Archive

2023

Browsing

Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes, Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts, Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow, Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Justin Jefferson and Buffalo Bills quarterback Josh Allen were named finalists for the NFL’s Most Valuable Player award, the league announced Wednesday.

Mahomes, the 2018 NFL MVP, threw for 5,250 yards and 41 touchdowns and added  358 rushing yards. He set an NFL record with 5,614 yards of total offense, leading the Chiefs to another AFC West title and the conference’s best record.

In his third season, Hurts solidified his status as a franchise quarterback, completing 67 percent of his passes for 3,701 yards with 22 touchdowns and six interceptions, adding 760 rushing yards and 13 scores. The Eagles finished with the NFC’s best record, despite Hurts missing two games with an injured shoulder. 

Jefferson, a first-team All-Pro selection, led the league in targets (184), catches (128), and receiving yards per game (106.4). His 1,809 receiving yards also led the league and scored eight touchdowns for the Vikings. No receiver has ever won the NFL MVP.

Follow every game: Latest NFL Scores and Schedules

Here are the finalists for the other awards:

Offensive Rookie of the Year

Brock Purdy, quarterback, San Francisco

Kenneth Walker, III, running back, Seattle

Garrett Wilson, wide receiver, New York Jets

Defensive Rookie of the Year

Aiden Hutchison, defensive end, Detroit

Ahmad Gardner, cornerback, New York Jets

Tariq Woolen, cornerback, Seattle

Coach of the Year

Brian Daboll, New York Giants

Sean McDermott, Buffalo

Doug Pederson, Jacksonville

Kyle Shanahan, San Francisco

Nick Sirianni, Philadelphia

Assistant Coach of the Year

Ben Johnson, offensive coordinator, Detroit

DeMeco Ryans, defensive coordinator, San Francisco

Shane Steichen, offensive coordinator Philadelphia

Offensive Player of the Year

Tyreek Hill, wide receiver, Miami

Jalen Hurts, quarterback. Philadelphia

Justin Jefferson, wide receiver Minnesota

Patrick Mahomes, quarterback, Kansas City

Defensive Player of the Year

Nick Bosa, defensive end, San Francisco 

Chris Jones, defensive tackle, Kansas City

Micah Parsons, linebacker, Dallas

Comeback Player of the Year

Saquon Barkley, running back, New York Giants

Christian McCaffrey, running back, San Francisco

Geno Smith, quarterback, Seattle

When are the winners announced?

As voted on by 50 sportswriters who regularly cover the league and handed out by The Associated Press, the winners of that award and others will be announced during the NFL Honors telecast set to air on Feb. 9 at 9 p.m. ET on NBC, Peacock, and NFL Network.

Man of the Year

The NFL Man of the Year award winner will also be announced during the awards ceremony.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The issue of charter flights has risen again in the WNBA, but not for the reason many people might guess. 

On the heels of Brittney Griner’s release from Russia, where the six-time WNBA All-Star was detained for nearly 10 months after being found guilty of carrying hash oil in her luggage, there are concerns about her travel. 

It’s a complicated issue. 

Who’s calling for charters?

Sunday afternoon, seven-year veteran Breanna Stewart, the highest profile free agent this offseason who is reportedly entertaining offers to either stay in Seattle or join the New York Liberty, tweeted, “I would love to be part of a deal that helps subsidize charter travel for the entire WNBA. I would contribute my NIL, posts + production hrs to ensure we all travel in a way that prioritizes player health + safety, which ultimately results in a better product. Who’s with me?” 

Her message drew support from many in the basketball community, including numerous WNBA players who replied with the emoji of a woman raising her hand to imply that they’d chip in, too. Mystics forward Elena Delle Donne responded, “I’m in! Whatever it takes.” 

NBA players even chimed in, with Memphis Grizzlies guard Ja Morant, who said, “Count me in.’ 

But WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert has shot down the idea, previously telling ESPN, “We’ve asked all the major airlines. We’ve asked charter companies. I’ve been working on this since the moment I came into the league. Without sponsors stepping up, it’s just not in the cards right now. 

“If we could get it sponsored or funded in some way … I’m all ears. I’ve gotten lots of calls over the past year about this since we’ve been back in our 12 markets. Then when people price it out, you never hear from them again.” 

Engelbert has estimated that chartering the entire season for all 12 teams would cost more than $20 million. In previous comments to The New York Times, Engelbert said when negotiating the 2020 CBA, players ‘didn’t ask for first-class or charter travel. They asked for more pay.’ 

But agents take issue with the notion that it’s one or the other.

Jade-Li English of Klutch Sports Group, who represent numerous WNBA players including two-time MVP A’ja Wilson, said for her clients, travel is the No. 1 issue, and needs to be prioritized over everything else, including expansion. 

‘It’s very disappointing to see the league being unwilling to prioritize player health, safety and equity,’ English told USA TODAY Sports via text message. ‘The NBA and the WNBA are globally influential leagues. It’s hard for me to believe they cannot come up with a single solution to meet these players’ needs. To suggest that these women have not made their consensus on this issue known is disingenuous.’ 

Engelbert and the WNBA declined to comment to USA TODAY Sports for this story, though the league is expected to work with Griner and her representatives to ensure she is safe. 

The WNBPA did not answer specific questions about Griner, but told USA TODAY Sports in a statement that the players association is ‘always seeking ways to support the members. Travel is a particular pain point that we look to address every year with creative solutions and resources. We recognize this as a health and safety issue for all of our members.’

How does WNBA travel work now?

Charter flights have been a divisive topic across the league for years. The WNBA, despite being subsidized by the NBA, uses commercial air travel. In the 2020 CBA, the league agreed to upgrade players to Economy Plus or Comfort seats, to ensure extra leg room. Before the 2022 finals, Engelbert announced that the league would charter during the five-game championship series.  

Historic CBA elevates WNBA as progressive, aggressive league

How the USWNT and WNBA have fought and won major gains in collective bargaining agreements

But there are problems. Last season, the Los Angeles Sparks were stranded in Washington, D.C., after a canceled flight, and forced to sleep in the airport, a fiasco documented by Nneka Ogwumike, the WNBPA president, via her Twitter account. 

During last season’s WNBA quarterfinals, then-Connecticut Sun coach Curt Miller said the team wasn’t able to practice before Game 3 at Dallas because after a canceled commercial flight and last-minute scramble for a charter, the plane could not bear the weight of the Suns’ luggage, including their practice gear.

In 2018, a nightmare travel day for the Las Vegas Aces where they were delayed almost a full 24 hours resulted in a game being canceled against the Washington Mystics. 

In March 2022, Sports Illustrated revealed that New York Liberty owner Joe Tsai was fined a whopping $500,000 when the league discovered he had chartered the second half of the season. Sports Illustrated also reported that at a September 2021 WNBA Board of Governors meeting, the majority of the league voted against chartering full-time. Multiple players voiced their frustration, with Mercury guard Skylar Diggins-Smith calling the news “disgraceful.”

Flying private isn’t new for the Mercury. After Phoenix won Game 5 of the 2021 semifinals over Las Vegas, Diana Taurasi chartered a private plane to get home to Phoenix and her wife, Penny Taylor, so Taurasi could be present for the birth of their second child, a girl named Isla. 

Aces coach Becky Hammon, a longtime NBA assistant, vented about travel during the 2022 All-Star game. 

‘I know we’re locked into the CBA we’re in right now, but we gotta get these girls from A to B in the most efficient way possible, because it directly affects the product on the floor that you’re selling to the public,” Hammon said. 

How will security work for Griner?

The WNBA spent months calling for the Biden Administration to do whatever necessary to free Griner. On Dec. 8, Biden announced that Griner was on her way home to the U.S. after a prisoner swap for notorious Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout. Her homecoming was met with celebration — and vile comments from the far right. 

Critics have said Griner, who has been an outspoken advocate for Black Lives Matter and the LGBTQ community, should not have been traded for a convicted criminal known as the ‘Merchant of Death.’ U.S. Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) called the trade ‘weak and disgusting,’ and social media is awash with voices decrying her release. One political analyst called the trade ‘a bad deal for America and the rest of the world.’

High-profile prisoner swaps or releases like Griner’s often involve a member of the military — think former U.S. Senator John McCain, who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam for more than five years, or Army soldier Bowe Bergdahl, who was held captive by the Taliban from 2009-2014. Typically, the U.S. government does not provide security for civilians, which means Griner is likely to have to pay for security out of pocket. 

Liz Cathcart, the executive director of Hostage US, a non-profit that helps families of Americans held hostage or wrongfully detained, told USA TODAY Sports that most people who return after being held captive don’t need security. American Trevor Reed, who was released in April after being wrongfully detained since 2019, has not needed private security, and wouldn’t have the option of flying private or retaining private security given the cost. 

Griner’s agent, Lindsay Colas of Wasserman, did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Follow Lindsay Schnell on Twitter @Lindsay_Schnell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Kansas City Chiefs shared some encouraging news on quarterback Patrick Mahomes’ ankle injury Wednesday.

Mahomes, who is dealing with a high ankle sprain on his right foot, will practice on Wednesday, coach Andy Reid said.

It’s unclear to what extent Mahomes will participate in practice. But his return to the practice field is encouraging for the Chiefs ahead of Sunday’s AFC championship game against the Cincinnati Bengals.

Bet on the Big Game: Super Bowl 57 stats, odds and more

“It’s doing good. I had a few days of treatment and a few days of rehab. I’m excited to go on the practice field and test it out, and see where I’m at. But it’s feeling good so far,” Mahomes said during a press conference before practice.

Mahomes remains day to day with the injury, which he suffered during the first half of the Chiefs’ playoff win against the Jacksonville Jaguars last week.

The Bengals have won three straight games against the Chiefs, including last season’s AFC championship game. 

And Mahomes intends to play in this pivotal game. 

“It’s just about being a competitor. You want to be out there, especially in these games,” Mahomes said. “So, all you can do is just mentally prepare yourself, your body throughout the week, and when you get to game day, you just have to focus on the game. That’s what I’ll try to do, is prepare my body the best I can to get to the game, and I’ll go out there and play, and find a way to win.”

Patrick Mahomes says his ankle is steadily improving 

Since suffering the injury, Mahomes has been in a constant state of treatment, rehabilitation, watching film, and resting. 

“It’s a full day thing, where you’re trying to make sure you’re obviously prepared for the Bengals and a great football team, mentally and physically,” Mahomes said. 

Mahomes’ goal during practice this week is to see the limitations of his injury, and how they will affect him in Sunday’s game.

“I’ll see what I can do to not re-aggravate the injury, obviously, but to push it to see what I’m able to do on Sunday.”

Reid, who said Mahomes was able to participate in the Chiefs’ walkthrough earlier Wednesday, said he may have to restrain Mahomes from doing too much in practice.

“I might have to pull him back a little bit, but knowing him he’ll try to do everything,” Reid said of Mahomes. 

Patrick Mahomes has played through injury before

Mahomes said the most he’s been bothered while playing injured was during the end of the 2021 season, when he was hampered by a toe injury. 

The Chiefs lost the Super Bowl to Tom Brady and the Buccaneers. 

“I had to curl my toes when I walked, so that was probably the toughest injury that I had to play through

. But I’ve dealt with a lot of them,” Mahomes said. 

“And you have to mentally get yourself focused on what you need to be focused on, and that’s the team you’re playing. You prepare your body all week, and when it gets to Sunday, you focus on playing the football game, and that’s what I’m going to try to do this week.”

Mahomes has also dealt with a high ankle sprain before, after the 2019 season opener against the Jaguars. But that injury was to his left foot instead of his right foot. 

Still, the injury gives him some experience to lean on. 

“The last one was the leg that I landed on. So, I had to find ways to throw where I could land and keep it in the right spot. This time I have to find ways to be able to push off and be able to still make the throws the right way,” Mahomes said.  “Different similar in a sense, but I’ll have limitations I’ll have to work through.”

Underdog vs. Bengals, no problem for Patrick Mahomes

The Chiefs have lost their last three games against the Bengals – all by three points. 

But don’t tell Mahomes he’s the underdog against Joe Burrow and the Bengals this week. 

“Every time I walk on that field, I don’t think I’m an underdog – especially when I walk on Aarowhead’s field,” Mahomes said. 

“I just go in with the same mindset of we have to play our best football to win. We know we’re playing a good football team that’s beat us three times in the past. We have to learn from our mistakes from the best in order to win against a good football team.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The ongoing off-field controversy surrounding Gio Reyna doesn’t seem to be affecting his performance on the field.

Reyna scored a stoppage-time winner for Borussia Dortmund at Mainz on Wednesday — the second straight game he’s come off the bench to score a winning goal.

This one wasn’t quite as spectacular as the stunning half-volley Reyna scored three days prior against Augsburg, but it was just as vital for his side’s Bundesliga title hopes.

With the game tied 1-1 in stoppage time, Sébastien Haller — making just his second appearance after returning from testicular cancer — won a header off a corner kick that found an unmarked Reyna at the back post to steer home.

The 20-year-old has now scored the winner in each of Dortmund’s first two games after the World Cup break, putting his side into fourth place — five points back of table-topping Bayern Munich.

The goals represent some much-needed positive news for Reyna, who has been all over the headlines recently for all the wrong reasons.

His World Cup was blighted by a poor effort in training that nearly saw him sent home, as he played just 52 total minutes over four games in Qatar for the USMNT.

That would’ve been bad enough on its own, but the aftermath of the World Cup has seen the scandal kick into overdrive. USMNT coach Gregg Berhalter publicly revealed he nearly sent Reyna home, causing Reyna’s parents to leak details of a three-decade-old domestic violence incident involving Berhalter and his future wife to U.S. Soccer.

It’s no wonder that after both of his post-World Cup goals, Reyna has celebrated by putting his fingers in his ears. Amid all the turmoil around him, the USMNT forward has managed to block out all the noise on the field.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Cincinnati Bengals went into their AFC divisional round matchup with the Buffalo Bills thinking that the league saw them as an afterthought. The Bills meeting the Kansas City Chiefs in the AFC title game would have meant a neutral site game in Atlanta, but the Bengals were determined to spoil those plans for the NFL.

The Bengals went into a snowy Highmark Stadium with a kind of confidence that seemed to catch the Bills off guard, controlling the whole game. And nobody seemed to be more confident than quarterback Joe Burrow.

We saw how Burrow responded after the game with a sweet jab at the NFL. It was no different during the game as well.

In the latest edition of ‘Inside the NFL’ from NFL Films, we got to hear how a mic’d-up Burrow pumped up himself as the Bengals pulled away from the Bills. After his second touchdown pass of the game, Burrow went toward the sideline as Mike Hilton greeted him. Burrow shouted back, ‘I’m him!’

Hilton loved that answer. Bengals fans also enjoyed hearing the personality that Burrow brings to the game.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Another battle between Rory McIlroy and Patrick Reed began to take shape Wednesday.

As one of the most vocal critics of the LIV Golf breakaway league, McIlroy felt mentally drained at the end of last year and decided to put his clubs away for a few weeks.

“It’s been nice,” the top-ranked McIlroy said, “to try to take a little bit of time away, and try to sort of distance myself from the game of golf.”

Now he’s back and appears to be as fiery as ever.

McIlroy was on the driving range Tuesday at the Dubai Desert Classic when he was approached by Reed, one of the high-profile players to have joined the exodus to the Saudi-backed series that changed the face of golf in 2022.

McIlroy said he was busy practicing and didn’t feel the need to acknowledge Reed.

“Patrick came up to say hello and I didn’t really want him to,” McIlroy said Wednesday.

McIlroy was asked about reports the American threw a tee toward him. The four-time major winner said he didn’t see or feel anything.

”But apparently that’s what happened,” McIlroy said. “And if roles were reversed and I’d have thrown that tee at him, I’d be expecting him (to file) a lawsuit.”

McIlroy said he was served a subpoena on Christmas Eve from Larry Klayman, an attorney who has filed a lawsuit against the PGA Tour and European tour for suspending players who have signed with LIV Golf. Reed is not involved in that lawsuit.

Klayman also represents Reed in lawsuits filed against a number of media outlets.

“Of course, trying to have a nice time with my family and someone shows up on your doorstep and delivers that, you’re not going to take that well,” McIlroy said.

It’s clear McIlroy is in no mood for reconciliation in Dubai.

“So again, I’m living in reality, I don’t know where he’s living. If I were in his shoes, I wouldn’t expect a hello or a handshake.”

Reed, in a statement provided by Klayman, wanted to make clear he had nothing to do with the subpoena McIlroy received.

“So, McIlroy being upset about being served on Christmas Eve has absolutely nothing to do with Patrick Reed,” the statement said. “So we don’t know what world McIlroy is living in, but we live in the real world, and to try to lay blame on Patrick Reed or being upset with Patrick for being subpoenaed for a lawsuit that Patrick Reed is not a part of is simply ignorant.”

Reed said in Dubai it was “unfortunate” that McIlroy didn’t shake his hand.

“But it is one of those things — if you’re going to act like an immature little child then you might as well be treated like one,” Reed was quoted as saying by British newspaper The Daily Mail.

Reed said he “flicked” a tee toward McIlroy because it had a logo of the 4 Aces, his team in LIV Golf, on it.

“It was kind of a funny shot back,” Reed said.

Reed and McIlroy had a memorable singles match in the 2016 Ryder Cup at Hazeltine, which Reed won. They also were in the final round at the 2018 Masters, where Reed had a three-shot lead and went on to win. The Masters is the one major McIlroy has not won.

McIlroy was later asked if it would be beneficial to “fix your relationship” with another LIV rebel, Sergio Garcia, if it would help Europe’s cause ahead of this year’s Ryder Cup.

“No,” was the Northern Irishman’s blunt response.

The toll taken on McIlroy for effectively being an anti-LIV spokesman didn’t stop him returning to the top of the world ranking at the end of last year.

His last competitive tournament was the World Tour Championship, which was also in Dubai, in November.

McIlroy said the break gave him the opportunity to “recharge and reset and try to start 2023 with renewed optimism,” and he is back in the Middle East with some unfinished business.

In last year’s Dubai Desert Classic, McIlroy was in a share of the lead after 71 holes but bogeyed the par-5 No. 18 on Sunday after hitting his second shot into the water in front of the green. He finished a shot behind Viktor Hovland and Richard Bland, and Hovland wound up winning a playoff.

“Wasn’t quite the way I wanted to finish it off,” McIlroy said. “But you know, I went on from that week and played really well and had a great year.”

McIlroy is a two-time winner of the event — in 2009, which was his first title as a pro at the age of 19, and in 2015 — and enjoys coming to this part of the world.

“I’ve been coming here for a long time, 17 years,” he said. “I’ve got a level of comfort here. I like starting my year here. I have a lot of friends. I called this place home for four years.”

___

More AP golf: https://apnews.com/hub/golf and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

EXCLUSIVE: House China Select Committee Chairman Mike Gallagher called the Biden administration ‘divided’ on whether Beijing or climate change poses the greatest national security threat to the U.S., telling Fox News Digital that the split is the reason for the administration’s ‘policy incoherence.’

Rep. Gallagher, R-Wis., is leading the new House committee focused on combating the threat China poses to the U.S. — a panel created for the 118th Congress by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and established with broad bipartisan support.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Gallagher said he has a relationship with the Biden administration and is confident that the committee will be able to work with officials, despite disagreements in approach.

‘We can still have a bipartisan spirit that makes room for thoughtful disagreement,’ Gallagher said.

And the White House National Security Council (NSC) told Fox News Digital it plans to work with the committee on the matter. 

‘Under President Biden, we are more prepared to outcompete China, protect our national security, and advance a free and open Indo-Pacific than ever before,’ NSC spokesperson Adrienne Watson told Fox News Digital. ‘Many of the efforts we have been pursuing are bipartisan, underscoring the alignment at home on this key issue.’ 

She added: ‘We look forward to the committee getting stood up and we will continue working with Democrats and Republicans in Congress on this top priority.’ 

But Gallagher said a challenge could be the apparent split between Biden administration officials in what the greatest threat to the nation is, and prioritizing how to address that threat.

‘I think the White House is divided,’ Gallagher said. ‘The chairman of the Joint Chiefs will say China is our biggest short-term, near-term, long-term threat.’

Officials like FBI Director Christopher Wray, CIA Director William Burns and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines have repeatedly warned that China poses the greatest threat to the national security of the U.S.

‘But you have some of this tension because there is a substantial portion of the administration that actually believes that climate change is our biggest existential threat,’ Gallagher said, referring to officials like White House climate czar John Kerry.

‘If you read the national security strategy, it talks about climate — I think it says it is an ‘existential challenge’ of our time, and so, this creates incoherence and lack of consistent prioritization,’ Gallagher said. ‘And it leads someone like John Kerry to advocate against the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, because he knows that solar panels subcomponents are built with slave labor in China.’

‘So I think that sort of competition between the two camps in the Biden administration explains a lot of their policy incoherence,’ he added.

But a senior administration official told Fox News that they are focusing on climate change as ‘a way to compete with China.’ 

The official pointed to the bipartisan infrastructure bill, which they say positions the U.S. to ‘outspend China’ for the first time. The official also pointed to the Inflation Reduction Act, saying the administration is focusing on making ‘huge investments’ to create U.S.-based manufacturing jobs and strengthening supply chains. 

‘Regarding China and climate change: We are focused on putting the full weight of the Biden administration’s national security and foreign policy enterprise behind the kinds of investments in our national strength that are the basis for strong inclusive economic growth, competitiveness, and American leadership in the key industries of the future that will sustain and grow the American middle class,’ the official said. 

‘We’ve been very clear about China and the threat it poses,’ the official continued, pointing to the administration’s national security and defense strategy. ‘China is seen as the greatest geopolitical threat.’ 

That threat, Gallagher says, is one he views in ‘three dimensions’ — a military threat, an economic threat and an ideological threat.

With regard to the military threat, Gallagher warned that a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan could ‘potentially bring us into kinetic confrontation with China.’

‘I believe time is not on our side and that we have entered the window of maximum danger,’ Gallagher told Fox News Digital.

Fox News reported last summer that China could invade Taiwan within the next 18 months, according to current and former officials familiar with U.S. and allied intelligence — specifically through amphibious assault and military invasion.

Gallagher said his panel would likely play a ‘supporting’ role with regard to the military threat, as that topic falls under the jurisdiction of the House Foreign Affairs Committee under Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, and the House Armed Services Committee under Mike Rogers, R-Ala.

With regard to the economy, Gallagher warned that the economic threat ‘manifests itself in the nature of critical dependency on China in various areas.’ He added: ‘Think about the absurdity of that — in many cases, we are relying on China for the things that we put in our weapons systems that we might need in a future war with China.’ 

Gallagher told Fox News Digital that the U.S. ‘needs to ensure that we’re not subsidizing our own destruction.’ 

As for the ideological threat, Gallagher said this is a ‘competition between two very different systems of government.’

Meanwhile, Gallagher touted the Republican members appointed to the panel — all of whom, he said, are ‘serious, sober members that represent a wide swath of the caucus and represent almost every committee that affects this issue.’ 

Democrats have yet to appoint members to the panel, but Gallagher urged them to ‘take this seriously.’ 

‘We do not want this to be a Republican-only effort,’ he said. ‘We want Democrats to participate and we want them to appoint serious, sober members as well.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Certain sex offenders in New Mexico would be required to undergo chemical castration as a condition of their parole, according to a bill being proposed by state lawmakers. 

Reps. John Block of Alamogordo and Stefani Lord, both Republicans, said House Bill 128 would be a ‘commonsense’ step to protect children from pedophiles. 

‘Passage of this commonsense bill is the very least we can do to protect children in our communities from the horrific threat of pedophiles,’ Block told Fox News Digital. ‘The New Mexico Legislature must now choose to either stand on the side of children’s safety by passing our bill or risk letting predators continue to abuse New Mexico children when let out on parole.’

Chemical castration causes the human body to stop producing sex hormones and has been shown to weaken sexual urges.

Under the bill, a person required to undergo the treatment would begin the process at least one month prior to their release from a correctional facility. The treatment would continue until a court determines it is no longer necessary. 

The therapy would be administered by the New Mexico Department of Health and the offender would be responsible for the costs unless they are indigent, according to the bill. 

In addition, parolees would be required to allow the Health Department to share their medical records with the state Parole Board.  

Offenders will not be forced to undergo the treatment, but those who elect to stop the process before a court determines it is no longer necessary will be charged with a fourth-degree felony for being in violation of their parole, the measure states. 

Other states – Alabama, California, Florida, Iowa, Georgia, Louisiana, Montana, Oregon, Texas, and Wisconsin – have passed chemical castration laws.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The recent uptick of endangered whale deaths along the East Coast has sparked a vigorous debate between environmental groups over the role offshore wind development.

Nine whales – including two sperm whales and seven humpback whales – have been found dead off the coasts of four East Coast states in less than two months, according to federal environmental officials. The discovery of the whales, five of which were beached in New Jersey, sparked calls from environmentalists to halt offshore wind development until more information was known about their deaths.

‘The wave of dead whales is the ocean sounding the alarm and we must heed the warning,’ Cindy Zipf, the executive director of Clean Ocean Action, said in a statement on Jan. 9. ‘These tragic multiple deaths of mostly young, endangered whales are of no apparent cause, however, the only new activity in the ocean is the unprecedented concurrent industrial activity by over 11 companies in the region’s ocean, which allows the harassment and harm of tens of thousands of marine mammals.’ 

‘Moreover, federal and state agencies have been recklessly fast-tracking offshore wind development projects,’ Zipf added. ‘These three coinciding factors raise suspicions, and a responsible and reasonable response is the action plan for which we are calling.’

Clean Ocean Action led a coalition of groups, including Protect Our Coast NJ, Save Long Beach Island and Defend Brigantine Beach, calling for an investigation and a ‘hard stop’ on all existing offshore wind industry development activities and all wind development permitting activities. The groups sent a letter with their demands to President Biden.

Lisa Daidone, the president of Defend Brigantine Beach, added that the current offshore wind development process is ‘critically lacking in adequate communication, sufficient time allowed for public understanding and input, and rigorous research which will result in the suffering of our economy, ecology, environment, marine mammals including endangered species, and the health and wellbeing of our residents.’

However, days later, a series of other environmental groups – led by the Sierra Club and joined by the League of Conservation Voters (LCV), Surfrider Foundation and Clean Water Action – slammed the calls to halt offshore wind development. They said it would be irresponsible to assume offshore wind infrastructure caused the whale deaths without evidence, but suggested vessel strikes and fishing equipment was to blame.

‘Blaming offshore wind projects on whale mortality without evidence is not only irresponsible but overshadows the very real threats of climate change, plastic pollution, and unsustainable fishery management practices to these animals,’ Anjuli Ramos-Busot, the New Jersey director of the Sierra Club, said on Jan. 13.

‘New Jersey LCV continues to advocate for responsible offshore wind development that is in full compliance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act,’ Allison McLeod, the policy director at New Jersey LCV, added. ‘We are confident that the professionals involved will determine an accurate cause of death for each of the mammals, as ship strikes and entanglements from abandoned fishing gear continue to be a concern for our marine life.’

Earlier this month, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said the state’s government would investigate the excess whale deaths.

And on Jan. 18, federal officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) held a press briefing to address the issue. The officials said they were studying the cause of deaths for the nine whales recently discovered, but that no whale mortality has been attributed to offshore wind activities yet.

‘NOAA Fisheries is dedicated to minimizing risks to protected resources, habitats, and managed fisheries throughout the life cycle of offshore wind energy projects,’ NOAA spokesperson Lauren Gaches told reporters.

Other environmental groups, though, have sought a middle ground, suggesting that the current offshore wind development permitting process needed to be scaled back, but not scrapped altogether.

‘I’m skeptical that either side is correct,’ Brett Hartl, the government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘I saw environmental groups saying wind definitely isn’t the cause of this and then others are saying wind is definitely the cause of this. These things take a lot of time – they’re going to do autopsies and necropsies to figure it out.’

‘I think both sides in the recent debate in New Jersey were being more than a little bit irresponsible in their rhetoric about what is causing this,’ he continued.

The Center for Biological Diversity, which has taken a hard-line stance against a wide range of projects that threaten endangered species and wildlife, submitted comments to BOEM last year, warning of the threats offshore wind projects present to various marine mammals.

Hartl said the group would continue to advocate for responsible wind development.

‘We believe that it is possible to do offshore wind in a way that does address the real threats to whales,’ he told Fox News Digital. ‘Part of it is better research, part of it is better sort of standard operating procedures. Part of it may be – frankly, some of the leases that Interior have done and offered in these call areas are probably just too large and too many.’

‘We shouldn’t assume a deployment of wind that ignores all the other really important values of the ocean,’ Hartl added. ‘The Biden administration has to probably reevaluate Sullivan to address these threats better.’

But the Biden administration and East Coast states like New Jersey continue to push for aggressive clean energy development including offshore wind projects as part of their climate agenda. 

In July, President Biden argued that offshore wind would create jobs and power millions of homes in the future. And the Department of Interior has expanded plans for offshore lease sales for wind development along the nation’s eastern and western coastlines and in the Gulf of Mexico.

There are currently three offshore wind projects being constructed off the coast of New York in federal waters and another four projects in federal waters off the coast of New Jersey, according to BOEM.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican senators had a message for President Joe Biden while addressing the national debt and quickly approaching debt ceiling deadline during a Wednesday press conference: He ‘will negotiate.’

‘President Biden needs to know, absolutely he will negotiate, and it’s better to start now,’ Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told reporters, pushing back on the Biden administration’s stance that the talks surrounding the debt ceiling are ‘not a negotiation.’

Paul added that the greatest security threat to the nation is the debt and that no conservatives and no Republicans in the House of Representatives will vote to raise the debt ceiling ‘without significant budget reform.’

The growing U.S. national debt stands at $31.4 trillion while the federal government’s annual budget is currently operating at $6.3 trillion, nearly $2 trillion more than what it spent annually prior to the coronavirus pandemic.

According to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, the U.S. will need to raise the debt ceiling by June in order to avoid ‘irreparable harm to the U.S. economy, the livelihoods of all Americans and global financial stability.’

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who spoke immediately before Paul, called Biden’s position on the debt ceiling ‘unreasonable and ridiculous’ and vowed that the Republican conferences in both houses of Congress will use every possible ‘lever point’ to stop the massive spending contributing to the rising debt and historic inflation plaguing the nation.

‘We are at a moment in time, because the American people elected a Republican majority in the House, where we have an opportunity to stop the madness. And I believe it is incumbent on that Republican majority, and on the Republicans in the Senate, to use every lever point we have to stop the out-of-control spending that is driving inflation, that is punishing hard-working Americans across this country,’ Cruz said.

Cruz said the debt ceiling has historically been ‘the most effective lever point to force meaningful concessions’ on budget and debt reform, and he called on members of the press to avoid reporting White House talking points that Republicans wanted to default on the national debt.

‘Nobody standing here wants to default on the debt. Let me be absolutely clear and unequivocal: The United States of America should never, ever, ever default on its debt,’ he said.

‘There is one principle person in this town that is talking about a default in the debt, and that is Joe Biden. Joe Biden wants to threaten a default in the debt. He wants to scare the markets, and frankly, he’s counting on you all,’ he added.

Cruz went on to cite instances in which he said Republicans were able to force legislation to address the budget and debt, including the Budget Control Act of 2011, and he reiterated that it was not the position of Republicans that the debt ceiling would never be raised.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked earlier this month about debt ceiling negotiations and whether Biden is willing to ‘cut any spending’ or would be willing to negotiate with Republicans who ‘want to cut spending as part of a debt limit deal.’

‘Look, as you’ve heard us say before, we will not be doing any negotiation over the debt ceiling,’ Jean-Pierre said.

‘What we’re saying is that … this should be done without conditions,’ she added. ‘In the past … we have seen both Republicans and Democrats come together to deal with this issue. It is one of the basic items that Congress has to deal with, and it should be done without condition. So, there’s going to be no negotiation over it. This is something that must get done.’

‘It is not my position that we will never raise the debt ceiling — rather what the rules say is we will use the debt ceiling as leverage to force real and meaningful structural reforms to fix the underlying problem,’ Cruz said. ‘[It] doesn’t have to be a total solution for everything, but it has to be real and meaningful progress.’

Fox News’ Peter Kasperowicz and Kyle Morris contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS