Archive

2023

Browsing

The surprise OPEC+ production cuts last week had investors frantically positioning themselves in anticipation of the opportunities, risks, and opportunity risks surrounding crude oil exposure.

What Just Happened?

On Monday, OPEC+ announced it was reducing its output by 1.16 million barrels per day. The cuts are to begin in May and will continue until the end of the year.

Why’s This a Big Deal?

The global economy runs on oil. As a major global input, it will affect not only the cost of production, but consumer costs as well. Even if a product isn’t made using petroleum, its means of transportation and delivery are likely powered by petroleum. So, in a way, oil powers almost everything you buy.

Making Matters Worse…

Given Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, this move has shaken up the global energy markets and further exacerbated the tense geopolitical landscape.

Remember OPEC’s earlier reduction of two million barrels back in October? Well, that increased tensions between the US and its long-time ally, Saudi Arabia. Currently, the nation is seeking entry into BRICS, which can reduce demand for petrodollars (another huge matter altogether that we won’t discuss here).

What Are Analysts Predicting?

Several analysts say that the cuts may push crude oil prices back up to $100 per barrel (or higher).  CMC Markets’ analyst Tina Teng told CNBC that oil prices might move toward the $100 mark, considering China’s reopening and Russia’s output cuts. A Reuters® report also supported the possibility of oil prices moving toward $100 a barrel.

What Are Investors Thinking?

They’re probably tempted to jump into a trade and readjust their portfolio for heavier crude oil exposure. Is it a wise thing to do? After all, Saudi Arabia’s cuts aim to counter the global decrease in industrial output, so it says. Its move aims to stabilize the oil market.

Fundamentally, it may be wise to go long oil, especially considering how this “stabilizing” action may also be a form of geopolitical posturing in support of BRICS and defiance of the West.

Headwinds and Turbulence Ahead

Let’s use the United States Oil ETF (USO) as a proxy for WTI crude oil. The fundamental driver may be enough to fuel oil’s trajectory toward $100 a barrel. But it’s likely to be a turbulent flight, considering the resistance levels ahead (see chart below).

CHART 1: WHICH WAY FOR OIL? USO broke down from a rectangle formation. A breakaway gap took prices just below the resistance within the rectangle. A divergence between price and the Chaikin Money Flow indicate the possibility of increased buying pressure.Chart source: StockChartsACP. For illustrative purposes only.

In March, oil broke down from a three-month rectangle formation. Typically, this is a continuation pattern that hints former support will turn resistance. But then, OPEC+ came along with an unpleasant surprise.A breakaway gap occurred over the weekend, falling short of resistance within the rectangle (see the blue-dashed line). In general, gaps are likely to be filled or tested. To demonstrate convincing momentum for USO’s upward movement based on the fundamental principle, let’s anticipate that it won’t drop below the rectangle formation’s low point (support) and will instead break through the formation itself.Note the divergence in the Chaikin Money Flow in relation to USO’s low, as it broke below the bottom of the rectangle formation. This indicates the possibility of increased buying pressure while USO’s price was sinking.The main feature here is the multiple resistance levels facing USO on its way up toward analysts’ $100 price target.

The Bottom Line

Why make such a big deal out of this? It’s only a big deal if you’re not expecting it. Investors relatively new to (or unfamiliar with) basic technical analysis should know what to expect.

It’s like a turbulent flight. You have conviction that you’re getting from point A to point B, but the bumpiness can easily shake your resolve. But while flight passengers have no choice but to power through the ride, investors can easily exit.

And while no expert can predict whether oil (or, in this case, USO) will ever reach analysts’ fundamentally-driven price target, using these charts can at least help you map out the course and prepare for several technical headwinds ahead. This, in turn, can give you more options to manage or adjust your trade, rather than simply bailing out.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

Jesse Livermore is one of the most famous (and infamous) traders of all time. In his classic (written under a pen name) Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, he tells his story of how he became a successful trader. Livermore’s focus on price and human nature made him a pioneer in both technical analysis and trading psychology. In this week’s edition of Trading Simplified, Dave begins a series of videos delving into the wisdom of Livermore, drawing mostly from Reminiscences. He also fills in some background information to help you understand Mr. Livermore’s trials and tribulations. Further, as an active trader, he discusses how the information is just as timely today as it was over 100 years ago.

This video was originally broadcast on April 5, 2023. Click anywhere on the Trading Simplified logo above to watch on our dedicated show page, or at this link to watch on YouTube. You can also watch this and past episodes on the StockCharts on-demand video service StockChartsTV.com — registration is free!

New episodes of Trading Simplified air on Wednesdays at 12:00pm ET on StockCharts TV. You can view all recorded episodes of the show at this link. Go to davelandry.com/stockcharts to access the slides for this episode and more. Dave can be contacted at davelandry.com/contact for any comments and questions.

April is Financial Literacy Month—a good excuse to bump up your financial knowledge so you can be better equipped to manage your personal finances. To support your financial journey, StockCharts is featuring several articles in April that focus on how you can take advantage of the educational tools that can make you a smarter trader and investor.

With such a large universe of stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds, and so on to choose from, it can be tempting to base your decisions on a tip you received from a friend. But that doesn’t necessarily end up well.

A better plan would be turning to techniques that have worked. Jesse Livermore, thought of as one of the greatest traders who ever lived, uses a three-pronged approach—timing, money management, and emotional control. Very basic, yet logical. It’s one that any trader can apply when it comes to finding which stocks to trade. 

Assume you’ve done your market analysis and, based on the action of the broader indexes, you’ve determined that large-cap stocks are performing well and are likely to trend higher. You want to get in on the action, but which stocks or funds should you trade?

Scanning the Stock Universe

Your objective is to make money on your investments. But how are you going to achieve it?

The key is identifying the setups that have a high probability of moving in a specific direction. You want your investments to have enough of a move that you can profit from. Unfortunately, traders often get caught up in making that money quickly. With such a mindset, it can be easy to make bad judgments. And the market is good at telling you when you made a bad judgment.

Wouldn’t it be great if you knew you were wrong before the market told you? After all, you don’t want to tie up your money in an investment that doesn’t move much or one that loses money. 

A prerequisite to trading or investing is to understand the market and yourself. In this age of information overload, it may be best to shut out everything you’ve heard and focus on looking at price charts. Go through charts of stocks that have had a long-term move in one direction and then reversed. Make a note of the different support and resistance levels. Analyze the price action at these levels. Did price make an explosive move for a few days, then pause and reverse? 

Once you understand price action, the first step is to think about what types of stocks are likely to give you the most bang for your buck. Do you want to find:

stocks and funds that have reached their 52-week high,stocks and funds that are reversing from a downtrend, or stocks and funds that are crossing above a SCTR of 80? 

Let’s say you’re looking for stocks that are in a new uptrend because, well, you want to take advantage of the developing trend. From looking at your charts, you’ve identified that, once a stock starts to trend higher, it moves pretty quickly for a few days, then slows down and pulls back. After the pullback, it continues to move higher.

You want to get in on this trend, but the key is to get in at the right time.

Scans To Identify the Best Stocks

Once you’ve formulated the price behavior of a particular stock, you can run some scans. The good news is that StockCharts has predefined scans that mimic some of the more common price actions of stocks. There are a few different ones for identifying stocks that are in a new uptrend.

How To Find Predefined Scans in StockCharts

From Your Dashboard, under Member Tools, select Advanced Scan Workbench.Select Predefined Scans and look through the large collection of scans.Try out a few of the scans. Scans are sorted based on equities and mutual funds. Equities are sorted by the exchanges they trade in and include US, Canadian, UK, Indian exchanges.Edit the scan criteria so it does what you want it to do.Save the scan to a ChartList or download the .csv file.

Say you used the Stocks in a New Uptrend (Aroon) predefined scan to start your scan. You’ll see that the results are sorted by the exchanges, and there’s a column for mutual funds. So, in the image below, you see 27 NYSE stocks made the list. Click on it to bring up a list of all those stocks. You could sort the list by any of the columns. For example, if you’re looking for those with the highest SCTR score, click on the column heading to sort in ascending or descending order. If you want to sort by the universe, you can click on the U column and sort.

CHART 1: PREDEFINED SCANS. To look for the best stocks to trade, review the predefined scans in the StockCharts platform. It’s easy to modify the scans so it meets specific criteria.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes only.From your earlier analysis, you see that large-cap stocks are outperforming. Based on that, you want to identify large-cap stocks that are in a new upward trend. After sorting by universe, you identify a handful of large-cap stocks. Hover your mouse over the stock symbol to see a small chart. It’s one way to quickly run through the charts to see if they’re close to their highs or lows or if the price is more in line with your risk tolerance level. Running through the list will help to narrow down your stocks even further.

Zeroing in on a Stock

Say Pfizer, Inc. (PFE) was one stock that you shortlisted. Pull up a chart of the stock to do your analysis. The Aroon Up is at 100, and Aroon Down is at 28, which means the strength is to the upside. But will the uptrend sustain? To answer this question, you could perform a more in-depth analysis.

CHART 2: STOCK IN A NEW UPTREND. The Aroon indicator helps identify stocks that are in a new uptrend. Pfizer (PFE) was one of the stocks in the scan results. Doing a more in-depth analysis of the stocks helps to identify entry and exit points.Chart source: StockChartsACP. For educational purposes only.

The Aroon indicator helps identify emerging trends. The Aroon-Up has moved above the Aroon-Down, with Aroon-Up well above and Aroon-Down well below 50. The third stage is when Aroon-Up reaches 100 while the Aroon-Down is relatively low. So, in the case of Pfizer, the emerging trend reached all three stages pretty quickly. The Aroon Oscillator in the lower sub-chart shows the difference between the two.

If you look back at the last uptrend, from October to December, the crossover occured closer to the 50 level, whereas this time, it was lower—closer to the 30 level. The stock price had some big moves during the uptrend, then slowed down a bit. In the most recent uptrend, volume increased on March 31 and April 3. The down day on April 4 had a slightly lower volume.

If the uptrend continues with strong moves with high volume, it could be a potential candidate for a long position. But the stock is trading a hair below its 50-day moving average (MA), so, if you were considering trading Pfizer, you may want to set an alert for when the stock price crosses above the 50-day MA, then observe it. If the stock slows down, pulls back, and then continues its uptrend, there’s a strong chance you could make a decent profit.

Stay in Tune With Stock Price Movement

It’s important to understand how a stock moves to time your exits. It requires patience, but it can be worth the wait. Once you decide to enter a long position in the stock, watch how price moves. In particular, look at the momentum in the up moves vs. the down moves.

Once you sense a slowing down, you may want to exit your positions. Looking at the chart, the stock tends to fall hard and fast. You don’t want to get caught up in that downfall, so you can’t let your emotions control you. Your winning trade could turn into a losing trade, and you could end up hanging on to a losing investment for way too long. You know yourself better than anyone else. Risk only what you feel comfortable losing in the trade.

You can apply this type of analysis to different stocks before deciding which stock to trade. Stay tuned for more articles during Financial Literacy Awareness month that focus on helping you become a more empowered trader and investor.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

SPX Monitoring Purposes: Long SPX on 2/6/23 at 4110.98.

Monitoring Purposes GOLD:  Long GDX on 10/9/20 at 40.78.

Long Term SPX Monitor Purposes: Neutral.

Above, we have the chart of the daily SPY. The pink area shows the times when the 10-day TRIN was above 1.20, a reading which shows panic and usually comes near lows in the SPY. The blue area shows when the 10-day TRIN is below .80, a reading that shows euphoria and normally comes near highs in the SPY. Right now, the 10-day TRIN stands at 1.08 and near-neutral reading for the market. If the rally continues (which we think it will), the 10-day TRIN may drop to .80 or lower and give us a “heads-up” that the market may be near a high and that may develop near 470 on the SPY. The purple area shows where most the 10-day TRIN reading was above 1.20, which was from the 370 to 405 range on the SPY and lasted 10 months, which in turn suggests a support area. This sideways pattern appears to be breaking out to the upside and giving a target to the 470 range, which is the January 2022 high. An interesting statistic: in pre-election years (like this year), April is up 94% of the time. If January was up (it was up over 6% this year), April is up 88% of the time.

The chart above is updated to today’s trading, but what we said yesterday is still relevant. “The breakout area on the monthly SPY chart is near the 405 level, which was exceeded on last Friday’s close. There was also a ‘Sign of Strength’ for the month on March (noted on the chart). The pattern that appears to be forming is a ‘Head-and-Shoulders bottom’ and has a measured target to the 470 level, which is the January 2022 high. The SPY didn’t quite get to the 50% retracement level, measured from the March 2020 low (50% level noted on chart). A 50% retracement suggests the market will at least rally back to the old high (January 2022 SPY 470) or can mark the half way point of the move up, which would give a much higher target. The bottom window is the monthly Slow Stochastic, which turned up last November and suggests an uptrend was started back then.”

Tim Ord,

Editor

www.ord-oracle.com. Book release “The Secret Science of Price and Volume” by Timothy Ord, buy at www.Amazon.com.

Signals are provided as general information only and are not investment recommendations. You are responsible for your own investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Opinions are based on historical research and data believed reliable; there is no guarantee results will be profitable. Not responsible for errors or omissions. I may invest in the vehicles mentioned above.

McDonald’s Corp is temporarily closing its U.S. offices this week as it prepares to inform corporate employees about its layoffs as part of a broader company restructuring, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

In an internal email last week to U.S. employees and some international staff, McDonald’s asked them to work from home from Monday through Wednesday so it can deliver staffing decisions virtually, the report said. It is unclear how many employees will be laid off.

“During the week of April 3, we will communicate key decisions related to roles and staffing levels across the organization,” the Chicago-based company said in the message viewed by the Journal.

McDonald’s also asked employees to cancel all in-person meetings with vendors and other outside parties at its headquarters, the report added.

McDonald’s did not immediately respond to Reuters’ request for a comment.

The fast-food chain said in January that it would review corporate staffing levels as part of an updated business strategy, which could lead to layoffs in some areas and expansion in others.

McDonald’s is expected to begin announcing key decisions by Monday.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Vince McMahon’s World Wrestling Entertainment has agreed to merge with UFC to form a new publicly traded company controlled by Endeavor Group, the companies announced Monday morning.

Endeavor will own a 51% stake in the new combat sports and entertainment company, while WWE shareholders will have the remaining 49%, according to the terms of the agreement. The deal values WWE at $9.3 billion and UFC, which is owned by Endeavor, at $12.1 billion, the companies said in a news release.

Shares of WWE fell in premarket trading, while Endeavor shares rose.

Ari Emanuel will be CEO of both Endeavor and the new company, the companies said. McMahon will be executive chairman, while Endeavor President and Chief Operating Officer Mark Shapiro will also work in the same roles at the new company. Dana White will remain as president of UFC, and WWE CEO Nick Khan will stay on as president of the wrestling business.

The board will consist of 11 people, six appointed by Endeavor and five by WWE. The merged company’s name will be announced later.

The announcement confirmed a CNBC report. It also came a day after WWE wrapped up its flagship live event, WrestleMania, in California. The company has spent the past several months looking for a buyer; McMahon returned to the company as chairman in January to oversee the process. Shares of WWE are up by more than 33% this year as of Friday’s closing bell, giving it a market value of more than $6.79 billion.

The agreement would pair two of the biggest sports entertainment brands in the world. Despite notable differences — WWE features scripted matches and soap opera-like storylines, while UFC showcases authentically brutal mixed martial arts fighting — the organizations look like a good fit in terms of content and culture. Several UFC fighters, including Ronda Rousey and Brock Lesnar, have already wrestled for WWE.

More from CNBC

Home prices suddenly jump after several months of declines Starbucks fired the employee responsible for igniting the Starbucks Workers United union campaign Rihanna rented an Arizona man’s house for $500,000 — enough to pay off 2 years of his mortgage

UFC champion and superstar Conor McGregor lauded the news Sunday evening. “Incredible. What a powerhouse!” he said in a tweet, following up with another tweet displaying an image of him brandishing UFC and WWE championship belts.

A merger will also conclude WWE’s decades as a family business. McMahon’s father founded WWE in its original incarnation in the middle of the 20th century. McMahon, who bought the company from his father in 1982, is the controlling shareholder. Over the past four decades, WWE has grown into a global phenomenon, spawning breakout stars such as Hulk Hogan, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Dave Bautista and John Cena.

McMahon, 77, retired from the company in July following a string of revelations that he paid several women millions of dollars over the years to keep quiet about alleged affairs and misconduct. His daughter, Stephanie McMahon, became co-CEO alongside Khan. Paul Levesque, who’s both Stephanie McMahon’s husband and the wrestler known as Triple H, took over creative duties from Vince McMahon.

After Vince McMahon came back in January, Stephanie McMahon stepped down and Khan fully assumed the CEO role. The elder McMahon recently locked in a two-year employment contract, according to a securities filing.

Khan in recent weeks has been making the media rounds to discuss the potential sale. He told CNBC’s Morgan Brennan on Thursday that it has been a robust process and that it has drawn many interested buyers.

WWE offers Endeavor’s shareholders a muscular media and live events business, as well as decades worth of intellectual property. The company generated $1.29 billion in revenue last year, driven mainly by its $1 billion media unit.

UFC, meanwhile, has paid off for Endeavor. Last year, the MMA league helped its parent company’s sports business make $1.3 billion in revenue. Endeavor’s market cap stood at about $10.53 billion as of Friday’s close.

WWE also fits well with the cultures of Endeavor and UFC, which also reflect their leaders’ hard-edged styles. McMahon, Emanuel and White are known for their outsized personalities, and each has their share of devoted allies and and harsh critics.

White is no stranger to scandal, either. Earlier this year, video emerged showing the UFC boss slapping his wife during a public argument at a New Year’s Eve party in Mexico. He later apologized.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The total amount refunded to taxpayers by the Internal Revenue Service to date this year is approximately $172 billion — $16.4 billion less than in in 2022, the latest data from the agency shows.

That equates to an average refund of $2,903 — $360 less per person than in 2022, the data shows.

Given the importance of these refunds to many households’ annual budgets, those spending plans are likely to be dramatically affected, according to Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate.

‘Lots of people like refunds,’ Rossman said. ‘It’s the largest windfall many households get throughout the year.’

A recent Bankrate survey found 75% of respondents said this year’s tax refund would be very or somewhat important to their financial health, compared with 67% who said so in 2022.

The IRS previously forecast that refund checks were likely to be lower in 2023 due to the expiration of pandemic-era federal payment programs, including stimulus checks and child-related tax and credit programs.

Still, the lower-dollar checks come at a time of ongoing inflation and may put many households into further financial distress. Rossman said that historically, refund-reliant households have used the money to pay down debt or boost savings. The recent Bankrate survey found just 3% of respondents said they’d use their refunds on retail splurging.

At the same time, the lower-dollar refunds may help further the Federal Reserve’s goal of lowering inflation if it ultimately causes households to curb spending, Rossman said.

If the refunds were higher, ‘there would have been some inflationary pressure,’ he said. ‘So being down a bit maybe contributes to disinflation.’

In general, Rossman advises taxpayers that, by adjusting the withholding amounts from their regular paychecks, they can maximize the take-home pay they earn throughout the year. If you’re getting a refund at tax time, it means you paid too much income tax during the previous year, which is essentially an interest-free loan to the government.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Attorneys acting on behalf of two former college athletes on Tuesday filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences that seeks retroactive damages for thousands of college athletes based on the nearly $6,000-a-year academic-achievement payments that were allowed by a U.S. district court judge in March 2019 and unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court a little more than two years later.

Tuesday’s filing is certain to be cited by the NCAA as another illustration of why it says it needs a federal law covering college athletes’ ability to make money from their name, image and likeness that also would include protection from antitrust suits. A form of such protection was one feature of a bill that has been offered by Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., although not in the current Congressional session.

The plaintiffs’ lead attorneys, Steve Berman and Jeff Kessler, told USA TODAY Sports they have no concerns about this case strengthening the NCAA’s position with lawmakers.

Said Kessler: ‘I’ve spoken to many members of Congress about this the last several years. I know Steve has, too. We have yet to find members of Congress who don’t worry about the athletes as the victims of the exploitation. They’re not really terribly concerned about the NCAA’s claim that, somehow, it’s the victim. So, I don’t think there’s any real desire in Congress to grant immunity to the NCAA any more than they would grant immunity to Amazon.’

NCAA officials were not immediately available for comment.

The new case was filed in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California’s Oakland Division. It is the same venue through which other antitrust suits against the NCAA related to college-athlete compensation have proceeded over the past 14 years. In the two cases that have gone to trial there before Judge Claudia Wilken, the NCAA has been found in violation of antitrust law. She already is overseeing another case that has reached the phase in which she will determine whether it will proceed as class action.

Lawyers at the center of Alston case involved

Tuesday’s suit is the fifth antitrust case against the NCAA that has been led or co-led by the Seattle-based firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP. Not all of those cases have fully succeeded. But Berman, one of the firm’s name partners, was at the center of the case that went to the Supreme Court on behalf of former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston and has served as the launch point for this litigation.

The Alston case began as a quest for both an injunction that would prevent the NCAA from having limits on the compensation athletes could receive from their schools, and damages based on the difference between the value of a cost-of-attendance-based scholarship and the value of a traditional scholarship mainly comprising tuition, room, board, books and fees. The NCAA and a group of 11 conferences settled the damages portion for $208.7 million.

During the injunction phase of the case, Berman joined forces with Kessler, a New York-based lawyer with Winston & Strawn LLP known widely for his work in sports cases. Kessler ended up arguing the case before the Supreme Court.

Berman and Kessler also are leading the case already pending before Wilken that seeks to build on the Alston case in a different way. That case not only asks that the NCAA be prevented from having association-wide rules that “restrict the amount of name, image, and likeness compensation available” to athletes but also seeks unspecified damages based on the share of television-rights money and the social media earnings it claims athletes would have received if the NCAA’s current limits on NIL compensation had not existed. Those damages, conservatively, could total hundreds of millions of dollars.

Several thousand athletes could be covered in new suit

The case filed Tuesday also seeks to be a class action. It is connected directly to Wilken’s injunction in the Alston case. She ruled that the NCAA’s limits at the time on benefits related to education for athletes playing Division I men’s or women’s basketball or Bowl Subdivision football violated antitrust law.

Under the injunction, the basketball and football players were permitted to receive payments for academic achievement in an amount equivalent to the maximum cash value of awards they could receive for athletic achievement. Those awards are the items given for winning championships or participating in bowl games, which have provided athletes with gift cards and and/or an array of merchandise. Based primarily on the dollar-value limits listed in the NCAA Division I rulebook, Wilken determined their maximum cash value to be $5,980.

To comply with the injunction, the NCAA changed its rules for Division I men’s or women’s basketball players and Bowl Subdivision football players in August 2020.

After the Supreme Court’s ruling, the NCAA in October 2021 allowed schools to award the academic-achievement payments to athletes in any sport.

Schools that have adopted these payments have set varying requirements that athletes must meet to receive them, but some schools have made them contingent only on maintaining “minimum academic eligibility under NCAA standards,” according to the lawsuit, which alleges that is the case with at least 16 schools. The suit claims that, overall, more than 50 schools are paying academic-achievement awards.

The goal of Tuesday’s lawsuit is to obtain a damages award that covers all current and former athletes who competed on a Division I team on or after April 1, 2019 “who would have met the requirements for receiving an Academic Achievement Award under the criteria established by their schools for qualifying for such an Award.”

The four-year reach-back from filing date is allowed under federal antitrust law. In addition to covering athletes at schools that already are providing academic-achievement awards, the suit proposes to cover athletes at any school that starts to provide the awards between now and the date the case is certified by a judge as a class action. A ruling on that issue could be at least a year or two away. Also, if a jury decides to award damages to an antitrust plaintiff, the amount is tripled.

The suit says the plaintiffs “are informed and believe that there are several thousand” athletes who would be covered. Kessler said: ‘We know that it’s going to be thousands — probably tens of thousands — of athletes, but we can’t really be more precise at this moment.’ 

How amounts owed to athletes could be determined

How the suit proposes that this would work was illustrated by its claims regarding the named plaintiffs, former Oklahoma State football player Chuba Hubbard and former Oregon and Auburn track and field athlete Keira McCarrell. Both plaintiffs’ athletic and academic achievements are included in the lawsuit.

Hubbard played for Oklahoma State from 2017 through 2020-21 season. According to the lawsuit, Oklahoma State announced in March 2022 that it would begin offering annual $5,980 academic-achievement awards.

As “a direct result of the NCAA rules prohibiting OSU from offering such payments sooner — rules that have since been determined to violate the antitrust laws — Hubbard was deprived of receiving the $5,980 Academic Achievement Awards that he would have earned each year that he attended OSU,” the lawsuit alleges.

McCarrell competed for Oregon in 2017-18 and ’18-19, then for Auburn for three years. In February 2022, Auburn started paying academic-achievement awards, and Oregon also started doing this during the 2021-22 academic year, the lawsuit states.  “ … McCarrell was deprived of receiving Academic Achievement Awards that she would have earned each year that she attended Oregon and the first two years that she attended Auburn,” the suit alleges. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 10 postseason teams in the NBA’s Eastern Conference are just about set.

In what order they finish – from the first seed to the 10th seed – is not settled with each team playing three or four more regular-season games.

Two games separate first-place Milwaukee from second-place Boston. Just 2½ games are between third-place Philadelphia and fourth-place Cleveland. The Cavs have a three-game lead over fifth-place New York. Sixth-place Brooklyn has a two-game lead over seventh-place Miami, which is two games up on Atlanta and Toronto, who are each a game ahead of 10th-place Chicago.

Let’s take a look at the playoff race in the East heading into Tuesday’s games:

Follow every game: Latest NBA Scores and Schedules

1. Milwaukee Bucks (56-22)

The Bucks don’t have the top seed secured and don’t own the tiebreaker against Boston, so they have to win to get the top seed and league’s overall best record. They have an easier schedule than the Celtics, too.

Remaining games: at Washington; vs. Chicago; vs. Memphis; at Toronto

2. Boston Celtics (54-24, two games back)

The Celtics have a chance at the top seed and best overall record, but in their position, they need other teams to beat the Bucks and they need to win games. Regardless, the Celtics didn’t have home-court advantage in last season’ playoffs, winning Game 7 of the conference finals in Miami.

Remaining games: at Philadelphia; vs. Toronto; vs. Toronto; vs. Atlanta

3. Philadelphia 76ers (51-27, five games back)

The Sixers are just about locked into the third seed — unless they beat Boston on Tuesday, win their remaining games and the Celtics lose their four remaining games. The Celtics own the tiebreaker if they finish with identical records based on head-to-head win-loss percentage.

Remaining games: vs. Boston; vs. Miami; at Atlanta; at Brooklyn

4. Cleveland Cavaliers (49-30, 7½ games back)

Cleveland could catch Philadelphia for the third seed, but need to win all three games while the Sixers don’t win another regular-season game. The tiebreaker goes to the Sixers if they share the same record. However, Cleveland would fall to the fifth seed (and lose home-court for the first round) if it loses out and New York wins out.

Remaining games: at Orlando; at Orlando; vs. Charlotte

5. New York Knicks (46-33, 10½ games back)

The Knicks, one of the better teams in the East in the second half of the season, have an outside chance to get the fourth seed. Either way, unless the Knicks really stumble, it looks like a Cleveland-New York first-round series.

Remaining games: at Indiana; at New Orleans; vs. Indiana

6. Brooklyn Nets (43-35, 13 games back)

Credit to the Nets for holding it together after trading Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. Mikal Bridges is turning into a two-way star now that he can showcase his offensive talent. A tough closing schedule makes it difficult for the Nets to catch the Knicks. Holding off Miami for the sixth seed is the bigger concern.

Remaining games: vs. Minnesota; at Detroit; vs. Orlando; vs. Philadelphia

7. Miami Heat (41-37, 15 games back)

The Heat, who reached the conference finals last season, would love to sneak in at the sixth seed and avoid a play-in game situation. But that’s going to be difficult since Brooklyn owns the tiebreaker. Not falling a spot or two is also on Miami’s radar, though it has the tiebreaker against Atlanta but not Toronto.

Remaining games: at Detroit; at Philadelphia; at Washington; vs. Orlando

8. Atlanta Hawks (39-39, 17 games back)

The Hawks’ final four games includes two against top teams in the East and another team trying to make the play-in tournament. Owning the tiebreaker against Toronto helps.

Remaining games: at Chicago; vs. Washington; vs. Philadelphia; at Boston

9. Toronto Raptors (39-39, 17 games back)

Not an easy way to finish the season for the Raptors, who have two games at Boston. Moving up to the seventh seed is more likely than the eighth seed given the tiebreaker scenario. But the Raptors have to watch Chicago, too, with the tiebreaker between those two teams going to the Raptors.

Remaining games: at Charlotte; at Boston; at Boston; vs. Milwaukee

10. Chicago Bulls (38-40, 18 games back)

It’s been a difficult season for the Bulls, especially with Lonzo Ball’s unknown future due to knee issues, but all they need to do is win one game and they’re in the play-in game format. Tuesday’s game against Atlanta has tiebreaker implications with the Bulls ahead 2-1 in seasons series.

Remaining games: vs. Atlanta; at Milwaukee; at Dallas; vs. Detroit

11 and 12. Orlando Magic and Washington Wizards (34-44, 22 games back)

Though the Magic and Wizards have the same record, the Wizards have been eliminated from the postseason because they lose the tiebreaker to Chicago. However, if the Bulls were to lose their final four games and the Magic win their final four (brutal schedule, though), the Magic own the tiebreaker and would sneak into the play-in game.

Orlando’s remaining games: vs. Cleveland; vs. Cleveland; at Brooklyn; at Miami

Washington’s remaining games: vs. Milwaukee; at Atlanta; vs. Miami; vs. Houston

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Julie Ertz wasn’t supposed to make it back to the U.S. women’s national team.

Ertz, who last week was recalled for the first time since the Olympics, gave birth to her son in 2022, and has been without a club for over a year. USWNT boss Vlatko Andonovski said in February the team didn’t believe she was going to be available for the World Cup. There were no outward signs she was about to make a comeback.

And yet, that’s exactly what she’s doing. Over 600 days after her last competitive match, Ertz is on Andonovski’s roster for two friendlies against the Republic of Ireland.

What brought her back?

‘I do love competing. I love playing the sport,’ Ertz told reporters from the team’s camp in Texas. ‘It’s hard to step away from it. Obviously coming back from pregnancy changes things — obviously your body — so I just wanted to make sure, when I was coming back, that I felt like I was strong enough, to be able to feel like I could be myself.’

Julie Ertz searches for club to meet USWNT requirement 

Ertz, 30, said she is practicing ‘an attitude of gratitude’ with her return, acknowledging the recall is rooted in ‘probably my past successes with the team, individually and collectively.’ Ertz is still without a club, and Andonovski told reporters last week the USWNT is holding club play as a requirement.

That issue is one Ertz said she’s working on while focusing on this national team camp.

‘I’m in communication with a few teams,’ said Ertz, adding she is ‘trying to stay focused on the games coming up, but also knowing that I need a club team.’

USWNT helped Julie Ertz get back into playing shape

Still, the USWNT kept Ertz connected while she’s trained away from a team environment. Ertz said she’s been watching a lot of film and asking plenty of questions.

‘I’ve been in really good conversations with Vlatko, just what they’ve been looking at, what they’ve been trying to do about each game,’ Ertz said. ‘It’s been a little bit different from game to game. So it’s been fun listening to what he sees, and allowing [me] to ask questions. 

‘ And then, making sure to have that part where I can really focus on what they were doing tactically, if even if I wasn’t there physically.’

Ertz said despite the long road back into playing shape, that side of things is going well.

‘My body feels physically where it needs to be,’ Ertz said. ‘I feel great.’

NWSL moms offer support to Julie Ertz

Ertz added that she heard from multiple mothers around the NWSL, specifically taking a moment to shout out Chicago Red Stars and Jamaica forward Cheyna Matthews, who has returned to play after the birth of each of her three children. Ertz also said she trained with Kealia Watt, another NWSL moms.

‘I had so much respect for them [as players], and now it’s like a whole different level of like, oh my gosh, you have no idea,’ Ertz said. ‘The behind the scenes of stuff that they go through, and so I’m grateful for it all. They really inspired me.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY