Archive

2023

Browsing

The Dallas Independent School District has apologized for sending grade schoolers home with Winnie the Pooh-themed books on proper conduct during active shooter situations and failing to issue any guidance or warning to parents beforehand.The book, ‘Stay Safe,’ outlines the ‘run, hide, fight’ safety plan in a manner its publisher deems appropriate for young children.‘Recently a booklet was sent home so parents could discuss with their children how to stay safe in such cases,’ the school district said of the controversy. ‘Unfortunately, we did not provide parents any guide or context. We apologize for the confusion and are thankful to parents who reached out to assist us in being better partners.’

Cindy Campos’ 5-year-old son was so excited about the Winnie the Pooh book he got at school that he asked her to read it with him as soon as he got home. But her heart sank when she realized it was a tutorial about what to do when ‘danger is near,’ advising kids to lock the doors, turn off the lights and quietly hide.

As they read the ‘Stay Safe’ book the school sent home without explanation or a warning to parents, she began crying, leaving her son confused.

‘It’s hard because you’re reading them a bedtime story and basically now you have to explain in this cute way what the book is about, when it’s not exactly cute,’ Campos said.

She said her first-grader, who goes to the same elementary school as her pre-K son, also got a copy of the book last week. After posting about it in an online neighborhood group, she found other concerned parents whose kids had also brought the book home.

The district’s decision to send kids home with the book has made waves. California’s Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, tweeted: ‘Winnie the Pooh is now teaching Texas kids about active shooters because the elected officials do not have the courage to keep our kids safe and pass common sense gun safety laws.’

It sparked enough of a reaction to warrant an explanation from the Dallas Independent School District, which said in a statement Friday that it works ‘hard every day to prevent school shootings’ by dealing with online threats and improving security measures. It also conducts active shooter drills.

‘Recently a booklet was sent home so parents could discuss with their children how to stay safe in such cases,’ the district said. ‘Unfortunately, we did not provide parents any guide or context. We apologize for the confusion and are thankful to parents who reached out to assist us in being better partners.’

The district did not say how many schools and grades in the district received the books.

Campos said the book was ‘haunting’ her and that it seemed especially ‘tone deaf’ to send it home with kids without explanation around the time the state was marking the anniversary of last year’s mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, when a gunman killed 19 children and two teachers. It also comes as Texas’ Republican-controlled Legislature wraps up a session in which it rejected virtually all proposals to tighten gun laws but did pass legislation banning school libraries from having books that contain descriptions, illustrations or audio depicting sexual conduct not relevant to the required school curriculum.

Active shooter drills have become common in American schools, though there’s disagreement over whether they do more harm than good.

Campos said that although she doesn’t disagree with the book’s intent, she wished it would have come with a warning to parents so that she could introduce it to her kids at the right time and in the right way. She said she has discussed school shootings with her kids, and that she might have chosen to wait to read them the book until there was another attack.

‘I would have done it on my own time,’ said Campos, who first spoke to the Oak Cliff Advocate.

The book’s cover says: ‘If there is danger, let Winnie the Pooh and his crew show you what to do.’ Inside, it includes passages such as ‘If danger is near, do not fear. Hide like Pooh does until the police appear. Doors should be locked and the passage blocked. Turn off the light to stay out of sight.’

The book was published by Praetorian Consulting, a Houston-based firm that provides safety, security and crisis management training and services. The company, which didn’t respond to messages seeking comment, says on its website that it uses age-appropriate material to teach the concepts of ‘run, hide, fight’ — the approach authorities say civilians should take in active shooter situations.

The company also says on its website that its K-6 curriculum features the characters of Winnie the Pooh, which are now in the public domain and even featured in a recent horror movie.

<!–>

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

–>

Are stocks in a bull market phase at the moment?

Well, that certainly depends on where you’re looking. If you’re analyzing the Nasdaq 100 index, or semiconductors, or AAPL, or NFLX, or a handful of other mega-cap growth names, then that is basically an undeniable truth at this point. If you’re looking at energy stocks, or the financial sector, or the equal-weighted S&P 500, or to be completely honest most US stocks at this point, then that answer is a little tougher to justify.

So how much of a problem is it that this “narrow leadership” issue we’ve discussed frequently on The Final Bar continues to plague the equity markets as we near the end of May 2023? That depends on what you own during this narrowly-led bull market phase!

If you’re in the Nasdaq 100 (top panel, black) names like MSFT and AAPL, you’re seeing another strong up week. You’ve experienced a new high every month so far in 2023, including May. The trend is your friend, and that trend is clearly bullish!

If you own the S&P 500 index (middle panel, blue), you’re probably feeling cautiously confident at this point, with another test of the February highs working this last week. Although previous attempts to push above S&P 4200 have failed, the rally through the course of this week most likely lets you head into the holiday weekend with renewed optimism.

What about if you own the “average” S&P 500 stock, as represented by RSP, the equal-weighted S&P 500 ETF (bottom panel, red)? Now you’re thinking less about the February highs and more about the March lows, which are still very much in play.

And it’s not just the S&P 500 index having this “lack of participation” issue. Here are the cumulative advance-decline lines for the NYSE, large caps, mid caps, and small caps.

Note how, while the S&P 500 has been trending higher over the last six weeks, literally all four of those advance-decline lines are sloping lower. If the A-D lines are the real representation of the market trend, an argument that we find has great value these days, then this may be in fact a clear bear market phase! Yet the averages keep pushing onward and ever upward.

To add fuel to the bullish fire, we have the New Dow Theory chart very close to signaling a “bull confirmation” signal. We would need to see an upside follow-through next week to complete the pattern, but the setup so far seems constructive.

Charts like Netflix (NFLX) keep pushing above key resistance levels, indicating that additional buyers are coming in and providing further upside momentum. And with Consumer Staples stocks pulling back from their own resistance levels, the offense-defense ratio appears to be rotating clearly to the offensive side.

My biggest concern for this market? Limited upside from current levels. There are indeed two ways that this market resolves from here.

The first option is that breadth conditions improve, with beaten-down names that have yet to be participating in the upswing start regaining their ground. There are more 52-week highs to be had and charts like the McClellan Oscillator get out of the “bearish” region by breaking back above the zero level.

The second option is that the influx of demand for growth stocks pushes prices to unsustainable levels, as the FOMO-led AI craze evaporates, the music stops, and the lack of breadth support finally becomes the death knell for the great bull market of early 2023.

What’s the good news?

If the bullish option plays out, there will be plenty of buying opportunities. While it feels like you may have missed out on the biggest bull run in stock market history, things may just be getting started. Watch for breakouts, set price alert, run your scans, and you will find charts that are at actionable entry points.

If the bearish option plays out, then the charts will tell you when the uptrend in growth stocks has run its course. Watch indicators like RSI for bearish divergences, use something like MACD or PPO to confirm a downside rotation, and stick with uptrends until the chart tells you the uptrend is done.

I asked our three panelists on The Pitch this week (thanks again to Dave Landry, Mark Newton, and Joe Rabil!) how they manage to survive challenging periods like this. I thought Mark’s response was as good as I’ve heard.

“Well, I try to surround myself with charts rather than news.”

Well said, Mark.

Our latest YouTube video digs into the chart of Netflix, tracking the latest breakout and using RSI and Fibonacci Retracements to identify potential resistance levels. Check it out!

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

In this episode of StockCharts TV‘s The MEM Edge, Mary Ellen reviews the broader market’s move following the strong earnings report from Nvidia (NVDA) Wednesday afternoon. She also discusses which areas were most impacted and how you can capitalize on the renewed interest in AI. The rally in Banks is also highlighted.

This video was originally broadcast on May 26, 2023. Click on the above image to watch on our dedicated MEM Edge page on StockCharts TV, or click this link to watch on YouTube. You can also watch on our on-demand website, StockChartsTV.com, using this link.

New episodes of The MEM Edge air Fridays at 5:30pm PT on StockCharts TV. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link. You can also receive a 4-week free trial of her MEM Edge Report by clicking the image below.

On this week’s edition of StockCharts TV‘s StockCharts in Focus, Grayson tours you through the chart annotation tools in both SharpCharts and ACP, our Advanced Charting Platform. Along the way, you’ll get some helpful tips and tricks that will enhance your drawings and streamline your annotating experience. With shortcuts and hotkeys, you’ll be drawing trendlines, support and resistance lines, Fibonacci levels and more faster than ever before.

This video was originally broadcast on May 26, 2023. Click on the above image to watch on our dedicated StockCharts in Focus page on StockCharts TV, or click this link to watch on YouTube. You can also watch on our on-demand website, StockChartsTV.com, using this link.

New episodes of StockCharts in Focus air Fridays at 3pm ET on StockCharts TV. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link.

I like just about all types of breadth indicators, but I have learned that each type of breadth data requires its own proper manner of interpretation. The whole point of looking at breadth data is to get a different answer about market behavior than what prices are saying, and hopefully that different answer is a useful one.

For this reason, I do not pay much attention to the difference between New Highs (NH) and New Lows (NL). Each of those items can be interesting on its own, if interpreted in the right way, but putting them together is not very useful.

This week’s chart shows a cumulative daily NH-NL Line, which is constructed like a daily Advance-Decline (A-D) Line. We take the number of NH and subtract the NL to get the difference, then add that to the prior day’s value for this NH-NL Line. It is not very useful because, while it matches the price trend, this NH-NL Line lags prices at the turns. Getting a delayed message about a price trend change is not very helpful. It also does not show us useful divergences like the A-D Line does, so we really cannot get any functional information from looking at NH and NL data that way.

One way to combine the NH and NL data that is somewhat useful was developed many years ago by a technical analyst named Mike Moody. It involves these same raw data items, but the magic seems to come from the additional math thrown into it.

Moody’s innovation was to take NH and divide it by the sum of NH+NL, then calculate a 10-day simple moving average of that ratio. Because of the shorter lookback period, it is a much more lively indicator, one which tracks the shorter-term price moves pretty well. And it does sometimes show us useful divergences versus prices. Like any indication of trend, it is subject to noise, whipsaws, and delays, and, when it does display a divergence, one does not know at what moment this apparent divergence might start to matter.

I have found it useful to look at the numbers of NH and NL separately, rather than together. And of these, the numbers of NH tend to give the more useful indications.

The daily number of NH is quite a bit noisier than the 10-day smoothed version that Moody developed, which makes sense. It also shows us more frequent useful divergences, but, once again, there is the problem of not being able to know when an apparent divergence might start to matter. The NL number can get a lot more exciting, but only after a selloff that is severe enough and long enough to produce a rising number of stocks making new 52-week lows.

The problem with this is that, by the time you see a big number for NL, you probably already know from other signs that an ugly price move has been happening. You probably don’t need confirmation from the number of NL in order to know that. But one cool feature is that, in a sharp selloff, the day of the maximum number of NL is almost never the same as the final price low. So, if you see NL making a higher value, you can have some assurance (but not certainty) that the final low is likely not here yet.

I should note a couple of things about these data. The calculations of NH and NL, for years, have employed a 52-week lookback period. It has not always been that way. Before 1980, all of the tabulations of stocks making new 52-week highs or lows were done on paper ledgers, and the record-keepers would have a separate ledger for each stock and for each calendar year. So, on January 2, a new ledger would be started for each stock, tracking its price travels in that calendar year. Because using a new ledger would mean that on the first day of the year, every stock would either be making a new high or a new low for the year, that information would not be useful at all. So the record-keepers would carry over the prior year’s records for a few weeks into the new year, before, sometime around April, they would switch to the new year’s ledgers.

Because of this recording methodology, the NH and NL data which exist before 1980 could employ anywhere from a 4 to 16 month lookback period, making them questionable for their utility. Starting in 1980, the data honchos finally possessed enough computing power to switch over to a more uniform lookback period of a year, and that is the standard that continues in these statistics to this day. It is also worth noting that the tabulation of whether an individual stock has made a new high or a new low is based on intraday trading. So a stock might not have a 52-week closing high, but it could be counted in the NH column of data if it made a new high intraday.

Looking at daily totals of both NH and NL is also sometimes useful, as the late Jim Miekka showed us with his Hindenburg Omen. That signal was a refinement of Gerald Appel’s old “Split Market Sell Signal”, which would be triggered any day that saw both NH and NL for the NYSE exceed 45 on the same day. This was similar to Norman Fosbacks High Low Logic Index, which also looked at big days for both NH and NL. The idea is that seeing both NH and NL get up to high enough values was a sign of illiquidity, and an uptrend coming apart. Miekka adjusted for the changing numbers of issues over time, and added a few additional rules (including use of the McClellan Oscillator) to get better signals.

Coming back to the current day readings, the declining numbers of NYSE NH that are being recorded lately even as the S&P 500 was making higher price highs was a warning of trouble, and is a sign of a loss of broad participation in the rally. That warning does not tell us very much about the potential severity of any decline, but it does tell us that there is a problem.

On this week’s edition of Moxie Indicator Minutes, TG explains how today was all about NVDA, semis, and sympathy moves. If we look under the hood, we continue to see that some names are doing great, while many others remain weak. Let’s look at those names, along with some foreign ETFs, so see how the Moxie Indicator is showing their weakness.

This video was originally broadcast on May 26, 2023. Click this link to watch on YouTube. You can also view new episodes – and be notified as soon as they’re published – using the StockCharts on demand website, StockChartsTV.com, or its corresponding apps on Roku, Fire TV, iOS, Chromecast, Android, and more!

New episodes of Moxie Indicator Minutes air Fridays at 1:15pm ET on StockCharts TV. Archived episodes of the show are available at this link.

When the stocks of large-cap companies, such as Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon.com (AMZN), and Nvidia (NVDA), keep moving higher and higher in an uncertain economic environment, it can be a cause for concern. Maybe investors have forgotten about these uncertainties surrounding the financial market—inflation is still around, credit conditions are likely to tighten in light of bank struggles, and the debt ceiling has still not been solved. The PCE data released on Friday morning shows that inflation is still a worry. The CME FedWatch Tool shows a higher probability of a 25 basis point rate hike at the next Fed meeting. 

So in the midst of these uncertainties, why is there a massive buying surge in a handful of big tech companies? Blame AI.

FOMO on the AI Rally

A handful of stocks are riding higher on the AI buzz. Here’s what’s interesting: if you look at the entire S&P 500 index, its performance isn’t in sync with the performance of these top five stocks—AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, and NVDA. These five stocks are trading above their 50-, 100-, and 200-day moving averages. But if you look at the percent of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 200-day moving average ($SPXA200R), it’s below the 50% level (see chart below). The chart in the bottom panel is the $SPX, which is trending higher. So there’s a divergence between the two.

CHART 1: PERCENTAGE OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE. Even though the S&P index is trending higher, the number of stocks trading above their 200-day moving average is still less than 50%. Chart source: StockCharts.com (click chart for live version). For educational purposes only.

And if you compare the performance of $SPX with the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index ($SPXEW), the two were pretty correlated until March 2023, when $SPX experienced greater moves (see chart below). Then, from early May, $SPXEW moved lower while $SPX moved higher. The divergence between the two shows that the heavily weighted stocks in the S&P 500 are carrying the index higher.

CHART 2: S&P 500 EQUAL WEIGHTED INDEX VS. S&P 500 INDEX. The S&P 500 equal-weighted index equally weights all the stocks in the index. Notice the divergence between the $SPXEW and $SPX in the last few months.Chart source: StockCharts.com (click on chart for live version). For educational purposes only.

To see how one stock impacts the S&P 500 index, look at how NVDA stock surged after its earnings announcement. The stock made headlines—its market cap almost reached $1 trillion after its earnings boost.

NVDA has had a StockCharts Technical Ranking (SCTR) above 70 since January 2023. And its relative strength against the S&P 500 index ($SPX) spiked along with the stock price after knocking earnings out of the ballpark (see chart below).

CHART 3: IS THE AI RALLY REAL? NVDA is a large AI player with a massive influence in the market. It’s spreading its AI love to other big tech stocks.Chart source: StockCharts.com (click chart for live version). For educational purposes only.

When equities keep rising quickly, there’s always the fear that prices may fall back to reasonable values. A big question among investors is, “Is there an AI bubble brewing, or is this rally real?” There’s a chance that the stock prices of some of the larger, more AI-centric companies could pull back, but, if AI catches on, what about some of the laggards who could also gain from the AI wave?

Most small-cap indexes have some catching up to do to come close to the returns from the Tech sector. If AI does take off as forecasted, then there’s a possibility that several companies that will have to adopt AI into their operations could also benefit from the AI surge. This includes many semiconductor companies that have yet to have a stronger hold in the AI department.

Final Thoughts

So if you missed out on the AI rally in the large-cap AI-centric stocks, give it some time. Things could get extremely competitive as more players enter the field, more partnerships are established, and AI broadens its reach across different industries.

The AI excitement makes it look like the market has forgotten about the debt ceiling, inflation, and possible interest rate hikes. That’s not to say you shouldn’t take advantage of trading opportunities. You should, as long as you do so without losing sight of the big picture. Monitor the fundamentals, market internals, and price action among the market laggards.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

When rocket green flares fly across the space, it is so hard to chase in terms of risk management. Friday’s example of Marvel (MRVL) moving 40% in a week after Nvidia lit the fuse one day earlier is amazing to watch.

Friday saw the Nasdaq 100 soar by more than 2%. The Nasdaq is up 7% on the month!

It sure feels like understanding macro technical analysis is a waste of time this month. An index of large cap stocks that hold CRM, AAPL, MSFT, CSCO, INTC, IBM is making lower highs for three weeks now and the low was a 7-week low.

In my newsletter, I always insert a picture hinting at something going on. A sunset, a sunrise, a storm or a rainbow, they all convey a message. Last week, I posted a picture of a ladder. A narrow advance going higher. This week, Nvidia rocked the world with optimism around AI. After that announcement, we have seen the whole AI list of names shoot higher. However, there was a wider response through some different industries on both Thursday and Friday.

Names like Adobe, Workday, Monday, are joining the party and are in the technology sector.

IBM, the owner of Watson the AI tool, with ads that we had seen for years, is finally getting a bid, up 2%.

Goldman Sachs is trying to change the chart shape from down to up potentially. Near 8-week lows to start Thursday, it is now making 3-week highs.

You see credit card debt exploding, and American Express is going higher, breaking a downtrend.

Looking at so many pieces of macro information, it seems so odd. The Shanghai Composite breaking down to 4 month lows after making fresh highs in early May.

The Hong Kong Hang Seng is worse.

The UK stalling out.

Germany, the economic engine of the Eurozone, stalling out.

France, one of the best performing markets on the back of high luxury products, rolling over.

I could post a few more, but it comes down to one thing in my view.

America is the easiest place to invest in the AI trade, and that could garner inflows. It is also a country with a lot more technology companies that have come through the Silicon Valley incubator. Bringing the semiconductor manufacturing on shore is a big deal and semi’s are clearly leading the way. How much it broadens out into other sectors and industries remains to be seen.

Can financials, discretionary and energy turn up to join them? Maybe it doesn’t matter and we should avoid our technical bias and run with the church of what is working. Software and semiconductors are working. As big companies in the $SPX and $NDX they continue to drive the indexes higher. Perhaps another leg has just begun.

Neuralink, the neurotech startup co-founded by Elon Musk, announced Thursday it has received approval from the Food and Drug Administration to conduct its first in-human clinical study.

Neuralink is building a brain implant called the Link, which aims to help patients with severe paralysis control external technologies using only neural signals. This means patients with severe degenerative diseases like ALS could eventually regain their ability to communicate with loved ones by moving cursors and typing with their minds.

“This is the result of incredible work by the Neuralink team in close collaboration with the FDA and represents an important first step that will one day allow our technology to help many people,” the company wrote in a tweet.

The FDA and Neuralink did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. The extent of the approved trial is not known. Neuralink said in a tweet that patient recruitment for its clinical trial is not open yet.

Neuralink is part of the emerging brain-computer interface, or BCI, industry. A BCI is a system that deciphers brain signals and translates them into commands for external technologies. Neuralink is perhaps the best-known name in the space thanks to the high profile of Musk, who is also the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter.

Scientists have been studying BCI technology for decades, and several companies have developed promising systems that they hope to bring to market. But receiving FDA approval for a commercial medical device is no small task — it requires companies to successfully conduct several extremely thorough rounds of testing and data safety collection.

No BCI company has managed to clinch the FDA’s final seal of approval. But by receiving the go-ahead for a study with human patients, Neuralink is one step closer to market.

Neuralink’s BCI will require patients to undergo invasive brain surgery. Its system centers around the Link, a small circular implant that processes and translates neural signals. The Link is connected to a series of thin, flexible threads inserted directly into the brain tissue where they detect neural signals.

Patients with Neuralink devices will learn to control it using the Neuralink app. Patients will then be able to control external mice and keyboards through a Bluetooth connection, according to the company’s website.

The FDA’s approval for an in-human study is a significant win for Neuralink after a series of recent hurdles at the company. In February, the U.S. Department of Transportation confirmed to CNBC that it had opened an investigation into Neuralink for allegedly packaging and transporting contaminated hardware in an unsafe manner. Reuters reported in March that the FDA had rejected Neuralink’s application for human trials, and reportedly outlined “dozens” of issues the company needed to address.

Neuralink has also come under fire from activist groups for its alleged treatment of animals. The Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine, which advocates against animal testing, has repeatedly called on Musk to release details about experiments on monkeys that had resulted in internal bleeding, paralysis, chronic infections, seizures, declining psychological health and death.

A representative for PCRM did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

More from CNBC

Disney still has plans to spend billions in Florida despite its battle with DeSantis JPMorgan is developing a ChatGPT-like A.I. service that gives investment advice Ford EVs will use Tesla charging tech in surprise partnership between rival automakers

In addition to helping patients with paralysis, experts believe BCIs could someday help treat maladies like blindness and mental illness. Musk has expressed his intent for Neuralink to explore these future use cases, as well as potential applications for healthy people.

At a “show and tell” recruitment event late last year, Musk even claimed he plans to someday receive one of Neuralink’s implants himself.

“You could have a Neuralink device implanted right now and you wouldn’t even know,” Musk said at the time. “In fact, in one of these demos, I will.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. declared he ‘can’t wait’ to join Twitter CEO Elon Musk on the platform just one day after Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis held a joint event with the latter, announcing he was jumping into the 2024 race for the White House.

Kennedy posted the comment in response to Musk tweeting that ‘all Presidential candidates are most welcome’ on Twitter.

Fox News Digital reached out to Twitter and Kennedy’s campaign to ask whether there were any plans for the two to appear together in a similar format as the DeSantis event, but did not immediately receive responses.

Musk faced intense flak after the Twitter Spaces feature event with DeSantis was mired by repeated technical glitches on Wednesday evening in a black eye for the social media platform. Twitter’s mobile app repeatedly crashed and users complained that they were unable to hear the broadcast.

However, the technical issues appear to have not deterred Kennedy, who previously found an ally in Musk on the issue of Democratic primary debates.

Last month, Musk ripped the Democratic National Committee for choosing not to hold debates between the three declared candidates from the party, essentially coronating President Biden in his bid for re-election.

‘DNC has already announced that it will not allow any debates in 2024 primary. Biden is not to be challenged. Everyone on the Democratic side must shut up and fall in line. Not having debates is undemocratic and ridiculous. No progressive should agree to this kind of power grab,’ Musk tweeted.

Aside from Biden, Kennedy is also facing author Marianne Williamson in the race for the Democratic nomination.

Fox News’ Thomas Catenacci contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS