Archive

2023

Browsing

There is nothing particularly complicated about what should happen to Bob Huggins. 

If his boss, West Virginia athletics director Wren Baker, went on a radio show and said the highly offensive, homophobic things Huggins said Monday, he would be fired before nightfall. 

If Baker’s boss, West Virginia president Gordon Gee, had said those things, his tenure would also be over in the blink of an eye.

Heck, if a public-facing employee or executive of any American company said those things, we all know what would happen. 

Why would anyone hold a basketball coach to a different standard? 

This isn’t about wokeness or cancel culture. This wasn’t a slip of the tongue or an innocent mistake. This was a 69-year-old man going on a radio show in Cincinnati and gleefully using a term to describe gay people that was intended to denigrate fans of Xavier University, Huggins’ former rival when he coached the Cincinnati Bearcats from 1989-2005. 

And he did it twice, without even a hint of hesitation or apology as it was happening. 

You may not like where the line has been drawn here. You may have grown up saying that word and don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. Maybe you even use it now in private because you believe certain groups of people aren’t worthy of equality. 

But our society, which has come a long way in acceptance and celebration of the LGBTQ community but still has miles to go, has decided that slur is no longer acceptable. And so when it is used so callously, so cavalierly and said with the seeming delight that Huggins employed in order to make two lame radio hosts laugh, there is nothing to be done other than the obvious. 

He must go, or West Virginia might as well rename itself University of Bob Huggins. At some point, he may be worth forgiveness and grace on a human level. But as large of a figure as Huggins is, both literally and figuratively in the history of Mountaineer basketball, he cannot remain in his position as the most highly paid public employee of West Virginia’s flagship university.

If Huggins wants to be remembered as a man who valued dignity and honor, he will do it himself and step away. But if he tries to stay, he is asking the people who work with him and the university he loves to debase themselves for his benefit. 

That’s not a choice they should be forced to make because he decided that it was a good day to go on a radio show and have a laugh at the expense of one of America’s most vulnerable groups. 

Huggins is a legend in college basketball and one of the great characters remaining in an industry that has become more buttoned-down and corporate. He can be funny and engaging while also being extremely tough. Huggins isn’t for everyone, but his style has undeniably helped hundreds of players become the best versions of themselves. 

That doesn’t give him a pass on this one. 

In times like this, the most fervent defenders of a high-profile person will point to the good they’ve done in their life, as if somehow that gives them immunity from any mistake. That’s not the way things work. Every person contains multitudes of good and bad qualities, but we all have to live by certain standards. 

Huggins didn’t just go over that line, he did it with his full chest out, as if that phrase were second nature. As much progress as the LGBTQ community has made, what Huggins said shows that there’s still a segment of our population that thinks they exist to be the butt of jokes, because they are inherently lesser than the kind of people Huggins believes are worthy of his respect. 

If West Virginia retains Huggins, its message to LGBTQ students or citizens of the state would be undeniable: The basketball coach thinks your very existence is funny and to be made fun of. How can anyone in a position of power at West Virginia accept that? 

At least the apology Huggins tweeted out did not attempt to make any excuses or say the clip was taken out of context. He has lived in the public spotlight long enough to know how this works.

There is always a certain sadness when someone so accomplished at their craft and so beloved in their profession shows themselves to be a garden-variety bigot. But there was no other way to hear or interpret what he said on that radio show. 

For all the games he has won and the glory he brought West Virginia, he’s not bigger than the school. It would be a sad way to go out, but there isn’t much other choice. If what he said on that radio show would be fireable for any other school employee, it must be for him as well. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Connor Bedard has been considered the top pick for the 2023 NHL draft for years, and the biggest question was who would end up with his rights.

That was answered Monday night, when the Chicago Blackhawks won the draft lottery and the opportunity to select Bedard with the No. 1 overall pick on June 28 in Nashville.

Bedard, 17, who entered the Western Hockey League draft early, has dominated junior hockey and international hockey. He had 100 points in 62 games last season with the Regina (Saskatchewan) Pats and topped that with 143 points in 57 games this season. He was MVP of the world junior championships with 23 points in seven games as Canada won gold.

Here are the winners and losers of the NHL draft lottery:

Winner: Blackhawks and their fans

Chicago won Stanley Cups in 2010, 2013 and 2015, but it has missed the playoffs for five of the last six seasons. Bedard, by himself, won’t get the team back to the playoffs, but he can provide enough excitement for fans as the team builds around him. It’s reminiscent of when the Blackhawks built around Jonathan Toews (No. 3 in 2006) and Patrick Kane (No. 1 in 2007). ‘It can change a franchise, it can change a city and it change an era in a team’s history,’ general manager Kyle Davidson said of having the No. 1 overall pick in the right year. ‘When our logo flipped over there, I was like, ‘Wow.”

Follow every game: Latest NHL Scores and Schedules

Loser: Blackhawks critics

The franchise is less than two years removed from the release of a damning report about how it mishandled a sexual assault allegation involving then-video coach Brad Aldrich during the team’s run to the 2010 championship. Most people from then have left the team, but the scandal tarnished the organization. Plus, the Blackhawks were the definition of organizational tank, moving out Alex DeBrincat, Kane, Max Domi, Jake McCabe and others either in the offseason or before the trade deadline. Should a team be rewarded for paring down that much?

Winner: Connor Bedard

He lands with an Original Six team and in a big city. The endorsement opportunities will be immense. He gets a solid coach in Luke Richardson. Plus, he’s in the Western Conference and the Vancouver-area native will get more games on the West Coast than he would have if an Eastern Conference team had won the lottery, though not as much as if Anaheim, San Jose or Vancouver had won.

Loser: Connor Bedard

Who will he pass to? Who will pass to him? Chicago’s roster is very thin after all the departures. Only 13 players are under contract next season, according to Cap Friendly, and the Blackhawks already said they are moving on from captain Toews. Bedard would have a better chance at more immediate success on other teams. But he should be a draw for pending free agents, so the Blackhawks potentially could rebuild more quickly.

Winner: The NHL and its network partners

It’s better for the league, ESPN and TNT to have a player like Bedard in a major TV market like Chicago. Being in the Central time zone means Bedard likely will spend a lot of time on national television. The Blackhawks haven’t been in a Winter Classic since 2019 because of the team’s recent struggles. Perhaps, they’ll get back in the mix now.

Loser: Arizona Coyotes

If the Coyotes had won the lottery, gaining the rights to Bedard would have helped the team during a May 16 vote to determine whether an arena will be built in Tempe. But Arizona did gain another first-round pick in this year’s draft (No. 12 overall via the Jakob Chychrun trade) when the Ottawa Senators didn’t win either drawing.

Winner and loser: Anaheim Ducks

The last-place team didn’t get Bedard despite the best odds, but they won the second drawing and hold the No. 2 pick. This is an extremely deep draft and expected No. 2 pick Adam Fantilli, the Hobey Baker Award-winning center from the University of Michigan, is also projected to be an impact player. The Ducks had excellent luck with another Hobey Baker winner in Paul Kariya.

Loser: Columbus Blue Jackets

They moved back a spot after Anaheim won the second drawing. Plus ESPN’s Kevin Weekes, in a gaffe, announced that were picking third and the team had to wait through a commercial break to see deputy commissioner Bill Daly flip over the No. 3 card and reveal the Columbus logo. ‘I think it was pretty evident what was going to happen,’ general manager Jarmo Kekalainen said. ‘Spoiled the moment, I guess.’ The Blue Jackets were aggressive in the offseason by signing Johnny Gaudreau, but were crushed by injury after injury. Bedard would have made an excellent center for Gaudreau and Patrik Laine. But again, they’ll get an impact player at No. 3 overall.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 147th annual Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show is back, with over 3,000 dogs of more than 200 different breeds competing for the ultimate prize, glory and bragging rights.

The show will run from Monday, May 8 to Tuesday, May 9 in New York City’s USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center for the first time ever. The coveted ‘Best in Show’ honor — which was won by Trumpet the Bloodhound last year — will be announced on Tuesday night. 

The weekend kicked off with the 8th annual Masters Obedience Championship and 10th Anniversary Masters Agility Championship on Saturday.

See photos from this year’s event so far:

More coverage by USA TODAY

After losing beloved dog, grandma gets best surprise from her family– a golden retriever

Can cats smile? Yes, but not in the way you’d expect. Here’s what they’re trying to tell you.

At King Charles III’s coronation, these dogs stole the show

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

LOS ANGELES – A smile spread across the face of Lonnie Walker IV, a reserve guard for the Los Angeles Lakers.

‘It might sound narcissistic or what not,’ he said, ‘but I’m in love with myself and I want to be my best self.’

It was a lovefest for Walker Monday night in front of a sellout crowd of 18,997 at Cypto.com Arena. He spurred the Lakers past Golden State Warriors, 104-101, with 15 points – all coming in the fourth quarter as the Lakers rallied from a seven-point deficit.

LeBron James had 27 points and Anthony Davis had 23 points for the Lakers in Game 4 of the Western Conference semifinals. But the hero was Walker, who accounted for 15 of the Laker’s 27 points in the fourth quarter on 6-of-9 shooting from the floor.

‘The game ball definitely goes to him,’ James said. ‘We don’t win without him.’

Follow every game: Latest NBA Scores and Schedules

STAY UP-TO-DATE: Subscribe to our Sports newsletter now!

Walker opened the scoring in the fourth quarter with a 3-pointer, and with 1:53 left he made a decisive shot – a 15-footer that put the Lakers ahead 100-99.

They never trailed again.

‘The greatest feeling you can ever imagine,’ Walker said of his fourth-quarter performance.

This season, he was a starter until December when he suffered a knee injury. In February, when he was healthy enough to return to action, the Lakers acquired Malik Beasley and Walker fell out of the rotation.

‘But he remained a trooper, remained professional, remained high spirited, positive and really kept working on his game and attacking his game every day,’ Lakers coach Darvin Ham said. ‘Really staying locked in on the information, especially during these playoffs up to point where he was able to crack the rotation.’

Curious play by Steph Curry

With 5.4 second left and Golden State trailing 104-101, Steph Curry leapt into the air and corralled a jump ball tipped by Andrew Wiggins. Then he fell onto the court and, although the Warriors had a timeout, threw the ball over his head and out of bounds.

The Lakers inbounded the ball and ran out the clock.

‘I didn’t realize how much time went off when I was in the air coming down, how long I was on the ground,’ he said. ‘I actually felt like somebody was behind me and kind of just let it go. But bang-bang play. I wish I had a little bit more awareness to maybe call a timeout knowing we had enough time.’

Warriors coach Steve Kerr said he was trying to call a timeout, which potentially would have given the Warriors a chance to tie the game with a 3-pointer.

‘He lost the ball so quickly that (we) didn’t get the call,’ Kerr said.

Warriors remain dangerous

The Lakers, despite being up 3-1 heading into Game 5 Wednesday in San Francisco, are expressing reverence Warriors. It sounds genuine, too. After all, the Warriors are the defending champions and won four titles in the past eight years. During that stretch, they reached the NBA Finals six times.

‘I just told the team in the postgame speech, there’s no other team on earth that plays the way they play and puts you in like precarious positions that they did,’ Lakers coach Darvin Ham said, also referred to Golden State as a ‘monster.’

Said James: ‘One thing when you play Golden State, you don’t have an opportunity to relax. You just don’t. So I’m not worried about us going in there comfortable. You just can’t do it versus Golden State. It’s not possible.’

What day is it?

Apparently the playoffs have become a blur for James, who after the game Monday night wondered aloud what day it was.

Addressing how the young Lakers have an opportunity to grow with every game, James said, ‘Tonight was another moment, and then whenever we play, every other day, I don’t even know what today is. Whenever Game 5 is, it’ll be another opportunity for us to grow as a ballclub.’

Good chance the Lakers will inform him soon that Game 5 is Wednesday.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Tampa Bay Rays right-hander has a simple message for umpiring crews he’ll encounter the rest of the season: Make me.

Eflin on Tuesday will make his first start since crew chief Adrian Johnson told him he had to remove his rubber ring after the first inning of his outing last week against Pittsburgh – even though the ring is on his glove hand.

When Eflin completes the bottom of the first inning against the Baltimore Orioles on Tuesday night, he’ll get his hands and glove checked by crew chief Todd Tichenor for foreign substances.

And Eflin, 29, says he hopes a band on his left hand won’t be considered contraband.

Follow every game: Latest MLB Scores and Schedules

‘If they ask me to take it off because they’re going to eject me out of the game, then I’ll take it off,’ Eflin said Monday. ‘But I have to keep telling everybody it’s important to me. It’s my representation of the covenant I have with my wife. If other people have problems with that, so be it.

ROYALS: Pitcher Ryan Yarbrough goes on IR with head fractures

‘I’ve been wearing it for two years now. This is really the first issue I’ve had with it.’

That issue occurred when crew chief Adrian Johnson engaged Eflin in a lengthy conversation and insisted the ring – commemorating his 2020 marriage to Lauren Dennen – come off.

Eflin says other players around the league have worn similar rings without incident and, with the ring buried in his glove hand, it would be the last place any foreign substances might aid his pitching.

That’s why he insists even the equivalent of a traffic ticket is out of bounds when umpires aim to crack down on foreign substances. And why he’ll wear his band Tuesday night.

‘If they’re really coming after me for a rubber wedding ring, then I think they have their head in the wrong spot,’ says Eflin, who has three children with Lauren, including twins born in March. ‘I never really use both my hands to rub down the ball. The only time they ever see it is during a very cold game, or when I’m getting checked off to the side.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When West Virginia basketball coach Bob Huggins uttered a homophobic slur on Monday’s WLW-AM (700) talk show with host Bill Cunningham, it put both the coach and the radio host in the national spotlight.

During a segment called the ‘Stooge Report,’ Huggins recalled an incident in which ‘rubber penises’ were thrown on the court during a Crosstown Shootout game between the University of Cincinnati and Xavier. Cunningham joked about the game being ‘transgender night.’ Huggins then said: ‘It was all those f–s and those Catholic f–s I think threw them.’

The coach has since apologized, saying in a statement he ‘used a completely insensitive and abhorrent phrase that there is simply no excuse for.’ West Virginia University Athletics said in a statement that Huggins’ comments were ‘insensitive, offensive and do not represent our University values,’ and the situation is under review.

But who is Cunningham, the longtime radio and television host with a history of controversy?

Who is Bill Cunningham?

The 75-year-old talk radio host and conservative commentator was born in Covington, Kentucky. Prior to becoming a radio and television host, he had a career in law, first as a staff attorney with the Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati-Public Defender Division.

From 1978-1986, he was Assistant Attorney General in the office of the Ohio Attorney General under Attorneys General William J. Brown and Anthony J. Celebrezze Jr.

He currently works for the law firm of Steven R. Adams, which specializes in criminal defense in Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky.

Cunningham is married to Judge Penelope R. Cunningham, who served on the Ohio District Courts of Appeals.

He started at WLW in 1983 and currently hosts two radio shows: ‘The Big Show with Bill Cunningham,’ which airs weekdays on WLW, and ‘Sunday Nights with Bill Cunningham,’ which is syndicated nationally by Premiere Radio Networks, a subsidiary of iHeartMedia.

He also hosted ‘The Bill Cunningham Show,’ a television show which aired on The CW from 2011-2016.

Did Bill Cunningham retire?

2022 marked Cunningham’s 40th year at WLW, and his contract was set to expire that year. At the time, he told The Enquirer’s ‘That’s So Cincinnati’ podcast he hadn’t decided whether to call it a career, but has since continued broadcasting.

Why is Bill Cunningham controversial?

Cunningham has had a history of making controversial remarks, both on his radio show and at in-person events. Media Matters for America, which describes itself as a progressive media watchdog, has labeled him a ‘fringe radio host’ and a purveyor of ‘hate speech.’ 

In February 2008, then-Presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain was holding a rally at Memorial Hall in Over-the-Rhine ahead of Ohio’s presidential primary. He was introduced by Cunningham, who insulted President Barack Obama, the Clintons and the media. Cunningham twice referred to Obama as ‘Barack Hussein Obama,’ using his middle name, The Enquirer reported. After, McCain made a point of speaking out.

‘I take responsibility, and I repudiate what he said,’ McCain told reporters after the rally. ‘A person came out here before I arrived and made some disparaging remarks about Senators Obama and Clinton, and I regret that.’

Cunningham also called out Obama during another occasion, saying his father left him when he was two years old because he ‘acted the way a Black father normally acts, which is quickly have a baby and leave.’

And during a 2013 appearance on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show, Cunningham yelled at a female news contributor to ‘know your role and shut your mouth.’

The Cincinnati radio announcer acted as sort of an unofficial adviser to President Donald Trump. He later slammed Trump for inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol. 

In 2020, Cunningham told The Enquirer’s ‘That’s So Cincinnati’ podcast of the biggest regret of his radio career. It was in November 1993, after Cincinnati voters passed a charter amendment restricting certain legal rights for LGBTQ+ citizens. Roxanne Qualls became mayor after that same election, and there were a lot of questions around town about her sexual orientation.

Cunningham invited reporters to WLW’s studios to talk about Qualls and the charter amendment. 

‘With the media present, I asked if she is gay,’ Cunningham said on the podcast. ‘I shouldn’t have done it. It was the biggest mistake and blunder that I made. It was a big news story at the time. But man, I thought about it. On a human level, I was unnecessarily cruel.’ 

Cunningham said he had seen Qualls one time since, sometime in the late 1990s. If he had the opportunity, Cunningham said, ‘I would apologize to her.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Detroit Lions waived released three players ahead of this weekend’s rookie minicamp, including wide receiver Stanley Berryhill, who was suspended six games for violating the NFL’s gambling policy.

Berryhill was one of four Lions players disciplined in a league investigation last month. Wide receiver Jameson Williams also was suspended six games for gambling on non-NFL games from an NFL facility, while safety C.J. Moore and receiver Quintez Cephus were suspended indefinitely for betting on football.

The Lions released Moore and Cephus at the time of their suspensions.

Along with Berryhill, who is allowed to take part in formal workouts and training camp before his suspension begins in the regular season, the Lions released cornerback Mac McCain and defensive tackle Demetrius Taylor on Tuesday.

McCain signed with the Lions in February after spending most of last season on the Philadelphia Eagles practice squad, while Taylor made the Lions initial 53-man roster last summer but was waived in October and spent the rest of the season on practice squad.

The Lions currently have 72 players on their 90-man roster. They are expected to sign more than a dozen undrafted free agents this week.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NFL offseason marches on with yet another procedural matter that somehow became a hyped event: the regular-season schedule release.

All 32 teams’ home and away opponents have been locked in for some time, but the true shape of the season will be revealed by 8 p.m. ET on Thursday, when the league is set to announce its full 18-week, 272-game slate. And given that the NFL traditionally has allowed the defending champion to serve as host on Thursday night of Week 1, the Kansas City Chiefs look poised to once again command the spotlight at Arrowhead Stadium to launch a new campaign.

With nine home games for Patrick Mahomes and Co. this year, there are several intriguing options for the first meaningful action of the fall. While only a few of these showdowns seem like viable candidates for the opener, here are all of the possibilities ranked from worst to best as options to kick off the 2023 NFL season.

9. Chicago Bears

With all due respect to Bears general manager Ryan Poles and the improvements he has made to the roster in the last two months, there’s high blowout potential in having the team with the NFL’s worst record in 2022 open Week 1 at one of the league’s most daunting venues. Maybe this could be a more competitive matchup later on in the season, when the various free-agent additions have settled in and new No. 1 wide receiver DJ Moore has established a rapport with Justin Fields. For now, though, the Matt Nagy Revenge Bowl has the trappings of an early-window Sunday game.

8. Las Vegas Raiders

None of the three AFC West meetings seem like good bets to inaugurate the new season, as the only time the NFL has opened with a divisional matchup in the last 10 years was with the Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears tilt in 2019 – a special exception made to honor the NFL’s 100th season. Mahomes vs. Jimmy Garoppolo is likely the least interesting quarterback showdown in all of Kansas City’s home games. And there’s little chance that Las Vegas’ undermanned defense has an answer for Andy Reid and Co. after the Chiefs averaged 37.5 points per game in their last four contests against the Silver and Black. 

7. Denver Broncos

There undoubtedly will be plenty of early intrigue surrounding Sean Payton and his efforts to repair Russell Wilson. Still, that’s probably not enough to elevate the latest iteration of a lopsided rivalry – the Chiefs have a series-best 15-game winning streak – that otherwise looks more like a midseason ‘Thursday Night Football’ affair. 

6. Detroit Lions

With Detroit emerging as a favorite to claim its first division title in 30 years, the Chiefs will provide a useful litmus test for where the team stands relative to an established contender. But maybe this game makes sense for another slot, such as Kansas City’s already announced game in Germany.

5. Los Angeles Chargers

The only significant obstacle standing between the Chiefs and their eighth consecutive AFC West title is Justin Herbert. Offensive coordinator Kellen Moore’s arrival could mean big things for the Chargers quarterback and the rest of the attack. Yet while the last four contests between the divisional foes have each been decided by no more than six points, there might not be enough new or unknown elements to really sell this to a national audience.

4. Cincinnati Bengals

You can’t go wrong kicking off the schedule with the league’s defining rivalry of the last two seasons. The animosity is organic, too, with the postseason’s ‘Burrowhead’ tiff serving as the latest point of contention. That bitterness hasn’t dissipated, as Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce described the defection of former teammate Orlando Brown Jr. to Cincinnati this offseason thusly on a March edition of his podcast: ‘It’s like watching your best friend just turn evil on you.’ But if this clash does get set for early September, it will mark the fifth showdown in 21 months between the two sides. Maybe a little spacing – and letting each team find its peak form – would do everyone some good.

3. Philadelphia Eagles

A Super Bowl 57 rematch would seem like an easy choice to open the season, especially with the Eagles looking like the overwhelming NFC front-runner after returning the bulk of their core contributors. Yet given the immense interest this game is sure to generate, the NFL might benefit from putting it into an early-to-midseason prime-time slot and looking elsewhere for the opener. This would also be perhaps the most difficult Week 1 draw for the Chiefs’ offense, which could have tenuous early pass protection behind new offensive tackles Donovan Smith and Jawaan Taylor while the unit also recalibrates its receiving corps. Still, no matter where this game lands on the schedule, it likely will be one of the most anticipated matchups of the entire regular season. 

2. Miami Dolphins

Tyreek Hill going full throttle against his former teammates for the first time since he forced his way out of Kansas City via a trade? Jalen Ramsey and new defensive coordinator Vic Fangio scheming ways to slow down Mahomes? Tua Tagovailoa’s return to the field? There’s no shortage of fascinating subplots to be found in this showdown, and there are ample stars on each side. Maybe the other games featuring established powers end up with a closer final score. But with these teams not having met since Mike McDaniel took over and transformed the Dolphins’ attack into one of the league’s most explosive units, there’s a unique dynamic here that worth spotlighting in the opener. 

1. Buffalo Bills

Don’t overthink this. Pitting the NFL’s two best offenses and its most dynamic quarterbacks against one should always set up a successful showcase for the league. And that very equation gave us arguably one of the greatest playoff games of all time less than a year and a half ago. Buffalo, of course, already spoiled the opening to a Super Bowl title defense last year when it routed the Los Angeles Rams, so maybe the league looks in a different direction for this fall. But the entertainment value whenever these two teams meet is sure to be astronomical.

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Michael Middlehurst-Schwartz on Twitter @MikeMSchwartz.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

At the midway point of the NBA’s Eastern and Western conference semifinals, two series are tied 2-2 (Phoenix-Denver and Philadelphia-Boston) and two are 3-1 (Miami up on New York and Los Angeles Lakers ahead of Golden State).

There have been some good games and some blowouts, but the conference semis have been marked by incredible individual performances from Denver’s Nikola Jokic, Phoenix’s Devin Booker and Kevin Durant, Philadelphia’s James Harden and Joel Embiid, Los Angeles Lakers’ Anthony Davis and LeBron James, Boston’s Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum, Miami’s Jimmy Butler, Golden State’s Steph Curry and Klay Thompson and New York’s Jalen Brunson.

Let’s take a look at the winners and losers halfway through the conference semifinals:

Winners

Phoenix’s Devin Booker

The superlatives are stupendous. Booker is an elite scoring master. In two consecutive Suns victories that tied their series against Denver at 2, Booker scored 47 and 36 points on a combined 34-for-43 shooting − an unbelievable 79%. If the Nuggets don’t find an answer, Booker is going to shoot the Suns right into the conference finals. For the series, he averages 36.3 points and shoots 63.7% from the field and 57.1% on 3-pointers. Don’t dismiss his 8.8 assists, 5.3 rebounds and 1.3 steals per game.

Follow every game: Latest NBA Scores and Schedules

Miami Heat

The Heat can become just the second eighth seed in NBA history to reach the conference finals (New York did it in 1999) if they beat the Knicks one more time. Miami gets just enough offense, and it has the No. 1 defense in the conference semifinals. Jimmy Butler, Bam Adebayo and a collection of hard workers accomplish tough tasks.

Philadelphia 76ers

Los Angeles Lakers’ role players

The trade deadline deals the Lakers made are working. D’Angelo Russell had 19 points in Game 1 and 21 points in Game 3. Rui Hachimura is 5-for-7 on 3s, and while their offense isn’t a factor, Austin Reaves and Jarred Vanderbilt have contributed defensively. Dennis Schroder has had his moments at both ends, and Lonnie Walker IV scored 15 fourth-quarter points in Game 4.

Denver’s Nikola Jokic

Jokic has been one of the two most impressive players in the playoffs. Here are his four games against Phoenix on 57% shooting from the field and 42.9% on 3-pointers:

Game 1: 24 points, 19 rebounds, five assists; Game 2: 39 points, 16 rebounds, five assists; Game 3: 30 points, 17 rebounds, 17 assists; Game 4: 53 points, 11 assists and four rebounds.

Boston’s Jaylen Brown

Buried in Boston’s inconsistency is Brown’s play: 23.5 points, 4.8 rebounds and 4.5 assists while shooting 57.4% from the field and 40.9% on 3-pointers. Along with Jayson Tatum, the Celtics have the best offense in the conference semis at 123.6 points per 100 possessions, five points better than No. 2 Denver and almost nine points better than No. 3 Phoenix.

Losers

Golden State Warriors

Too many turnovers. The Warriors are worst in the conference semifinals at 14.8 turnovers per game, and they give up the third-most points off of turnovers at 15.3 per game. Those mistakes always have grated on coach Steve Kerr. Sixteen turnovers, including six in the fourth quarter and two in the final nine seconds with a chance to tie the score, hurt the Warriors in Game 4. They have been able to overcome them for the most part. That’s tougher for them to do against the Lakers.

Golden State’s Jordan Poole

Poole didn’t score in Golden State’s Game 4 loss. He missed the four shots he attempted, two of them 3-pointers, and Poole didn’t play in the fourth quarter. In the past two games, he shot 2-for-13 from the field. He’s averaging just 10.5 points in the playoffs (8.0 against the Lakers) and shooting 27.8% on 3s in 11 playoff games. That’s way below the stats from his 2022 playoff performance which helped him land a four-year, $128 million contract in the offseason.

Boston Celtics

The Celtics have an unfortunate knack of getting in their own way. They have the superior talent and more playoff experience. But turnovers, questionable plays and a rookie head coach in Joe Mazzulla have allowed Philadelphia to tie the series at 2.

Denver Nuggets

All Denver needed was a split in Phoenix to take a 3-1 series lead. Instead, the Nuggets had zero answers for Devin Booker and Kevin Durant, and now it’s a 2-2 series headed back to Denver for Game 5.

New York’s Julius Randle

Randle is averaging 18.3 points (seven points below his season average) and shooting 43.5% from the field and 22.2% on 3-pointers − also below his season averages of 45.9% and 34.3%. Randle had a better Game 4 (20 points, 61.5% shooting, nine rebounds), but fouled out at 3:08 of the fourth quarter. The Heat play tough defense, but the Knicks need more from Randle.

Phoenix’s Deandre Ayton

Ayton was benched at the end of Game 3 and left the arena without talking to reporters even though the Suns won. He was torched by Nikola Jokic in Game 4 so much so that backup center Jock Londale is getting some of Ayton’s minutes. Jokic was 10-for-13 and scored 26 of his 53 points and had five assists against Ayton, according to nba.com tracking data. The Suns invested too much (four years, $132.9 million) for petulance at playoff time.

3-point shooting − for some players and teams

New York’s Jalen Brunson is shooting 27.3% on 3-pointers, Boston’s Jayson Tatum 32%, Denver’s Jamal Murray 28.6%, Phoenix’s Kevin Durant 25%, Los Angeles Lakers’ LeBron James 30%, the Knicks 27.2% and the Heat 30.8%. Golden State is normally a great 3-point shooting team but made 12-for-41 (29.3%) in Game 4.

New York Knicks

The Knicks are the higher seed but are down 3-1 and the game they won in the series was when Miami was without Jimmy Butler. They committed too many turnovers (16), gave up too many offensive rebounds (13), were outscored 17-7 on second-chance points and 22-15 on points off of turnovers in Game 4.

Follow NBA reporter Jeff Zillgitt on Twitter @JeffZillgitt

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

FIRST ON FOX: Ethics experts tell Fox News Digital that President Biden is flirting with crossing ethical lines in talking about the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) investigation into his son, Hunter Biden.

Fox News Digital reached out to several ethics experts to weigh in on the president proclaiming his son’s innocence as Hunter faces down potential DOJ charges.

Cully Stimson, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital that like ‘most fathers, President Biden is going to defend his son.’

‘However, as the President of the United States, Biden knows (or should know) that it is entirely inappropriate for him to weigh in on an ongoing federal investigation of a suspect because as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, and the person assigned the Pardon Power under the Constitution, he should not pre-judge any federal case until the case has come to its natural conclusion,’ Stimson said.

Mike Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT), told Fox News Digital there ‘is a reason that officials, including the President in past occasions, normally refuse to comment on ongoing investigations.’

‘Especially in the case of the President, whom DOJ officials are ultimately responsible to, any statement commenting on a case or investigation could likely sway those working on the case and could tend to manipulate the outcome,’ Chamberlain warned.

‘While this is clearly irresponsible, it may be worse,’ he continued. ‘Given that the DOJ is already under fire after reports that a whistleblower has alleged political interference in career officials’ recommendations to prosecute Hunter Biden, the President’s statement could be interpreted by some as akin to potential obstruction of justice.’

Former Obama administration ethics chief Walter Shaub told Fox News Digital that Biden’s weighing in on his son’s potential criminal charges ‘highlight’ the dangers of the president or his White House personnel talking to the DOJ or Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about Hunter’s case.

Shaub said he hopes Biden and his administration keep their distance from Hunter’s investigation but believes it’s likely okay for a presidential father to exercise caution while proclaiming his son’s innocence as to not appear as attempting to influence the decision.

‘I think these remarks highlight exactly why neither President Biden or anyone from the White House should talk to anyone at the IRS or Justice Department about the investigation of his son,’ Shaub said. ‘I hope they continue to maintain a strict firewall.’

‘As long as he stays away from doing that, it’s probably ok for a father to say he believes his son is innocent,’ he continued. ‘But he should exercise caution to avoid appearing to try to influence a potential jury pool or undermine the credibility of the investigation, which may mean refraining from going further than answering an interviewer’s questions, for instance, by raising the topic in a speech.’

The Justice Department is reportedly nearing a decision to charge Hunter Biden on federal tax-and-gun-related charges. 

The first son has been under federal investigation since 2018 for two misdemeanor tax filing charges, a felony tax evasion charge, and a false statement charge over a gun purchase. 

President Biden was asked how the potential looming charges would impact his presidency in an interview last Friday with MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle. 

‘First of all, my son’s done nothing wrong. I trust him. I have faith in him and, it impacts my presidency by making me feel proud of him,’ Biden explained.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS