Archive

2023

Browsing

The Biden administration is reportedly finalizing a proposal that would force fossil fuel-fired power plants to substantially curb emissions or utilize costly carbon capture technology.

The proposal — which will soon be released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) — is expected to require coal- and natural gas-fired power plants to cut or capture the vast majority of their carbon dioxide emissions by 2040, The New York Times reported on Saturday, citing officials briefed on a draft of the plan. The regulation, if finalized, would represent the first-ever federal action curbing power plant emissions.

‘EPA cannot comment because the proposals are currently under interagency review,’ EPA spokesperson Maria Michalos told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

‘But we have been clear from the start that we will use all of our legally-upheld tools, grounded in decades-old bipartisan laws, to address dangerous air pollution and protect the air our children breathe today and for generations to come,’ Michalos said.

An Office of Management and Budget filing from late last year stated that the EPA anticipates issuing a proposed rule for the action, described as a proposal to limit greenhouse gas emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired plants, in spring 2023 and promulgating a final rule by summer 2024. The filing noted there are no EPA regulations on the books limiting emissions from existing electric generating units.

Overall, there are 3,393 fossil fuel-fired power plants nationwide, the majority of which are natural gas plants, according to the most recent federal data. Those plants generate more than 60% of the nation’s electricity, compared to the roughly 14% of electricity generated by wind and solar projects.

However, EPA data shows that the electric power sector accounts for about 25% of total U.S. emissions, placing it behind only the transportation sector and slightly ahead of the industrial sector. As such, fossil fuel power plants have been targeted by environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers who argue that emissions must be reduced in an effort to stave off cataclysmic climate change.

Shortly after he took office, President Biden pledged to enable the nation to achieve an up to 52% total emission reduction by 2030 and to create a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035.

‘Setting effective, affordable power plant carbon standards under the Clean Air Act now can ensure that the power industry delivers the emissions reductions needed to help meet the climate crisis,’ argued an issue brief released this month by the Natural Resources Defense Council, an influential environmental group. ‘Time is of the essence.’ 

‘The EPA needs to move expeditiously, proposing power plant carbon standards soon as promised and finalizing them by early next year,’ the brief added. ‘This will allow states and power companies to get to work on implementing them, so we can curb this dangerous pollution and safeguard the climate as soon as possible.’

However, the fossil fuel industry has pushed back, arguing the U.S. power grid is still deeply reliant on coal, natural gas and petroleum.

‘The expected EPA regulation is just the latest in President Biden’s anti-fossil fuels agenda, coercing the retirement of electricity sources that are needed during the grid transition,’ Michelle Bloodworth, the president and CEO of America’s Power, a coal power trade group, told Fox News Digital. 

‘EPA’s actions are contrary to the concerns of grid operators and other energy experts who have warned about possible electricity shortages,’ she continued.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2022 that an Obama-era rule limiting power plant emissions under the Clean Air Act was unconstitutional, since Congress never granted the EPA the explicit power to issue such regulations. But the Inflation Reduction Act passed two months after that ruling allows the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A Montana state representative condemned a transgender legislator’s ‘hate-filled remarks’ to Fox News Digital, accusing the representative of ‘seeking media attention.’

The controversy stems from comments made by State Rep. Zooey Zephyr during a Tuesday debate about a bill that would ban gender-affirming care for minors.

Zephyr accused the bill’s supporters of being complicit in the deaths of transgender youths.

‘The only thing I will say, is if you vote yes on this bill and yes on these amendments, I hope the next time there’s an invocation when you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands,’ Zephyr said.

After her remarks, Republican Speaker Matt Regier refused to allow Zephyr to express her thoughts on a bill that would put binary definitions of sex in the state code. Zephyr was also barred from speaking at Thursday and Friday sessions.

‘Not only has my colleague violated decorum, but has broken the trust given by the other 99 Representatives,’ Montana state representative Braxton Mitchell told Fox News Digital. ‘The hate-filled remarks were an act of self-service, not public service.’

‘I applaud the Speaker and Majority Leader for giving my colleague opportunities to rectify the consequences of this stunt,’ the Republican lawmaker added. ‘Since the hateful attack on the House, the Representative has tried to create further opportunities to seek media attention. We will not stand for it.’

Regier reportedly demanded Zephyr to apologize before allowing her to speak in the sessions again. Zephyr stood by her remarks, accusing the bill of targeting her community.

‘When there are bills targeting the LGBTQ community, I stand up to defend my community,’ Zephyr said. ‘And I choose my words with clarity and precision and I spoke to the real harms that these bills bring.’

Fox News’ Adam Sabes and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

After ending with gains for three weeks in a row, the markets took a breather this time by ending modestly in the red. In the previous technical note, it was mentioned that the Nifty is not only over-extended on the shorter timeframe charts; the VIX is also hovering around one of its lowest levels seen in the recent past. It was also mentioned that at any point in time, the indices may look to correct; if not sharply, then at least modestly. The trading range remained in line with expectations; the index oscillated in a 309-point range through the week. After consolidating for the major part of the week and coming off from its high point, the benchmark index NIifty ended with a net loss of 203.95 points (-1.14%) on a weekly note.

Over the coming week, it is important to keep a very cautious and close tab on a couple of things from a technical perspective. The India VIX. This volatility gauge has closed at a new low of 11.63 after coming off by 2.33% on a weekly basis. This has plunged to a new low by violating 2021 low of 11.70. With this being persistently at precariously low levels, this has left the markets vulnerable to sharp profit-taking bouts from current and higher levels. The week will also see the expiry of the monthly derivative series; the 17700 strike has the highest built-up of Call OI and this is set to act as a strong resistance point for the Index.

The next will see the levels of 17700 and 17865 acting as strong resistance points. Supports come in at 17500 and 17380.

The weekly RSI is 50.15; it stays neutral and does not show any divergence against the price. The weekly MACD remains bearish and below the signal line.

The pattern analysis shows that the high point of the previous week, i.e., 17863 is almost become an immediate top for the short-term; no meaningful up-move is likely unless this level is taken out. Besides this, an important support zone for the NIFTY falls in the 17367 and 17187; the 50-week, and the 100-Week MA of NIFTY. However, the possibility of testing these levels would increase only if the index ends up violating 17500 levels.

As we approach the markets over the coming days, we will need to do it on a very cautious note. The long-only market participants will need to focus on finding opportunities from the broad market universe; it would be imprudent from this time one to chase the up-move in the indices and its constituents. Some relative outperformance is expected from the defensive space like FMCG, Consumption, Pharma, PSE, etc. A highly selective approach is advised for the coming week.

Sector Analysis for the coming week

In our look at Relative Rotation Graphs®, we compared various sectors against CNX500 (NIFTY 500 Index), which represents over 95% of the free float market cap of all the stocks listed

The analysis of Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) does not show any major change in the sectoral set up over the previous week. We have NIFTY Infrastructure, Midcap 100, and PSE index placed inside the leading quadrant and they are expected to relatively outperform the broader markets. The Financial Services Index has rolled inside the leading quadrant.

The IT and the Auto Index have rolled inside the weakening quadrant. This may well end their phase of relative outperformance and we may see these pockets taking a breather. Banknifty and PSU Bank indices are also inside the weakening quadrant. However, they are seen improving on their relative momentum against the broader markets.

Media and Metal Indices are seen in the lagging quadrant; they all appear to be trying to consolidate and put a potential base in place by showing improvement in their relative momentum against the broader markets. The NIFTY Services sector index is also inside the lagging quadrant. All these groups are likely to relatively underperform the broader NIFTY500 Index.

The Energy, Pharma, and Commodities indices have rolled inside the improving quadrant. The Consumption Index and the Realty Index is also seen rolling firmly inside the improving quadrant. These groups are likely to see resilient performance over the coming week.

Important Note: RRG™ charts show the relative strength and momentum of a group of stocks. In the above Chart, they show relative performance against NIFTY500 Index (Broader Markets) and should not be used directly as buy or sell signals.  

Milan Vaishnav, CMT, MSTA

Consulting Technical Analyst

www.EquityResearch.asia | www.ChartWizard.ae

The major equity averages have stalled out in recent weeks, trading up to their February highs but unable to muster enough positive momentum to push to new swing highs.

The key question as we continue through earnings season is whether there will arise a catalyst to propel the S&P 500 above 4200. But while we wait for this bullish indication, three charts tell me that the more likely scenario is a pullback from current levels.

McClellan Oscillator Suggests Weakened Breadth

One of the main bullet points for bears in 2023 has been a lack of participation. This has been a narrow-led rally dominated by mega-cap growth stocks. How can the market uptrend be sustained without stronger breadth readings?

Breadth indicators like the McClellan Oscillator started to turn bullish in late March, telling us to believe in the upward market trend as the participation was widening. Now this indicator has turned back negative, suggesting that a downside move is likely.

Notice that the McClellan Oscillator often moves back below zero pretty early in market pullbacks. The three most recent signals led to pullbacks of about 4-14% and last four to eight weeks. While that is no guarantee that we see a pullback next week, it certainly suggests that is a strong possibility!

Amazon Tests Its 200-Day Moving Average

Amazon (AMZN) broke down through its 200-day moving average in December 2021, after testing this long-term barometer as support numerous times earlier that year. Rallies in May 2022, August 2022, and February 2023 all failed right at the 200-day moving average.

What’s interesting more recently is the higher low last month. Just like the S&P 500, AMZN established a higher low before the current rally phase. Could this finally be the time when Amazon is able to power through this key resistance level?

I remain skeptical, because I tend to believe that a trend will continue until proven otherwise. So until we get the confirmed breakout, it’s nothing but a downtrend. But a move above the 200-day would certainly provide a boost to the Consumer Discretionary ETF (XLY), as well as the broad market as a whole.

3. TSLA Confirms a Bearish Rotation

So let me start this section by pointing out that yes, I understand that market can rally just fine without Tesla (TSLA). But hear me out.

I think of Tesla in a similar way that I think about the ARK Innovation Fund (ARKK) or even Bitcoin. These represent a play on general speculation. The COVID era saw a huge influx of novice investors, many of which focused on these themes of emerging growth and promising new technologies.

So I would say that a more sustainable bull market phase may need to include things like TSLA and ARKK to demonstrate that this cohort of investors is once again putting bets on emerging growth stories.

The chart is telling us that this groundswell of support from newer investors has not yet come to fruition. After peaking just below the 200-day moving average in February, Tesla has settled into a coil pattern of lower highs and higher lows.

Basically, the price is rotating around an equilibrium level of about $190, implying that the market is an agreement of the value of the stock. A coil pattern at some point will resolve to the upside or downside, which would indicate a new shift in momentum and a likely continuation of the breakout.

The stock gapped lower Thursday after earnings disappointed following the close on Wednesday. This confirms a downside break of the coil pattern, suggesting further deterioration from current levels.

The McClellan Oscillator breaking below zero has been one of the most effective market indicators over the last 12 months. With this week’s sell signal, we once again face a likely drawdown period.

Amazon could certainly break above its 200-day moving average next week, and Tesla could bounce right back to make a new high in May. But for now, these charts appear to confirm the short-term bear case, which means the S&P 500 may have to wait a bit longer to eclipse 4200.

One more thing…

My latest video covers the simple checklist I used to validate a recent uptrend in semiconductors. How does your checklist compare to mind? Check it out and let me know!

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

BuzzFeed News is shutting down.

In an email to staff shared with NBC News, BuzzFeed Inc. CEO and co-founder Jonah Peretti said the move was part of a 15% workforce reduction across a number of teams.

‘While layoffs are occurring across nearly every division, we’ve determined that the company can no longer continue to fund BuzzFeed News as a standalone organization,’ he wrote.

Peretti said he had overinvested in BuzzFeed News ‘because I love their work and mission so much.’

‘This made me slow to accept that the big platforms wouldn’t provide the distribution or financial support required to support premium, free journalism purpose-built for social media,’ he wrote.

He added that he had failed to ‘hold the company to higher standards for profitability’ to give it a buffer during downturns.

Moving forward, BuzzFeed will have a lone news brand, HuffPost, which BuzzFeed acquired in 2020 and which Peretti said ‘is profitable, with a loyal direct front page audience.’

Affected BuzzFeed News staffers will have an opportunity to apply for ‘a number of select roles’ at HuffPost and BuzzFeed.com. Peretti said he planned to engage with the News Guild union about the cost reduction plans and what they would mean for affected union members.

BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti during the company’s listing day at Nasdaq on Dec. 6, 2021.Bennett Raglin / Getty Images for BuzzFeed file

BuzzFeed News launched in earnest at the outset of 2012 after it named longtime New York City political reporter Ben Smith as its editor-in-chief. In 2021, the news organization won a Pulitzer Prize for a series exposing China’s mass detention of Muslims. That same year, it was also named a Pulitzer finalist — the second time it had received the honor.

Later that year, BuzzFeed Inc. became a publicly traded company amid a global frenzy of reverse mergers, many of which have since lost significant value. In BuzzFeed’s case, it never traded above its initial public offering price of about $10.

Following the announcement Thursday, shares in the company fell another 20%, to about $0.72.

Comcast, the parent company of NBC News, owns a minority stake in BuzzFeed Inc.

BuzzFeed’s announcement came the same day the digital news media company Insider said it would shed 10% of its workforce. The Daily Beast was first to report the Insider layoffs.

The job cuts reflect a broader downturn in the media and tech industries, as the breakneck growth seen in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic has begun to rapidly fade amid a slowing economy. Other digital platforms that have announced headcount reductions include ESPN, Spotify, Yahoo and Vimeo.

MSNBC’s Hayes Brown contributed reporting.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Disney is preparing to take its fight with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and his GOP allies in the state legislature to the next level, according to people familiar with the matter.

With just weeks until Florida’s legislative session ends, Disney is pushing lobbyists to step up their efforts to influence the Republican-controlled state legislature and to target land use related bills that could hurt the company, among other measures, said the people, who declined to be named in order to speak freely about the issues.

A spokesman for Disney declined to comment on the lobbying effort.

The battle between the entertainment giant and DeSantis started last year after Disney opposed the Florida bill that critics named “Don’t Say Gay,” which forbids instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in public schools for kindergarten through third grade.

Then, before DeSantis could strip the district where Disney is based of its self-governing status and replace the board that oversaw the area, a Disney-allied panel signed a long-lasting development agreement that drastically limits the governor’s control. DeSantis has said that state legislators are drafting legislation to nullify that agreement.

Republican officials and business leaders have increasingly criticized DeSantis’ salvos against the company. Former President Donald Trump and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie — two of Florida governor’s potential 2024 rivals — and even former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein have all pushed back on DeSantis for his battle with the company.

Since DeSantis suggested Monday that he wanted to develop land near Disney World, potentially by building a prisonDisney announced that “affordable and attainable housing” around the park is set to open in 2026.

Republican Florida state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia warned Disney not to fight back, as he stood next to DeSantis at a news conference Monday.

“I have a couple words for Disney. You are not going to win this fight. This governor will,” Ingoglia said. “One word of advice for Disney going forward: Let it go. Just let it go.”

At the same event, DeSantis vowed to nullify an agreement that would allow the Orlando amusement park to circumvent a special governing district board filled with DeSantis appointees.

Shortly after DeSantis’ remarks on Monday, Disney executives called on lobbyists to keep an eye on any Florida bills that could hurt the company and to start aggressively working against them, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter. There is a particular interest in combatting legislation related to land use following DeSantis’ remarks, this person said.

This person, who was unauthorized to speak publicly on Disney’s plans, told CNBC that one of the land-related bills Disney lobbyists are watching carefully is CS/SB 1604: Land Use and Development Regulations. Ingoglia introduced the bill in the Senate, and an identical bill was put forward in the state House.

Both chambers have introduced amendments that could affect Disney. The measures would allow a “newly elected or appointed governing body of the independent special district,” such as the DeSantis-appointed governing body of the Disney district, to review any development agreements and have the option to vote on whether that district will readopt that original development deal.

Both of those amendments were filed on Tuesday, the day after the DeSantis’ press conference where he hammered Disney, according to the state legislature website.

Disney and CEO Bob Iger don’t appear to be taking DeSantis and his allies’ latest moves lightly.

Friends of Iger’s say that the Disney CEO could be hoping that a new lobbying effort against DeSantis and allies, along with a critical public perception of the governor’s actions, might dissuade enough Republican officials from siding with the governor. DeSantis effectively controls the state legislature with a GOP supermajority.

“It’s almost like every time DeSantis says these crazy things Bob comes out ahead,” a longtime ally of Iger’s told CNBC. “He feels Disney is ready for the fight but I think he’s sort of watching the governor try to float his own boat on this one.”

A Disney spokesman told CNBC that this perception of Iger is “not accurate.”

DeSantis’ potential competitors in a presidential primary have pounced on the controversy as a chance to stick it to the Florida governor. Trump, who is running for president, and Christie, another potential 2024 candidate, have both ripped DeSantis for his war with Disney.

“Disney’s next move will be the announcement that no more money will be invested in Florida because of the Governor — In fact, they could even announce a slow withdrawal or sale of certain properties, or the whole thing,” Trump said in a Truth Social post response to DeSantis’ latest fight with the company, without citing evidence that the company could take those steps.

Early GOP primary polls show DeSantis as the second leading candidate behind Trump. The ex-president has held a massive edge in most of the recent polls.

The Disney feud may cost DeSantis donors, too. Some Republican megadonors, who were once staunchly in DeSantis’ corner for 2024 GOP, have called the governor’s allies recently to say they might not help him run for president, according to a longtime DeSantis ally. Instead, they said they could back another possible candidate in Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., this person said.

There may be a way out of the protracted fight, however. Before DeSantis’ latest attack, Iger had hinted to Time that he was open to trying to make amends with the governor.

“I do not view this as a going-to-mattresses situation for us. If the governor of Florida wants to meet with me to discuss all of this, of course, I would be glad to do that,” he said.

Iger has also publicly ripped DeSantis’ treatment of Disney.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The Federal Trade Commission’s public comment period for its proposal to ban noncompete agreements closed Wednesday, just as major business groups ramped up their campaign against it.

In series of letters this week to the FTC, which proposed the restrictions in January, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a leading human resources group asked the agency to stand down or shrink its proposal and questioned the legal authority behind it.

Top labor unions and consumer advocates chimed in on the other side, arguing in favor of barring employers from limiting where their staffers can take jobs or start businesses after leaving. The lobbying crossfire came in addition to the more than 26,000 comments from the public the FTC gathered over the past several months.

Noncompete policies can range from prohibitions of working for a competitor or even working in the same geographic region. And the periods they cover vary, depending on what state courts deem enforceable, from six months to five years.

The outcome of the battle will affect large swaths of the U.S. workforce. Roughly 30% of private sector employers currently use noncompete agreements for all their workers, said Evan Starr, an economics researcher at the University of Maryland. Businesses that use the policies typically cite the need to protect trade secrets and other sensitive information from rival firms looking to poach talent.

The FTC, which estimates that banning noncompetes could boost workers’ earnings by nearly $300 billion annually and broaden job opportunities for 30 million Americans, will now review the flood of input. An FTC spokesperson declined to offer a timeline on the process but said the agency could adjust its proposal based on the feedback or solicit more commentary.

For workers, noncompetes typically function much as they did for Will Medina, a 32-year-old sales executive in Phoenix, Arizona, who found himself hemmed in by one nearly a decade ago.

After he graduated from college, Medina said, the public relations agency where he’d been interning offered him a job — but stipulated that he couldn’t work for any of its clients for four years if he left. Around five years later, “burnt out” and looking for the exits, Medina discovered that the terms sharply limited his job search.

Will Medina.Courtesy Will Medina

His employer was a multicultural-focused agency in the area, he said, and had already developed business ties with many local companies where Medina was well-qualified to work.

“Reading it all after I left, I was like, ‘What the hell did I sign?’” he said.

After quitting Medina tried freelancing, but many of his contacts were still connected to his former employer. He eventually accepted an entry-level sales role at a local newspaper, which he said required a 20% pay cut and taking on a new roommate to afford his rent.

“I didn’t want to deal with any kind of suing or anything like that,” Medina said. “[My former employer] was known to sue or send a cease and desist. I was like OK well, ‘I’m not going to be able to do this industry stuff for a while.’”

The Chamber of Commerce, one of the nation’s most powerful business lobbies, organized a coalition of industry groups that sent a letter to the FTC on Monday urging the agency to “withdraw its proposed rule, and revert to the authority granted to it by Congress.”

Signed by more than 280 organizations — ranging from the National Retail Federation and the American Hotel & Lodging Association to trade groups for mortgage bankers, roofers and convenience stores — the letter said that noncompetes “promote pro-competitive interests far more effectively than alternatives,” such as trade-secret laws.

The groups argued that the policies “encourage investment in employees and help to protect intellectual property,” thus boosting innovation and attracting investment.

The chamber, which threatened in January to sue the FTC over its proposal, declined to comment.

On Wednesday, the Society for Human Resource Management sent the FTC a nine-page letter, which it provided to NBC News, calling the proposed rule “overbroad” and a threat to workers’ training and development. The group, which represents 325,000 HR professionals and executives worldwide, said the restrictions “will impede SHRM members’ ability to balance the needs of workers and employers and will reduce the contractual capabilities of reasonable and consenting parties” and called for narrower changes instead.

A few brand name companies such as Yelp and Microsoft have backed bans on noncompetes or rolled back their use internally. In 2021, a Yelp executive was barred from starting work at the company for a year and a half due to a noncompete he had signed as a Groupon employee.

Major labor and consumer organizations have also joined the debate. Several dozen groups, including the AFL-CIO, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Consumer Federation of America, threw their support behind the FTC’s proposal in their own letter to the agency Wednesday. “Firms use non-compete clauses as a substitute for other means of retaining workers, such as good working conditions, high wages, and the opportunity for future raises and promotions,” the letter said.

Among the thousands of comments posted to the FTC’s online forum over the last few weeks, more people who self-identified as employees voiced support than criticized the proposed ban, with many of those in favor sharing frustrations akin to Medina’s.

“People traditionally think of noncompetes as something for very high-level executives who have access to confidential information or people who have access to trade secrets,” said Terri Gerstein, the director of the Project on State and Local Enforcement at Harvard Law School, “but they really have been used much more indiscriminately throughout the economy.”

Critics of noncompetes argue that they suppress pay, and nearly a dozen states already restrict or prohibit their use. Colorado recently banned noncompetes for workers below a certain income level, and California bars them outright. As many as 73 bills are currently pending in statehouses, most of them looking to tighten rules around the agreements.

In the five years after Oregon banned enforcement of noncompetes for employees earning less than the median U.S. family income for a family of four, hourly workers’ wages grew 6%, Starr’s research found, and their job mobility also rose 17%.

“There are many things that firms can do to protect themselves without noncompete agreements,” Starr said. If the FTC adopts new limits, he said, “we’ll definitely see more of the reliance on nondisclosure, non-solicitation [agreements] and more of the kind of perks such as higher wages, better benefits, etc.”

Nondisclosure and nonsolicitation agreements allow employers to seek damages from employees who spill trade secrets or certain company information. But unlike noncompetes, they don’t preemptively restrict workers’ ability to move jobs.

Many individual business owners voiced opposition to the proposed ban in the FTC’s online forum.

“This rule will negatively impact small businesses and economic growth and is not the result of legislation but rather bureaucracy,” wrote Mimi Steger, owner of North Port, Florida-based Total Martial Arts & Fitness.

Another commenter, Bruce Fearon, wrote in support of region-based noncompetes, noting that his medical practice focuses on lymphatic maladies and requires him to invest heavily in training new hires. “There is absolutely no incentive for me to teach anyone anything I know and practice, only to have them move into the neighborhood and compete against me,” Fearon argued.

Neither Steger nor Fearson responded to requests for interviews.

For now, businesses still have ways to coerce employees — especially lower- and middle-income ones — to stay, beyond nondisclosure and nonsolicitation agreements. “Training repayment” rules, for example, require workers to compensate their employers for development programs they undertake if they leave within a given time frame.

Last week the FTC proposed banning those, too.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The NFL’s 88th annual draft, aka its ‘Player Selection Meeting,’ will kick off next week in Kansas City, Missouri.

And while the event has proven a lottery ticket of talent procurement for some franchises (Steelers, 49ers) through the years, for others (Jets, Buccaneers), it’s been an infuriating shell game.

This draft marks the, well, unremarkable 50th anniversary of the Houston Oilers’ selection of the late John Matuszak No. 1 overall in 1973 … when eventual Hall of Famers John Hannah and Dan Fouts were among several superior alternatives. And while Matuszak won’t make our list of the 50 hugest busts of all time, it seemed like a pretty good juncture to reflect on the guys who rate as history’s biggest deterrents to playing the draft lottery over the past half-century.

Some words about the methodology: This ranking and analysis are certainly interspersed with opinion. But I tried not to view these wayward picks in a vacuum – taking into account what teams sacrificed to take a player, either in terms of trade currency or whom they opted not to select, when evaluating each bust. Some deals themselves are included since many prevented teams from choosing superior options. Naturally, extra weight was given to quarterback gaffes.

Lastly, I tried to have some fun and creativity in select spots to keep you (and me) engaged, so try not to get too bent out of shape if that defensive tackle or tight end your team took in the top 10 before he petered out didn’t warrant a mention.

NFL Draft Hub: Latest NFL Draft mock drafts, news, live picks, grades and analysis

Here we go … and you’ll note I managed to shoehorn more than *50* players in here:

1. QB Ryan Leaf, 2nd overall 1998, Chargers

It seems patently obvious a quarter-century after the fact, but he was very much in the conversation to be this draft’s No. 1 pick. Of course, the Colts wisely chose eventual five-time MVP Peyton Manning. Meanwhile, the Bolts set themselves back years by taking Leaf (4-14 in 18 starts for the club with a 48.8 passer rating), whose gross immaturity and inability to solve pro defenses trumped his vast physical talent. What cements his infamy is the price San Diego paid to simply swap its initial No. 3 pick to get Arizona’s spot at No. 2 (more on that later). But the freight the Cardinals commanded, aside from the switch, was a second-rounder, an additional first-rounder in 1999 and two veterans (WR Eric Metcalf and LB Patrick Sapp). Oof.

2. OT Tony Mandarich, 2nd overall 1989, Packers

The Sports Illustrated cover boy deemed ‘The Incredible Bulk’ prior to the draft – he had uncommon athleticism and size for the position at the time – was labeled ‘The NFL’s Incredible Bust’ by SI only three years later. Mandarich’s steroid-fueled body and poor work ethic didn’t hold up against professional competition, and he later descended into drug and alcohol abuse. Any value he later provided at guard might have helped the Colts but obviously didn’t do the Pack any good. But this context truly frames his failure: Mandarich was the only player selected in the top five that year who didn’t wind up in the Hall of Fame. Troy Aikman went No. 1, but Green Bay passed on Barry Sanders, Derrick Thomas and Deion Sanders.

3. QB JaMarcus Russell, 1st overall 2007, Raiders

It turned out to be a miserable year for passers, the likes of Brady Quinn, Kevin Kolb, John Beck and Drew Stanton also taken way too early. But Russell, who began his career with a lengthy holdout, never fulfilled the hype generated by his howitzer arm and legendary pro day. He lasted just three seasons, losing 18 of 25 starts and compiling an abysmal 65.2 passer rating, before laziness and weight gain washed him out of the league. Who could Oakland have taken instead? Calvin Johnson, Joe Thomas, Adrian Peterson, Patrick Willis, Marshawn Lynch and Darrelle Revis all came off the board in the first half of Round 1.

4. QB Jeff George, 1st overall 1990, Colts

He looked like Uncle Rico, threw like him, too … and basically played like the “Napoleon Dynamite” folk hero. George forced Indianapolis to surrender Pro Bowl OT Chris Hinton, future Pro Bowl WR Andre Rison and a first-round pick in 1991 to Atlanta – where George wound up himself in 1994 after wearing out his welcome with a bad attitude and 14-35 record for the Colts, who passed on three eventual Hall of Famers in the first round (more on them later). Never particularly popular in the locker room, George played for five different teams – and did post better numbers, if not many more wins, later in his career.

5. RB Lawrence Phillips, 6th overall 1996, Rams

Bad player. Bad dude. And St. Louis should have known better. The Rams parted with DT Sean Gilbert to acquire the Phillips pick – Eddie George was still available – and they exported Jerome Bettis to Pittsburgh in a separate deal to clear the way for Phillips. Brutal.

6. QB Zach Wilson, 2nd overall 2021, Jets

Brace yourself, NYJ fans, as this is merely the first of many mentions. The New York brain trust won’t admit it publicly, but the Jets are essentially throwing in the towel on Wilson after two seasons given the pivot to four-time MVP Aaron Rodgers. At a time when young quarterbacks are given little margin for error, Wilson, a pro day all-star who’s done little since, used up his – the league’s lowest-rated passer since 2021 among those with at least 100 completions and a subpar podium performer. The mistake is magnified by the fact the Jets could have taken QBs Justin Fields or Mac Jones, if not augment the roster around then-QB Sam Darnold with WR Ja’Marr Chase, OT Penei Sewell or LB Micah Parsons. But maybe Wilson belatedly blossoms a la Geno Smith, another quarterback who quickly flamed out after being drafted by the Jets.

6a. QB Trey Lance, 3rd overall 2021, 49ers

Maybe a premature corollary, but inexperience and injury limited Lance to four starts in his first two seasons – and no guarantee he’ll be the guy in 2023 given the ascent of Brock Purdy, ‘Mr. Irrelevant’ in 2022. Worse, not only did San Francisco pass on the same studs the Jets did, the Niners bartered three first-rounders to get into position for Lance. Soon, he might be dealt.

7. Jets’ decisions to trade down in 1997

After going 1-15 in 1996, Gang Green most definitely earned the No. 1 pick of the ’97 draft – which they surely would have used for Manning … had he opted not to return to the University of Tennessee for his senior year. (And you can argue that newly acquired coach Bill Parcells could have done more to entice Manning to go pro, but that’s neither here nor there.) But after Manning was off the table, Parcells dealt down from No. 1 to No. 6 in a bid to restock this roster, passing on the opportunity to snatch future Hall of Fame LT Orlando Pace. Then Parcells dropped from No. 6 to No. 8, passing on the opportunity to get future Hall of Fame LT Walter Jones. (Ugh and ugh.) LB James Farrior, who was much better in Pittsburgh later in his career than during his Gotham stint, ‘headlined’ New York’s forgettable haul, which could have also included Hall of Fame TE Tony Gonzalez, who went 13th.

8. Colts’ decision to draft John Elway No. 1 in 1983

His talent obviously justified the selection, but team brass should have taken Elway seriously when he threatened to play baseball rather than for Baltimore. In the end, he launched his Hall of Fame career in Denver while the Colts were left with Hinton, backup QB Mark Herrmann, a first-round pick in 1984 (spent on G Ron Solt) and, in a year’s time, a one-way ticket to Indianapolis.

9. QB Robert Griffin III, 2nd overall 2012, Washington

The team shipped three first-round picks and one in Round 2 to the Rams for the chance to take RG3. Initially, it seemed a reasonable gambit as the 2011 Heisman Trophy winner won Offensive Rookie of the Year honors while leading a charge to the NFC East title. The rest is unfortunate history. Washington is still picking up the pieces.

9a. Rams’ haul for Robert Griffin III

On the opposite end of the RG3 coin? St. Louis parlayed its bounty into Michael Brockers, Janoris Jenkins, Isaiah Pead, Rokevious Watkins, Alec Ogletree, Stedman Bailey, Zac Stacy and Greg Robinson. Some decent (and not-so-decent) players in there, but obviously not a group that came anywhere close to salvaging the NFL in The Gateway City, much less providing the bedrock for a perennial powerhouse.

10. OLB Aundray Bruce, 1st overall 1988, Falcons

Atlanta thought it was getting the next Lawrence Taylor. Nope. Bruce was no better than a sub package guy, including spot duty at tight end. There were five Hall of Famers picked elsewhere in Bruce’s draft and a pretty good pass rusher (Neil Smith) directly after him.

11. RB Bo Jackson, 1st overall 1986, Buccaneers

Don’t get it twisted – this isn’t a dig at a guy who might truly be a ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ athlete. Instead, interpret it as a dig at a long-feckless franchise that chose to squander its pick even though Jackson had vowed never to play in Tampa, believing the team deliberately cost him his baseball eligibility at Auburn while trying to strong-arm him into a football-only career. The Bucs took Jackson anyway, and he was soon stroking towering taters for the Kansas City Royals … before joining the Raiders in 1987.

12. OT Robert Gallery, 2nd overall 2004, Raiders

He never approached his pre-draft hype and only became serviceable after moving to guard. Who could Oakland have had instead? Larry Fitzgerald, Philip Rivers, Sean Taylor and Ben Roethlisberger heard their names called shortly after Gallery’s selection.

13. RB Blair Thomas, 2nd overall 1990, Jets

To think future Hall of Famers Cortez Kennedy and Junior Seau were sitting there. Or, if New York really had to have a back, eventual all-time leading rusher Emmitt Smith was around until No. 17.

14. Bills’ decision to draft Tom Cousineau No. 1 in 1979

Buffalo owned the choice after dealing O.J. Simpson to the 49ers. But Cousineau took the Canadian Football League’s money and bolted, never playing a down for the Bills. Hall of Famers Dan Hampton and Kellen Winslow went later in that first round.

15. QB Sam Darnold, 3rd overall 2018, Jets

In the former USC star’s defense, New York did next to nothing to help him succeed, Darnold’s development further hampered by foot and shoulder injuries and mono. But given then-GM Mike Maccagnan surrendered the No. 6 overall pick (used by the Colts on future All-Pro G Quenton Nelson) and three high second-rounders to advance three slots in order to get into position for Darnold – and he seemed like a slam-dunk acquisition at the time – it’s hard to view this gamble as anything other than a failure given his inability to overcome his circumstances … especially as QBs drafted later (2019 MVP Lamar Jackson, 2020 MVP runner-up Josh Allen) figured out how to thrive. 

16. Seahawks’ decision to trade down in 1977

They were induced to deal out of No. 2 after Tony Dorsett threatened not to play in Seattle, so the Cowboys moved up for the future Hall of Fame back. The Seahawks instead reeled in Steve August, Tom Lynch, Terry Beeson and Glenn Carano. Who? Exactly. Guess who won the Super Bowl the following season …

17. QB Art Schlichter, 4th overall 1982, Colts

On the field, he was horrendous (42.6 passer rating). Off the field, he was worse, his gambling problems leading to his suspension for the 1983 season and, later, prison. Schlichter’s issues also forced Baltimore into its ill-advised Elway pick the next year.

18. QB Jack Thompson, 3rd overall 1979, Bengals

The ‘Throwin’ Samoan’ never threw very effectively in six seasons. Furthermore, Cincinnati was just fine under center with Ken Anderson, who would lead the Bengals to their first Super Bowl two years later. Also, Phil Simms was chosen four slots after Thompson – or, if Cincy needed, like, a developmental quarterback, they could have had, uh, Joe Montana in Round 3 …

19. DE Dion Jordan, 3rd overall 2013, Dolphins

The slender pass rusher was repeatedly suspended and only rewarded Miami with three sacks in two seasons. The Dolphins paid a first- and second-round pick to Oakland to get the Oregon prospect.

20. WR Johnny ‘Lam’ Jones, 2nd overall 1980, Jets

New York hoped his Olympic speed would translate into stardom. Not so much. Jones never looked natural as a receiver, often leaving his feet while trying to catch easy passes. The next player taken was Hall of Famer Anthony Munoz, arguably the best left tackle of all time. The next receiver selected was Hall of Famer Art Monk.

21. DT Steve Niehaus, 2nd overall 1976, Seahawks

Seattle’s maiden draft selection didn’t turn out nearly as well as fellow expansion franchise Tampa Bay’s after the Bucs landed future Hall of Famer Lee Roy Selmon at No. 1. (The Seahawks recovered by acquiring HOFer Steve Largent, who was taken by the Oilers in Round 4.)

22. Buccaneers’ decision to trade down in 1978

Confident in RB Ricky Bell, the No. 1 pick in 1977, Tampa Bay sent the top pick of ’78 to Houston for TE Jimmie Giles and four selections, including a first- and second-rounder. The Oilers? Hello, Earl Campbell.

23. QB Josh Rosen, 10th overall 2018, Cardinals

Arizona traded a first-, third- and fifth-round pick to move up five spots to snatch him 10th overall in 2018. He flopped as a rookie and was replaced by Kyler Murray atop the 2019 draft … when Rosen also burned the Dolphins, who gave up a Round 2 pick to rescue him from the desert before he failed in Miami. Like Darnold, Rosen was a victim of circumstances, but the Cards wouldn’t have reset had they picked Jackson in 2018 instead.

24. P Russell Erxleben, 11th overall 1979, Saints

Groan. Known for his record 67-yard field goal in college with Texas, he proved neither the kicker nor punter New Orleans envisioned. Erxleben is the highest-drafted special teamer of the common draft era, going two spots ahead of Hall of Famer Winslow. Erxleben landed in prison later in life for securities fraud.

25. K Steve Little, 15th overall 1978, Cardinals

Taking a kicker in Round 1, especially in an era when the position was far less reliable, could be forgiven. But not if your guy misses 14 of 27 field goal attempts in three seasons … and when you could’ve had Ozzie Newsome or Doug Williams. 

26. OLB Vernon Gholston, 6th overall 2008, Jets

He played 45 games for New York. He registered nary a sack.

27. QB Kelly Stouffer, 6th overall 1987, Cardinals

He held out his rookie season and got traded to Seattle. Lucky for the Cards, given Stouffer (7 TD passes, 19 interceptions in five seasons) would make subsequent Seahawks franchise QB Rick Mirer – continue reading – look like an All-Pro.

28. WR Troy Williamson, 7th overall 2005, Vikings

Minnesota basically traded Randy Moss to Oakland in order to get this guy … who finished with 153 fewer TDs than Moss.

29. TE Kyle Brady, 9th overall 1995, Jets

New York could have had Warren Sapp. Or Ty Law. Or Derrick Brooks. But in typical J-E-T-S fashion, they screwed it up royally. (And the availability of Law and Brooks didn’t deter the Jets from taking DE Hugh Douglas 16th overall, either.)

30. QB Sam Bradford, 1st overall 2010, Rams

He certainly wasn’t a bad player, and many forget he was Offensive Rookie of the Year. But his injury history at Oklahoma was predictive. The six players selected after Bradford? Ndamukong Suh, Gerald McCoy, Trent Williams, Eric Berry, Russell Okung and Joe Haden with Earl Thomas off the board at No. 14. Bradford later cost Minnesota a first- and fourth-rounder in 2016 to replace Teddy Bridgewater but didn’t get the Vikings to the postseason and lost his job to Case Keenum the next year. Bradford never appeared in a playoff game.

31. Browns’ haul for Julio Jones

Cleveland dealt the sixth pick in 2011 to Atlanta – Falcons GM Thomas Dimitroff was widely panned for paying so much to get Jones – and ultimately wound up with NT Phil Taylor, WR Greg Little, FB Owen Marecic and QB Brandon Weeden.

32. Browns’ 2012 draft

As bad as Weeden (22nd overall) was, RB Trent Richardson, the No. 3 pick, was worse based on relative value. Cleveland sent Minnesota four picks to swap from fourth to third overall. Even when the Browns flipped Richardson to the Colts for a first-round pick in 2013, they eventually wound up with Johnny Manziel.

32a. Browns’ 2014 draft

Manziel (22nd overall) was dreadful. CB Justin Gilbert, the No. 8 pick, was a bigger blunder given his slot.

33. QB Brady Quinn, 22nd overall 2007, Browns

Not only did he add to Cleveland’s litany of quarterback washouts, he cost the Browns a first- and second-round pick in order to trade up for him. (In case you hadn’t noticed, it’s a QB death knell to get drafted by Cleveland at No. 22.)

34. QB Akili Smith, 3rd overall 1999, Bengals

Just abject in four seasons (3-14 record, 5 TD passes, 13 INTs). The next four players taken were Edgerrin James, Ricky Williams, Torry Holt and Champ Bailey. No. 12 selection Cade McNown, Chicago’s QB failure that year, looked all-world relative to Smith.

35. WR Charles Rogers, 2nd overall 2003, Lions

Sadly, he couldn’t evade drugs or injuries. Also, Andre Johnson went to Houston with the next pick.

36. QB Heath Shuler, 3rd overall 1994, Washington

He was a better congressman than quarterback – and wasn’t even the best passer Washington picked in 1994, seventh-rounder Gus Frerotte proving superior.

37. DE Andre Wadsworth, 3rd overall 1998, Cardinals

Often forgotten in the aftermath of the Manning-Leaf debate atop that draft, but some scouts considered Wadsworth a better prospect than both quarterbacks. Knee injuries sapped his vast potential after just three seasons. Hall of Famer Charles Woodson was chosen next.

38. QB Rick Mirer, 2nd overall 1993, Seahawks

That year’s Drew Bledsoe consolation prize, Mirer was wretched in four years with Seattle (20-31 record, 65.2 passer rating). Oh, and Hall of Famers Willie Roaf and Bettis were available in the top 10.

38a. Bears’ 1997 trade for QB Rick Mirer

Forgot about this, didn’t you? Seattle stole Chicago’s first-round pick in exchange for Mirer, who was even worse in one season in the Windy City. Meanwhile, the Seahawks recovered to draft stud CB Shawn Springs.

39. QB Mitchell Trubisky, 2nd overall 2017, Bears

Another botched move by Chicago atop a draft in an ill-considered bid to fix the century-old organization’s ongoing quarterback conundrum. To simply swap the No. 2 and No. 3 overall selections, the Bears had to give the 49ers a third- and fourth-rounder plus a future third-rounder (used on eventual All-Pro LB Fred Warner in 2018). GM Ryan Pace then picked Trubisky, who was middling at best while starting for two Bears playoff teams – the 2018 edition was Super Bowl-caliber otherwise – when he could have had Patrick Mahomes or Deshaun Watson.

39a. DL Solomon Thomas, 3rd overall 2017, 49ers

For all the capital the Niners inhaled in the Trubisky deal, they flubbed much of it by taking the disappointing Thomas before trading the 2017 third-round pick … which the Saints used on perennial Pro Bowl RB Alvin Kamara.

40. Raiders’ 2020 draft

As much trouble as former GM Mike Mayock ran into in early rounds, this was the class that ultimately might have gotten him fired. First-rounders Henry Ruggs and Damon Arnette (the latter obtained as part of the Khalil Mack trade years before) were both released in 2021 amid serious off-field incidents, an inebriated Ruggs involved in an auto accident that killed a woman and her dog. Third-rounder Lynn Bowden Jr. was traded to Miami before his rookie season and never amounted to anything in the NFL. Fellow third-rounder Tanner Muse never played for the Raiders, either, while WR Bryan Edwards lasted just two seasons in Las Vegas.

40a. OL Alex Leatherwood, 17th overall 2021, Raiders

Mayock got one more crack at the draft … and took the Alabama lineman much earlier than most observers had him projected. Unable to handle right tackle in the NFL, Leatherwood moved to guard but was waived prior to the 2022 season – by the regime that succeeded Mayock.

41. DE Mike Mamula, 7th overall 1995, Eagles

It’s bad enough that Philly got duped into taking the original scouting combine superstar. Adding to the ignominy, the Eagles traded the 12th pick to Tampa Bay (the Bucs used it on Warren Sapp) plus two second-rounders to elevate into this mistake.

42. Raiders’ 2011 trade for QB Carson Palmer

Oakland gave up a first- and second-rounder to pry the former No. 1 pick out of Cincinnati and quasi-retirement. A three-time Pro Bowler, Palmer was 8-16 in 1½ seasons with the Silver and Black and was shipped to Arizona – where he reverted to star form – for the net gain of a Round 6 choice in 2013.

43. Colts’ 1992 draft

Indianapolis owned the top two picks and selected DE Steve Emtman and LB Quentin Coryatt. Emtman was beset by injuries, and Coryatt was a pedestrian performer. This would rank higher, but the ’92 draft was short on talent and hasn’t produced one Hall of Famer – despite running 12 rounds – though Dallas’ Darren Woodson might eventually reach Canton.

44. RB Ki-Jana Carter, 1st overall 1995, Bengals

In fairness, he ripped up his knee in his first preseason game and was never the same. Of note, it could have been much worse for Cincinnati. Expansion Carolina only charged the Bengals the fifth and 36th overall picks to move up for Carter, sweetheart terms by today’s standards. Yet it worked out OK for the Panthers, who took QB Kerry Collins.

44a. DT Dan ‘Big Daddy’ Wilkinson, 1st overall 1994, Bengals

He was average at best for Cincinnati, which could have avoided the Carter gaffe in 1995 by taking Marshall Faulk No. 1 in 1994.

45. Todd Blackledge, Tony Eason, Ken O’Brien

If you drafted a quarterback in the first round of the 1983 draft, you had a 50% shot at getting a Hall of Famer – Elway, Jim Kelly or Dan Marino. Otherwise, you got one of these guys, all taken with Marino (27th overall) still available.

46. DT Gabe Rivera, 21st overall 1983, Steelers

For whatever reason, Pittsburgh bypassed hometown hero Marino, who would have made a mighty fine acquisition with Terry Bradshaw heading into his final season. Driving drunk, Rivera was paralyzed in a car accident midway through his rookie season.

47. Bears’ first-round running backs

Brad Muster (23rd overall pick, 1994), Rashaan Salaam (21st in 1995), Curtis Enis (5th in 1998) and Cedric Benson (4th in 2005) all bombed in the post-Walter Payton years. (Neal Anderson, taken 27th in 1986, was pretty good, though.)

48. Cowboys’ 2000 trade for WR Joey Galloway

In one of owner Jerry Jones’ most notorious moves, Dallas sent two first-rounders to Seattle for the speedy receiver. Galloway averaged fewer than 50 yards per game in four years in Big D, while the Seahawks snagged future MVP Shaun Alexander.

49. QB J.P. Losman, 22nd overall 2004, Bills

He followed Eli Manning, Rivers and Roethlisberger as the fourth Round 1 passer in 2004. Oops. Oh yeah, Buffalo also gave up a first-, second- and fifth-rounder to get Losman when it could have simply waited to grab future Pro Bowler Matt Schaub in the third round.

50. QB Blaine Gabbert, 10th overall 2011, Jaguars

Aside from quarterbacks not named Cam Newton, this was an epic draft. Jacksonville didn’t get a crack at Newton, Von Miller, A.J. Green, Patrick Peterson, Julio Jones or Tyron Smith but could’ve taken J.J. Watt, Robert Quinn, Mike Pouncey, Ryan Kerrigan, Cam Jordan or Mark Ingram (among others – even Andy Dalton) instead of Gabbert. The Jags also gave up a second-rounder to move up six spots for Gabbert. Oy.

50a. QB Jake Locker, 8th overall 2011, Titans

Aside from quarterbacks not named Cam Newton, this was an epic draft. Tennessee didn’t get a crack at Newton, Von Miller, A.J. Green, Patrick Peterson or Julio Jones but could’ve taken Tyron Smith, J.J. Watt, Robert Quinn, Mike Pouncey, Ryan Kerrigan, Cam Jordan or Mark Ingram (among others – even Andy Dalton) instead of Locker. Oy.

50b. QB Christian Ponder, 12th overall 2011, Vikings

Aside from quarterbacks not named Cam Newton, this was an epic draft. Minnesota didn’t get a crack at Newton, Von Miller, A.J. Green, Patrick Peterson, Julio Jones, Tyron Smith or J.J. Watt but could’ve taken Robert Quinn, Mike Pouncey, Ryan Kerrigan, Cam Jordan or Mark Ingram (among others – even Andy Dalton) instead of Ponder. Oy.

***

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Nate Davis on Twitter @ByNateDavis.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Thomas Evans once snapped footballs to Aaron Rodgers. 

Now he heaves logs. 

Evans, 29, never reached his dream of playing in the NFL. This weekend, though, is a pit stop on what he considers his road to redemption: the 2023 World’s Strongest Man.

In 2017, Evans was one of the final cuts the Green Bay Packers made to its 53-man roster before the season began.

“I thought I was one of the strongest guys playing,” Evans told USA TODAY Sports a day before the competition started in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

NFL Draft Hub: Latest NFL Draft mock drafts, news, live picks, grades and analysis

It wasn’t enough to make the team, and his football career ended. His competitive endeavors did not stop there, however.

Evans, whose day job is a strength and conditioning coach at the University of Delaware, turned that power – and the frustration that comes with falling agonizingly short of his life’s goal to that point – into his endeavor of becoming a professional strongman.

“When football ended, it was devastating to him,” Delaware associate athletic director and head strength and conditioning coach Chris Stewart told USA TODAY Sports. “He had a second to gather his thoughts and redirect that passion for competition into lifting.”

NFL dream falls short

Raised in Franklin, North Carolina, Evans played collegiately at the University of Richmond. There, he met Stewart, then the Spiders’ head strength and conditioning coach who is now Evans’ boss at Delaware.

Stewart said Evans, a natural leader who became a team captain, was “everything you want in a football player” who had a passion for the weight room and strength and conditioning.

“He’s the strongest athlete I’ve ever trained,” said Evans, who spent 11 years at the University of Tennessee prior to Richmond (2009-16).

Evans went undrafted and was invited to Packers camp. To try to make the team, he tried out multiple positions on the offensive line, including center.

He never received a reason for being cut.

“I could hold my own at right guard,” Evans said. “When I got flipped over to the left side, my pass setting wasn’t as good.”

From gridiron to weight room

While still pursuing the NFL, Evans latched onto Stewart’s new operation in Delaware, starting as a volunteer while becoming a certified coach. He secured a minicamp invite in 2018 with the Washington Commanders, but a contract did not materialize.

“At that point, I was pretty hurt and over with it,” said Evans, who is now an assistant strength coach for the Blue Hens’ football team and is the lead strength coordinator for men’s and women’s lacrosse.

This was before spring football leagues such as the AFL, XFL and USFL began their most-recent iterations in earnest. Evans said his desire to make it in football likely would have lured him to one of those options had they existed sooner. It was not meant to be.

Instead, he was at home, and found the Netflix documentary, “Born Strong,” which chronicled the annual Arnold Strongman Classic (named after bodybuilding icon and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger).

Evans saw a community that spoke his language – little running and lots of weight being moved.

“I thought, ‘Hey, why can’t I do this?’” Evans said.

His goals started small. Evans found himself humbled in his first competition, finishing third out of five in a statewide competition in Delaware.

“He also loved the brotherhood, the camaraderie, of the athletes … and how they worked together and coached each other,” Stewart said.

‘OK, you belong here’

Eight months ago, Evans was asked when he wanted to debut in the World’s Strongest Man competition. He responded that, ideally, it would be within three to four years.

Clearly, that timeline has sped up.

Evans placed fifth out of nine at America’s Strongest Man in September 2019, his first event. He won the Arnold Amateur Strongman six months later and the Shaw Classic Open later that year.

“To me, that was a moment like, ‘OK, you belong here,’” Evans said.

This year, in his debut at the Arnold Strongman Classic, Evans came in fifth.

Evans said he prefers events that are moderate in weight with the goal of maximizing repetitions. The log ladder is his best event, he said, and Evans showed that Wednesday during his World’s Strongest Man qualifying by leading his group with five reps in 38.96 seconds. (Overall, he finished fourth in his group of six with 18 points.)

Evans made it this far by being a generalist, he said. He’s worked hard at improving his deadlift, which maxed out at 855 pounds at the Arnold Strongman in March.

“You don’t necessarily need to win any event, but if you get top three in everything, you’ll win the whole (competition),” Evans said.

This week, Evans competed with a heavy heart. His grandfather, Frank Lasky, played football at the University of Florida and two seasons in the NFL with the New York Giants. Lasky was the father figure in Evans’ life, and he passed away last week following a long-term battle with dementia, Evans said.

“He was a fighter,” Evans said. “He hung in there a long time.”

Evans wanted to follow in his grandfather’s footsteps on the gridiron and ultimately came up short. He also hoped to honor him with his performance in Myrtle Beach. But Evans knows that the weight does not care about his feelings.

“Five hundred pounds,” he said, “is five hundred pounds every day you walk in there.”

Follow Chris Bumbaca on Twitter @BOOMbaca.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

BOULDER, Colo. – Kavosiey Smoke spent five years as a running back at Kentucky after growing up in the Deep South and receiving scholarship offers from several football programs in the Southeastern Conference, including South Carolina and Florida.

His hometown is Wetumpka, Alabama. His sports hero is Bo Jackson, the two-sport icon from Auburn.

But this week he’s changing direction and heading west – to Folsom Field at Colorado to watch the first spring football game under new head coach Deion Sanders.

“I’ve got to get around my boys,” said Smoke, who graduated from Kentucky and is joining Sanders’ team in Boulder this summer as a graduate transfer.  “I wish I was playing, man. I would have turned the fans up.”

They’re all still likely to go a little nuts Saturday anyway. They’ve been desperate after so many years of despair, including a 1-11 season last year. And they can’t believe what just happened.

‘It’s crazy’

Since his hiring in December, Sanders has delivered hope to the Colorado masses by massively reshaping the team roster and bringing in the nation’s No. 1 recruiting class of transfer players, including Smoke, according to 247Sports.

Colorado then sold out of tickets for its intrasquad spring game Saturday at $10 apiece. ESPN is even coming to town to televise it at 3 p.m. ET., the only spring college football game it will televise on its main network.

“It’s crazy, huh?” asked Jeff Crawford, a Colorado graduate and donor.

Expect a big party-like atmosphere Saturday even though it’s just a glorified practice and the weather might be chilly and cloudy.

COLORADO FOOTBALL: Sanders is leading Colorado makeover with transfer portal

SURPRISES AHEAD:Who can mimic TCU’s unlikely College Football Playoff run?

It feels like a revival

They’re coming from all over to watch this. Crawford is coming from Southern California and can’t remember the last time he came to Boulder for a spring game. Another Colorado grad, Chuck Stilwell, is coming from South Florida, where he runs a crop insurance business. He hadn’t attended a spring football game since the 1990s, when the Buffaloes went to major bowl games and won a Heisman Trophy.

“Since December, I just watched the transformation,” Stilwell said. In less than five months, he said, it went from a “dead program” to this – an offseason juggernaut that just sold out season tickets for the first time in 27 years.

It crescendos again Saturday when more than 20 current and former NFL players from Colorado return to Folsom Field for a reunion, including former quarterback Kordell Stewart and receiver Michael Westbrook, a pair that led the Buffaloes to a No. 3 national finish in 1994 with an 11-1 record.

“It’s like there was a plug that was sitting on the floor next to the socket, and somebody had to be brave enough to put it in the wall to get this thing lit up again,” Stewart said on campus Wednesday.

Nostalgia is running thick

Sanders, the flamboyant former two-sport superstar, electrified it with his signature mixture of hype and swagger, a combination that has served him well in recruiting new players. He’s also restored pride to a downbeat program that had only two winning seasons in the past 17 years and never had a spring crowd of more than 17,800 (2008).

And that’s the thing: Stewart, Crawford and Stilwell knew it didn’t have to be so bad. Quite the contrary. Stilwell attended Colorado when the Buffs finished No. 3 nationally at 10-2 in 1971.

“I’ve suffered so damn long that I said, `Let me go out there and see,’” Stilwell said of his decision to attend the spring game.

 In 1989, Crawford’s senior year, the Buffs were undefeated before losing in the Orange Bowl to Notre Dame to finish 11-1. The Buffs won a share of the national title a year later at 11-1-1 under coach Bill McCartney.

“I’ve been dying for the Buffs to be relevant in football again,” Crawford said. “It’s just been a terrible dry spell, and I think Coach Prime (Sanders) is going to turn it around.  I want to see it come to fruition.”

It’s a recruiting showcase

A crowd of more than 45,000 is expected Saturday, along with more than 20 recruits, including defensive lineman Williams Nwaneri, the nation’s No. 4 prospect for 2024, according to 247Sports. Even prospects who previously committed to other schools are expected to be there, such as linebacker Sterling Dixon, who chose Alabama in December but is keeping his mind open enough to watch Coach Prime’s preliminary product.

Smoke, the incoming graduate transfer from Kentucky, said it doesn’t matter that many of today’s players are too young to have remembered Sanders as a player. They have parents or older brothers who did and know his reputation.

“I just liked how he approached the game, like he was a dog,” Smoke said in an interview with USA TODAY Sports. “He had a dog mentality. He wanted to win all the time, you feel me? So I know he was going in to win as a player. He’s going in to win as a coach. I just like the winning atmospheres he builds.”

It’s a sneak peak at massive change

Earlier this year, Sanders signed 42 newcomers to a roster that is limited to 85 scholarship players. He’s adding more transfer players and incoming freshman in the summer. By the time he’s done, perhaps 60% to 70% of his roster in the fall could be newcomers.

This more than anything has fueled hope now, as opposed to the wait-and-see approach many fanbases take after their team changes coaches and needs three years to rebuild.

Sanders still has stressed patience, at least until this summer.  

‘What you see is not what you’re going to see,” Sanders said of the spring game.

He said it’ll be different when the Buffs open the season at TCU Sept. 2.

‘I promise you when we go out there and play our first game you’re going to be happy with the product that we place on the field for you,’ Sanders said. ‘I promise you.’

It’s Coach Prime

Before the game, Colorado fans might notice a new CU brand taking up prominent space at the campus bookstore. It’s Coach Prime gear – T-shirts ($29.99) and hooded sweatshirts ($69.99) emblazoned with Sanders’ nickname above the Colorado logo.

This surge is all about the man. It likely would not have happened under any other coach except him, just because his fame and accomplishments in sports give him instant credibility and relevance with today’s players and fans.

Colorado merchandise sales skyrocketed 505% in December over the previous year, according to the school. In January and February, the CU Buffs team store was No. 2 on the Fanatics platform behind only Georgia, said Alexis Williams, CU’s senior associate athletic director for external operations.

They even had to turn away customers who wanted to buy tickets.

“It went through the roof more than we could ever imagine,” Williams said.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. E-mail: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY