Archive

2023

Browsing

Detroit Lions coach Dan Campbell wants to help Texas A&M football, his alma mater, but that won’t be as the Aggies’ coach.

The former Texas A&M tight end from 1995-98 shot down the possibility of him returning to College Station to coach the Aggies, who fired Jimbo Fisher on Nov. 12.

‘Maybe,’ Campbell said Friday when asked if Texas A&M had reached out to him. ‘But that’s all good. Certainly, I know some people there, and I love my school. That’s my alma mater. I want to do anything I can to help them but coach for them, and I’ll do that.’

The nine-year NFL veteran did however offer his take on what qualities Texas A&M’s next coach should have.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

‘Look, I don’t want to get into all that,’ he said. ‘Certainly, the hire is important, and it needs to be somebody that understands the state of Texas, understands the history of Texas A&M and can communicate with young people and develop them. I think that’s where it starts. Strong leadership.’

Campbell caught 27 passes for 314 yards and three touchdowns in four seasons with the Aggies before he was selected in the third round of the 1999 NFL Draft by the New York Giants.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow is out for the season.

Bengals coach Zac Taylor told reporters Friday that Burrow suffered a season-ending torn ligament in his right wrist during Cincinnati’s 34-20 loss to the Baltimore Ravens on Thursday night. The injury is to his throwing hand.

“He had an acute injury (Thursday),” Taylor said. “He tore a ligament in his wrist that will likely require surgery and require him to be out for the rest of the season. We’re still gathering more information on that, but that seems to be where it’s headed right now.”

Burrow injured his right wrist in the second quarter when he landed on it following a hit. He checked out of the game after a short touchdown throw to running back Joe Mixon with 5:49 remaining in the second period and didn’t return. Burrow clutched his wrist following the TD throw and was seen grimacing on the sideline trying to grip and throw a football before he headed to the locker room.

‘I landed on the wrist a little bit,’ Burrow said of the sequence of events. ‘The next play, the touchdown pass I felt a pop in the middle of the throw.’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Who will replace Joe Burrow at quarterback?

Jake Browning replaced Burrow at quarterback on Thursday, and the Bengals likely will rely on Browning for the rest of the season. Cincinnati also might elevate AJ McCarron from the practice squad.

“Sure, this is adversity. It’s not foreign to our team over the last several years and even this year. It’s exciting to see guys rally around each other and rally around Jake (Browning) playing quarterback,” Taylor said. “I’m excited to see this team respond. I feel energy. Obviously, it’s tough to see your starting quarterback as good as Joe Burrow go down. That’s tough.”

Joe Burrow’s injury history

Injuries have plagued Burrow this season. He sustained a calf injury during training camp and was hampered by the injury to start the season. He appeared to be getting healthier during Cincinnati’s recent four-game winning streak, which included victories over the San Francisco 49ers and Buffalo Bills, but now he’s dealing with an injury to his right wrist that will sideline him for the rest of the season.

This is the second time an injury has cut Burrow’s season short. He sustained a season-ending knee injury as a rookie in Week 11 of the 2020 season. 

“It’s tough. You work so hard for seasons and moments like these. Whenever you get hurt and it ends it early, it’s tough to handle. But that’s part of the game,” Burrow said Friday. “I’ve been through it before. Just got to grind it out.”

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

DES MOINES, IOWA – They’ve traded fire from behind podiums on the Republican presidential debate stage.

But White House rivals Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former ambassador and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy sat down together on Friday around the same table for a very different discussion in front of a large crowd of social conservative voters in Iowa, the state whose caucuses kick off the 2024 GOP presidential nominating calendar.

All three candidates shared personal and at times emotional stories at a presidential Thanksgiving forum hosted by The Family Leader, a politically active and influential social conservative group in a state where evangelical voters play an outsized role in Republican politics.

And each of the candidates spotlighted the difficulties they endured in having children as they showcased their opposition to legalized abortion.

‘I actually haven’t shared this story before,’ Ramaswamy said as he described his wife Apoorva’s first pregnancy. 

‘About three and a half months in… one day she woke up, she was bleeding. She had a miscarriage. We lost our first child,’ Ramaswamy shared.

Moments later, he signaled for his young son to join him on stage.

DeSantis also noted his wife Casey’s miscarriage, and shared publicly for the first time how the two of them prayed for a child during a trip to Israel soon after their marriage.

‘We got back to the United States, and a little time later, we got pregnant,’ DeSantis continued. ‘But unfortunately, we lost that first baby.’

Haley also discussed the difficulties she had in getting pregnant.

And Haley doubled down on comments on her stance on abortion that she made last week at the third Republican presidential debate, in which she urged Americans to find consensus when it comes to limiting abortions.

Family Leader president and CEO Bob Vander Plaats noted that Haley’s debate comments sounded ‘pro-choice’ to some evangelicals and asked the presidential candidate to ‘assure them why that’s not a pro-choice answer.’

Haley reiterated that she is ‘unapologetically pro-life’ and emphasized that ‘our overall goal is how do we save as many babies as possible and support as many moms as we can.’ 

‘I think you can look at my entire record as governor. I fought for life whether it was a pain-capable bill, whether it was making sure that women had to wait to see an ultrasound before they made a decision,’ said Haley said as she pointed to her two-terms steering South Carolina.

And Haley, who served as ambassador to the United Nations during former President Donald Trump’s administration, touted that ‘they said that I was the most pro-life ambassador they had ever had represent the U.S. at the United Nations because we did everything we could to make sure our taxpayer dollars never went towards anything that would take that life away or abortion.’

When Vander Plaats pressed Haley on whether she would have signed a six-week abortion bill into law when she was governor,’ she quickly answered ‘Yes. Whatever the people decide, you should do.’

‘I think it’s right to be in the hands of the people. I think that the people decided this was put in the states; that’s where it should be. Everybody can give their voice to it.’ 

Nicole Schlinger, a longtime Iowa-based strategist with close ties to evangelicals, told Fox News that ‘this was the answer that I think Iowans were waiting for from Amb. Haley on life issues… I think that was very positive.’

‘Gov. DeSantis really came alive during the second half of this forum,’ added Schlinger, who’s neutral in the GOP presidential nomination race. ‘This was a very pro-DeSantis crowd. He got the biggest applause.’

While Haley and DeSantis have repeatedly clashed in recent weeks as they battle for second place in the polls behind Trump, who remains the commanding front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination, there were no fireworks on Friday. 

And the recent acrimony between Haley and Ramaswamy was also not evident at the forum.

‘I don’t want to know what is bad about the other person,’ Vander Plaats, who moderated  the forum, said as he explained the ground rules. ‘I want to have an adult conversation about the future of this country.’

Trump, who was invited to the forum, declined to attend. It was the second major presidential cattle call hosted by the Family Leader that Trump skipped this year. The former president will return to Iowa on Saturday, to headline a rally. 

The forum was briefly interrupted by a climate protester, who shouted, ‘Repent! Repent!’ 

‘How can you guys talk about being pro-life when our children’s future is on fire? ‘ the protester said before being escorted out of the hotel ballroom in downtown Des Moines where the event was held.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Members of the House Freedom Caucus are watching Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., with a wary but hopeful eye after a GOP rebellion over government spending saw the new leader take his first major public setback. 

‘He assures us, and we trust him that that’s the case,’ Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital of Johnson’s goals to cut spending and advance conservative policies.

Norman added, ‘Now, if that’s not the case, then I mean, we’re going to get cuts either way. We’re gonna start taking rules down. We’re just not going to keep going like this. We’re just not doing it. Whatever it takes.’

Long-standing fractures within the House GOP Conference, primarily over government spending, rose to the surface again this past week after Johnson passed a short-term spending bill known as a continuing resolution (CR) to avert a government shutdown. 

‘I’ve been very public about it, I think it was a mistake… and I think it was not in the best interest of trying to force Democrats to the table on the things we need to do,’ Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. 

‘Bottom line is, he’s been in three weeks, he’s a good friend, he’s a good man. I’ll fully get behind him, you know, if we pick a fight, we’ll go fight. Let’s rock and roll, move forward,’ Roy said.

Roy and Norman were two of 19 Republicans who tanked a procedural vote, known as a rule vote, on the spending bill dealing with the Departments of Justice and Commerce on Wednesday. 

Freedom Caucus Chairman Scott Perry, R-Pa., another opponent of Johnson’s CR who voted to kill the rule, told reporters afterward, ‘We’re sending a shot across the bow. We do this in good faith. We want to see these bills move. We want to see good righteous policy. But we’re not going to be part of the failure theater anymore.’

Norman said his vote against the rule was as much a protest vote as it was about his opposition to the spending bill itself. 

Johnson’s predecessor, ex-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., was ousted by eight Republican hardliners and all Democrats after putting a clean CR on the floor. But the conservatives who spoke with Fox News Digital insisted that Johnson is taking a different approach than McCarthy had — for now. 

‘It’s not in his nature to just listen at the beginning and then fade into the habits of just convening leadership meetings, and not listening to the people. He’ll be that listening speaker who continues to solicit the input of the rank-and-file moving forward,’ Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ben Cline, R-Va., who voted for the rule, told Fox News Digital. 

‘That confidence… among us, the rank and file members, is going to help him as he moves forward.’

Norman similarly praised Johnson: ‘We trust Mike… he laid it out, and he just was honest with us. We never had that with McCarthy.’

Though he warned, ‘This country is in trouble financially. There will be no difference between McCarthy and Johnson if the spending continues. We’ve got to come up with some solution.’

Roy would not comment directly on comparisons between McCarthy and Johnson, explaining, ‘I’m not interested that much in rehashing all of this. It is what it is. We are where we are, and we need to move forward.’

But the Texas Republican suggested that he saw the House GOP as largely in a similar spot as it was a month ago, before Johnson took charge — not that he blamed him.

‘What I would say is, there was a lot of noise for a month and change for us to end up with a CR,’ Roy said. ‘There’s a whole lot of noise, there’s a whole lot of bluster, but we kind of got off track. And now we’ve got to figure out how to get back on track fighting.’

Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., another Freedom Caucus member who voted to advance the failed spending bill but against the CR, told Fox News Digital of Johnson, ‘I’m withholding any kind of judgment because I think it’s hard to imagine, if I was in his shoes, being able to find or devise a plan that’s different.’

‘The real test will be when it comes to FISA reauthorization or when it comes to finding a path on these appropriations bills,’ he said. ‘What I think is the real fight is not between the conference and Mike Johnson, it’s the conference against the conference.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo unleashed a fiery response to Biden administration officials who signed on to a dissent letter over President Biden’s pro-Israel stance in its fight against Hamas terrorists — with the former top diplomat saying their moral compass ‘is broken.’

‘People who serve our country in any government institution, whether in the military or the State Department, swear allegiance to the United States and should commit to the mission of the President — elected by the American people — and his Administration,’ Pompeo said in a statement to Fox News Digital. ‘If they are unable or refuse to do so, they should resign or face termination.’

Hundreds of government officials from 40 departments and agencies within the administration signed an anonymous letter demanding a ‘cease-fire’ and opposing the president’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.

‘We call on President Biden to urgently demand a cease-fire; and to call for de-escalation of the current conflict by securing the immediate release of the Israeli hostages and arbitrarily detained Palestinians; the restoration of water, fuel, electricity and other basic services; and the passage of adequate humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip,’ the letter reads, in part.

Biden and others have argued that a cease-fire would only benefit Hamas, who launched a brutal terrorist attack on Israel on Oct. 7, in which militants murdered over 1,000 Israeli civilians. The administration has pushed for humanitarian pauses in fighting, which Israel has carried out.

Pompeo said the dissent was a problem that plagued him during his time in office ‘when hundreds of State Department employees worked to subvert the mission of the Trump administration.’

‘Then as now, these dissenting staff fundamentally misunderstand their role and authority. Not a single American voted for them or their personal views on foreign policy. Their job is to serve the State Department as it executes the elected President’s foreign policy objectives to keep America safe,’ he said. ‘To do otherwise is not just inappropriate; it is deeply at odds with our Constitutional order and subverts the will of the American people.’

Apart from their general outspokenness about government policy, Pompeo argued that the staff ‘are also dead wrong.’

‘Their moral compass is broken,’ he said. 

‘It is absolutely right for America to back Israel in its war against the barbaric Hamas terrorists who committed the worst massacre against Jews since the Holocaust. Supporting Israel right now isn’t about politics. It’s about enabling the triumph of good over true evil,’ he asserted. ‘Any staffer who fails to recognize this does not deserve the honor of serving the American people at the State Department or any other government agency.’

Meanwhile, President Biden on Wednesday said he believes that Israel’s military operation in Gaza will stop when Hamas ‘no longer maintains the capacity to murder, abuse, and do horrific things to the Israelis.’

‘Hamas said they plan to attack Israelis again and this is a terrible dilemma,’ he said.

Fox News’ Anders Hagstrom and Chris Pandolfo contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

GOP lawmakers are renewing their call for the federal government to ban the Chinese-owned app TikTok after Usama bin Laden’s 2002 ‘Letter to America’ went viral on social media and received sympathy from hundreds of young users. 

The letter, published by The Guardian but taken offline Wednesday, blamed U.S. policies for the Sept. 11 attacks. 

‘We should ban it,’ Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Sean Hannity Thursday. ‘It tracks everything you do on your phone. It tracks everywhere you go, every text message you send, every email you write, and it’s — all that information — all of it’s available to the Chinese Communist Party.

‘It’s an espionage tool. It’s a propaganda machine, and we ought to ban it.’

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., called the app ‘toxic’ in a post on X, formerly Twitter, Thursday. 

‘It’s outrageous that Chinese Communist Party controlled TikTok is pushing terrorist propaganda on American kids,’ Cotton wrote. ‘This toxic app should have been banned years ago.’

TikTok users reacted to the letter, and some said it changed their worldviews. Others went as far as to say they realized bin Laden ‘was right.’ Part of bin Laden’s letter blamed America for supporting the ‘Israeli oppression of the Palestinians’ and ‘the occupation’ in the Holy Land. 

Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., condemned the trend on TikTok on Fox News Thursday, calling the sympathy ‘absolutely disgusting’ and ‘further evidence that we need to ban TikTok or force a sale before a Chinese-controlled app, before the Chinese Communist Party, checkmates the free world by controlling the dominant media platform in America that can spread this dangerous, disgusting nonsense.

‘It is time for a ban or forced sale before it is too late.’ 

After the trend gained some traction on TikTok, with 274 videos posted under the hashtag from Tuesday to Wednesday, a compilation of videos was uploaded again to X and gained over 35 million views, surpassing the 1.85 million views originally gained on TikTok. 

One TikTok influencer, Lynette Adkins, was banned from the app Friday morning after she shared a video of her reaction to reading the letter. She provided Fox News Digital with a statement.

‘I read the letter after some other creators shared it and was surprised because I never knew it existed,’ Adkins said. ‘I posted it to my page so others could read it as well.

‘I did not share the letter to promote any form of hate or violence against anyone, nor do I agree with the extremism in it. I was just shocked by what I had read and wanted to have a conversation about it with my followers. I was 3 in 2001 and was always taught 9/11 happened because other people were jealous of our democracy in the U.S. 

‘Now that I’m older and am able to learn about history beyond the narrative of mainstream media, I’m realizing that there is more to the story. I think we all deserve a right to access the information being presented to us and form our own conclusions without subscribing to extreme or radical ideologies.

‘The letter was taken off of The Guardian’s site after being on there for over 20 years. My TikTok was banned as of this morning, and many people who are sharing the letter are getting their videos removed as well. If we live in a true democracy, I think we should be allowed to have open and peaceful conversations about what’s happening in the world.’

Montana is the only state to have passed legislation banning TikTok from all personal devices. More than 30 states have banned it from state-issued devices. And a bipartisan law drafted by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., and John Thune, R-S.D., introduced earlier this year would crack down on communication technologies developed by foreign adversaries like China and Russia. 

‘I will never look at life the same, I will never look at this country the same,’ one user said. ‘Please read it, and if you have read it let me know if you are going through an existential crisis in this moment.’ 

‘It becomes apparent to me that the actions of 9/11 and those acts committed against the USA and its people, were all just the build up of our government failing other nations,’ another user said. 

By Friday morning, the hashtag #lettertoamerica was removed from TikTok. 

‘Content promoting this letter clearly violates our rules on supporting any form of terrorism,’ a TikTok spokesperson told Fox News Digital in a statement. ‘We are proactively and aggressively removing this content and investigating how it got onto our platform. The number of videos on TikTok is small and reports of it trending on our platform are inaccurate. This is not unique to TikTok and has appeared across multiple platforms and the media.’

A spokesperson for The Guardian previously told Fox News Digital, ‘The transcript published on our website 20 years ago has been widely shared on social media without the full context. Therefore, we have decided to take it down and direct readers to the news article that originally contextualized it instead.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Below is a reprint of an article written Thursday in the subscriber-only DecisionPoint Alert:

One of the things we keep track of is the performance of the S&P 500 Index (SPY), which is cap-weighted, versus the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (RSP). In a healthy bull market, the equal-weighted index (tan line) will outperform the cap-weighted index (blue line) because the advance is broadly based. This is demonstrated by the chart below.

As an advance gets closer to a top, participation narrows and the cap-weighted index takes the lead. We are now at that point in the rally, as you can see from the next chart — the leadership shifted months ago. That doesn’t mean that the rally has to end right away, but it will probably end sooner rather than later.

Good Luck & Good Trading,

Carl Swenlin & Erin Swenlin

Black Friday – Cyber Monday Sale is Coming for New Subscribers!

We will be running our best special yet next weekend! Be sure to sign up for our free email list from our homepage to ensure you get all the details! We also send out free articles and free educational material periodically. We will not blow up your inbox!

Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:

Watch the latest episode of DecisionPoint on StockCharts TV’s YouTube channel here!

Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 at checkout!

Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin

(c) Copyright 2023 DecisionPoint.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.

Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

DecisionPoint Alert Chart List

DecisionPoint Golden Cross/Silver Cross Index Chart List

DecisionPoint Sector Chart List

DecisionPoint Chart Gallery

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules

Am I bullish or bearish? Should I be focusing more on capital growth or capital preservation? Do I have permission to buy breakouts?

With this week’s impressive rally phase, my proprietary Market Trend Model has now turned bullish on all three time frames. While I can come up with all sorts of subjective measures to back up any way you want to answer those previous questions, I have found that a systematic analysis of trends is a much more effective approach.

I’m going to share a Market Trend Model that I’ve been running for years, mainly to inform discussions with my Market Misbehavior premium members. I’ll show you how it’s calculated, why considering multiple time frames is so vital for investors, and what may be next for the S&P 500 now that the model has turned bullish.

Managing Multiple Time Frames

I tend to think of the market in three timeframes:

Short-Term, a couple days to a couple weeksMedium-Term, a couple monthsLong-Term, a couple years

As you can tell, these are pretty general time frames, and I tend to favor approaches that give me flexibility in case the market conditions suggest doing so. To be honest, I feel that some of the great benefits of technical analysis are that it allows you to be flexible, it enables you to adapt to changing market conditions, and it empowers you to admit you are wrong!

My general timeframe of interest is the medium-term, which means I’m generally looking out about 1-3 months. By using the 5 and 13-week exponential moving averages, I’m able to clearly define the trend on this time frame and recognize when there has been a shift in trend.

You have to remember that the medium-term time frame is comprised of shorter upswings and downswings, which I describe as the short-term time frame. This is where swing traders are able to benefit from buying low and selling high, and long-term investors can benefit from optimizing entry and exit points. While I usually analyze short-term trends using a daily S&P 500 chart, I can also look at the current price relative to the 5-week exponential moving average for a simple gauge of the short-term trend.

Finally, you have to recognize the longer time frame that covers multiple years. This is where we need to consider the business cycle and how sectors and themes can come in and out of favor over time. By comparing the 21- and 34-week exponential moving averages, I’m able to effectively track these longer-term trend shifts and reflect on the larger cycles at work.

Putting Recent Market Action into Proper Context

As you can see from the chart, this week’s strong performance moved the medium-term model from bearish to bullish. This brings all three time frames to the bullish range for the first time since July, and suggests that the rotation from a bearish October to a so-far quite bullish November was enough to indicate a high likelihood of further upside.

The long-term model has actually been bullish since the end of May, when the rally off the October 2022 lows had shown enough of an upside follow-through to confirm a cyclical bull market. The two most recent bullish signals from the long-term model, in February 2019 and June 2020, led to much further upside for the equity benchmarks and reinforced the overall bullish environment for stocks.

The bounce off the October low was sudden and severe, which caused the short-term model to quickly turn bullish. But as the medium-term model is my main risk-on/risk-off measure, it’s only now giving me the permission to focus more on capital growth than capital preservation.

What’s Next for the S&P 500?

What concerns me about the current configuration? Well, we’ve seen this before. Look back to early 2022 and you’ll see a similar setup of the short-term and medium-term models turning negative even as the long-term model remained bullish.

The March 2022 bounce higher certainly appeared to be the beginning of a retest of the late 2021 high. The long-term model was declining, yet it remained in the bullish range. The medium-term and short-term models both turned bullish in March 2022, confirming this upside bounce in price.

The medium-term model only remained slightly above zero for 2-3 weeks before going back to the bearish range. The S&P 500 ended up progressing lower to establish the June and October 2022 lows before finally turning higher in the fourth quarter.

For now, I’m inclined to remain bullish as long as the medium-term model remains bullish. Every week that the medium-term model sits above the zero level, that’s one more week where buyers appear to outweigh sellers!

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

“Add a tip?”

The prompts have become ubiquitous in all kinds of sales situations — from ordering a coffee to paying for a packaged sandwich — as digital card readers proliferate. But while automated requests for gratuities continue to spur confusion and grumbling, recent data suggests consumers have no trouble breezing past them.

Many people first started noticing so-called tipflation as the economy emerged from the pandemic. Venturing out again to bars, restaurants and shops, consumers were confronted with what felt like a new set of etiquette expectations — and duly began tipping more often, even as many griped loudly about it. But those upticks were modest and far from universal, and some of shoppers’ generosity now looks to be waning.

In a survey released this month by the Pew Research Center, 72% of American adults said tipping is now expected in more places than it was five years ago — but that’s pretty much all consumers can agree on when it comes to tipping.

Many dislike it when the tablets they’re presented suggest specific gratuity amounts; 40% oppose the prompts, while just 24% favor them, according to Pew.

But when consumers are left to their own devices, they take widely different approaches to deciding how much extra to offer and when to offer it, if at all. While 78% of respondents told Pew they always or often tip for haircuts, just 61% said the same of tipping their taxi or ride-hailing drivers. And only 1 in 4 reported frequently tipping baristas.

Americans can’t even agree on whether adding a tip is more of a choice or an obligation: 21% see it the first way and 29% the latter, with the remaining 49% landing somewhere in the squishy middle, saying it depends on the situation.

There’s just too many prompts now in the marketplace with these automated payment systems.

Deidre Popovich, Texas Tech University

It’s no surprise consumers are so divided and exasperated, said Deidre Popovich, a Texas Tech University professor of marketing and supply chain management who specializes in consumer behavior.

“I think there’s just too many prompts now in the marketplace with these automated payment systems,” she said. “We’re used to tipping when we can evaluate the service, and in a lot of these situations, there’s no service tied to the tip. What do we do?”

There has been some movement at the margins of Americans’ gratuity habits.

NBC News reported in February that tipping frequency was up, possibly reflecting a pandemic hangover of good vibes toward service workers when expanding point-of-sale systems made it easier for businesses to solicit tips.

The payments processor Square, which makes a popular point-of-sale platform, said the restaurant and retail workers who use its software have seen increases in tipped and overtime earnings. But the company noted that the rises have tracked broader wage increases and higher restaurant menu prices.

“We’ve definitely observed a slight increase in tipping over the last few years,” said Ara Kharazian, the research lead at Square. “But I think it’s a lot more modest than people realize, and it’s starting to slow down a lot.”

For example, the average overall earnings for restaurant workers using Square were $17.67 an hour in October, with a base wage of $13.80. That $3.87 difference, which mostly reflects tips, is only about 60 cents higher than it was in October 2021, according to the company’s payroll index.

As consumers get used to seeing tip prompts in more places more regularly, they may be getting more comfortable ignoring them — especially after having dealt with inflation-related sticker shock for many goods and services over the past year.

We’ve definitely observed a slight increase in tipping over the last few years, but I think it’s a lot more modest than people realize.

Ara Kharazian, research lead at Square

Lightspeed, another POS provider, said customers add tips on just 1.3% of in-store transactions at the retailers that have enabled its tipping feature.

While tip levels in some settings have held steady or inched higher, others are declining.

Lightspeed said the median tip at all types of restaurants using its service increased from 16.9% in the second quarter last year to 17.3% in the same period this year. But tip amounts for online orders and delivery — for which patrons can decide privately whether to tip, without service workers nearby — have dipped since last year, from about 8.8% to 8.1%.

Another point-of-sale platform, Toast, said in September that average tips at full-service restaurants declined from 19.7% in the first quarter this year to 19.4% in the second — the lowest level for that category since the start of the pandemic. Gratuities at quick-service restaurants using Toast barely ticked up to 16.1% from 16.0% over the same period.

A Bankrate survey this year found tipping frequency has continued a multiyear downslide virtually across the board. The shares of Americans who say they always tip in service transactions from food delivery to hotel housekeeping have steadily shrunk. That’s the case even at sit-down restaurants, where those who reported always tipping their servers fell from 75% in 2021 to 65% this spring.

Some companies are trying other ways to nudge customers to tip. DoorDash wrote in a blog post this month that it was testing an in-app pop-up in the U.S. and Canada to remind users of its delivery service to leave gratuities, lest they risk longer waits.

“Orders with no tip might take longer to get delivered,” the test prompt reads. “Are you sure you want to continue?”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Beer giant Anheuser-Busch says its head of U.S. marketing is leaving, months after its Bud Light brand lost its position as the top beer brand in the country.

The company said U.S. Chief Marketing Officer Benoit Garbe will leave at the end of 2023 “in order to embark on a new chapter in his career,” with U.S. Chief Commercial Officer Kyle Norrington taking charge of marketing activities.

The company said other sales leaders will report directly to Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth.

“These senior leadership changes will accelerate our return to growth as we continue to focus on what we do best — brewing great beer for everyone and earning our place in moments that matter,” Whitworth said in an emailed statement.

He also said the changes would reduce layers of management.

Bud Light lost its U.S. leadership title to Modelo Especial over the summer. Sales of the brand have been falling for years while Modelo’s parent, Constellation Brands, gained steam and marketed itself more successfully to younger beer drinkers.

Bud Light was also the target of a sharp backlash after it partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in April for a sponsored Instagram post that ran the weekend of the NCAA basketball men’s and women’s national championships.

Conservative politicians and influencers said they would boycott the brand in response and shared videos of themselves throwing the beer away, pouring it out, or shooting cans.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS