashing in on their fame with sponsorship and endorsement deals, but more than two dozen state-level NIL laws have made it impossible for the association to create detailed and uniform rules of its own.

Just last week at the NCAA convention, college sports leaders reiterated the need for Congress’ help in regulating NIL compensation and protecting the association from state laws that undercut its ability to govern college sports.

“We need to solidify that as it relates to college sports, federal law preempts state law,” Baylor President Linda Livingstone, the chairwoman of the NCAA’s Board of Governors, said last week. “In areas such as NIL, we already see that state legislators will take action that they believe will give the universities in their states a competitive edge over their neighbors.”

The bill introduced by Holden, a Democrat whose district includes Pasadena, calls for Division I schools in California to share 50% of revenue with athletes who are considered to be undervalued because the amount of their athletic scholarships doesn’t match their market value. That would mostly be aimed at athletes competing in the revenue-generating sports such as football and basketball, but not exclusively.

Money paid toward scholarships would be included in the 50% that goes toward the players. The rest would go into a fund that would pay out yearly. Individual payments would be determined based on what schools bring in and could not exceed $25,000 per year for any one athlete.

Any excess revenue from the athletes’ share would go into a degree completion fund that athletes would be eligible to draw from after they have graduated within six years.

The bill also calls for schools to provide coverage of sports-related medical expenses, establish and enforce safety standards and transparency in recruiting, preserve all sports programs – not just those that produce revenue – and Title IX compliance.

The bill is reminiscent of one introduced in 2020 at the federal level by four Democratic senators, including Cory Booker of New Jersey, called the College Athlete Bill of Rights.

That bill, similar to numerous others related to college sports and more specifically NIL, introduced in Congress went nowhere.

Holden introduced the College Athlete Civil Rights Act of 2019 that was eventually signed into state law. That required schools to document and inform athletes of their rights and prohibited retaliation against athletes who reported violations or abuse.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS — In response to a tweet Wednesday morning about a proposed Minnesota state bill that would require menstrual products in boys’ school bathrooms, Tony Dungy scoffed via Twitter.

‘That’s nothing,’ the former Indianapolis Colts coach tweeted at 9:38 a.m. Wednesday. ‘Some school districts are putting litter boxes in the school bathrooms for students who identify as cats. Very important to address every student’s needs.’

By 7:30 p.m. Wednesday, Dungy had deleted his cat litter tweet, which was in response to a Daily Wire video showing Minnesota State Rep. Sandra Feist advocating for menstrual items in boys’ school bathrooms.

‘We ensure that students have toilet paper, paper towels, soap and Band-Aids, and we should ensure that students have period products as well,” Feist told the House Education Policy Committee last week in the video. ‘Not all students who menstruate are female.’

Follow every game: Latest NFL Scores and Schedules

Dungy’s response created some outrage as the cat litter ‘myth’ was debunked months ago after being spread by politically conservative types who oppose LGBTQ+ rights and gender nonconformity.

IndyStar reached out to Dungy, but did not immediately receive a response.

Dungy, a Pro Football Hall of Famer and Super Bowl champion who now is a television analyst, is known for his Christian faith and often conservative views, especially on social values. His latest tweet received nearly 140,000 views and a lot of backlash.

‘Tony Dungy is out here spreading unhinged conspiracy theories,’ was the headline to the Deadspin article on Dungy’s tweet.

‘Dungy has also been getting roasted, and rightly so, by Cyd Zeigler over at OutSports for his ongoing opposition to same-sex marriage,’ Deadspin wrote after Wednesday’s tweet was deleted. ‘In the past, Dungy once called openly gay SEC defensive player of the year Michael Sam ‘a distraction,’ (then tried to walk it back) and has publicly aligned himself with anti-gay individuals and organizations.’

Dungy, an advocate for adoption and foster care and national spokesman for All Pro Dad, a fatherhood program helping men lead their families, told IndyStar in 2018 that ‘having both a mother and father in the picture is the best way for children to be raised.

‘That’s the way God set up the plan for families,’ Dungy said.

Follow IndyStar sports reporter Dana Benbow on Twitter: @DanaBenbow. Reach her via email: dbenbow@indystar.com.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Greg Roman is no longer the Baltimore Ravens offensive coordinator after he and the team parted ways on Thursday.

“Greg has led the development and success of a record-setting offense in Baltimore for several seasons,” coach John Harbaugh said in a statement. “We are grateful for Greg’s great work and abilities, and we wish him and his wonderful family the utmost happiness going forward.”

Roman also released a statement via his agency that he is stepping away to pursue other opportunities. 

‘After visiting with Coach Harbaugh and after huddling with my family, I have decided that now is the right time to move on from the Ravens so that I can explore new challenges and opportunities,’ Roman said in a statement through Athletes First.

Follow every game: Latest NFL Scores and Schedules

Roman had been Baltimore’s offensive coordinator since 2019 and helped guide one of the most successful offenses in the NFL.

Under Roman, the Ravens routinely had one of the NFL’s top rushing offenses. In 2019, they rushed for an NFL record 3,296 rushing yards. Quarterback Lamar Jackson was awarded NFL MVP and Roman was named AP Assistant Coach of the Year. From 2020-2021, Baltimore gained at least 100 rushing yards in 43 consecutive games, tying an NFL record.

This season, though, the Ravens offense was hampered by injuries. Wide receiver Rashod Bateman sustained a season-ending foot injury, running back J.K. Dobbins appeared in only eight games due to a knee injury and Jackson missed the latter part of the season because of a knee injury.

Despite the injuries, the Ravens (10-7) earned a wild-card berth in this year’s playoffs but were knocked out in the first found by the Cincinnati Bengals.  

In Roman’s final season in Baltimore as offensive coordinator, the Ravens finished with the NFL’s 16th ranked offense and second ranked rushing attack. But Baltimore had the league’s 28th ranked passing offense.

The Ravens’ next offensive coordinator will be tasked with upgrading the team’s passing attack while also taking full advantage of Jackson’s unique dual-threat skillset. 

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on Twitter @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

For the 18th consecutive season, the NFL will not have a repeat Super Bowl champion. In fact, since the New England Patriots won back-to-back titles following the 2003 and 2004 seasons, only three teams have won multiple times. The Pats alternated victories in Super Bowls 49, 51 and 53; the Pittsburgh Steelers prevailed in Super Bowl 40 and 43; and the New York Giants came out on top in Super Bowls 42 and 46.

Who’ll be next to wear the crown? Let’s chart the path 14 fortunate franchises will need to navigate to end up playing for a ring in Super Bowl 57 at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on Feb. 12, 2023.

How many teams make the NFL playoffs?

A total of 14 teams qualify for the postseason – the four division winners, plus three wild card teams in each conference.

Follow every game: Latest NFL Scores and Schedules

NFL playoffs format 

The wild card matchups are: No. 7 seed at No. 2 seed, No. 6 at No. 3, No. 5 at No. 4.

The teams with the best overall records in each conference (No. 1 seeds) receive a bye in the wild card round and will host the lowest remaining seed in the divisional round.

The winners within each respective conference will face each other in the conference championships with those winners battling in the Super Bowl.

What is the NFL playoff schedule?

The playoffs for the 2022 NFL regular season kick off Jan. 14-16, 2023, with three days of wild-card games on Saturday, Sunday and Monday. The divisional round takes place the following weekend, followed by the conference championship games. The Super Bowl will be played two weeks after the conference title games.

WILD CARD ROUND

Saturday, Jan. 14

San Francisco 49ers 41, Seattle Seahawks 23Jacksonville Jaguars 31, Los Angeles Chargers 30

Sunday, Jan. 15

Buffalo Bills 34, Miami Dolphins 31New York Giants 31, Minnesota Vikings 24Cincinnati Bengals 24, Baltimore Ravens 17

Monday, Jan. 16

Dallas Cowboys 31, Tampa Bay Buccaneers 14

DIVISIONAL PLAYOFFS

Saturday, Jan. 21

Jacksonville Jaguars at Kansas City Chiefs, 4:30 p.m. ET (NBC)New York Giants at Philadelphia Eagles, 8:15 p.m. ET (FOX)

Sunday, Jan. 22

 Cincinnati Bengals at Buffalo Bills, 3 p.m. ET (CBS) Dallas Cowboys at San Francisco 49ers, 6:30 p.m. ET (FOX)

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP 

Sunday, Jan. 29

NFC, 3:00 p.m. ET (FOX)AFC, 6:30 p.m. ET (CBS)

SUPER BOWL 57

Sunday, Feb. 12

AFC champion vs. NFC champion, 6:30 p.m. ET (FOX)

When is Super Bowl 57?

Super Bowl LVII will be played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona on Sunday, Feb. 12 at 6:30 p.m. ET.

The Phoenix area has hosted a Super Bowl three times before – Super Bowl 30 (Jan. 28, 1996, at Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe) and twice at the venue in Glendale formerly known as University of Phoenix Stadium, Super Bowl 42 (Feb. 3, 2008) and 49 (Feb. 1, 2015).

The last time the game was played in Glendale, the Patriots defeated the Seattle Seahawks, 28-24, in a game best remembered for Malcolm Butler’s game-saving interception in the final seconds (… and Katy Perry’s halftime performance with the infamous ‘Left Shark.’)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Former President Donald Trump blasted the Biden administration’s ‘two-tiered justice system’ claiming that his successor was getting the ‘white glove treatment’ after classified documents were found in his home.

‘There are two standards of justice in our country: One for people like you and me, and one for the corrupt political class of which there are many,’ Trump said in a video posted on Donald Trump Jr.’s Twitter.

In Trump’s first video appearance since Biden’s attorneys ‘unexpectedly’ discovered the first batch of classified documents at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C., the former president compared the two special counsel investigations.

‘At the very same moment when my ultra secure Mar-a-Lago home was raided by the FBI, Joe Biden was harboring classified documents in his China-funded Penn Center in his unsecured garage … right on the floor, piles of paper.’ Trump started in a two-minute video. ‘Yet while I’m being persecuted by a Trump-hating Special Counsel…Joe Biden, in the meantime, is being given white glove treatment by an establishment hack who tried to cover up the Russia hoax.’

On Jan. 12, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Biden’s handling of classified documents months after officials discovered the classified documents at the Penn Center on Nov. 22. Garland tapped Robert Hur, a former U.S. attorney, to handle the investigation. On Thursday, officials announced that they found a second small batch of documents with classified markings  in a storage space in Biden’s garage in Wilmington, Delaware, with one document being located in Biden’s personal library in his home.

Last week, Biden attempted to reassure the public by saying the stolen classified documents were in a locked garage next to his Corvette.

Video

Just last year, the FBI raided Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida recovering some 300 classified documents which ensued calls from House Republicans and allies of the former President to defend the FBI after allegations that the Biden administration had ‘weaponized’ the Justice Department. 

Trump continued, saying that since Biden was serving as former President Barack Obama’s Vice President, and not president, he did not have had the power to declassify files like he did.

‘It’s a travesty.’ the former president continued. ‘Biden lied to the American people and weaponized the Justice Department, or what I like to say-the Injustice Department, to go after me for the very crime he actually committed. And he wasn’t president, so he didn’t have the right to declassify as I did.’

On Thursday morning, the former president had teased a ‘big political speech’ he planned to deliver, promising supporters ‘wild and exciting’ rallies as he rolls out his 2024 presidential campaign.

‘Making a big political speech today at TRUMP DORAL, in Miami,’ Trump said in a post on his social media platform Truth Social on Thursday morning.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said Thursday that it has released nearly 3,000 detained immigrants in response to a data leak last year that resulted in personal information for thousands of immigrants in detention being posted online.

The agency was hit by an initial data leak on Nov. 28, which led to the information — including names, locations and other personally identifiable information — of 6,200 immigrants being published online. Of those, 5,100 were in custody while another 1,000 had been removed or released already.

ICE said the incident came while the agency was performing routine website updates and was up for approximately five hours before it was eventually removed. The document in question contained information related to those in ICE custody on Nov. 19, meaning if they weren’t in custody on that date, they were not affected.

A separate December incident involved the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accidentally revealing to Cuba that some immigrants on deportation flights had been affected by the data leak in November, thus revealing that they had applied for protection in the U.S. That incident affected just over 100 Cubans.

As the agency seeks to deal with the aftermath of the leak, which advocates have noted could put immigrants fleeing persecution or harm in danger, a spokesperson confirmed that ICE has now released 2,900 ‘impacted noncitizens’ from custody and is continuing to review the cases of an additional 2,200.

‘U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) quickly implemented a robust response to the unintentional disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) of noncitizens that occurred in November and December 2022, providing timely notice of the disclosure to the noncitizens and their representatives (as applicable) and taking significant steps to prevent potential harm to the affected noncitizens,’ an ICE spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital. The releases were first reported by the L.A. Times.

The agency reiterated that it is not deporting any of those impacted by the breach without allowing them to apply for ‘additional relief from removal’ while also giving them information about the breach ‘to make informed decisions regarding their immigration status.’

ICE said all those released have been served with Notices to Appear in immigration court so they can apply for protection from removal due to the breach. If an illegal immigrant with an order of removal had an order of removal in place, ICE said it wouldn’t object to oppose a motion to apply for protection. 

ICE has also said it is taking additional efforts to ‘clawback’ information from entities or individuals that may have downloaded or accessed the document — requesting they destroy or refrain from using the document.

The incident, though accidental, sparked outrage from immigrant rights groups and some Democrats who lambasted the agency for the ‘unacceptable’ leak they said potentially put asylum seekers at risk of danger.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A local jurisdiction in northern Virginia moved closer to rejecting a clean energy developer’s plan to construct a massive 149-megawatt solar facility on a sprawling plot of farmland for the third time in three years.

The Culpeper County, Virginia, planning commission, a nine-member panel that reviews the county’s zoning and development proposals, voted unanimously during a public hearing last week to recommend the facility’s proposal be denied by the board of supervisors. During the meeting, both residents and members of the commission expressed concern about the size of the project and its agricultural and environmental impacts. 

The Maroon Solar project was first proposed by North Carolina-based energy developer Strata Clean Energy in 2020. The company withdrew its original application following intense pushback from locals and submitted a modified proposal in 2021. After that was turned down by the county, Strata returned with its third proposal last year.

‘We advocate for solar on covered parking lots along highways, on marginal brownfields or on industrial zone land,’ Susan Ralston, the founder of the Virginia-based group Citizens for Responsible Solar, told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘But what we don’t want to see is large swaths of farmland, agricultural land and timberland being taken out of [agricultural] use and used for solar.’

Ralston, who spoke at the hearing last week, founded Citizens for Responsible Solar in 2019 to help equip local solar opposition efforts with resources and information. The group has been active supporting grassroots movements against the development of solar facilities, including the Maroon Solar project and others in northern Virginia, on rural property.

Ralston also noted that Strata’s most recent proposal involves a $4 million siting deal.

‘It’s like a cash incentive, it’s like a bribe. You know, ‘If you approve our project, then we’re going to give you $4 million in cash once it gets approved,” Ralston said. ‘They’re going to throw as many incentives at our board to disregard the policy and disregard what residents want. There’s just a lot of money at stake.’

During the hearing Jan. 11, several local residents voiced concern with the project, echoing Ralston’s concerns.  

Among the main objections to the project was the potential environmental impact of water runoff that could disturb agricultural production in the area.

‘I’m from a farm family and maybe bring some sort of perspective to flooding,’ William Foshay, a local farmer, told the commission during the Jan. 11 hearing. ‘It’s a wet area with highly productive soils. In an average wet year, we get corn into the ground in the middle of May. If we are dealing with an enormous amount of impervious [solar] panel coverage and vast amount of tree clearing, the subsoil is going to remain impervious — runoffs are going to be substantial.

‘In just an average wet year, it means that the soils — we won’t get into them until June,’ he added. ‘Furthermore, for the truly bad years, you’re going to see enormous sediment runoff. You’re going to see vast amounts of erosion that permanently jeopardizes productive agricultural land.’

Josiah Wilkes, a young resident who was accompanied by his father, told the panel the project was about ‘the money a few people would make’ from it.

‘I think solar panels would be really good on top of office buildings and hospitals and even on top of people’s houses,’ Wilkes said. ‘Can we keep our farmland for the cows, the crops and the woods? The farmers need to grow the food and the lumber that we all need. We don’t have to be like other counties in Virginia that want money from data centers and solar fields.’

Wilkes’ father Joshua added that the proposal would benefit ‘a few select landowners who will pocket money’ while having the potential to cause ‘disastrous environmental issues and the wasting of land.’

Video

Sarah Parmelee, a local landowner and a member of the Piedmont Environmental Council, wrote to the commission earlier this month, arguing the proposal would ‘destroy nearly a thousand acres of timberland.’

In addition to the environmental impacts, the planning commission voted against the proposal because it violated the county’s solar development policy approved in October 2019. The policy limits solar projects to 300 acres and requires certain limitations to disturbances caused by construction of such facilities.

The project, however, would stretch across 671 acres of farmland, and construction would impact surrounding property owners, the commission concluded. 

‘The sheer size and scale of this project will undoubtedly in many ways change the character of the area and should be considered,’ staff for the planning commission wrote in a report Dec. 28. ‘Converting several hundred acres of productive, commercial forestland to solar panels will change the character of the immediate area.

‘Staff cannot recommend support of this project at this time as proposed as it does not conform closely enough to the county’s most current Utility Scale Solar policy.’

Strata Clean Energy did not respond to a request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

EXCLUSIVE: The head of Border Patrol pushed back against the Biden administration’s handling of a false ‘whipping’ controversy aimed at his agents in 2021, emails from the days after the incident seen by Fox News show — with the chief reprimanding officials for failing to highlight migrant assaults on agents, as well as the lives his agents were saving.

Emails obtained by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project via FOIA, and provided to Fox News, shed new light on the Sept. 2021 Haitian migrant crisis in Del Rio, and a related incident in which Border Patrol agents on horseback encountered migrants coming across the river. Photographs from the incident were misinterpreted by commentators, reporters and some Democrats as showing the agents whipping migrants. In fact, the agents were using reins to control their horses, were not carrying whips and did not whip anyone. 

But the controversy went viral on social media and made national news, leading to a scrambled response from the Biden administration. The emails show how on the day after the incident, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials were immediately under pressure for a response. 

‘Hi all. We need to get the more [sic] details on this as soon as possible,’ one Sept. 20 2021 email from a redacted official said. ‘Just got a call from White House [Office of Inter-Governmental Affairs]/Political — the footage is getting everywhere.’

‘DHS wants to be able to update the talking points for media inquiries to say an investigation is underway. Please let me know if/when I can confirm that,’ another says minutes later.

Eventually, a statement was put out in which DHS says that the CBP Office of Professional Responsibility was investigating the matter and in which the footage was described as ‘extremely troubling’ with a promise that an investigation will ‘define the appropriate disciplinary actions to take.’

The email chain also includes redacted talking points for officials to use. But, in response to the back-and-forth, Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz expressed his frustration at the failure to highlight the good work his agents were doing or the violence and abuse they faced at the hands of migrants.

‘This horse business is awfully negative but there are great efforts occurring and we aren’t highlighting any of them,’ he said in a furious email. ‘Everyday we are providing lifesaving efforts to migrants under the bridge.’

‘Our agents are being assaulted and we aren’t saying a word,’ Ortiz said.

The Chief then also noted incidents in which Haitian migrants on removal transportation had hijacked buses and attempted to escape — something he said had not been commented on by the agency – as well as the long hours they were putting in, often in intense heat and under difficult conditions.

‘The bus contractors and pilots are dealing with Haitians escaping or trying to overrun drivers and we stay quiet. Agents and pro staff are working 14 hour days in difficult conditions, nothing said,’ he said. ‘We have to change the narrative or these stories will be only story.’

Ortiz’s words do not appear to have been heeded. While Mayorkas had given an initial defense of the agents alongside Ortiz that day, noting the distinction between the use of reins and any use of whips, he later walked that back — saying it was before he saw the footage.

In the emails, Mayorkas is told in an email from an unnamed official that DHS ‘will need to clarify what reins looks like vs a horse whip, and clarify use of force.’

By the end of the week, Mayorkas was deferring to the OPR’s investigation, while also expressing his horror at the images.

‘Our nation saw horrifying images that do not reflect who we are. We know that those images painfully conjured up the worst elements of our nation’s ongoing battle against systemic racism,’ Mayorkas said at a press conference.

President Biden meanwhile, came out swinging at the agents directly, angrily (and falsely) accusing them of assaulting migrants — and promising that there would be consequences.

‘To see people treated like they did, horses barely running over, people being strapped — it’s outrageous,’ Biden told reporters, making a whipping motion with his hand. ‘I promise you, those people will pay. There will be an investigation underway now, and there will be consequences. There will be consequences.’

In the emails obtained by Fox, an official flags Biden’s remarks to Ortiz, who responds: ‘The tremendous work that took place over the last 10 days is what I’m gonna choose to focus on.’ 

Acting CBP Commissioner Troy Miller responds simply: ‘Agree.’

Months later, in March 2022, an official appeared to scold Ortiz’s comments he made in a local radio interview in which Ortiz said he hoped the investigation would be wrapped up ‘relatively quickly.’

‘And we’re going to find out, you know, really, what the truth was behind that incident, and I’m confident that almost all of those [agents] will be exonerated. And what we’ll find is it was probably, you know, mischaracterized,’ he said.

The email flags the remarks and then reminds the recipients of ‘our approved messaging on this’ which emphasizes sharing the results of the investigation when it is complete ‘consistent with the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and individuals’ privacy.’

The subsequent investigation, which did not reveal its findings until the summer of 2022, found ‘no evidence’ that agents struck migrants and found that they were not carrying whips, but it still faulted agents on more minor infractions. An agent was accused of using ‘denigrating and offensive’ language against migrants regarding national origin and gender, and of having maneuvered a horse around a child in an ‘unsafe manner’ – while agents were said to have used ‘unnecessary use of force’ to drive the migrants back.

In a statement, former acting CBP Commissioner Mark Morgan and former acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Thomas Homan said that the emails ‘paint a picture of the Biden administration’s continued incompetence and politicizing of border security.’

‘They offer more proof that Secretary Mayorkas was made aware the ‘whipping’ narrative was false, days before he continued to insinuate otherwise from the White House podium,’ they say. ‘They show the White House pressuring CBP for answers in what quickly became a politicized investigation.’

The former officials also claimed that DHS leadership ‘do not care’ about how the administration’s policies impact the morale and well-being of the Border Patrol. 

‘Mayorkas, in particular, as one of the chief architects and consistent defenders of this radical agenda, bears unique responsibility for the cratering of morale across the force. Even his own agents have lost confidence in his ‘leadership,’’ they say.

Brandon Judd, the head of the National Border Patrol Council, accused the administration of vilifying law enforcement in order to appease its base.

‘President Biden, Vice President Harris and Secretary Mayorkas knew they could use the court of public opinion to make their base supporters happy by prematurely convicting the overworked and overwhelmed Horse Patrol agents with their political rhetoric,’ he said. 

‘They knew the evidence would ultimately come to light to show the agents not only did nothing wrong but actually carried out their duties lawfully and in accordance to orders from an Executive Branch Department they control. They obviously didn’t care,’ he said. They knew by the time all evidence came to light, the damage would be done and the political points they desperately wanted would be scored.

 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Biden said Thursday he has ‘no regrets’ about his handling of classified documents that were discovered at his home and former Washington, D.C. office. 

The president made the remarks while touring California to assess the damage from a series of recent winter storms that pummeled the state. 

At the conclusion of his speech, a reporter shouted a question about the classified documents. 

‘You know what, quite frankly, bugs me is that we have a serious problem here we’re talking about. We’re talking about what’s going on,’ Biden said, referring to the damage. ‘And the American people don’t’ quite understand why you don’t ask me questions about that.’ 

The president then allowed the question to proceed. The reporter asked Biden whether he had any regrets about not revealing the existence of those documents when they were discovered – less than a week before the November midterms.

‘We found a handful of documents were filed in the wrong place,’ Biden said. ‘We immediately turned them over to the Archives and the Justice Department. We’re fully cooperating and looking forward to getting this resolved quickly.’ 

He added: ‘I think you’re going to find there’s nothing there. I have no regrets. I’m following what the lawyers have told me they want me to do. It’s exactly what we’re doing. There’s no there there.’ 

The White House said Biden attorneys discovered classified documents and official records on four separate occasions — on Nov. 2 at the offices of the Penn Biden Center in Washington, on Dec. 20 in the garage of the president’s Wilmington, Delaware, home, and on Nov. 11 and 12 in the president’s home library.

Biden previously lambasted his predecessor over his possession of such sensitive records. 

‘When you saw the photograph of the top secret documents laid out on the floor at Mar-a-Lago, what did you think to yourself looking at that image?’ CBS’ Scott Pelley asked. 

‘How that could possibly happen, how one anyone could be that irresponsible,’ Biden responded. ‘And I thought what data was in there that may compromise sources and methods. By that, I mean, names of people helped or et cetera.’ 

‘And it’s just totally irresponsible,’ Biden added.

Attorney General Merrick Garland last week appointed Robert Hur, a former Maryland U.S. attorney, to serve as special counsel to oversee the Justice Department’s inquiry into the documents.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for clarification on Biden’s Thursday remarks. 

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS