Archive

2023

Browsing

Political advisers to both President Biden and Vice President Harris were reportedly annoyed with Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom over a planned debate with the Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a 2024 Republican presidential hopeful.

‘It’s disrespectful,’ an outside adviser to Harris said, according to a report from NBC News on Sunday. ‘Joe Biden is running with Kamala Harris. That’s the Democratic ticket.’

The adviser is one of several in the Biden and Harris orbit that have begun to view Newsom as a nuisance, according to the report, in part because of the California governor’s planned debate with DeSantis. While many Biden advisers no longer see Newsom as a potential primary challenger to the president, they do believe the planned debate would carry more risks than rewards.

The debate, which is slated to be televised on Fox News and hosted by Sean Hannity, has the potential to make some voters believe that Newsom is running a shadow campaign against the president in 2024, the report said. The debate comes at a time when many Democrat voters have expressed a desire for change at the top of the ticket, the report noted.

The debate has been viewed in an even more negative light by those in Harris’ orbit, with some reportedly seeing it as an attempt by the California governor to position himself ahead of the vice president for the 2028 Democratic presidential primary.

Newsom made the standing challenge to debate DeSantis this month, an invitation that was seemingly accepted by the Florida governor. But the two camps have yet to agree on the rules and format, calling into question whether the event will go ahead as planned.

DeSantis’ office did not immediately respond to a Fox News request for comment.

Not everyone in the Biden camp expressed concern about the prospects of the debate, with some saying such a move could actually be helpful to Biden’s reelection chances the report said.

‘What he’s doing here is appropriate for a surrogate. It would not be appropriate for the president or the vice president,’ one Biden adviser said, according to NBC News.

‘We’re in close touch with him,’ this adviser continued. ‘This is the kind of thing we want surrogates to do.’

Kevin Munoz, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, expressed a similar sentiment, telling NBC News that Newsom and the campaign have closely coordinated.

‘Governor Newsom is a strong partner and surrogate for the Biden-Harris campaign,’ Munoz said. ‘We coordinate closely on campaigning, whether it’s fundraising or media. When he brought the debate idea to us, we endorsed it.’

The Biden-Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a Fox News request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

–>

Hunter Biden’s former business partner and fellow Burisma board member, Devon Archer, met with then-Secretary of State John Kerry just weeks before the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma was fired in 2016.

Former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was fired on March 29, 2016, less than four weeks after Archer met with Kerry at the State Department in Washington, D.C., according to a State Department email.

‘Devon Archer coming to see S today at 3:00pm – need someone to meet/greet him at C Street,’ reads the redacted email on March 2, 2016, which was previously released via the Freedom of Information Act.

Fox News Digital can confirm that ‘S’ refers to Kerry, based on multiple other email communications. However, it is unclear what Archer and Kerry discussed at the meeting or whether Burisma came up in conversation.

At the time of the meeting, Archer and Hunter Biden had been sitting on the board of Burisma for about two years, and then-Vice President Joe Biden had recently wrapped up a trip to Ukraine where he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid if Ukrainian officials didn’t fire Shokin, claiming he was too lax on prosecuting corruption.

When the email was first released in 2019, Sens. Grassley, R-Iowa and Johnson, R-Wis., expressed concerns about the meeting and sent a letter to then-Secretary of State Pompeo requesting all records from the meeting in addition to other meeting, including Hunter’s 2015 meeting with Blinken.

During an interview Saturday with Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade, Shokin said he was fired at Biden’s insistence because of his investigation into Burisma – a claim the White House has disputed.

‘I have said repeatedly in my previous interviews that [then-Ukrainian President Petro] Poroshenko fired me at the insistence of the then-Vice President Biden because I was investigating Burisma,’ Shokin said in the interview.

‘[Poroshenko] understood and so did Vice President Biden that had I continued to oversee the Burisma investigation, we would have found the facts about the corrupt activities that they were engaging in. That included both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer and others.’

However, in a statement to Fox News, the White House pointed to indications that Shokin was fired because he had been too soft on corruption.

The White House also stated that Shokin’s office had not been investigating Burisma or Hunter at the time of his ouster in March 2016, and it pointed to three reports published within weeks of each other in 2019 by the Washington Post, Associated Press and New York Times that said Shokin’s office wasn’t investigating Burisma.

Archer said in a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee in July that, amid pressure from Shokin’s office and other entities investigating Burisma, company leaders turned to Hunter for help.

He went on to say that Hunter and Burisma executives ‘called D.C.’ in December 2015, just days before the vice president’s trip to Ukraine, to ask the Obama administration to help get Shokin fired.

Burisma executive Vadym Pozharsky emailed Hunter Biden, Archer and fellow Hunter associate Eric Schwerin in early November 2015 about a ‘revised proposal, contract and initial invoice for Burisma Holdings’ from lobbying firm Blue Star Strategies. Hunter reportedly connected Burisma with Blue Star Strategies to help the energy firm fight corruption charges levied against Mykola Zlochevsky, the company’s owner.

Pozharski said in his email that the ‘ultimate purpose’ of the agreement with Blue Star Strategies was to shut down ‘any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine,’ referring to Zlochevsky, who also went by Nikolay.

‘The scope of work should also include organization of a visit of a number of widely recognized and influential current and/or former US policy-makers to Ukraine in November aiming to conduct meetings with and bring positive signal/message and support on Nikolay’s issue to the Ukrainian top officials above with the ultimate purpose to close down for any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine,’ Pozharsky continued.

This wasn’t the first time that a Burisma board member met with a top State Department official in the middle of a growing pressure campaign to help protect Zlochevsky and Burisma from investigations. In May 2015, Hunter and then-Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken were exchanging emails about setting up a meeting at the State Department. After the first scheduled meeting, which appeared to have been canceled due to the death of Hunter’s brother, Beau, the pair rescheduled and met in July 2015.

Hunter forwarded Archer a couple of the email exchanges between Hunter and Blinken about planning for the first meeting, prompting Archer to respond, ‘Roger,’ in one reply.

’12:00-1:30pm- Lunch with Tony Blinken (State Department),’ Hunter’s schedule reads. ‘Enter at main entrance (‘Diplomatic Entrance’), 22nd & C St, NW. Proceed to receptionist area where Kenny Matthews will be waiting to escort you to Tony’s office.’

The longtime Biden family friend and business partner, who is facing jail time in an unrelated case for his role in a $60 million bond fraud scheme, worked as an adviser to Kerry during his failed 2004 presidential campaign.

Kerry now serves as Biden’s special presidential envoy for climate (SPEC).

In 2013, Archer exchanged emails with Kerry’s then-chief of staff at the State Department, David Wade, organizing a call between Kerry and then-Foreign Minister of Kazakhstan Yerlan Idrisov.

‘Devon: understand you spoke to the Secretary re having him call Foreign Minister Idrisov today, can you let me know topics Idrisov wants to talk about/any requests he’ll have of the boss, so we can get paper prepared for a call,’ Wade wrote.

Archer told Wade that Idrisov wanted to speak with Kerry about keeping open a direct line of communication between the two of them as well as brief him on a ‘subject as it relates to Afghanistan.’

Wade went on to advise Hunter on rapid response related to Burisma after leaving the State Department in June 2015, Fox News Digital previously reported.

Archer co-founded Rosemont Seneca Partners with Hunter and Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz, his Yale roommate, in 2009.

In a 2012 email chain, when then-Sen. Kerry was serving as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Archer listed him as one of his top references for Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP) after one of the firm’s partners told Archer and Hunter they needed their ‘bazooka references.’

An individual with knowledge of the reference list told Fox News Digital they were not aware of Kerry ever vouching for RSTP or its clients. The individual, who requested anonymity, went on to say that Hunter and Archer’s role was to help navigate Washington but also said they would sever ties with Hunter after he was kicked out of the Navy Reserve for cocaine in late 2014 and that Archer’s position was cut the following year because he wasn’t doing any work for RSTP.

The State Department and Archer’s lawyer did not respond to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.

Fox News’ Thomas Catenacci contributed to this report.

For more of Fox News Digital’s reporting on the Hunter Biden investigation, please click here.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The chances of a government shutdown on October 1 are high.

In fact, the possibilities of a shutdown may be even greater now than they were for the 35-day government shutdown from mid-December, 2018 until late January, 2019.

That is not to say the government will shutter. There are just a number of factors which are working against keeping the government open this time around. In fact, few saw the government shutdown of several years ago coming. It was generally thought that the House and Senate reached a spending accord just before Christmas in 2018 – until former President Trump torched the package. That came after the president signaled he would sign the deal. The Senate passed a bill which it presumed the House would adopt. But then the House altered the package over border and immigration provisions. Former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., punted the measure back to the Senate and the shutdown was on.

This year, the problems are more complex. 

First of all, there isn’t much time. The House has approved one of the annual spending bills which fund the government: The Senate: zero. That means the only way to keep the government open is to approve a short-term bill (known as a Continuing Resolution or ‘CR’) which funds the government at present levels for a short period of time.

The House and Senate could likely approve a CR with the proper mixture of Democrats and some Republicans. But House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., must be mindful of advancing any measure with significant Democratic support. The Speaker faced backlash from conservatives after cutting a deal with President Biden in the spring to avoid a collision with the debt ceiling. Conservatives didn’t think the spending levels agreed to in the debt ceiling pact showed significant fiscal savings. So they demanded lower spending numbers for the 12 annual appropriations bills heading into the fall.

Want to know why the House has only approved one bill? Infighting among Republicans. Remember that the GOP is in the majority in the House. Some Republicans approve of the steep cuts for the appropriations bills. Other GOPers can’t abide the cuts. Democrats won’t sign on because the cuts are really something they’d never agree with. So, there’s an impasse. 

But remember: a coalition of Democrats and Republicans could approve a CR. The question is whether McCarthy is willing to do that and what backlash he faces from conservatives and the Freedom Caucus. Recall what I said a moment ago about a CR simply renewing federal spending for all programs at last year’s levels? Well even that is something which many conservatives can’t go for. That’s because the spending from last year is too high for the right. Conservatives may only agree to a package which cuts spending. A CR, by definition, does not. 

So here we are.

Here’s another set of issues.

Republicans loyal to former President Trump are incensed at the spate of indictments over the past five months. Some Republicans want to restrict or withhold funding for the Justice Department because of these inquests. In particular, some Republicans aim to cut money to Special Counsel Jack Smith who is prosecuting the former president. That’s to say nothing of a new front which emerged over the past month: GOP questions about Delaware U.S. Attorney and now Special Counsel David Weiss. Weiss negotiated the initial plea deal for Hunter Biden. A federal judge later torpedoed that agreement. Attorney General Merrick Garland then appointed Weiss as Special Counsel. Republicans have plenty of questions about the entire exercise.

The circumstances surrounding Weiss, Hunter Biden, Garland and funding for the Justice Department are likely to be a donnybrook when it comes to funding measures this fall. This dynamic alone could trigger a government shutdown.

Another longstanding grievance for the GOP: the border and funding for the Department of Homeland Security. 

Many Republicans are skeptical of how Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas handled the border. Again, GOP issues about the border and funding for DHS may have been enough to prompt a government shutdown before the rhubarbs about former President Trump. The border issue faded slightly into the background for now – only because it can’t maintain the political pace of the Trump indictments and Hunter Biden. But funding for DHS remains a prominent subject.

If lawmakers did everything by the book, they’d approve 12 spending bills to operate the federal government each fiscal year. But it’s common for Congress to also okay additional spending measures. These are ‘supplemental’ spending packages, often crafted for wars, the pandemic, 9/11 or natural disasters. 

President Biden is pushing Congress to okay a supplemental spending package to assist Ukraine in its battle against Russia. Congress is torn over the issue – especially Republicans. Some Republicans like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., are vocal advocates for Ukraine. But there is vitriolic opposition to boosting Ukraine from right-wing members like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. 

Then there is the call for disaster aid – especially after the hellscape which descended on Maui. Some fiscal conservatives oppose latching disaster aid to other spending packages. That’s because it makes the extra money easier to pass. But critics of the congressional spending process refer to this as logrolling. Unpopular items – be it money for the war or something else – are hard to defeat because it’s taped to the rest of the spending package. Hence, logrolling. 

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., has advocated detaching the war money from the disaster assistance. 

But here’s the problem: there are only so many spending bills leaving the congressional train station. So lawmakers must hook war aid and/or disaster aid to something. Congress is reduced in recent years to approving a CR or two, perhaps an omnibus or a few other spending packages where the they lump several bills together. This means there are only so many opportunities to approve disaster or war aid. 

It’s unclear how Congress will manage these issues. Proponents of Ukraine aid and the Hawaii delegation will howl if Congress fails to deliver assistance in some form. Those who oppose helping Ukraine, or are enraged at the federal prosecution of former President Trump and wary about how DHS handles the border will be vocal if there aren’t reductions in spending for those areas as well.

As written earlier, the obvious way to avert a government shutdown is to find the right blend of Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill. But that could create internal political headaches for McCarthy. 

And that’s why many congressional observers believe the chances high for a government shutdown later this fall.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

After all the drama over the preceding days, the takeaways from Mr. Powell’s Jackson Hole speech were ultimately pretty straightforward:

Even though the Fed will be data-dependent on its future interest rate decisions, the data, until proven otherwise, says inflation remains a problem;And that means that there may be more rate hikes.

Stocks got the message and delivered a relief rally. The market’s breadth improved, while asset rotation was evident.

Housing Sector Feels the Bond Market’s Pinch

I remain long-term bullish on homebuilders and expect a major buying opportunity in the sector will eventually materialize. But for now, patience is required.

Last week in this space, I noted: “We may have seen the top in the housing stocks, although the jury is still out on this. I’ve been bullish on homebuilders for quite a long time, but, unless something improves quickly, the best days for this group may be behind us.”

Regular readers might have been surprised about my change in viewpoint, given my long-term bullish stance on the homebuilders. As I’ve stated here multiple times, the sector has one big long term positive going for it; tight housing supplies. But the short-term looks choppy.

Again, I want to be clear on this. The long-term trend for the homebuilders (SPHB) remains up. The S&P Homebuilders Sector Index (SPHB) is trading well above its 200-day moving average. Yet the macro effects of higher bond yields and their reflection in higher mortgage rates will likely weigh on the homebuilder stocks for the intermediate-term.

The composite chart of the homebuilder sector vs. mortgage rates (Mortgage) and the U.S. Ten Year Note yield (TNX) shows the nearly perfect relationship between the three indicators, as SPHB rolled over when TNX crossed above 4% and the average mortgage rate first approached 7%. 

Apartment REITs Are Attracting Smart Money

Certainly, things could change, but, for now, the smart money is flowing away from homebuilders into the apartment rental REIT sector as tight housing supplies, the ongoing migration to the sunbelt, and stable-to-lower rents are not changing but interest rates are pushing buyers to the sidelines.

So, while homebuilder stocks sagged after Mr. Powell’s speech, the iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) held above its recent bottom. Note the bullish uptick in On Balance Volume (OBV) indicating that stealthy smart money is moving in.

Another important area of the market to watch is the tech sector, especially the AI stocks. The market initially rallied on Nvidia’s (NVDA) bullish earnings and outlook, but pulled back as the good news about AI could well be factored in. Note the emerging downslope in Accumulation/Distribution and the flattening-out of On Balance Volume (OBV) for NVDA. These are signs that short sellers are building positions (ADI) and sellers are overtaking buyers (OBV).

On the other hand, the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) may have made a short-term bottom, which will be worth watching. Certainly, a sustained recovery in tech will bode well for stocks.

Finally, as I’ve noted here over the last few weeks, despite the notion that the global economy is slowing, energy stocks continue to attract money. One of the brightest spots is that oil exploration as evidenced in the shares of the iShares U.S. Oil Exploration and Production ETF (IEO).

The ETF has entered an orderly consolidation pattern between the $94 and $98 price points. ADI and OBV are off their bottoms and may weaken in the short term. But for now, if the 50-day moving average holds, this looks like a pause that refreshes.

Do you own energy or tech stocks? What’s your plan of action with the homebuilders?  Join the smart money at Joe Duarte in the Money Options.com. You can have a look at my latest recommendations FREE with a two-week trial subscriptionYou can also get the latest big picture news and analysis on real estate here.

Hopeful Signs Emerge; Fingers Crossed

The worst may be over in the short-term for stocks. The New York Stock Exchange Advance Decline line seems to have bottomed out after its RSI indicator hit the 30 area. Hopefully it will stick.

Nevertheless, NYAD remained below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages; thus, it could still roll over and perhaps still test the 200-day moving averages.

The Nasdaq 100 Index (NDX) is now negotiating a trading range between 14500 and 15250 with its 50-day moving average offering overhead resistance. Accumulation/Distribution (ADI) and On Balance Volume (OBV) may have bottomed out.

The S&P 500 (SPX) remained below 4500, but above 4350, where it found support twice last week. It is also below its 20-day and its 50-day moving averages. But both ADI and OBV may be bottoming out.

Again, VIX Remains Below 20

VIX has been a bright point in the market for the last couple of weeks as it’s failed to rally above the 20 area. This is good news as a move above 20 would be very negative as it would signal that the big money is finally throwing in the towel on the uptrend.

When the VIX rises, stocks tend to fall, as rising put volume is a sign that market makers are selling stock index futures to hedge their put sales to the public. A fall in VIX is bullish, as it means less put option buying, and it eventually leads to call buying, which causes market makers to hedge by buying stock index futures. This raises the odds of higher stock prices.

Liquidity Remains Stable

Liquidity is stable, but, again, may not remain so for long if the current fall in stock prices accelerates. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which recently replaced the Eurodollar Index (XED), but is an approximate sign of the market’s liquidity just broke to a new high in response to the Fed’s move. A move below 5.0 would be more bullish. A move above 5.5% would signal that monetary conditions are tightening beyond the Fed’s intentions. That would be very bearish.

To get the latest information on options trading, check out Options Trading for Dummies, now in its 4th Edition—Get Your Copy Now! Now also available in Audible audiobook format!

#1 New Release on Options Trading!

Good news! I’ve made my NYAD-Complexity – Chaos chart (featured on my YD5 videos) and a few other favorites public. You can find them here.

Joe Duarte

In The Money Options

Joe Duarte is a former money manager, an active trader, and a widely recognized independent stock market analyst since 1987. He is author of eight investment books, including the best-selling Trading Options for Dummies, rated a TOP Options Book for 2018 by Benzinga.com and now in its third edition, plus The Everything Investing in Your 20s and 30s Book and six other trading books.

The Everything Investing in Your 20s and 30s Book is available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. It has also been recommended as a Washington Post Color of Money Book of the Month.

To receive Joe’s exclusive stock, option and ETF recommendations, in your mailbox every week visit https://joeduarteinthemoneyoptions.com/secure/order_email.asp.

In a week that has gone by, Indian equities continued to heavily consolidate. They defended key levels for most of the week; it was in the last two trading sessions that the markets came off from their high point while giving up all their weekly gains. The trading range got wider on the anticipated lines. As compared to a 228-point range in the week before this one, NIFTY found itself oscillating in a 354-point range over the past five sessions. Despite giving up the gains from the week’s high point, the headline index went on to close with a negligible loss of 44.35 points (-0.23%) on a weekly basis.

The past week was important from a technical perspective. On the daily chart, the NIFTY has seemingly broken down from a not-so-classical bearish Head & Shoulders formation. This is a small formation, not a very potent one, as it is not visible on the weekly chart. However, the important thing is that after defending the 50-DMA for four days, the NIFTY finally gave up and closed below this 50-DMA which is currently placed at 19374. This action has dragged the resistance point for the markets lower between the 19400-19500 zone. All technical pullbacks, as and when they occur, will find themselves capped in this zone.

The volatility remained unchanged; while staying much towards one of its lowest levels seen in the recent past, INDIAVIX declined marginally by just 0.49% to 12.08. The coming week is likely to see a quiet start. Nifty is likely to see the levels of 19410 and 19490 acting as resistance points. The supports come in at 19110 and 18900 levels.

The weekly RSI is 61.70; it stays neutral and does not show any divergence against the price. The weekly MACD is bullish and stays above the signal line. However, the sharply narrowing Histogram suggests that it may be moving towards a negative crossover in the coming days.

The pattern analysis shows that the NIFTY staged a breakout by moving past the previous high point. This breakout was achieved as the index moved past the 18900 level; it went on to form a high at 19991 following which it is presently witnessing corrective retracement. The most immediate support is at 18900; if Nifty tests this level, it may achieve a full throwback by retesting the breakout point.  While the NIFTY has violated the 50-DMA on the daily chart, it trades comfortably above all key moving averages on the weekly chart.

All in all, the coming week is likely to be a tricky one; the markets may continue to display a corrective undertone on one hand, and on the other, we may see some strong improvement in the sectors that are either low beta or considered traditionally defensive. We are expected to see pockets like IT, Energy, PSE, etc. doing well. Some risk-off approach is likely to be visible and the sessions may also stay influenced by the rollover-centric activity due to the monthly derivatives expiry slated to come up later next week. It is recommended to continue staying highly stock-specific and selective in approach while maintaining a cautious approach for the coming week.

Sector Analysis for the coming week

In our look at Relative Rotation Graphs®, we compared various sectors against CNX500 (NIFTY 500 Index), which represents over 95% of the free float market cap of all the stocks listed.

The analysis of Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) shows that the Nifty PSE Sector and Energy indexes have rolled inside the leading quadrant. Besides this, Nifty Media, Metal, Pharma, PSU Bank, and Midcap100 sectors are inside the leading quadrant. These groups are likely to relatively outperform the broader NIFTY 500 Index. The Nifty Infrastructure Index is on the verge of rolling inside the weakening quadrant.

The Nifty Realty Index has rolled inside the weakening quadrant. The Consumption and Auto sectors are inside the weakening quadrant.

The Nifty Services sector, Banknifty, and Financial Services index are inside the lagging quadrant. The FMCG index has also rolled inside the lagging quadrant.

The Nifty Commodities is also on the verge of rolling inside the weakening quadrant again. Besides this, Nifty IT has rolled inside the improving quadrant and may begin relatively outperform the broader markets.

Important Note: RRG™ charts show the relative strength and momentum of a group of stocks. In the above Chart, they show relative performance against NIFTY500 Index (Broader Markets) and should not be used directly as buy or sell signals.  

Milan Vaishnav, CMT, MSTA

Consulting Technical Analyst

www.EquityResearch.asia | www.ChartWizard.ae

In an exclusive interview with Fox News, former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin detailed the involvement he believed President Biden, the then-vice president, played in his firing and how it involved Hunter Biden’s business dealings.

During the interview with Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade, Shokin said he was ousted in 2016 because he was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company where Hunter Biden served on the board. Shokin also claimed that Joe and Hunter Biden accepted bribes in the case, and that the then-vice president ultimately hurt America’s reputation and created the groundwork for Russia to invade Ukraine.

‘I have said repeatedly in my previous interviews that Poroshenko fired me at the insistence of the then Vice President Biden because I was investigating Burisma,’ Shokin told Fox News in the interview which aired Saturday evening.

‘You understood me correctly, this is how it was,’ he added after a follow-up question from Kilmeade about Biden’s involvement. ‘There were no complaints whatsoever and no problems with how I was performing at my job. But because pressure was repeatedly put on [then-Ukrainian President Petro] Poroshenko, that is what ended up in him firing me.’

Shokin did not provide additional evidence of his claim that the Bidens accepted bribes or elaborate on the allegation. 

In March 2016, Poroshenko ousted Shokin, who was appointed one year earlier, after facing pressure from the U.S. government. The international community, led by the U.S. and then-Vice President Biden who led U.S.-Ukraine policy, believed Shokin was allowing corruption to fester in the nation’s government and his own office.

In December 2015, Biden traveled to Kyiv, Ukraine, where he demanded Poroshenko root out corruption and fire Shokin, threatening to withhold a key U.S. aid package. During a speech delivered with the country’s leaders present, Biden said the Office of the General Prosecutor ‘desperately needs reform’ and warned about the dangers posed by corruption in the government.

Biden urged Ukrainian president to fire Shokin

A year after leaving the White House, Biden recounted his closed-door conversations with Poroshenko during the 2015 trip. He explained how he told Ukrainian officials the U.S. would withhold up to $1 billion in aid money earmarked for their country if Shokin remained in his position.

‘I said, ‘Nah, I’m not going to – we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.’ They said, ‘You have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said –.’ I said, ‘Call him,’’ Biden recounted during a January 2018 event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations. ‘I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the $1 billion.’’

‘I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here,” Biden continued. ‘I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.’

Republican lawmakers and Shokin himself, however, have pointed to Shokin’s investigation of Burisma and its owner Mykola Zlochevsky at the time of his ouster. In February 2016, one month before Shokin was fired, his office filed a legal petition to seize Zlochevsky’s property, including four homes, two pieces of property and a Rolls-Royce sports car, the Kyiv Post reported at the time.

The investigation took place while Hunter Biden served on Burisma’s board of directors. Hunter joined the firm in 2014 and departed in 2019 after his term on its board expired. 

In a statement to Fox News, the White House pointed to indications that Shokin was fired because he had been too soft on corruption. 

‘For years, these false claims have been debunked, and no matter how much air time Fox gives them, they will remain false,’ White House spokesperson Ian Sams told Fox News. ‘Fox is giving a platform for these lies to a former Ukrainian prosecutor general whose office his own deputy called ‘a hotbed of corruption,’ drawing demands for reform not only from then-Vice President Biden but also from U.S. diplomats, international partners, and Republican senators like Ron Johnson.’

The White House also stated Shokin’s office had not been investigating Burisma or Hunter at the time of his ouster in March 2016, and it pointed to three reports published within weeks of each other in 2019 by The Washington Post, Associated Press and New York Times stating Shokin’s office wasn’t investigating Burisma.

Shokin: Burisma merited ‘special attention’

‘The reason I oversaw the Burisma case was because I was the prosecutor general. Burisma was an ordinary case. There wasn’t anything particularly different about it,’ Shokin told Fox News.

‘The reason that I was handling it was because it deserved a special mention,’ Shokin continued. ‘It was on a list of cases to merit special attention because Hunter Biden was involved with Burisma and of course, his father, the vice president, Biden at the time oversaw Ukraine affairs for the White House. This is why.’

He added that he had ‘no doubt’ Burisma was engaged in illegal activities and stated it would take him ‘half a day’ to explain them all. Among the allegations, he said Burisma illegally produced, sold and utilized natural gas supplies.

‘I have no doubt that there were illegal activities engaged in by Burisma,’ Shokin said. ‘As a matter of fact, the criminal case had been started before me.’ 

‘It continued to expand and Zlochevsky, who at the time held the post of minister and was the founder and CEO of Burisma, started bringing in people who could provide protection for him,’ he said. ‘Hunter Biden was among them and the corruption network expanded as a result. So, yes, to answer your question, there was no doubt in my mind that Burisma was engaged in illegal activities.’

Hunter Biden ‘called D.C.’

Echoing Shokin’s claim that Hunter Biden was hired solely to protect Burisma by leveraging his father’s role in the White House, Hunter’s former business partner Devon Archer, who also served on Burisma’s board, confirmed in a closed-door interview in July that company leaders turned to Hunter for help amid pressure from Shokin’s office and other entities. 

Archer said Hunter ‘called D.C.’ to help get Shokin fired.

‘When Burisma’s owner was facing pressure from the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating the company for corruption, Archer testified that Burisma executives asked Hunter to ‘call D.C.’ after a Burisma board meeting in Dubai,’ House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said after Archer’s testimony.

Fox News Digital recently reported that, on Nov. 2, 2015, Burisma executive Vadym Pozharski emailed Hunter Biden, Archer and fellow Hunter associate Eric Schwerin about a ‘revised proposal, contract and initial invoice for Burisma Holdings,’ from lobbying firm Blue Star Strategies. Hunter reportedly connected Burisma with Blue Star Strategies to help the energy firm fight corruption charges levied against Zlochevsky, the company’s owner.

Pozharski emphasized in his email that the ‘ultimate purpose’ of the agreement with Blue Star Strategies was to shut down ‘any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine,’ referring to Zlochevsky, who also went by Nikolay. 

‘The scope of work should also include organization of a visit of a number of widely recognized and influential current and/or former US policy-makers to Ukraine in November aiming to conduct meetings with and bring positive signal/message and support on Nikolay’s issue to the Ukrainian top officials above with the ultimate purpose to close down for any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine,’ Pozharskyi continued.

Biden made the infamous December 2015 trip to Ukraine a month after the Pozharski email and would host a holiday party at his residence days after he returned that included Hunter and multiple Burisma-linked associates.

Shokin accuses Bidens of taking bribes

Shokin added in the interview Saturday that if he had been allowed to continue his investigation, he would have uncovered a scheme involving the Bidens and Archer. He also said he believed both Joe and Hunter Biden took bribes in the case.

‘Had I continued to oversee the Burisma investigation, we would have found the facts about the corrupt activities that they were engaging in,’ Shokin said. ‘That included both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer and others.’

‘I do not want to deal in unproven facts, but my firm personal conviction is that, yes, this was the case. They were being bribed,’ the former prosecutor general added. ‘And the fact that Joe Biden gave away $1 billion in U.S. money in exchange for my dismissal, my firing isn’t that alone A case of corruption?’

After Shokin’s ouster, The New York Times reported that Shokin had been criticized in Ukraine for not prosecuting officials, businessmen and lawmakers for corruption while Viktor Yanukovych was president. The U.S. government and International Monetary Fund had believed in 2016 that Shokin wasn’t doing enough to fight corruption, which ran rampant throughout Ukraine.

Both former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and former Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Bridget Brink testified during a Senate hearing in 2020 that Shokin’s decision not to pursue a Burisma investigation or root out corruption elsewhere were reasons for his firing.

‘It was our conclusion by then that, in fact, the dismissal of Prosecutor Shokin would be counter to Burisma’s interests, because not only was he not pursuing the Burisma case, he was responsible for protecting those who had helped get the case dismissed,’ Nuland said.

However, Shokin pushed back when asked about the media reports and claims made about his alleged corruption, saying there hasn’t ever been an example given. He added he doesn’t have enough money to sue news outlets for defamation.

‘I would appreciate if any of these highly respectable publications could come up with a single instance or a single example of my personal corruption or any offense whatsoever allegedly committed by me,’ Shokin told Fox News. ‘Since I was fired, nobody, including Joe Biden, has cited or mentioned or provided any examples of my corruption or any offense allegedly committed by me.’

‘I would gladly [sue for defamation],’ Shokin continued. ‘But suing somebody costs money and I simply don’t have the money to do that because I am a retiree and my monthly pension constitutes the equivalent of $800.’

And Shokin concluded saying that Biden has harmed America’s reputation abroad through his actions in Ukraine.

‘There is no doubt that his actions have damaged the US reputation in Ukraine. It is public knowledge,’ he said. ‘Everybody knows that it was because of Joe Biden’s actions that Russia was able to claim Crimea without firing a single shot, which of course eventually led to a full scale war that is currently under way.’

Shokin did not elaborate on how Biden’s actions contributed to Russia’s rapid takeover of Crimea in 2014. According to reports about the White House’s response to the invasion, Biden urged then-President Obama to send lethal assistance to Ukraine, but was overruled. The White House noted that Shokin took office after Russia seized Crimea.

Shokin told Fox that his book addresses the role Biden has played in Ukraine in his book.

‘But, yes, the damage has been done. Definitely,’ Shokin concluded. ‘I have long been concerned about my personal safety and security. I’ve already died technically, twice as I was poisoned with Mercury.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Texas has sent a 10th bus with migrants to Los Angeles on Saturday, days after its mayor harshly criticized the southern state for sending migrants.

According to FOX Los Angeles, the bus had a total of 39 migrants, which included 12 families and 21 children.

The 10th bus was sent five days after the previous bus, according to the outlet.

Los Angeles Governor Karen Bass criticized Texas Governor Greg Abbott when the ninth bus was sent when Tropical Storm Hillary was impacting the city, saying ‘LA has not extended an invitation asking for people to come. This is a political act.’

The Los Angeles City Council voted in June to make the city a sanctuary city for immigrants.

On Tuesday, Bass again condemned Abbott for sending the buses.

‘This evening, Los Angeles received another bus from Texas. That means that while we were urging Angelenos to stay safe, the Governor of Texas was sending a bus with families and toddlers straight towards us KNOWING they’d have to drive right into an unprecedented storm,’ Bass tweeted on X. ‘Evil.’

Abbott’s press secretary, Andrew Mahaleris, previously told Fox News Digital the migrants all signed a voluntary consent waiver before boarding.

‘Bus drivers receive updated weather conditions along their routes and for their destination ahead of and while en route to the sanctuary cities,’ Mahaleris said. Yesterday’s bus rerouted out of an abundance of caution and took a cautious path to Los Angeles to keep all on board safe. Migrants willingly chose to go to Los Angeles, having signed a voluntary consent waiver available in multiple languages upon boarding that they agreed on the destination. And they were processed and released by the federal government, who are dumping them at historic levels in Texas border towns because of the Biden-made crisis.’ 

‘Each bus is stocked with food and water and makes stops along the trip to refuel and switch drivers,’ Mahaleris continued. ‘Migrants are allowed to purchase any needed provisions or disembark at any of these stops. Instead of complaining about Texas providing much-needed relief to our overrun and overwhelmed border communities, Mayor Bass needs to call on President Biden to step up and do his job to secure the border—something he continues failing to do.’

To date, Texas has bused over 30,000 migrants to Democratic-led cities across the United States.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Trump 2024 presidential campaign confirmed to Fox News on Saturday that they have pulled in nearly $20 million in fundraising over the last three weeks, which coincides with the federal indictment in Washington, D.C. and mugshot from Atlanta seen around the world.

Former President Trump’s camp said of the almost $20 million, $7.1 million was collected after his mugshot was taken in Atlanta on Thursday evening.

Trump’s team said they raked in $4.18 million on Friday, which was the highest grossing day of the entire campaign.

The campaign added that they expect to cross the $20 million mark in fundraising in a few days.

‘Organic money has skyrocketed, especially after President Trump tweeted out the picture along with the website,’ the campaign told Fox News.

The spike in fundraising also appears to be fueled, in part, by merchandise they have been selling through their online store.

Once Trump was taken into custody, the campaign started selling shirts, posters, bumper stickers and beverage coolers, all with Trump’s mugshot.

The items also include the tagline, ‘NEVER SURRENDER!’

Politico first reported the Trump fundraising news on Saturday evening, which was confirmed by his campaign team to Fox News.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The campaign for President in 2024 won’t all play out in New Hampshire diners and corn fields in Iowa. That’s to say nothing of steel towns in Pennsylvania and dairy farms in Wisconsin.

Let’s presume that President Biden and former President Trump face each other in a 2020 rematch. The battle for the presidency may emerge in two forms. For Democrats who oppose former President Trump: various courtrooms in New York, Miami, Washington, DC and Atlanta. For Republicans who disapprove of President Biden, the venues are closed-door depositions, committee hearings and maybe even articles of impeachment on the House floor.

Democrats think they have the goods on former President Trump on a variety of charges in court – ranging from allegedly stealing secret documents to potentially trying to steal the election. 

Republicans think they have the goods on President Biden as they probe Hunter Biden, Biden family businesses and potential links to Mr. Biden himself.

It’s unclear if either of these strategies – or hopes of each side – pays dividends with the electorate. But it’s something which party loyalists on both sides watch closely. And Republicans and Democrats alike are agog that the other side isn’t as outraged at the purported transgressions as they are.

Much has been written about the legal woes facing former President Trump and what it means for the 2024 campaign. Let’s explore the Biden family investigations and consequences for next year.

Most Congressional Republicans are determined to link President Biden to some of the legal issues surrounding the president’s son. The torpedoed plea deal for Hunter Biden coupled with testimony from IRS whistleblowers, a closed-door transcript by former Hunter Biden business associate Devon Archer and empaneling of Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss fuels the outrage.

Most Republicans demanded a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden. But they were aghast when Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Weiss – architect of the now nullified plea agreement.

Weiss offered House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a series of four dates to testify about his inquiry of Hunter Biden and the plea arrangement this fall. But it’s now far from clear if Weiss will ever appear after becoming special counsel. Most special counsels speak to Congress after their inquiries are complete. As special counsel, Weiss has complete authority to decide whether to testify to Congress.

Democrats continue to stand by Weiss. They applaud his independence and argue they have no reservations with his ability to serve. They also remind people that former President Trump nominated Weiss for his post as Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney for Delaware.

‘It’s just the judicial process taking place,’ said Rep. Ami Bera, D-Calif., on Fox.

However, Bera conceded that such allegations and an inquiry wasn’t good for the country.

‘Let the legal process take place if there was wrongdoing,’ said Bera.

But Congressional Republicans won’t do that. They see an opportunity to go for the jugular with President Biden. And if nothing else, their anti-Biden Republican base compels them to move in that direction.

AUGUST IS OFTEN THE STRANGEST MONTH IN POLITICS, AND THIS YEAR IS NO DIFFERENT

‘They’ve made it an industry as a family of monetizing access to high people in government,’ said Rep. Nick Langworthy, R-N.Y. ‘The evidence just continues to pile up. But it’s a web of lies and deceit as the President continues to deny this involvement.’

So what shall we look for?

There’s always the possibility of Weiss’s testimony – although unlikely. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., wants Archer to testify in public soon. There’s also the possibility that Weiss’s investigation doesn’t take that long since he already probed Hunter Biden. That said, some Republicans believe the creation of a special counsel – be it Weiss or someone else – could serve as a way to stymie Congress from investigating further. And Jordan and Comer would like to hear from Garland to explain what went into the decision to appoint Weiss – especially if Weiss won’t appear.

That brings us to the push by some Republicans to begin an impeachment inquiry.

On FOX Business recently, Comer said he intended to subpoena the Biden family. That may be problematic amid Weiss’s inquest. But a House vote to launch a formal impeachment inquiry – and thus call witnesses like the Bidens – could give the House more even footing.

To wit:

Republicans want to know more about the cryptic firms tied to the Biden family.

There are more than 20 shell firms associated with the Bidens.

The cryptic names sometimes echo one another.

Rosemont Seneca Partners. Rosemont Seneca Bohai. Rosemont Seneca Thornton.

Fox asked forensic accountant Bruce Dubinsky to review the Biden family bank records released by the House Oversight panel.

Dubinsky initially focused on the sheer number of shell firms in which the Bidens were involved.

‘A shell company is just that. Just a shell. It doesn’t have typically an operating business,’ said Dubinsky. ‘They’re used in nefarious ways to either launder money or hide a transaction.’

In other words, the mere existence of these firms presents a red flag.

‘$20 million flows through these accounts, these fake businesses,’ alleged Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., on Fox.

Republicans have focused in particular on Yelena Baturina, one of the wealthiest women in Russia. Records from the Oversight panel show Baturina wired Rosemont Seneca Thornton $3.5 million in 2014. $2.5 million of that then appears to have gone to Rosemont Seneca Bohai. Baturina then dined with Mr. Biden in Washington when he was vice president in 2014.

‘You see $3.5 million moving, coming inbound from Russia. And then it moves in two transactions to Devon Archer and one of Hunter Biden’s companies. That dollar for dollar – that is the signature of a problem,’ said Dubinsky.

It’s also unclear whether these firms provided a good or service. Republicans believe the linchpin is to demonstrate the commodity was access to the President when he served as Vice President.

Of course, drawing a straight line between all of this and alleged corruption by President Biden is hard to do – even if it’s true.

But from a political standpoint, it doesn’t necessarily have to be true or go back to the president to inflict damage.

Republicans know this encourages their base and makes good on various political promises.

Moreover, this is not necessarily a winning political strategy heading into 2024 for the GOP. It’s far from clear if the public is buying into the Republican arguments. And regardless, the ultra high-profile legal travails of former President Trump could overshadow anything House Republicans do in their investigation of the current president.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Like many customers of Green Dot Bank, Texas resident Sheldon Ransom first encountered the online banking company through TurboTax, in the form of a stimulus check. 

Though perhaps not a household name, Green Dot, headquartered in Austin, Texas, with a Utah-based bank regulated by the Federal Reserve, has been used by millions of Americans like Ransom, who said he was “never a big banking person” and used to carry cash but suddenly found an easy way to receive basic banking services through the company.

Green Dot, which also operates under the moniker Go2bank, specializes in prepaid debit cards and digital accounts that can be set up for direct-deposit paychecks and to pay bills online. The company has touted itself and its app as the “ultimate mobile bank of Americans living paycheck to paycheck.” Since 1999, the company says it has served more than 33 million customers — a figure that is a function of its 17-year relationship with Walmart and TurboTax, which partners with the bank to help customers claim their tax refunds.   

On Aug. 10, Ransom, who works for an ambulance service, tried to use his card to pay tithes to his church but was declined. He then tried to use the card for another payment and was declined again. He called Green Dot customer service and said he was told there was a maintenance issue that would need to be resolved. 

By Aug. 14, the issue still hadn’t been fixed. “By the grace of God,” Ransom said, a fellow church member offered to help pay for school clothes for Ransom’s three children.  

“It’s really put a damper on our day to day lives,” Ransom said while still locked out of his account.

It was ultimately not until Aug. 19, Ransom said, that he could regain access to his account.

Other Green Dot customers said their funds had been recently waylaid by the bank for one reason or another. The complaints have increased to such an extent that the Better Business Bureau said in a statement that it was looking into “a pattern and influx of complaints against Green Dot,’ which it was reviewing and which required the agency to update Green Dot’s listing on its website.  

In addition to Ransom, NBC News spoke with six other customers who said they’d had problems gaining access to their accounts or retrieving their money. Five said they were told by Green Dot customer service representatives that a maintenance or technical issue was making their accounts unavailable. Two others were informed that suspicious or fraudulent activity had been detected and that the bank would have to freeze their accounts. One customer remains frozen out of her account; the status of another is unclear.  

Since reaching out to these customers over the past two weeks, all but one in the group who were told their issue stemmed from a maintenance problem said they had regained access to their accounts.

Whatever the reason, the effect has been the same: Customers said that during the time they were frozen out of their accounts, they could not make necessary purchases and pay bills.

Inaccessible funds and mixed messages

NBC News first reported on the issues customers were facing on Aug. 11. The day before, on Aug. 10, a message on Green Dot’s homepage stated the bank was experiencing high call volumes because of “an issue with one of our processing partners,” adding that “some functionality, including balances and transactions, may have been impacted.” 

After an inquiry from NBC News, Green Dot spokesperson Alison Lubert said in an email that there had been no system or platform outage; the message on the website was subsequently updated and no longer mentioned a functionality issue. Instead, Lubert said, the bank was in the process of upgrading its platforms. Doing so, she said, required “temporary service interruptions for small segments of customers and can lead to increased call volumes and hold times.”

On Aug. 23, Lubert reiterated in an emailed statement that recent tech conversions at Green Dot caused temporary outages for “very small segments of customers,” but that these have been resolved, and that customers whom the bank confirmed had been affected were issued courtesy credits. The initial message regarding a problem with a processing partner was outdated, she said. 

As for the cases that cited suspicious activity, Lubert said that, generally, fraud was increasingly prevalent across the financial services industry. She said Green Dot “invests heavily to identify, mitigate and prevent fraud,” and that it partners with government agencies, including the Secret Service and industry peers to combat and prevent fraud across the board.

Lubert said she could not comment on individual cases. 

Walmart did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for TurboTax parent Intuit said in an emailed statement that the company works closely with customers, banking partners and the IRS to help resolve issues quickly.

Kevin Myhre, 60, who lives in Idaho, was among those who received a courtesy credit for having been locked out of his account, of $25. 

That money was deposited on Aug. 15. But his account wasn’t reopened until Aug. 21, according to emails viewed by NBC News. 

Yet at the time he received his credit he couldn’t use it because his account was still frozen, he said.

Myhre said he signed up with Green Dot after learning about it at Walmart sometime in the past year or two. Having recently been unemployed, Myhre now needed a bank to receive his direct deposit paycheck after taking a job as a video-game tester. 

On Aug. 9, Myhre said he tried to use his Green Dot debit card at a Burger King, but it was declined. At first, he didn’t think much of it; he knew he had sufficient funds in his account. When he called the bank the next day, he was told there was a “glitch” or “maintenance issue” as they were putting in “some kind of new system,” and that it was the bank’s “top priority” to address it.

The following day, Myhre said, he went to try the card, but it kept getting declined, at both brick and mortar and online stores. Myhre said he called back and kept receiving the same response about the maintenance issue. 

For more than two weeks, the problem persisted, causing Myhre to fall behind on his phone bill, he said. Myhre also pays for the internet access at his parents’ house, and he feared that too could be affected. He had set up the Green Dot account to accept his direct deposits, and as his only bank account, it was the primary mechanism he used to pay bills online.

“I’ve got things shutting down on me because I can’t pay my bills,” Myhre said before the problems were resolved. “I don’t carry cash. I use my card everywhere.”

Myhre said his account was finally unfrozen Aug. 21 — but he remains in the dark about what exactly happened.

“Needless to say, I’m pulling out my funds as fast as possible,” Myhre said. 

Green Dot is known for its partnership with TurboTax, furnishing its Turbo Visa Debit Card that customers can use to collect their tax refunds. 

That’s how Alabama resident Malisha Robbins, 42, became a Green Dot customer some eight or nine years ago. But for more than a month, Robbins said, she was locked out of her account.

On July 7, she said, she went into a dollar store to make a purchase that was declined. She subsequently called Green Dot customer service, but it wouldn’t give her any information beyond the fact that there was suspicious activity on her account, she said. She was told to mail in a copy of her driver’s license — an extra headache, because she had to wait for Alabama to send her a new license in the mail after she’d lost her previous one — only to be repeatedly told that her situation was still being reviewed. 

As of Aug. 24, Robbins said her situation was still unresolved. Green Dot was her only bank account. 

Robbins said she and her husband, Brian, who have four children, have now fallen behind on “everything,” including their electricity bill and car payments, and have been forced to borrow money from family members to pay for their children’s school clothes and supplies, she said.

“We’ve been scraping by, just managing to keep our head above water,” she said. “It’s been a nightmare.”

‘Most trustworthy’

On its website, Green Dot Bank notes it was named one of Newsweek’s most trustworthy companies in America for 2023. 

But Green Dot has been involved in at least two class-action settlements in the past decade related to consumer harm, including a $3.3 million settlement in 2022 over claims it had spammed consumers with unsolicited text messages about its products. 

A 2017 class-action suit stands out as evocative of the current troubles some customers say they are having. According to the suit, Green Dot’s conversion to its processing company, Mastercard, prevented customers “from accessing their protected assets to purchase items as basic as food, clothing and shelter.” A Mastercard spokesperson referred an inquiry about Green Dot’s relationship with Mastercard back to Green Dot. Green Dot’s Lubert confirmed that as part of its technical conversion, it is now moving away from Mastercard.

“During the time the system was down, [Green Dot] account holders did not have access to their funds, causing immense hardship, including the inability to pay for basic necessities such as food, rent, electricity and gas,” the 2017 complaint alleged.

“Additionally, customers were unable to pay their household bills,” which resulted in late fees being assessed.

The case settled for $6.4 million. 

The incident also drew the attention of the Senate Banking Committee, whose members demanded to know how widespread the issue was while calling for greater regulatory scrutiny of the prepaid card industry. 

Green Dot’s debit cards have been a target for criminal activity. In 2014, the Regional Organized Crime Information Center, a law enforcement group, produced a report on the phenomenon. Similar warnings have been published by the New York Police Department in both 2014 and 2022.

In 2022, Green Dot’s prepaid debit cards were used in a scheme to defraud the Small Business Administration of $286 million worth of loans, the Justice Department said.

More recently, in 2022, Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., called for an investigation into Green Dot’s relationship with TurboTax over delays in issuing taxpayer refunds.

In response to the previous class action settlements and other official inquiries around the alleged mishandling of Green Dot’s financial products, Lubert said, “These are legacy issues that have been settled and resolved.

“Under our new CEO and management team, and supported by a new modern platform that is near completion, we are focused on being responsible stewards of our customers’ resources and providing products and services that will help them build stronger financial foundations,” Lubert said. 

A spokesperson for the Federal Reserve, which regulates Green Dot, said in a statement that it is aware of the latest set of complaints as part of its standard supervisory process. Both the Federal Reserve and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which helps regulate prepaid cards like Green Dot’s, said they could neither confirm nor deny the existence of an active investigation into the company — a customary response for government agencies. 

In a statement, the Utah Department of Financial Institutions said it does not comment on operating institutions. A spokesperson for the Texas Department of Banking said it does not regulate Green Dot Bank. 

Chuck Bell, financial policy advocate for Consumer Reports, called the ongoing reports of outages troubling, especially given the lack of bank branches a Green Dot customer can turn to in order to physically withdraw their money.

“It’s really a super big problem to have a glitch that goes on for more than a couple hours at most,” Bell said. “It’s a highly serious situation, and regulators should fine and cite them for the inconvenience to customers. It’s really not acceptable in banking to have this protracted outage.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS