Archive

2023

Browsing

Pressure is continuing to build on President Biden and his administration as some Senate Democrats are now saying they support a full investigation into his mishandling of the classified documents found at his home and former office disclosed earlier this month.

‘The reports about President Biden’s mishandling of classified documents are extremely irresponsible and disturbing. These allegations should be investigated fully,’ Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., told Fox News Digital on Friday.

Fox also spoke with Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., who echoed Manchin’s concern.

‘This news raises serious questions and the appointment of an unbiased special prosecutor to investigate the matter is the right step,’ Kaine said.

Last week, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel, former U.S. attorney Robert Hur, to investigate the now-president’s mishandling of documents from his time as vice president.

Manchin and Kaine joined a noticeably small list of Democrats who have spoken out about the Biden document scandal, while most, especially those up for re-election in 2024, have been reluctant to address the situation.

Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., who announced earlier this month that she would be seeking Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s, D-Calif., Senate seat even though Feinstein has yet to announce her retirement, told Fox after a Tuesday town hall event that lawmakers ‘definitely’ wanted ‘to get answers from the White House’ concerning the documents.

‘Classified documents belong in classified settings, and I think you heard me say oversight is not a partisan thing. Good oversight means you’re willing to hold any rule breaker to account,’ she added. ‘We should be asking for answers in a respectful way, and we should be expecting to get honest ones.’

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., who announced she would not be running for re-election next year, acknowledged it was a bad look for Biden to be caught having classified information after condemning former President Donald Trump for a similar situation.

‘Well, it’s certainly embarrassing. Right?’ Stabenow said during a Sunday interview on NBC. ‘I mean, it’s embarrassing that you would find a small number of documents, certainly not on purpose. They don’t think it’s the right thing and they’ve been moving to correct it, working with the Department of Justice, working with everyone involved, with the [National] Archives, and so from my perspective, you know, it’s one of those moments that obviously they wish hadn’t happened.’

Fox News Digital reached out to every Senate Democrat who has yet to make a statement on the Biden documents and whose term ends in 2024, but all except Manchin and Kaine didn’t respond.

Those that didn’t respond include Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn.; Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii; Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.; Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.; Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.; Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev.; Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J.; Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M.; Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio; Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa.; Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.; Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.; Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del.; and Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis.

Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., told Politico on Jan. 10, prior to the appointment of a special counsel, that he felt the situation was ‘being handled properly,’ but did not respond to Fox’s request for comment.

Fox also received no response from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Angus King, I-Maine.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., a former Democrat facing what could be a tough re-election battle should she decide to seek another term, declined to comment.

‘As is her long-standing practice, Kyrsten doesn’t comment on ongoing investigations,’ her office said in a statement to Fox News Digital. She took the same approach toward the investigation surrounding the mishandling of documents by Trump.

On Thursday, the White House refused to say whether it would cooperate with inquiries from the House Oversight Committee concerning the documents, while Biden later said he had ‘no regrets’ about his handling of the classified documents.

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer and Timothy H.J. Nerozzi contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The FBI is investigating allegations that cyber criminals stole nearly $700,000 from Kansas Republican Senator Jerry Moran’s campaign, according to a letter the campaign sent to the Federal Elections Committee.

On Dec. 8, 2022, Moran campaign treasurer Timothy Gottschalk notified the FEC of ‘fraudulent activity by a third-party cyber-criminal’ that was included in the campaign’s finance reporting, according to a Form 99 filing. 

Moran’s campaign informed the FEC that on Nov. 14, their office was contacted by Astra Bank and notified of potentially fraudulent activity concerning two wire transfers to SRCP Media Inc. that totaled $690,000. 

The first wire transfer was sent on Oct. 25, for $345,000 and the second wire was sent on Nov. 9, for $345,000. 

The letter states that Moran’s campaign reported the alleged theft to the Republic County Kansas Sheriff’s Office on Nov. 16. From there the case was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and remains under investigation.

On Nov. 23, Moran’s campaign was notified by Astra Bank that $168,184.03 of the Nov. 9 wire transfer was recovered from Wells Fargo Bank, according to the letter. 

The FEC filing was first reported by Raw Story, a left-wing progressive news website. 

Fox News has reached out to Moran’s office for comment. 

‘Cyber criminals targeted the accounting firm employed by Moran For Kansas and money was wired to fraudulent bank accounts,’ a Moran campaign spokesman told the Kansas City Star. ‘As soon as a discrepancy was realized, it was reported to law enforcement.’

‘We are currently pursuing all avenues available to recover the money and there is an ongoing investigation with the FBI,’ the spokesman added. 

Moran handedly won reelection to a third term in the Senate in November, defeating Democrat Mark Holland 60.1% to 36.9%. Moran’s campaign spent more than $4.6 million in the 2022 election cycle, according to FEC filings. 

READ THE FEC FILING. APP USERS: CLICK HERE:

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Thousands of pro-life Americans rallied in Washington, D.C., Friday for the 50th annual March for Life, where they demanded government enforcement of abortion bans and support for pregnant women in need.

Attendees like Anne and Randy McDonald from Dallas, Texas, celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade in the first march since the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization last year that gave states the authority to regulate abortion.

The McDonalds attended the march with their newborn child, Virginia Grace, and Randy’s mother Arcy. Anne McDonald said that while Texas only allows abortions through the first six weeks of pregnancy, she was told while 15 weeks pregnant at a hospital last year that she should get a fetal diagnosis to ‘examine her options’ if there are any complications with the baby.

‘I was pretty shocked, honestly,’ she told Fox News Digital. ‘I was being counseled on whether you want to get an abortion instead or whether you want to get help or counseling. In Dallas, they are not enforcing the ban. The executive branch needs to step up and actually enforce the law. I’d like to see police do what they’re supposed to do under the law instead of just ignoring it.’

It was revealed later that their child, Virginia Grace, has Down syndrome.

‘A child born with genetic orders is a blessing, and they bring joy,’ Arcy told Fox News Digital. ‘And she has brought joy to our family from the beginning. She is my seventh grandchild, and she is just so loved.’

Another core focus from attendees of the march was to increase support for pregnant women in need as they deliver and care for their children. Liberty Mildner runs the adopt-a-mom program for Let Them Live, which provides a sponsor for pregnant women in need of financial support.

‘Every mom’s situation is different,’ Mildner told Fox News Digital at the rally. ‘We need to love them with our resources, our money, but also with our whole lives. Pregnancies are hard and being a mother is hard. The goal is to completely change the culture around motherhood and to see how beautiful it is.’

Since the Supreme Court’s decision, 13 states have passed bans on abortion with only limited exceptions. One state allows abortions in the first six weeks, and four others allow them from 15 to 18 weeks. But marchers said the overturning of Roe is only the beginning for the pro-life movement, which aims to put an end to abortion nationwide.

Gina Tomes is the family life director for Bethlehem Home, which gives mothers in need overnight shelter, food and day-to-day care before and after they deliver their children. Tomes said elected pro-life leaders must work to provide government resources for groups who work to assist mothers in need.

‘Through the intervention in a woman’s life by just surrounding her with the proper care and love and services — it changes their life,’ Tomes told Fox News Digital. ‘Every little bit helps in strategic planning for their future and foundation. We have seen miracles happen on a daily basis. We work with women that overcome addiction, we end homelessness, we are poverty fighters. By choosing life, that is all possible.’

Jessica Bernet, 21, is a college student who traveled to the march from Pennsylvania. She said she wants to see a renewed pro-life movement to encourage more men to speak up and stand up for life.

‘I’d like to hear more from the pro-life march to call on men and include men in the conversation,’ Bernet told Fox News Digital. ‘I think it’s really important that fathers and grandfathers speak up for the truth and lead us in the right direction.’

Pro-life leaders and march attendees made clear the end goal of their movement is to abolish abortion. Jamie Scherdin, the Ohio director for Students for Life of America, said her generation of young people are the key to making abortion unthinkable.

‘We have such a big victory to celebrate, but we’re not even close to being done,’ Scherdin told Fox News Digital. ‘The reversal of Roe is only a part of our legacy. Our legacy will be ending abortion in this lifetime. And we need to carry that momentum back to every state to make sure that we have protection at conception everywhere. We’re the generation that reversed Roe, and we’re the generation that is going to end abortion.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Communications experts say the Biden administration has ‘lost control of the narrative’ after recent revelations that President Biden had classified documents in multiple unsecured locations.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has continued to dodge questions on the matter, leading some to criticize the Biden administration for lack of clarity on the situation.

President Biden ‘does indeed take classified information seriously, he does indeed take classified documents seriously. I’m just not going to go beyond that,’ Jean-Pierre said in a Friday press briefing – a line the press secretary has echoed at the podium since the scandal surfaced. 

Communications experts weighing in on the White House’s response since knowledge of Biden’s classified documents came to light in early January say that the administration’s response has been lackluster.  

‘Whether through intent or incompetence, the White House has been behind the curve throughout this entire scandal,’ said Marc Lotter, former director of strategic communications for Trump-Pence 2020. ‘They have lost control of the narrative. Simply wishing it would just go away while deflecting clearly isn’t working.’

In recent weeks, revelations that Biden had Obama-era classified documents in his personal possessions came to light. Classified materials were first revealed to be stored in Biden’s office at the Penn Biden center in Washington, D.C. Three days later, the public learned of a second set of files that existed in the garage of Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware, home. A third set of classified documents were also uncovered in another location in his Wilmington home.

‘President Biden is dealing with a ‘drip’ controversy that has no end in sight and each new revelation makes his criticisms of former President Trump appear ever more hypocritical,’ said Giancarlo Sopo, a Republican media strategist. 

‘When it comes to legal issues, the White House has to be very careful to not intervene politically in this type of investigation. But at the same time, you can’t ignore the issue. There’s a fine line that Biden and the White House need to walk on,’ says Jose Aristimuño, former deputy press secretary to the Democratic National Committee and Host of Americano Media.

Alex Conant, former communications director to Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, believes the White House should be in full on crisis mode, suggesting they assign a dedicated communicator on the issue to get the facts straight, mobilize resources and stay ahead of the story. 

‘Crisis communications 101 is to get all the facts out as soon as possible. The White House has done the opposite of that, letting news drip out day after day. The President should have addressed this directly days ago,’ Conant told Fox News Digital. ‘Waiting until Thursday and then giving a very lawyerly statement only feeds the scandal.’

Video

Though Republicans and Democrats have criticized the White House response on the issue, many on the left have commended the Biden administration’s cooperation with authorities. Christy Seltzer, a former spokesperson to numerous Democratic leaders, said the story on balance ‘isn’t a bad one.’

‘Biden’s team did everything right by flagging that they’d found documents and then giving them back,’ Seltzer said. ‘Typically, in situations like these, the communications strategy must follow the legal strategy, so the lawyers are likely driving what White House communications can and can’t say.’

A former Trump White House official supported Seltzer’s sentiment, sympathizing that White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is likely only receiving partial facts. At the same time, Jean-Pierre’s repeated referrals to the White House Counsel’s office seem to be a scapegoat to avoid tough questioning, according to the source who says the counsel’s office will traditionally defer to the White House Press Secretary for official statements.  

‘Democrat spokespeople normally live a charmed existence,’ said Matt Gorman said, a former communications director to the National Republican Congressional Committee. ‘When the mainstream media dare to question them on anything their reaction wavers between betrayal and outright confusion. That’s what you see here.’

Many questions remain unanswered on the exact whereabouts of the classified files, when they were placed among Biden’s possessions and who might have had access, outside of Biden’s family and staff. 

The Department of Justice has launched an inquiry into the documents, appointing Robert Hur, a former Maryland U.S. attorney, to serve as special counsel overseeing the process.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

An Illinois judge on Friday temporarily blocked Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker from enforcing a newly enacted ban on certain semiautomatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.

Effingham County Judge Joshua Morrison slapped the gun control law with a temporary restraining order after former Republican candidate for attorney general Tom DeVore sued to block the law. DeVore said in a press release he’s representing citizens from 87 Illinois counties who are challenging the law, which he called, ‘an outright attack on the constitutional rights of lawful gun owners across the state.’ 

Morrison’s ruling only applies to 850 plaintiffs listed in the lawsuit in Effingham County and four licensed gun dealers.

Pritzker said he was not surprised by the decision and accused the plaintiffs of advancing ‘ideology over public safety’ in seeking to have the law struck down.

‘We are well aware that this is only the first step in defending this important legislation,’ Pritzker said. ‘I remain confident that the courts will uphold the constitutionality of Illinois’ law, which aligns with the eight other states with similar laws and was written in collaboration with lawmakers, advocates, and legal experts.’

In an 11-page ruling, Morrison affirmed that the plaintiffs have a constitutional right to bear arms that is protected by both the Illinois state Constitution and the Constitution of the United States. 

‘Plaintiffs are being immediately and irreparably harmed each day in which their fundamental right to bear arms is being denied,’ Morrison wrote. 

The judge cited a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision from last year that struck down New York state’s concealed carry law. That 6-3 ruling in New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen found that the ‘plain text’ of the Second Amendment protected the right of the plaintiffs in that case to carry firearms for self-defense.

‘Due to the speed with which this bill was passed, the effect to protected classes could not have been considered, nor could the Legislature have studied if this was the least restrictive way to meet their goal,’ Morrison also wrote.

Pritzker signed the law on Jan. 10 in response to the mass shooting that killed seven and injured 30 at the Highland Park July Fourth parade. The law bans dozens of specific types of rapid-fire handguns and rifles, .50-caliber guns, attachments and limits cartridges to 10 rounds for long guns and 15 rounds for pistols.

The governor defended the gun control law, called the Protect Illinois Communities Act, saying it ‘takes weapons of war and mass destruction off the street while allowing law-abiding gun owners to retain their collections.’ 

‘I look forward to the next steps in this case and receiving the decision this case merits,’ he added.

The Illinois State Rifle Association, a gun rights group that filed a separate federal challenge to the law control law, applauded Morrison’s ruling. 

‘This is a clear indication from the court that the General Assembly and Governor Pritzker rammed this law through improperly. The ISRA firmly believes the law is an infringement on all law-abiding residents’ 2nd Amendment rights,’ the group said. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Vice President Kamala Harris teased the Biden administration’s top priorities for 2023, following a meeting at the White House Thursday with members of the Cabinet.

After the meeting, Harris shared a photo of the administration’s top officials at the White House and said they would be focusing on slashing inflation, job growth, and growing the economy.

In the tweet, the vice president said she has ‘never been more optimistic about our future.’

‘I’ve never been more optimistic about our future. Today, standing with [President Joe Biden] and other members of the Cabinet, we discussed our plan for 2023. Together we will deliver on lowering inflation, creating more jobs, and building an economy that works for everyone,’ she wrote.

Harris’ first two years in office have caused quite a headache for the administration as she continuously faces backlash over how she carries out her official duties. 

While Biden appointed her as the immigration czar two years ago, when she was tasked with finding and addressing the ‘root cause’ of the current immigration crisis, she has yet to visit the U.S.-Mexico border. 

She is also widely criticized in the media over her many staffing exoduses and her fairly common ‘word salad’ comments. 

Video

Like, in Sept., when Harris traveled along with Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to Claflin University in South Carolina, she overly emphasized that ‘community banks’ were located in one’s own community.

She said, ‘We invested an additional $12 billion into community banks, because we know community banks are in the community, and understand the needs and desires of that community as well as the talent and capacity of community.’  

Harris also gave a bewildered response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Video

During a CBS News interview in July, Harris suggested the landmark decision should have remained in place: ‘I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled. Certain issues are just settled.’

Despite the apparent lack of media support, Harris said in a recent interview that 2022 was a strong year for her.

‘There are things that I’ve done as vice president that fully demonstrate the strength of my leadership as vice president that have not received the kind of coverage that I think [the] Dobbs [decision] did receive,’ Harris said during an interview last month with Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart.

An optimistic 2023 viewpoint comes as current U.S. inflation sits at 7.1%, which is down from the summer’s high of 9.1% but up from the 1.4% it was on day one of the Biden administration. Prices are also up 13.8% and the average family in America has lost $5,800 in annual income.

As for the direction of the country under Biden and Harris, a whopping 75% of people said in an August Fox News poll that they were dissatisfied. 

The unhappiness was shared by Republicans, Democrats and independents alike as large majorities rate the economy negatively, fail to see signs of a recovery, and are generally unhappy with the way things are going in the country.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

I like to keep my process simple. That means I define the market trend using a simple combination of exponential moving averages. That also means that my charts are relatively straightforward, avoiding too many indicators and sticking to what I consider simple measures of trend and momentum.

So when I think about market breadth, I (not surprisingly) prefer to keep things simple. Are over half of the S&P 500 stocks above their 200-day moving average? Then conditions are pretty good. What if less than 50% of the benchmark names are above their 200-day moving average? Then the picture is probably much less rosy.

We’ll come to the most important breadth indicator in a minute, but first let’s acknowledge the value of simple comparisons of price and moving average.

It All Starts With the 200-Day

One of my early mentors used to say, “Nothing good happens below the 200-day moving average.” While there are indeed some positive things that could happen below the 200-day (bullish divergences come to mind), he was indeed correct that, until the price breaks above this long-term barometer, the conditions are, more likely, less than ideal.

The chart of GOOG over the last two years is a brilliant example of this approach in all its glory.

On the left half of the chart, you’ll notice the price is making higher highs and higher lows. The price is above the 50-day moving average, which is in turn above the 200-day moving average. This chart is “long and strong”, flowing up and to the right.

“A consistent, imperfect routine is way better than an inconsistent, perfect routine.”

What sets successful investors apart from others? A commitment to a consistent set of routines. What is the first chart you look at every day? What do you watch, read, and listen to every day? How would you describe your daily and weekly routines?

In our latest free webinar, I’ll walk through my own Morning Coffee Routine from start to finish. You’ll see what I use to maintain a high situational awareness for the markets, and identify some ways to upgrade your own routines! Sign up HERE for this free event on Tuesday 1/24!

Look how much things evolved on the right half of the chart. The price is now making lower lows and lower highs. The price is below two downward-sloping moving averages. Conditions are clearly bearish.

Now let’s take this analytical approach and expand it into a breadth indicator to tell us more about broad market participation.

The Most Important Breadth Indicator Ever

OK, I’m getting a little aggressive with the superlatives, but this chart has certainly provided some excellent perspective on the last 12 months for stocks. We’re now basically checking 500 charts to see whether the price is above or below the 200-day and 50-day moving averages.

You can see on the first panel below the price that, as of Friday’s close, 62% of the S&P 500 members are above their 200-day moving average. Look at how the indicator was above the pink 50% line for all of 2021, then dipped below the crucial 50% level in the first quarter of 2022. Notice how the indicator moved up to the 50%, but did not get above it, when the S&P 500 tested its own 200-day moving average in August 2022. You can also see how the indicator did finally break above the 50% level in November, as the market moved higher on a broad advance off the October lows.

Then in December, when the S&P 500 pulled back to 3800, this indicator notably remained above the 50% threshold. This was a key bullish tell when I was considering the likelihood of a retest of the October lows. As long as this indicator remains above 50%, then conditions are still fairly constructive for stocks.

Now let’s review the bottom panel, which shows the percent of stocks above the 50-day moving average. On Thursday of this week, the indicator dropped to just below 50%, which is why we highlighted it as a potential breakdown on Thursday’s episode of The Final Bar.

But Friday’s rally on options expiration day pushed this breadth indicator back up to 63%, meaning that most stocks ended the week back above their 50-day moving averages. Investors often use the 50-day moving average as a good pullback indicator, and the fact that stocks are holding the 50-day is a pretty bullish sign going into the weekend.

What Does a Bull Market Recovery Look Like?

I think the chart of Netflix (NFLX) is a good illustration of a rotation from a distribution phase (often described as having more sellers than buyers) to an accumulation phase (buyers outnumber sellers).

See how the price is now above both moving averages, the RSI has remained in the bullish range (above 40), and the relative strength has been trending steadily higher? The more stocks that have this sort of chart, the more likely that our benchmarks are in an uptrend phase.

Friday’s trading session was driven higher by the FAANG stocks and similar names in Technology and Communication Services. If we see more of that sort of behavior going into February, then we may see the sort of bullish environment suggested by the four-year Presidential cycle. For now, I’m focused on this chart of market breadth indicators to see if they remain above the crucial 50% level. As long as that is true, then the bullish recovery phase appears to be intact.

Want to digest this article in video format? Just head over to my YouTube channel.

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my YouTube channel!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. 

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.   Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

The Federal Trade Commission on Friday asked that notorious “pharma bro” Martin Shkreli be held in contempt of court for forming a new drug company in violation of a judge’s ban on the convicted fraudster from working in the pharmaceuticals industry.

Shkreli, who was released from prison last year, in February was banned “for life from directly or indirectly participating in any manner in the pharmaceutical industry” as a result of the FTC’s antitrust lawsuit against him and a prior drug company that he founded. 

That order stemmed from Manhattan federal court Judge Denise Cote’s ruling that Shkreli oversaw an illegal scheme to maintain a monopoly on the life-saving drug Daraprim, which continued even as he saw in prison for his conviction in an unrelated securities fraud case.

In its court filing Friday, the FTC noted that Shkreli in July announced the formation of a new company, Druglike, “that appears to be involved in the drug industry.”

The agency said that action, as well as Shkreli’s failure to pay his nearly $25 million share of a $64.6 million judgment he owes in the lawsuit, suggest that he is violating the court’s orders in the case.

The FTC and a group of states that sued Shkreli said in the filing he has failed to comply with their requests to give them documents and submit to an interview as part of their probe into whether his involvement with Druglink violates the February 2022 court order banning him from the industry.

More from CNBC

Amazon’s drone delivery unit hit with layoffs just as 10-year-old project finally launchesBed Bath & Beyond beefs up legal team ahead of possible bankruptcy filing in New JerseyHow robots are helping address the fast-food labor shortage

“Martin Shkreli’s failure to comply with the court’s order demonstrates a clear disregard for the law,” said Holly Vedova, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, in a statement.

“The FTC will not hesitate to deploy the full scope of its authorities to enable a comprehensive investigation into any potential misconduct,” Vedova said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

When Kim Talbot first launched her milling shop in southern Maine, she hoped to win a coveted contract with the federal government to manufacture steel and aluminum machine parts. With no idea where to start, she did what any inexperienced small-business owner might do: She Googled.

The top search result was, in her eyes, an official-looking webpage. It prominently displayed a logo very similar to that of SAM.gov, the government website where businesses must register before pursuing such contracts or grants. The site charged $597 for registrations, no insignificant fee for Talbot and her husband. They had already plunked a good chunk of their savings, some $100,000, into their fledgling, family-run business Muddy River Machining. Still, she assumed it was necessary and paid the amount.

Only later did the Talbots realize that this site was in no way affiliated with the federal government, having missed the smaller print disclosing this fact beneath the “Register Online Now” button and the logos resembling that of SAM.gov.

Not only are the SAM.gov registrations and annual renewals free, but also one-on-one assistance with these processes is available at no cost through government-funded nonprofit groups across the country. 

Even so, many companies with official-sounding names and websites that resemble SAM.gov, or sites that could suggest a government affiliation, charge hundreds of dollars or more. Several draw in unwitting customers like Talbot through Google ads that outrank the legitimate SAM.gov page, illustrating the ease of buying visibility on the world’s largest search engine.

Kim Talbot.Courtesy of Kim Talbot

“It’s definitely predatory,” Talbot said in a phone interview. “We could have used that money to help with payroll, taxes, insurance or even heating the building.”

The company that Talbot paid, Federal Contractor Registry, denies that its business practices are misleading or predatory, claiming that it “has always clearly identified itself as a ‘Third Party Service.’” On its website, after an NBC News inquiry, it replaced the logo closely resembling that of SAM.gov with its own.

While many websites that charge for assistance with SAM.gov registrations and renewals clearly state that they are not affiliated with the government and simply tout the ease of having a third party fill out the online forms, others are less transparent.

Google removed the ads for a number of these sites in response to an inquiry for this article but subsequently reversed its decision.

“We have strict ads policies that govern the types of ads and advertisers we allow on our platforms,” Google spokesperson Davis Thompson said in a statement. “If we identify an advertisement that violates our misrepresentation or government services policy, we immediately remove it.”

Like other online intermediaries, Google is likely shielded from liability for the third-party content it hosts, including ads, by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

A ‘substantial cottage industry’

The Federal Trade Commission recently proposed a new rule to crack down on the broader issue of government “impersonation,” a phenomenon that has cost consumers billions of dollars, and is “highly prevalent and increasingly harmful, especially for small businesses,” said Christopher Brown, an attorney in its marketing practices division. The most commonly impersonated government entity is the Social Security Administration, followed by Medicare, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the FTC and then the IRS. 

The FTC’s proposed rule would enable it to recover money from violators and pursue civil penalties against them, but it must still go through a public hearing period, more review and a final agency vote, which could take months or years.

After an NBC News inquiry, Federal Contractor Registry updated its website, replacing a logo highly similar to that of SAM.gov (left) with its own (right).
The official SAM.gov logo for the government website where businesses must register before pursuing contracts or grants. SAM.gov

Even if the process drags out, the rule would “make a huge difference for consumers,” said Bonnie Patten, the executive director of the consumer advocacy nonprofit group Truth in Advertising. 

As part of this process, Patten’s organization has filed comments with the FTC complaining about Federal Contractor Registry, as well as Federal Filing, Federal Award Management Registration and others, referring to them as “imposters” running “scams” to pose as the federal government while failing to adequately disclose that they are private companies.

Before Truth In Advertising filed its complaint last summer, Federal Filing displayed the official SAM.gov logo at the very top of its homepage, while disclosing near the bottom that it “is not a government agency,” as well as on a separate FAQ page. The logo has since been removed. Near the top of the site, the company now asks “Why Work With The Federal Government” and “Why SAM?” 

Federal Filing said that Truth In Advertising was “unfairly targeting us due to presumably bad actors in our line of work.”

Like Federal Contractor Registry and Federal Filing, the company Federal Award Management Registration was using Google ads to attract customers. When reached for comment, it also updated its website, which had featured a backdrop of the U.S. Capitol and offered the opportunity to talk with a “federal contractor advisor.” 

At the bottom of the homepage was its sole disclosure that it was an independent third party, with the accompanying line: “Often, the difference between landing and losing a contract is a small mistake that prevents proper filing. Trust the experts so you can be sure your company is properly registered and fully able to apply for and win federal contracts.”

Following an inquiry for this article, the site now provides an enlarged disclosure in bright blue font and no longer displays the Capitol.

This was due to “ongoing changes” to the site, company owner Brad Anderson said by phone. He added that “99.9%” of customers understand that his site is not affiliated with the government, and that it is the firm’s competitors who “grossly misrepresent themselves.” 

In an email, Federal Award Management Registration added in part that its representatives inform potential customers over the phone that it is “an Independent Party and that they could do the SAM registration for free on their own.” 

Even some sites that more clearly distinguish themselves from SAM.gov, but populated near or at the top of Google search results for queries, have received complaints from customers who confused them with the government. Among the many complaints filed against such sites with the nonprofit watchdog group Better Business Bureau, one person wrote of a website called US Federal Contractor Registration: “I assumed it was a government website but it was not.”

The individual said their charity paid $599 for a service they later learned could have been completed for free. In a public response, US Federal Contractor Registration — which states on its homepage that it is a “third-party” firm, and in small, gray-on-gray print at the bottom that it is “not a government agency” — said it discloses this information “clearly.”

The company’s president and CEO Eric Knellinger said in a lengthy email that “instead of pointing the finger at USFCR,” NBC News should “look at and report on the issues and problems with the System for Awards [sic] Management [SAM.gov] itself.”

As these companies continue to thrive without meaningful intervention, more and more are popping up.

“There’s a substantial cottage industry built around this,” said Ken Bloch, president of the Association of Procurement Technical Assistance Centers, which provides free help with registrations and annual SAM.gov renewals. “A lot of the businesses that fall prey to this are very small. They’re mom-and-pop businesses — maybe five or 10 people.”

Free, ‘superior’ alternatives

Federal Contractor Registry, Federal Filing and Federal Award Management Registration all said that they make clear to their customers that they are not connected to the government and that they have never misrepresented their businesses. Each likened their services to tax filings, a cumbersome and complex process which many people pay professionals to complete even though they can do it themselves at no cost.

But the Small Business Administration urges people not to spend their precious resources on these services when so many free alternatives exist. The SBA has scores of district offices nationwide, as well as business centers dedicated to helping women, veterans and other specific groups, offering no-cost assistance with SAM.gov registrations and renewals.

“Save those resources to do the other back-end work that can be overwhelming for small-business owners, like accounting and annual taxes,” said Bibi Hidalgo, SBA’s associate administrator for government contracting and business development. “There is no need to spend any of your hard-won contract awards on this.”

“There is no need to spend any of your hard-won contract awards on this.”

Bibi Hidalgo, Small Business Administration’s associate administrator for government contracting and business development.

The U.S. General Services Administration, which runs SAM.gov, said in an emailed statement that “no third party company should ever impersonate SAM.gov for any reason,” and noted that it “takes appropriate action when such impersonation is brought to our attention.” It did not respond to requests to clarify what such action entails.

Talbot has connected with her local Procurement Technical Assistance Center and plans to take advantage of its free support going forward. Already, she said, the help she has received at no charge has been “superior” to the services for which she paid hundreds of dollars.

Until the FTC’s proposed rule comes into effect, Patten from Truth in Advertising worries that more small-business owners like Talbot will unnecessarily spend their money on SAM.gov registrations and renewals. She expects new, prominently displayed Google ads to play a part in the problem.

“As much as we’d like to hope that Google wouldn’t take money from scammers,” she said, “we’ve seen time and time again that that’s not really how things seem to work out.’

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of disgraced biotech firm Theranos, bought a one-way ticket to Mexico shortly after she was convicted of fraud last January, a court filing submitted Thursday alleges.

Holmes was found guilty on four counts of lying to investors on Jan. 3, 2022. Shortly thereafter, federal prosecutors allege in the filing, Holmes bought a flight to Mexico departing Jan. 26, 2022 without a scheduled return trip. The U.S. government became aware of the booking on Jan. 23, 2022.

‘Only after the government raised this unauthorized flight with defense counsel was the trip canceled,’ prosecutors say.

The Thursday filing came as part of the government’s opposition to Holmes’ motion for release from detention pending appeal of her sentencing; in November, a judge sentenced Holmes to more than 11 years in prison. U.S. District Court Judge Edward Davila ordered Holmes to surrender herself into custody by April 27. It has not yet been determined where she would serve her sentence, but Davila has recommended a minimum-security prison camp in Texas.

Elizabeth Holmes, founder and former CEO of blood testing and life sciences company Theranos, walks with her mother Noel Holmes and partner Billy Evans into the federal courthouse for her sentencing hearing on November 18, 2022 in San Jose, Calif.Amy Osborne / AFP via Getty Images file

Holmes’ partner, William Evans, also bought a one-way ticket “and did not return until approximately six weeks later, returning from a different continent,” prosecutors said.

“The government anticipates (Holmes) will note in reply that she did not in fact leave the country as scheduled—but it is difficult to know with certainty what (Holmes) would have done had the government not intervened,” prosecutors said.

Prosecutors also allege Holmes maintains access to vast financial resources.

“(Holmes) has lived on an estate for over a year where, based upon the monthly cash flow statement (Holmes) provided to the U.S. Probation Office, monthly expenses exceed $13,000 per month,” they write.

They further note that a judge has found that Holmes “never fully appreciated that [s]he would be incarcerated” based on “ill-founded hopes that the Court would give [her] a probationary sentence.” Additionally, Holmes has not “demonstrated . . . in [her] words or manner, a genuine acceptance that [s]he stole a significant amount of money from [investors] by lying and falsifying documents,” the prosecutors say.

They thus vehemently object to any release.

“At the same time when her incentive to flee has never been higher, (Holmes) has requested the Court ease the restrictions on her travel, permitting her to travel outside of the Northern District of California and perhaps out of the state altogether ‘due to her significant other’s employment.’”

The U.S. has maintained bilateral extradition treaties with Mexico dating back to the 19th century — perhaps contrary to belief that crossing the southern border guarantees freedom. Since 2005, Mexico has deported between 150 and 200 fugitives to face charges in the U.S., according to the U.S. State Department.

In one prominent example, Wanda Lee Ann Podgurski, convicted of disability and insurance fraud in 2013, was apprehended in Mexico six months after an account in her name tweeted, “Catch me if you can.”

The U.S. Marshals service is the primary agency designated for tracking fugitives. In addition to maintaining an office in Mexico, the USMS works closely with law enforcement agencies along the borders of Mexico and Canada and with the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service.

An attorney for Holmes did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS