Archive

2023

Browsing

EXCLUSIVE: Republican presidential candidate and former governor and ambassador Nikki Haley will unveil her Veterans for Nikki coalition next week during a two-day swing through New Hampshire, the state that holds the first primary and second overall contest in the GOP presidential nominating calendar.

And Haley, the only female candidate among the major contenders for the Republican presidential nomination, will also launch a Women for Nikki New Hampshire coalition. The announcements, shared first with Fox News on Thursday, will come as the former two-term South Carolina governor who later served as ambassador to the United Nations makes her fourth swing through the Granite State since declaring her candidacy for the White House in February.

Serving as the honorary chair of Veterans for Nikki is someone that Haley knows quite well – her husband Michael – who’s a member of the South Carolina National Guard and a full-time federal military technician. He joined the National Guard following 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001, and in 2013, he became the first spouse of a sitting governor to serve in a combat zone when he deployed to Afghanistan.

‘When my National Guard unit deployed to Afghanistan while Nikki was governor, I had no doubt that our family and our state would be in strong, capable hands,’ Michael Haley said in a statement. ‘Nikki is fearless and has always had the backs of our veterans and armed forces. As commander-in-chief, she will lead with grit and resolve.’ 

Jason Church, a retired U.S. Army captain who lost both of his legs in an IED explosion during his first deployment to Afghanistan, will also serve as part of the veterans coalition leadership team. ‘A President Nikki Haley will face America’s national security threats with backbone and courage,’ he emphasized.

Haley will announce her veterans coalition next Wednesday, May 24, during a campaign event at VFW Post 1631 in Concord, New Hampshire. Headlining the event will be retired Army Gen. Don Bolduc, a New Hampshire native who spent four decades in the military and served ten tours of duty in Afghanistan. Haley made multiple trips to New Hampshire last autumn to support Bolduc as he made his second straight bid for the Senate. Bolduc endorsed Haley after she launched her 2024 presidential campaign and has introduced her at numerous New Hampshire events.

Bolduc noted that as South Carolina governor, Haley ‘signed multiple bills to help our veterans and make the transition to civilian life easier. The bottom line is, Nikki Haley will be a commander-in-chief we can be proud of.’

While in New Hampshire next week, Haley will also headline the latest installment of the politics and eggs speaking series at Saint Anselm College’s New Hampshire Institute of Politics, which has been a must stop for White House hopefuls for over two decades. And she’ll headline a No BS Backyard BBQ in Rye, New Hampshire that’s hosted by former Sen. Scott Brown and his wife, former congressional candidate Gail Huff Brown.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Riley Gaines, the former college championship swimmer who competed against transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, said Wednesday that her advocacy in support of women’s sports has earned ‘amazing’ support among liberals.

‘I have gotten messages… from women and men who are lifelong liberals, who once prided themselves, especially women, on the original feminist movement, who are seeing what’s happening with the Democrat party now,’ Gaines told Fox News Digital.

‘Just a few weeks ago, all [Democrats] in the U.S. House voted ‘no’ on protecting women and girls in sports,’ Gaines said. ‘And these women, they’re seeing this and they’re fed up.’

‘The amount of support that I’ve had from liberal women who, again, consider themselves feminists, is amazing. These are women who are sick of their own party. These representatives are not listening to their constituents, and these women have had enough,’ said Gaines, who is also a spokeswoman for the Independent Women’s Voice.

Gaines also accused Democrats in Washington of ‘ignoring’ women over the Biden administration’s pro-transgender inclusion policies in schools.

‘The people in charge, the governing bodies, the representatives, the senators, especially on the left, they are ignoring the demands of women,’ Gaines said. ‘We’re asking for the bare minimum. We want fairness, we want privacy, we want safety, and we want respect, and they’re ignoring that.’

Gaines was on Capitol Hill for the unveiling of House Republicans’ Women Bill of Rights legislation. During a press conference Wednesday morning, she explained the bill would define the word ‘woman’ in federal law in order to bolster other bills like the House’s recently passed Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.

‘It doesn’t prevent any laws from being passed for any other protected group, it doesn’t change any pre-existing laws. It simply defines the word ‘woman,’ codifies the term,’ she said.

As an example, she said the House-passed Fairness In Women’s Sports Act was ‘phenomenal,’ but asked, ‘what longevity does it have if we can’t define the word ‘woman?’ And that’s what this does. It gives longevity to bills such as the sports bill.’

The House bill is unlikely to get through the Democrat-controlled Senate, and if it did, President Biden is likely to veto it. He said last month that he would veto the women’s sports bill if it came to his desk.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Ariz., the Women’s Bill of Rights’ lead sponsor, acknowledged this likelihood as she introduced Gaines.

‘It’s a frustrating place… We don’t always get our legislation through, but this is really an important issue,’ Lesko said.

Throughout the event, multiple Republicans called on Democrats to take up the bill.

‘We call on the House, the Senate, and the Democrats who care about the future of women to come together and pass this bill,’ said Republican Study Committee Chair Kevin Hern, R-Okla.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

South Carolina’s Senate is set to vote on a bill that would ban abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, often before women even know they’re pregnant.If passed, the state’s near-total abortion ban would add to the list of southern states with abortion restrictions. Some southern states that already have abortion restrictions in place include Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Georgia, and West Virginia,Virginia will become an outlier among the southern states as the only state without abortion restrictions if South Carolina’s Senate votes in favor of the bill.

South Carolina became the latest state to move toward a near total abortion ban Wednesday with legislation that if enacted would leave Virginia an outlier in the South as a place where women have unrestricted access to abortions amid a rapid rise in restrictions in the year since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

South Carolina is among the last bastions in the region for those seeking legal abortions, but that status could end soon. Access would be almost entirely banned after about six weeks of pregnancy — often before women know they’re pregnant — under the bill that now must pass the state Senate, which previously rejected a proposal to nearly outlaw abortions but could give final passage to the new legislation next week.

And most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy will be banned in North Carolina beginning July 1 after the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature successfully overrode the Democratic governor’s veto late Tuesday.

Abortion is banned or severely restricted in much of the South, including bans throughout pregnancy in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. In Georgia, it’s allowed only in the first six weeks.

Such restrictions are possible because the U.S. Supreme Court last year struck down the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which established a nationwide right to abortion.

‘It would be just devastating for abortion access in the South,’ Jamie Lockhart, executive director of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, said of the proposed six-week ban in South Carolina, the 12-week ban in North Carolina, and a six-week ban in Florida that will take effect only if the state’s current 15-week ban is upheld by the state Supreme Court.

But North Carolina Rep. Sarah Stevens, a Republican, said she sees the 12-week ban and other restrictions in North Carolina’s new law as ‘safeguards,’ not obstacles to abortion.

‘We seek to balance protecting unborn babies while ensuring the safety of mothers,’ she said Tuesday.

Stricter bans across the South would heighten Virginia’s role as an access point and create a ‘ripple effect’ as people travel from out of state to seek care, Lockhart said.

‘Despite abortion providers’ efforts to increase available appointments and expand access for patients through telemedicine, the dramatic influx in out-of-state patients will lead to longer wait times for people in those access states,’ Lockhart said.

Virginia currently allows abortions in the first and second trimesters. An abortion is allowed in the third trimester only if three doctors certify the mother’s mental or physical health is at serious risk.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, pushed for a 15-week ban during this year’s legislative session, but that was defeated by the narrow Democratic majority in the state Senate.

Victoria Cobb, president of the conservative Family Foundation of Virginia, said Wednesday that the state’s laws became out of step with its neighbors’ during years of ‘liberal influence.’

Virginians ‘are going to have to work to protect our Commonwealth from being exploited by the abortion industry,’ Cobb said.

The costs of travel for women who need to go outside their home states for abortions can quickly pile up, said Ashlyn Preaux, who helps run an abortion fund in South Carolina. Her organization helps patients pay for abortion care as well as gas cards and sometimes plane tickets.

If South Carolina enacts new restrictions, she expects to help send more patients to Virginia and Washington, D.C.

‘All of these things add up and it’s just not anything that people are prepared for,’ Preaux said. ‘It’s not really treated at all like it’s a health care issue.’

The South Carolina House vote capped nearly 24 hours of grueling debate split across two days as the Republican supermajority tossed or defeated over 900 Democratic amendments. Lawmakers paused for roughly eight hours early Wednesday only after a computer glitch.

Democrats repeatedly spoke for all three minutes allotted per amendment. One would have required that residents read ‘The Handmaid’s Tale.’ Another sought to make the state cover funeral costs for anyone who dies upon being denied an abortion.

Republican Rep. John McCravy urged colleagues to support ‘the only path forward to prevent our state from becoming an abortion destination state in the Southeast.’

Attention now turns to the Senate. Lawmakers could accept the House changes and send the measure to the governor who has indicated he would sign it. Or they could put the bill to a conference committee, where members from each chamber would have to work out their differences.

Until then, abortion remains legal through 22 weeks in South Carolina, and the state had already seen an increasing number of out-of-state patients before Florida and North Carolina enacted new restrictions. Farther west, women often travel to Illinois, Kansas, New Mexico or Colorado.

Provisional state health department data show South Carolina reported nearly 1,000 abortions in each of the first three months this year, after totaling just over 200 in the one full month that a previous six-week ban took effect last year. Nearly half of the patients reportedly came from other states.

Until Tuesday, North Carolina had been considered a safe space, said Dr. Erica Pettigrew, a family medicine doctor in Hillsborough. But now, ‘North Carolinians will be health care refugees to other states,’ she said, also criticizing provisions of the law for potentially creating more paperwork, along with additional medical and licensing requirements.

Another challenge to abortion access was considered Wednesday when a federal appeals court heard arguments on whether the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the widely used abortion drug mifepristone should be overturned. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a ruling by a federal judge in Texas who ordered a hold on approval of mifepristone, a decision that overruled two decades of scientific approval of the drug. That ruling was stayed while the appeal is pending.

Lawyers seeking to preserve access to the drug used in the most common method of abortion got pushback Wednesday from the appellate judges, who each have a history of supporting restrictions on abortion. A ruling is not expected immediately.

In Michigan, one of the leading states in protecting abortion rights since Roe v. Wade was overturned, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation Wednesday that will prohibit companies from firing or otherwise retaliating against workers for having an abortion.

The legislation amends the state’s civil rights law, which had previously only outlawed employment discrimination if an abortion was to ‘save the life of the mother.’ It will ensure that workers cannot be treated differently for receiving an abortion regardless of reasoning.

<!–>

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

–>

Alaska lawmakers on Wednesday passed legislation that seeks to block state and local officials from closing gun stores during disasters declared by the governor, unless such closures apply to all other businesses.

The bill, HB61, is a response to business closures in Alaska and other states during the pandemic, according to a statement from House Speaker Cathy Tilton, a Wasilla Republican and the bill’s sponsor. Several other states have adopted similar bills.

The bill was one of the last debated by lawmakers in the waning days of the 121-day regular legislative session, which was set to end Wednesday. It was backed by the lobbying arm of the National Rifle Association and criticized as a ‘special rights’ bill by state Sen. Jesse Kiehl, a Juneau Democrat.

The measure passed the Senate 17-3 on Tuesday and was returned to the House for a concurrence vote. The House agreed 28-12 to pass the bill late Wednesday.

Last year a federal appeals court panel ruled that two California counties had violated the constitutional right to keep and bear arms when in 2020 they closed gun and ammunition stores as nonessential businesses during the pandemic. Alaska state Sen. Bill Wielechowski, an Anchorage Democrat, said HB61 aligns the state with that court decision.

For many residents in rural Alaska, ‘going to the ammo shop is essentially their way that they go and are able to … subsistence hunt and provide for their families,’ Wielechowski said.

The measure additionally states that in situations in which a governor has declared a disaster emergency, the governor, state agencies or municipalities cannot issue orders barring people from possessing or using guns or other weapons for personal use or issue orders that limit the sale of guns, ammunition or other weapons for personal use.

Prohibitions on gun possession would still apply to individuals who are otherwise restricted from having guns.

State law allows a governor to declare a disaster emergency if the governor finds a disaster has occurred or is ‘imminent or threatened.’ Disaster emergency proclamations are not to remain in effect for longer than 30 days unless extended by the legislature.

Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy issued a series of public health disaster emergency declarations during the pandemic. A 2020 order by Anchorage’s then-mayor was cited by Tilton’s office as an example of a situation in which there were gun store or shooting range closures during an emergency declaration. The city had issued its own emergency proclamation.

Jan Caulfield, a volunteer from Juneau with the group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, called the bill unnecessary. Lawmakers could have better used their time addressing issues such as high rates of gun deaths, she said.

<!–>

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

–>

Wells Fargo & Co. has agreed to pay $1 billion to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defrauding shareholders about its progress in recovering from a series of scandals over its treatment of customers.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods in Manhattan federal court granted preliminary approval on Tuesday to the all-cash settlement, which had been filed the night before.

The dollar amount had been suggested by a mediator. Woods scheduled a Sept. 8 hearing to consider final approval.

Wells Fargo has operated since 2018 under consent orders from the Federal Reserve and two other financial regulators requiring that it improve governance and oversight.

The fourth-largest U.S. bank is also subject to an asset cap by the Fed, limiting its growth and its ability to compete with larger rivals JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc..

Shareholders accused Wells Fargo of overstating how well it was complying with those orders, and said the bank’s market value fell by more than $54 billion over two years ending in March 2020 as the shortcomings became known.

The San Francisco-based bank denied wrongdoing, and settled to eliminate the burden and cost of litigation, court papers show.

“While we disagree with the allegations in this case, we are pleased to have resolved this matter,” Wells Fargo said in a statement.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs may seek up to 19% of the settlement fund for legal fees.

Wells Fargo has since 2016 paid or set aside several billion dollars to resolve regulatory probes and litigation over its business practices.

These practices included opening about 3.5 million accounts without customer permission, and charging hundreds of thousands of borrowers for auto insurance they did not need.

Chief Executive Charlie Scharf has said repairing the 171-year-old bank founded by Henry Wells and William Fargo has taken longer than he expected when he took over in 2019.

“When I arrived, we did not have the culture, effective processes, or appropriate management oversight in place to remediate weaknesses on a timely basis,” he said in his March 3 letter to shareholders. “Today, we approach these issues differently.”

The case is In re Wells Fargo & Co Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-04494.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

DETROIT — Stellantis is telling owners of nearly 220,000 Jeep Cherokee SUVs worldwide to park them outdoors and away from other vehicles because the power liftgates can catch fire even when the engines are off.

The company is recalling certain Cherokees from the 2014 through 2016 model years. Water can get into the liftgate control computer, causing an electrical short that can touch off a fire.

The company says it hasn’t developed a fix yet. Owners will get notification letters starting June 30. Stellantis says the problem was caught in a routine review of customer data.

It’s not clear how many of the small SUVs have caught fire. Stellantis says in documents posted Tuesday by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it has 50 customer assistance records, 23 warranty claims and 21 field reports due to the issue. The company says it’s not aware of any injuries.

The power liftgates may stop working before the SUVs catch fire.

Stellantis recalled many of the same vehicles in 2015 to fix a similar problem.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Declaring a mission to liberate “Taco Tuesday” for all, Taco Bell is asking U.S. regulators to force Wyoming-based Taco John’s to abandon its longstanding claim to the trademark.

Too many businesses and others refer to “Taco Tuesday” for Taco John’s to be able to have exclusive rights to the phrase, Taco Bell asserts in a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filing that is, of course, dated Tuesday.

It’s the latest development in a long-running beef over Taco Tuesday that even included NBA star LeBron James making an unsuccessful attempt to claim the trademark in 2019.

“Taco Bell believes ‘Taco Tuesday’ is critical to everyone’s Tuesday. To deprive anyone of saying ‘Taco Tuesday’ — be it Taco Bell or anyone who provides tacos to the world — is like depriving the world of sunshine itself,” the Taco Bell filing reads.

With more than 7,200 locations in the U.S. and internationally, Taco Bell — a Yum! Brands chain along with Pizza Hut, KFC and The Habit Burger Grill — is vastly bigger than Cheyenne-based Taco John’s. Begun as a food truck more than 50 years ago, Taco John’s now has about 370 locations in 23 mainly Midwestern and Western states.

The chain’s relatively small size hasn’t discouraged big-time enforcement of “Taco Tuesday” as trademark, which dates to the 1980s. In 2019, the company sent a letter to a brewery just five blocks from its corporate headquarters, warning it to stop using “Taco Tuesday” to promote a taco truck parked outside on Tuesdays.

Actively defending a trademark is key to maintaining claim to it, and the letter was just one example of Taco John’s telling restaurants far and wide that nobody else may use “Taco Tuesday.”

Taco John’s responded to Taco Bell’s filing by announcing a new two-week Taco Tuesday promotion, with a large side of riposte.

“I’d like to thank our worthy competitors at Taco Bell for reminding everyone that Taco Tuesday is best celebrated at Taco John’s,” CEO Jim Creel said in an emailed statement. “We love celebrating Taco Tuesday with taco lovers everywhere, and we even want to offer a special invitation to fans of Taco Bell to liberate themselves by coming by to see how flavorful and bold tacos can be at Taco John’s all month long.”

Yet “Taco Tuesday” has such widespread use and recognition these days — as a generic way of promoting tacos on a specific day of the week — that Taco John’s still can’t claim exclusive ownership, Taco Bell claims in its filing.

“‘Taco Tuesday’ is a common phrase. Nobody should have exclusive rights in a common phrase. Can you imagine if we weren’t allowed to say ‘what’s up’ or ‘brunch?’ Chaos,” reads Taco Bell’s document, written with a dollop of spicy marketing language.

The filing is one of two from Taco Bell involving “Taco Tuesday.” One contests Taco John’s claim to “Taco Tuesday” in 49 states, along with a similar filing that contests a New Jersey restaurant and bar’s claim to “Taco Tuesday” in that state. Both Taco John’s and Gregory’s Restaurant and Bar in Somers Point, New Jersey, have been using “Taco Tuesday” for over 40 years.

A Taco John’s franchisee in Minnesota came up with “Taco Twosday” to promote two tacos for 99 cents on a slow day of the week, Creel told The Associated Press in an interview Tuesday.

The Patent and Trademark Office approved the “Taco Tuesday” trademark in 1989. And while Taco John’s sends letters asking other businesses not to use “Taco Tuesday,” the company has never had to go to court over the phrase, Creel said.

He’s not feeling too picked on, either, by the much bigger Taco Bell.

“It’s OK. It’s kind of nice that they’ve noticed,” Creel said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Hundreds of people who bought tickets for U2’s Las Vegas residency are being offered refunds after learning their seats had obstructed views of the event venue’s screen.

Show organizers realized during a production review that an overhang in the new, $2 billion Sphere at The Venetian Resort’s first level would limit the view of the concert’s screen for some attendees. A source familiar with the issue said it affected about 4% of the venue’s approximately 17,500 seats.

In addition to refunds, affected customers are also being offered access to a presale for December seats with full views of the band, the stage and the screen.

‘As soon as we realized there was an issue, we worked closely with Event Organizers to reach the affected ticketholders with several make good options,’ a spokesperson for Sphere Entertainment Co., which owns Sphere, said in a statement. ‘We look forward to Sphere’s opening with U2 and their incredible run of shows they have planned for fans this Fall.”

One fan, Piotr Hryszkiewicz, said he paid $501.35 per ticket to see the band only to learn he would be seated in the obstructed area. In an email, Hryszkiewicz said he opted for a refund and called the situation ‘a s*** show.’

‘I get it, new venue, still being build etc., but seriously…there should be enough competent people to ensure it runs smoothly,’ he wrote.

According to Sphere’s website, tickets for U2’s residency started at $140, reflecting all-in pricing, with remaining tickets now starting at $550.

The band’s residency, the first musical performance to take place at Sphere, has been years in the making. Construction on the venue has been underway for five years. According to Rolling Stone, U2 first heard about Sphere “a little over two years ago” and the band had been top-of-mind to inaugurate the venue.

Unlike many traditional arenas, the dome-shaped Sphere is specially designed for music acts.

“It’s just an amazing playpen for us,” U2 guitarist The Edge told Rolling Stone.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

TORONTO — For the second straight night, the Yankees became steeped in a controversy against the Blue Jays at Rogers Centre.

After three no-hit innings Tuesday, Yankees starter Domingo German was ejected by umpires following an inspection of his pitching hand.

James Hoye was the plate umpire and crew chief. It was Hoye’s crew that warned German of excess use of rosin, April 15, in a game at Yankee Stadium against the Minnesota Twins.

At that time, Twins manager Rocco Baldelli felt that German should have been ejected since the umpires told him to clean off the excess rosin and he came back out with some sticky substance still on part of his hand.

German, through an interpreter, said it was because he works the rosin bag between innings, in the dugout.

Follow every game: Latest MLB Scores and Schedules

All four umpires convened Tuesday after a routine inspection of German’s pitching hand as he came out to pitch the bottom of the fourth inning, with the Yankees leading 2-0.

“The instant I looked at his hand, it was extremely shiny and extremely sticky,” Hoye a pool reporter after the Yankees’ 6-3 win. “It’s the stickiest hand I’ve ever felt. My fingers had a hard time coming off his palm.”

German maintained that the only thing on his hand was rosin.

“It was definitely just the rosin bag,” German said through a translator. “It was sweat and the rosin bag. I don’t need any extra help to grab the baseball.”

Ian Hamilton replaced German, who is now facing an automatic 10-game suspension by MLB.

Given all the time he needed to warm up, Hamilton loaded the bases with one out and exited the game after a visit to the mound by an athletic trainer and manager Aaron Boone.

Hamilton was replaced by Ron Marinaccio, who kept the Yanks’ two-run lead intact.

Before the game, MLB officials became involved with the Yankees and Blue Jays, regarding the positioning of Yankees base coaches Travis Chapman and Luis Rojas following Monday night’s 7-4 Yankees win.

In the eighth inning of that game, TV cameras caught Aaron Judge’s eyes darting toward the Yankees dugout right before several of reliever Jay Jackson’s pitches, the last of which Judge crushed for his second homer of the game.

During the third inning of Tuesday night’s game, umpires seemed to warn Rojas, the Yanks’ third base coach, about straying beyond the coaching lines. After some apparent heated moments between Rojas and the umpires, Rojas resumed his place along the third base coaching lines.

The Yankees appeared to use the same complaint in the fourth inning to prevent Toronto third base coach Luis Rivera from straying beyond the lines.

Meanwhile, coaches from both sides appeared to be jawing at one another at various points early in the game, with Toronto’s bench getting chatty with Rojas, positioned near the home dugout on the third base side.

By the fourth inning, both the first base coaches of the Yanks and Jays were standing at least 10 feet beyond the coaching line.

Judge hit another homer in the Yankees’ 6-3 win.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

“I know I’ve disappointed a lot of people who have supported me. This is a journey and I recognize there is more work to do,’ Morant said in a statement released to USA TODAY Sports on Tuesday. ‘My words may not mean much right now, but I take full accountability for my actions. I’m committed to continuing to work on myself.”

The 23-year-old was suspended from all team activities on Sunday after he flashed what appeared to be a pistol on Instagram Live, just two months after he served an eight-game suspension for a similar incident.

Over the weekend, an Instagram Live from the account @_dtap2 circulated online showing Morant in the front passenger seat of a car rapping along to music with others. At one point, the camera panned to Morant, who appeared to be holding a handgun in his left hand, pointed upward, near his head. The camera quickly panned away, but screenshots of the moment clearly show an object that resembles a handgun.

Morant is expected to face a significant suspension from the league for the 2023-24 NBA season.

Follow every game: Latest NBA Scores and Schedules

OPINION: Forget basketball. Ja Morant’s focus needs to be on his life, not his fame.

Earlier Tuesday, NBA commissioner Adam Silver said he was ‘shocked’ to see Morant’s latest video because he believed Morant was taking the matter ‘incredibly serious’ following the conversation they had months ago.

‘We talked directly about the consequences first,’ Sliver said ahead of the NBA Draft Lottery in Chicago. ‘We were very focused on the misconduct that was in front of us at the time. Frankly, most of our conversation was about how incredibly serious the first incident was of waving a firearm on social media.’

In March, Silver sat down with Morant after he brandished a gun at a Denver-area nightclub on Instagram Live following Memphis’ road loss to the Nuggets on March 3. Morant elected to step away from the court ‘to get help’ and enrolled himself into a counseling facility in Florida before an eight-game suspension was handed down by the league for ‘irresponsible, reckless and potentially very dangerous’ conduct.

‘Again, the consequences there – an eight-game suspension – was pretty serious and something that he, at least to me, seemed to take incredibly seriously in that time,’ Silver said. ‘And we spoke for a long time about not just the consequences that could have on his career, but the safety issues around it – (Morant) could’ve injured, maimed, killed himself, someone else with an act like that.’

Silver didn’t discuss a possible punishment for Morant, but he said the league is in ‘the process of investigating’ the video: ‘We’ll figure out exactly what happened to the best we can. The video is a bit grainy and all that, but I’m assuming the worst.’

‘He has an incredibly huge following, and (we discussed) my concern – and I thought he shared with me – that millions, if not tens of millions, of kids globally would have seen him do something that was celebrating in a way that act of using a firearm in that fashion,’ Silver added.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY